Hedonic preferences, symmetric loss aversion and the willingness to pay-willingness to accept gap

Fosgerau, Mogens (2008): Hedonic preferences, symmetric loss aversion and the willingness to pay-willingness to accept gap.

Abstract

The results in this paper are relevant for the application of valuation studies in cost-benefit analysis in the presence of the willingness to pay - willingness to accept gap. We consider a consumer who makes choices based on choice preferences exhibiting reference-dependence and loss aversion. Choice preferences are related to underlying hedonic preferences through the marginal rates of substitution (MRS) at the reference. Our issue is the identification of hedonic preferences relevant to welfare economic analysis. We show that the hedonic MRS is identified from reference-dependent choices if loss aversion exhibits a certain symmetry. Moreover, we show that this symmetry is rational in the sense that it leads to maximal expected hedonic utility when choices are made under reference-dependent choice preferences.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Behavioral public economics; valuation of non-market goods; prospect theory; loss aversion
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D0 - General > D01 - Microeconomic Behavior: Underlying Principles

References

Bateman, I., Munro, A., Rhodes, B., Starmer, C. and Sugden, R. (1997) A Test of the Theory of Reference-Dependent Preferences The Quarterly Journal of Economics 112(2), 479–505.

Becker, G. S. (1962) Irrational Behavior and Economic Theory Journal of Political Economy 70(1), 1–13.

Bernheim, B. D. and Rangel, A. (2007) Behavioral Public Economics: Welfare and Policy Analysis with Nonstandard Decision-Makers in P. Diamond and H. Vartiainen (eds), Behavioral Economics and Its Applications Princeton University Press chapter 2, pp. 7–84.

Beshears, J., J.Choi, J., Laibson, D. and C.Madrian, B. (2007) How Are Preferences Revealed? Working Paper (http://www.economics.harvard.edu/faculty/laibson/files/How%20are%20preferences%20revealed%202007%2002%2019.doc).

De Borger, B. and Fosgerau, M. (2008) The trade-off between money and travel time: a test of the theory of reference-dependent preferences Journal of Urban Economics Forthcoming.

Fosgerau, M., Hjort, K. and Lyk-Jensen, S. V. (2006) The Danish Value of Time Study - Results for Experiment 1 www.dtf.dk.

Gul, F. and Pesendorfer, W. (2001) Temptation and Self-Control Econometrica 69(6), 1403–1435.

Gul, F. and Pesendorfer, W. (2004) Self-Control and the Theory of Consumption Econometrica 72(1), 119–158.

Horowitz, J. K. and McConnell, K. E. (2003) Willingness to accept, willingness to pay and the income effect Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 51(4), 537–545.

Kahneman, D. and Sugden, R. (2005) Experienced Utility as a Standard of Policy Evaluation Environmental and Resource Economics 32(1), 161–181.

Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. (1979) Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk Econometrica 47(2), 263–292.

K¨oszegi, B. and Rabin, M. (2006) A model of reference-dependent preferences The Quarterly Journal of Economics 121(4), 1133–1166.

List, J. A. (2004) Neoclassical Theory Versus Prospect Theory: Evidence from the Marketplace Econometrica 72(2), 615–625.

Munro, A. and Sugden, R. (2003) On the theory of reference-dependent preferences Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 50, 407–428.

Plott, C. R. and Zeiler, K. (2005) The Willingness to Pay-Willingness to Accept Gap, the ”Endowment Effect,” Subject Misconceptions, and Experimental Procedures for Eliciting Valuations The American Economic Review 95(3), 530–545.

Stott, H. P. (2006) Cumulative prospect theory’s functional menagerie Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 32(2), 101–130.

Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. (1991) Loss Aversion in Riskless Choice: A Reference-Dependent Model The Quarterly Journal of Economics 106(4), 1039–1061.