Climate Change and Inequality: How to Solve These Problems Jointly?

Grigoryev, Leonid and Makarov, Igor and Sokolova, Anna and Pavlyushina, Victoria and Stepanov, Ilya (2020): Climate Change and Inequality: How to Solve These Problems Jointly? Published in: International Organisation Research Journal , Vol. 15, No. 1 (2020)

Abstract

In recent decades, economic growth in developing economies and the growth of the middle class lead to a surge in energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions. Within the framework of the United Nations (UN) sustainable development goals established in 2015, the solution to poverty and inequality thus comes into conflict with climate change mitigation. The existing international system of climate regulation does not address this contradiction. Today, global climate governance relies on estimates of aggregate emissions by countries without considering their level of development and the distribution of emissions among income groups within each country. Emissions from production are being monitored, while consumption-related emissions, albeit known to experts, rarely underlie decision-making. Meanwhile, income distribution has a higher impact on consumption-based emissions in comparison to production-based ones. Decisions on emissions regulation are made at the national level by countries with different development agendas in which climate change mitigation often gets less priority in comparison to other socio-economic objectives. This paper proposes a set of principles and specific mechanisms that can link climate change and inequality within a single policy framework. First, we highlight the need to modify the global emission monitoring system for the sake of accounting for emissions from consumption (rather than production) by income groups. Second, we suggest the introduction of a new redistribution system to address climate change which would include the imposition of a “fine” on households with the highest levels of emissions. Such a system follows the principles of progressive taxation but supports climate mitigation objectives and should be understood not as taxation of high incomes but rather as payment for a negative externality. Third, we outline the need to adjust climate finance criteria; priority should be given to projects designed to reduce carbon-intensive consumption by social groups entering the middle class, or to help the poorest population groups adapt to climate change. A special role in the implementation of these principles may belong to BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa), which may view this as an opportunity for a proactive transition to inclusive, low-carbon development.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: climate change; inequality; energy consumption; greenhouse gas emissions; sustainable development
• Subjects: Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q56 - Environment and Development ; Environment and Trade ; Sustainability ; Environmental Accounts and Accounting ; Environmental Equity ; Population Growth

References

Aichele R., Felbermayr G. (2013) The Effect of the Kyoto Protocol on Carbon Emissions. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, vol. 32, no 4, pp. 731–57. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.21720. (accessed 10 February 2020) Bell D. (1976) The Coming of the Post-Industrial Society. The Educational Forum, vol. 40, no 4, pp. 574–9. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/00131727609336501. (accessed 10 February 2020) Chancel L., Piketty T. (2015) Carbon and Inequality: From Kyoto to Paris: Trends in the Global Inequality of Carbon Emissions (1998–2013) & Prospects for an Equitable Adaptation Fund. Paris School of Economics. Available at: https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.3536.0082. (accessed 10 February 2020) Climate Action Tracker (2017) Improvement in Warming Outlook as India and China Move Ahead, but Paris Agreement Gap Still Looms Large. Available at: http://climateactiontracker.org/publications/briefing/288/Improvement-in-warming-outlook-as-India-and-China-move-ahead-but-Paris-Agreement-gap-still-looms-large.html. (accessed 10 February 2020) Cole D. H. (2015) Advantages of a Polycentric Approach to Climate Change Policy. Nature Climate Change, vol. 5, no 2, pp. 114–8. Available at: https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/facpub/1415. (accessed 10 February 2020) Davies J., Shi X., Whalley J. (2014) The Possibilities for Global Inequality and Poverty Reduction Using Revenues From Global Carbon Pricing. The Journal of Economic Inequality, vol. 12, no 3, pp. 363–91. Available at: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10888-013-9259-2. (accessed 10 February 2020) Davis S. J., Caldeira K. (2010) Consumption-Based Accounting of CO2 Emissions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 107, no 12, pp. 5687–92. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0906974107. (accessed 10 February 2020) Ehrlich P. R., Holdren J. P. (1971) Impact of Population Growth. Science, vol. 171, no 3977, pp. 1212–7. Available at: https://science.sciencemag.org/content/171/3977/1212. (accessed 10 February 2020) Gates B., Gates M. (2016) Two Superpowers We Wish We Had. Annual Letter, Gates Notes, 22 February. Available at: https://www.gatesnotes.com/2016-Annual-Letter. Gore T. (2015) Extreme Carbon Inequality: Why the Paris Climate Deal Must Put the Poorest, Lowest Emitting and Most Vulnerable People First. Policy Paper, OXFAM International. Available at: https://www.oxfam.org/en/research/extreme-carbon-inequality. 23 Grigoryev L. M. (2016) Social’noe neravenstvo v mire – interpretaciya neochevidnyh tendencij [Social Inequality in the World: The Interpretation of Non-Obvious Trends]. Journal of NEA, no 3, pp. 146–60 (in Russian). Grigoryev L. M., Pavlyushina V. A. (2018) Mezhstranovoe neravenstvo: dinamika i problema stadij razvitiya [Inter-Country Inequality as a Dynamic Process and the Problem of Post-Industrial Development]. Voprosy Ekonomiki, no 7, pp. 5–29. (in Russian). Grigoryev L. M, Pavlyushina V. A. (2019) Relative Social Inequality in the World: Rigidity Against the Economic Growth, 1992–2016. Russian Journal of Economics, vol. 5, no 1, pp. 46–66. Available at: https://doi.org/10.32609/j.ruje.5.35485. Grigoryev L. M., Salmina A. A. (2013) Struktura social’nogo neravenstva sovremennogo mira: problemy izmereniya [The Structure of Social Inequality of the Modern World: Measurement Problems]. Sociological Journal, no 3, pp. 5–16 (in Russian). Grunewald N., Harteisen M., Lay J., Minx J., Renner S. (2012) The Carbon Footprint of Indian Households. Paper presented at the 32nd General Conference of the International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, Boston, 5–11 August. Available at: http://www.iariw.org/papers/2012/GrunewaldPaper.pdf. (accessed 10 February 2020) Han X., Chatterjee L. (1997) Impacts of Growth and Structural Change on CO2 Emissions of Developing Countries. World Development, vol. 25, no 3, pp. 395–407. Available at: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305-750X(96)00110-6. (accessed 10 February 2020) Kaika D., Zervas E. (2013a) The Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) Theory: Part A: Concept, Causes and the CO2 Emissions Case. Energy Policy, vol. 62, pp. 1392–1402. Available at: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421513007970. (accessed 10 February 2020) Kaika D., Zervas E. (2013b) The Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) Theory: Part B: Critical Issues. Energy Policy, vol. 62, pp. 1403–11. Available at: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421513007969. (accessed 10 February 2020) Kaya Y. (1989) Impact of Carbon Dioxide Emission Control on GNP Growth: Interpretation of Proposed Scenarios. Response Strategies Working Group Memorandum, IPCC Energy and Industry Subgroup. Li J., Wang Y. (2010) Income, Lifestyle and Household Carbon Footprints (Carbon-Income Relationship), A Micro-Level Analysis on China’s Urban and Rural Household Surveys. 24 Environmental Economics, vol. 1, no 2, pp. 44–71. Available at: https://businessperspectives.org/pdfproxy.php?item_id:3684. (accessed 10 February 2020) Makarov I. A., Sokolova A. K. (2014) Ocenka uglerodoemkosti vneshnej torgovli Rossii [Evaluation of the Carbon Intensity of Russian Foreign Trade]. Economic Journal of the Higher School of Economics, vol. 18, no 3, pp. 477–507. Available at: https://ej.hse.ru/data/2014/11/19/1101018306/Макаров.pdf (in Russian). (accessed 10 February 2020) Makarov I. A., Stepanov I. A. (2018) Parizhskoe klimaticheskoe soglashenie: vliyanie na mirovuyu energetiku i vyzovy dlya Rossii [Paris Climate Agreement: Impact on World Energy and Challenges for Russia]. Actual Problems of Europe, vol. 2, no 1, pp. 77–100 (in Russian). Makarov I. A. (2018) Discrepancies Between Environmental Kuznets Curves for Production- and Consumption-Based CO2 Emissions. Research Paper No WP BRP199/EC/2018, Higher School of Economics. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3259100. (accessed 10 February 2020) Milanovic B. (2016) Global Inequality: A New Approach for the Age of Globalization. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Mir G., Storm S. (2016) Carbon Emissions and Economic Growth: Production-Based Versus Consumption-Based Evidence on Decoupling. Working Paper No 41, Institute of New Economic Thinking. Available at: https://www.ineteconomics.org/uploads/papers/WP_41-Storm-and-Mir_1.pdf. (accessed 10 February 2020) Oberthür S. (2016) Reflections on Global Climate Politics Post Paris: Power, Interests and Polycentricity. The International Spectator, vol. 51, no 4, pp. 80–94. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/03932729.2016.1242256. (accessed 10 February 2020) Olivier J. G. J., Peters J. A. H. W. (2018) Trends in Global CO2 and Total Greenhouse Gas Emissions: 2018 Report. PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency. Available at: https://www.pbl.nl/en/publications/trends-in-global-co2-and-total-greenhouse-gas-emissions-2018-report. (accessed 10 February 2020) Ostrom E. (2009) A Polycentric Approach for Coping With Climate Change. Annals of Economics and Finance, vol. 15, no 1, pp. 97–134. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-5095. (accessed 10 February 2020) Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Rosas J., Sheinbaum C., Morillon D. (2010) The Structure of Household Energy Consumption and Related CO2 Emissions by Income Group in Mexico. Energy for Sustainable Development, vol. 14, 25 no 2, pp. 127–33. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2010.04.002. (accessed 10 February 2020) Savaresi A. (2016) The Paris Agreement: A New Beginning? Journal of Energy & Natural Resources Law, vol. 34, no 1, pp. 16–26. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/02646811.2016.1133983. (accessed 10 February 2020) Shammin M. R., Bullard C. W. (2009) Impact of Cap-and-Trade Policies for Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions on U.S. Households. Ecological Economics, vol. 68, no 8-9, pp. 2432–8. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.03.024. (accessed 10 February 2020) Steininger K., Lininger C., Droege S., Roser D., Tomlinson L., Meyer L. (2014) Justice and Cost Effectiveness of Consumption-Based Versus Production-Based Approaches in the Case of Unilateral Climate Policies. Global Environmental Change, vol. 24, no 1, pp. 75–87. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.10.005. (accessed 10 February 2020) Stern D. I. (2017) The Environmental Kuznets Curve After 25 Years. Journal of Bioeconomics, vol. 19, no 1, pp. 7–28. Available at: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10818-017-9243-1. (accessed 10 February 2020) The Paris Agreement (2015) Adopted at the Twenty-First Session of the Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Paris, 12 December. Available at: https://treaties.un.org/Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=XXVII-7-d&chapter=27&lang=_en&clang=_en. (accessed 10 February 2020) Uchiyama K. (2016) Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis. Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis and Carbon Dioxide Emissions. Tokyo: Springer. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) (1992) Adopted at the Fifth Session of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee for a Framework Convention on Climate Change. New York, 9 May. Available at: http://unfccc.int/files/essential_background/background_publications_htmlpdf/application/pdf/conveng.pdf. (accessed 10 February 2020) Van Alstine J., Neumayer E. (2010) The Environmental Kuznets Curve. Handbook on Trade and the Environment (K. P Gallagher (ed)). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Available at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/30809/. (accessed 10 February 2020) Victor D., Jones B. (2018) Undiplomatic Action: A Practical Guide to the New Politics and Geopolitics of Climate Change. Cross-Brookings Initiative on Energy and Climate Paper No 1, Brookings. Available at: https://www.brookings.edu/research/undiplomatic-action-a-practical-guide-to-the-new-politics-and-geopolitics-of-climate-change/. (accessed 10 February 2020) 26 Waggoner P. E., Ausubel J. H. (2002) A Framework for Sustainability Science: A Renovated IPAT Identity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 99, no 12, pp. 7860–5. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.122235999. (accessed 10 February 2020) White V., Roberts S., Preston I. (2010) Understanding ‘High Use Low Income’ Energy Consumers. Final Report to Ofgem, Centre for Sustainable Energy. Available at: https://www.ofgem.gov.uk/ofgem-publications/57558/high-use-low-income-energy-consumersfinal-report-nov-10-pdf. (accessed 10 February 2020) World Bank (n.d.) World Development Indicators. Available at: https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/world-development-indicators. World Resources Institute (n.d.) CAIT Historical Emissions Data (Countries, U.S. States, UNFCCC). Available at: https://www.wri.org/resources/data-sets/cait-country-greenhouse-gas-emissions-data. York R., Rosa E. A., Dietz T. (2003) STIRPAT, IPAT and ImPACT: Analytic Tools for Unpacking the Driving Forces of Environmental Impacts. Ecological Economics, vol. 46, no 3, pp. 351–65. Available at: http://www.res.ku.edu/~crgc/NSFWorkshop/Readings/STIRPAT_%20IPAT%20and%20ImPACT.pdf. (accessed 10 February 2020)