Havas, Atttila and Weber, K. Matthias (2017): The role of foresight in shaping the next production revolution. Published in: OECD (ed.): The Next Production Revolution: Implications for governments and business, Paris: OECD No. ISBN 978-92-64-27099-2, doi: 10.1787/9789264271036-en (2017): pp. 299-324.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_100374.pdf Download (587kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Foresight can be a highly useful tool to address the opportunities and challenges triggered by the next production revolution. As shown by the various country cases considered in this chapter, it facilitates debating and systemic thinking about multiple futures and helps shaping the future through the process of participation and engagement. Given its participatory nature, key actors are mobilised to form shared views about the future, negotiate their future stakes and interests, and agree on actions aligned to their shared vision. The next production revolution requires quick and proactive policy-making, as well as better orchestration across different policy domains. Foresight can assist policy-makers by providing foundations for robust policies, fostering new framing of policy issues, as well as translating long-term concerns into aligned policy priorities. Furthermore, policy implementation is likely to be faster and more effective when key stakeholders are involved early on in shaping these policies. Foresight benefits, however, are far from being automatic: the chapter considers eight factors critical to achieving those. An astute embedding of a foresight process into policy-making enhances the likelihood of impact, but foresight recommendations are no substitute for policy decisions and actions.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | The role of foresight in shaping the next production revolution |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Foresight, Next production revolution, Four archetypes of prospective analysis, Roles and benefits of foresight in devising policies, Critical factors and conditions to reap the benefits of foresight |
Subjects: | O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O14 - Industrialization ; Manufacturing and Service Industries ; Choice of Technology O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O2 - Development Planning and Policy > O25 - Industrial Policy O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O30 - General O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O33 - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences ; Diffusion Processes O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O38 - Government Policy |
Item ID: | 100374 |
Depositing User: | Attila Havas |
Date Deposited: | 15 May 2020 05:17 |
Last Modified: | 15 May 2020 05:17 |
References: | Academy of Finland and Tekes (2006), FinnSight 2015: the Outlook for Science, Technology and Society, Helsinki. Amanatidou, E. (2013), The Greek National Technology Foresight Programme: success is in the eye of the beholder, International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy, 9 (1), 67-92. Amanatidou, E. (2014), Beyond the veil – The real value of Foresight, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 87, 274-291. Amanatidou, E., Guy, K. (2008), Interpreting foresight process impacts: Steps towards the development of a framework conceptualising the dynamics of ‘foresight systems’, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 75 (4), 539-557. Arilla, C. et al. (2005), Manufacturing Visions – integrating diverse perspectives into pan-European foresight (ManVis), final report, http://forera.jrc.ec.europa.eu/documents/Final_Report_final.pdf BMBF (2006), Die Hightech-Strategie für Deutschland, Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, Bonn, Berlin. BMBF (2008), The BMBF Foresight Process, Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, Bonn, Berlin. Cassingena Harper, J. (2016), The Impact of Technology Foresight on Innovation and Innovation Policy, in: Edler, J., Cunningham, P., Gök, A., Shapira, P. (eds), Handbook of Innovation Policy Impact, pp. 483-504, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham. Cuhls, K. (2004), Futur – foresight for priority-setting in Germany, International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy, 1 (3/4), 183-194. Cuhls, K. (2013), Foresight in Germany: Implications for Policy Making, in: Meissner, D. et al. (eds), Science, Technology and Innovation Policy for the Future, pp. 199-217, Springer, Heidelberg. Cuhls, K., Georghiou, L. (2004), Evaluating a participative foresight process: ‘FUTUR — the German research dialogue’, Research Evaluation, 13 (3), 143–153. Cuhls, K., Beyer-Kutzner, A., Ganz, W., Warnke, P. (2009), The methodology combination of a national foresight process in Germany, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76 (9), 1187-1197 Cuhls, K., Ganz, W., Warnke, P. (eds) (2009a), Foresight-Prozeß im Auftrag des BMBF, Zukunftsfelder neuen Zuschnitts, Fraunhofer ISI, Fraunhofer IAO, Karlsruhe, Stuttgart. Cuhls, K., Ganz, W., Warnke, P. (eds) (2009b), Foresight-Prozess im Auftrag des BMBF, Etablierte Zukunftsfelder und ihre Zukunftsthemen, IRB, Karlsruhe, Stuttgart. Cuhls, K., Ganz, W., Warnke, P. (eds) (2009c), Foresight-Prozess im Auftrag des BMBF, Zukunftsfelder neuen Zuschnitts, IRB, Karlsruhe, Stuttgart. Cuhls, K.; Ganz, W., Warnke, P. (eds) (2009d), Foresight Process – On behalf of the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF), Report, New Future Fields, Karlsruhe, Stuttgart. Cuhls, K., Erdmann, L., van der Giessen, A., Seiffert, L., Toivanen, H., Toivanen, M., Warnke, P. (2015), Models of Horizon Scanning: How to integrate Horizon Scanning into European Research and Innovation Policies, report for the European Commission, http://www.isi.fraunhofer.de/isi-wAssets/docs/v/de/publikationen/CU_ERL_PW_Models-of-Horizon-Scanning.pdf Donofrio, N.M. Whitefoot, K.S. (eds) (2015), Making Value for America: Embracing the Future of Manufacturing, Technology, and Work, The National Academies Press, Washington, D.C. DTI (2004), Exploiting the Electromagnetic Spectrum: Findings and analysis, DTI/Pub 7250/1k/04/04/, DTI, London. EFFLA (2012), Enhancing strategic decision-making in the EC with the help of Strategic Foresight, EFFLA Policy Brief No 1, Brussels: European Forum for Forward Looking Activities, https://ec.europa.eu/research/innovation-union/pdf/expert-groups/effla-reports/effla_pb1_-_enhancing_strategic_decision-making_in_the_ec_with_the_help_of_strategic_foresight.pdf Gaponenko, N. (2008), Russian Nanotechnology 2020, EFMN Foresight Brief No. 75, in: Giesecke, S., Crehan, P., Elkins, S. (eds), The European Foresight Monitoring Network: Collection of EFMN Briefs - Part 1, pp. 297-300, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg. Gavigan, J., Scapolo, F., Keenan, M., Miles, I., Farhi, F., Lecoq, D., Capriati, M., Di Bartolomeo, T. (eds) (2001), A Practical Guide to Regional Foresight, FOREN Network, EC STRATA Programme, EUR 20128 EN. Georghiou, L. et al. (2004), Evaluation of the Hungarian Technology Foresight Programme (TEP) – Report of an International Panel, http://pdc.ceu.hu/archive/00002690/ Georghiou, L., Cassingena Harper, J., Keenan, M., Miles, I., Popper, R. (eds) (2008), The Handbook of Technology Foresight: Concepts and Practice, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham. Georghiou, L., Keenan, M. [2006]: Evaluation of national foresight activities: Assessing rationale, process and impact, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 73 (7), 761-777. Georghiou, L., Keenan, M., Miles, I. (2010), Assessing the impact of the UK’s evolving national foresight programme, International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy, 6 (1/2/3), 131-150. Geyer, A., Scapolo, F., Boden, M., Dory, T., Ducatel, K. (2003), The Future of Manufacturing in Europe 2015-2020: The challenge for sustainability, European Commission, Joint Research Centre (DG JRC), Institute for Prospective Technological Studies, Technical Report Series, EUR 20705 EN. Government Office for Science (GOS) (2013), The Future of Manufacturing: A new era of opportunity and challenge for the UK, project report, URN 13/809, London: The Government Office for Science, London. Havas, A. (2003), Evolving Foresight in a Small Transition Economy: The design, use and relevance of foresight methods in Hungary, Journal of Forecasting, 22 (2-3), 179-201. Havas, A. (2009), Universities and the emerging new players: building futures for higher education, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 21 (3), 425-443. Havas, A., Schartinger, D., Weber, M. (2010), The impact of foresight on innovation policy making: recent experiences and future perspectives, Research Evaluation, 19 (2), 91-104. Havas, A., Weber, K.M. (2017), The ‘fit’ between forward-looking activities and the innovation policy governance sub-system: A framework to explore potential impacts, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 115, 327-337. Jarmai, K. (2015), Impact of Foresight Processes on the European Research and Innovation System, PhD thesis, Wirtschaftsuniversität, Vienna. Jefferson, M. (2012), Shell scenarios: What really happened in the 1970s and what may be learned for current world prospects, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79 (1), 186-197. Keenan, M., Miles, I. (2008), Foresight in the United Kingdom, in: Georghiou, L. et al. (eds), The Handbook of Technology Foresight: Concepts and Practice, pp. 91-111, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham. Klusacek, K. (2004), Technology foresight in the Czech Republic, International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy, 1 (1/2), 89-105. Kononiuk, A., Nazarko, L., Nazarko, J., Ejdys, J., Halicka, K., Glinska, U., Gudanowsak, A. (2012), Nanotechnology for Podlaskie 2020, EFP Brief No. 235, http://www.foresight-platform.eu/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/EFP-Brief-No.-235_Nanotechnology-for-Podlaskie-2020.pdf Könnölä, T., Salo, A., Brummer, V. (2009), FinnSight 2015 – A National Joint Foresight Exercise, Foresight Brief No. 164, http://www.foresight-platform.eu/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/EFP_Brief_No._164_FinnSight_2015_2_.pdf Kuwahara, T. (1999), Technology Forecasting Activities in Japan, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 60 (1), 5-14. Martin, B., Johnston, R. (1999), Technology Foresight for Wiring Up the National Innovation System: Experiences in Britain, Australia, and New Zealand, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 60 (1), 37-54. Miles, I. (2005), UK Foresight: three cycles on a highway, International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy, 2 (1), 1-34. NISTEP (2005), Comprehensive Analysis of Science and Technology Benchmarking and Foresight, NISTEP Report No. 99, NISTEP, Tokyo. OECD (1996), Government Technology Foresight Exercises, special issue, STI Review, No. 17. OECD (2016a), The Next Production Revolution – An interim project report, DSTI/IND/STP/ICCP(2016)1, 108 p., OECD, Paris. OECD (2016b), Enabling the Next Production Revolution: the Future of Manufacturing and Services – Interim Report, prepared for the Meeting of the OECD Council at Ministerial Level, Paris, 1-2 June 2016, 41 p., OECD, Paris. PACST (2012), Report to the President on Capturing Domestic Competitive Advantage in Advanced Manufacturing, 70 p., https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/pcast_amp_steering_committee_report_final_july_17_2012.pdf PACST (2014), Accelerating U.S. Advanced Manufacturing, report to the President, 108 p., https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/PCAST/amp20_report_final.pdf Prime Minister’s Office Finland (2009), Government Foresight Report on Long-term Climate and Energy Policy: Towards a Low-carbon Finland, Prime Minister’s Office Publications 30/2009, Helsinki. Prime Minister’s Office Finland (2014), Cooperative and continuous foresight: A proposal for a national foresight approach, Prime Minister’s Office Publications 2/2014, Helsinki. Prime Minister’s Office (2013), Japan Revitalization Strategy: Japan is back, http://www.maff.go.jp/j/kokusai/renkei/fta_kanren/pdf/en_saikou_jpn_hon.pdf Prime Minister’s Office (2014), Japan Revitalization Strategy: Japan’s challenge for the future, http://www.kantei.go.jp/jp/singi/keizaisaisei/pdf/honbunEN.pdf Prime Minister’s Office (2015), Japan’s Robot Strategy: Vision, Strategy, Action Plan, The Headquarters for Japan’s Economic Revitalization, Tokyo. Salo, A., Brummer, V., Könnölä, T. (2009), Axes of balance in foresight – reflections from FinnSight 2015, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 21 (8), 987-1001. Shell (2013), 40 years of Shell scenarios, http://s05.static-shell.com/content/dam/shell-new/local/corporate/corporate/downloads/pdf/shell-scenarios-40yearsbook080213.pdf Shin, T., Hong, S-K., Grupp, H. (1999), Technology Foresight Activities in Korea and in Countries Closing the Technology Gap, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 60 (1), 71-84. Stanovnik, P., Kos, M. (2007), Technology Foresighting in an Emerging Economy: The case of Slovenia, Economic and Business Review for Central and South-Eastern Europe, 9 (2), 165-181. Yokoo. Y, Okuwada, K. (2012), Validity of foresight derived from the evaluation of past activities in Japan, International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy, 8 (4), 296-310. UT-Battelle (2007), Productive Nanosystems: A Technology Roadmap, https://www.foresight.org/roadmaps/Nanotech_Roadmap_2007_main.pdf |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/100374 |
Available Versions of this Item
- The role of foresight in shaping the next production revolution. (deposited 15 May 2020 05:17) [Currently Displayed]