Shahbaz, Muhammad and Sharma, Rajesh and Sinha, Avik and Jiao, Zhilun (2020): Analyzing Nonlinear Impact of Economic Growth Drivers on CO2 Emissions: Designing an SDG Framework for India.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_103428.pdf Download (469kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Several Asian countries are facing challenges regarding accomplishment of the objectives of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), and India is facing a similar situation. Following this, this study talks about designing an SDG framework for India, which can be used as a benchmark for the other Asian countries. In this pursuit, this study looks into whether per capita income, energy use, trade openness, and oil price have any impact on CO2 emissions between 1980 and 2019. The nonlinear autoregressive distributed lag approach proves that the fluctuations in independent variables have an asymmetric long-term impact on CO2 emissions. The results reveal that the prevailing economic growth pattern in India is environmentally unsustainable, because of its dependence on fossil fuel-based energy consumption and imported crude oil. Import substitution has been identified as one of the first stepping stones to address this issue, and accordingly, a multipronged SDG framework has been designed based on the direct and extended version of the study outcomes. While the Central policy framework shows a way to address SDG 7, SDG 8, SDG 12, and SDG 13, the Tangential policy framework shows the way to sustain the Central policy framework by addressing SDG 4.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Analyzing Nonlinear Impact of Economic Growth Drivers on CO2 Emissions: Designing an SDG Framework for India |
English Title: | Analyzing Nonlinear Impact of Economic Growth Drivers on CO2 Emissions: Designing an SDG Framework for India |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | CO2, Energy, India, NARDL, Oil Prices, SDG |
Subjects: | Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics |
Item ID: | 103428 |
Depositing User: | Dr Muhammad Shahbaz |
Date Deposited: | 12 Oct 2020 13:45 |
Last Modified: | 12 Oct 2020 13:45 |
References: | Ahmed, K., Long, W., 2012. Environmental Kuznets curve and Pakistan: an empirical analysis. Proced. Econ. Financ. 1, 4-13. Ahmed, K., Rehman, M. U., Ozturk, I., 2017. What drives carbon dioxide emissions in the long-run? Evidence from selected South Asian Countries. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 70, 1142-1153. Ali, W., Abdullah, A., 2015. The long-run relationship between economic growth, financial development, trade openness and CO2 emissions in Malaysia. International Symposium on Technology Management and Emerging Technologies (ISTMET). Langkawi Island, Malaysia: IEEE, Available at https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7359049. Ang, J., 2007. CO2 emissions, energy consumption, and output in France. Energy Policy 35, 4772-4778. Ang, J., 2008. Economic development, pollutant emission and energy consumption in Malaysia. J. Policy Model. 30 (2), 271-278. Apergis, N., Ozturk, I., 2015. Testing environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in Asian countries. Ecological Indicators, 52, 16-22. Artuc, E., Lopez-Acevedo, G., Robertson, R., Samaan, D., 2019. Exports to Jobs: Boosting the Gains from Trade in South Asia. South Asia Development Forum, World Bank. Asian Development Bank (ADB), 2019. Achieving Energy Security in Asia: Diversification, Integration and Policy Implications. Available at: https://www.adb.org/publications/achieving-energy-security-asia Atici, C., 2009. Carbon emissions in Central and Eastern Europe: environmental Kuznets curve and implications for sustainable development. Sustain. Dev. 17 (3), 155-160. Aye, G., Edoja, P., 2017. Effect of economic growth on CO2 emission in developing countries: evidence from a dynamic panel threshold model. Cogent Econ. Financ. 5 (1), 1-22. Azomahou, T., Laisney, F., Van, P., 2006. Economic development and CO2 emissions: a nonparametric panel approach. J. Public Econ. 90 (6-7), 1347-1363. Banerjee, A., Dolado, J., Mestre, R., 1998. Error-correction mechanism tests for cointegration in a single-equation framework. J. Time Series Anal. 19, 267-283. Bello, L.D., 2019. Electrifying India Positive, But Won’t End Energy Poverty Soon. Environment & Energy Report, Bloomberg Law. Bouznit, M., Pablo-Romero, M., 2016. CO2 emission and economic growth in Algeria. Energy Policy 96 (2016), 93-104. Coondoo, D., Dinda, S., 2002. Causality between income and emission: a country group-specific econometric analysis. Ecol. Econ. 40 (3), 351-367. Destek, M., Sinha, A., 2020. Renewable, non-renewable energy consumption, economic growth, trade openness and ecological footprint: evidence from organisation for economic co-operation and development countries. J. Clean. Prod. 242, Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118537. Dickey, D., Fuller, W., 1979. Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 74 (336), 427-431. Ghosh, S., 2010. Examining carbon emissions economic growth nexus for India: a multivariate cointegration approach. Energy Policy 38 (2010), 3008-3014. Gökmenoğlu, K., Taspinar, N., 2016. The relationship between CO2 emissions, energy consumption, economic growth and FDI: the case of Turkey. J. Int. Trade Econ. Dev. 25 (5), 706-723. Gul, S., Zou, X., Hassan, C., Azam, M., Zaman, K., 2015. Causal nexus between energy consumption and carbon dioxide emission for Malaysia using maximum entropy bootstrap approach. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 22 (24), 19773-19785. Gupta, P., Goyal, A., 2015. Impact of oil price fluctuations on Indian economy. OPEC Energy Review 39 (2), 141-161. Holtz-Eakin, D., Selden, T., 1995. Stoking the fires? CO2 emissions and economic growth. J. Public Econ. 57 (1), 85-101. Hossain, M.S., 2011. Panel estimation for CO2 emissions, energy consumption, economic growth, trade openness and urbanization of newly industrialized countries. Energy Policy, 39(11), 6991-6999. Hu, M., Li, R., You, W., Liu, Y., Lee, C.C., 2020. Spatiotemporal evolution of decoupling and driving forces of CO2 emissions on economic growth along the Belt and Road. Journal of Cleaner Production, 123272. International Energy Agency (IEA), 2017. World Energy Outlook. OECD/IEA Report 2017. International Energy Agency (IEA), 2019. SDG7: Data and Projections: Access to affordable, reliable, sustainable and modern energy for all. Available at: https://www.iea.org/reports/sdg7-data-and-projections International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD), 2019. Asia-Pacific Discusses Energy Transition in Support of SDG 7. Available at: https://sdg.iisd.org/news/asia-pacific-discusses-energy-transition-in-support-of-sdg-7/ International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA), 2019. Tracking SDG 7: The Energy Progress Report 2020. Kanjilal, K., Ghosh, S., 2013. Environmental Kuznet’s curve for India: evidence from tests for cointegration with unknown structural breaks. Energy Policy 56 (c), 509-515. Kim, D., Perron, P., 2009. Unit root tests allowing for a break in the trend function at an unknown time under both the null and alternative hypotheses. J. Econom. 148, 1-13. Lacheheb, M., Rahim, A., Sirag, A., 2015. Economic growth and carbon dioxide emissions: investigating the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in Algeria. Int. J. Energy Econ. Policy 5 (4), 1125-1132. Lean, H., Smyth, R., 2010. CO2 emissions, electricity consumption and output in ASEAN. Appl. Energy 87 (6), 1858-1864. Liang, L., Wang, Z., Li, J., 2019. The effect of urbanization on environmental pollution in rapidly developing urban agglomerations. J. Clean. Prod. 237 (10 November), https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652619324990 (in press). Lindmark, M., 2002. An EKC-pattern in historical perspective: carbon dioxide emissions, technology, fuel prices and growth in Sweden 1870–1997. Ecol. Econ. 42 (1-2), 333-347. Magazzino, C., 2016. The relationship between CO2 emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in Italy. Int. J. Sustain. Energy 35 (6), 844-857. Managi, S., Jena, P., 2008. Environmental productivity and Kuznets curve in India. Ecol. Econ. 65 (2), 432-440. Meadows, D., Meadows, D.L., Randers, J., Behrens-III, William, W., 1972. The limits to growth: a report for the club of Rome's project on the predicament of mankind, Universe Books, New York. Mikayilov, J.I., Galeotti, M., Hasanov, F.J., 2018. The impact of economic growth on CO2 emissions in Azerbaijan. J. Clean. Prod. 197 (Part 1), 1558-1572. Mohiuddin, O., Asumadu-Sarkodie, S., Obaidullah, M., Dubey, S., 2016. The relationship between carbon dioxide emissions, energy consumption, and GDP: a recent evidence from Pakistan. Cogent Eng. 3 (1), DOI: 10.1080/23311916.2016.1210491. Nain, M., Ahmad, W., Kamaiah, B., 2017. Economic growth, energy consumption and CO2 emissions in India: a disaggregated causal analysis. Int. J. Sustain. Energy 36 (8), 807-824. NITI Aayog, 2019. SDG India: Index & Dashboard 2019-20. Ogundipe, A., Alege, P., Ogundipe, O., 2014. Income heterogeneity and environmental Kuznets curve in Africa. J. Sustain. Dev. 7 (4), 165-180. Panayotou, T., 1997. Demystifying the environmental Kuznets curve. Environ. Dev. Econ. 2 (4), 465-484. Paramati, S., Sinha, A., Dogan, E., 2017. The significance of renewable energy use for economic output and environmental protection: evidence from the Next 11 developing economies. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 24 (15), 13546-13560. Parker, S., Bhatti, M.I., 2020. Dynamics and drivers of per capita CO2 emissions in Asia. Energy Economics, 104798. Perron, P., 1989. The great crash, the oil price shock, and the unit root hypothesis. Econom. 57, 1361-1401. Pesaran, M., Shin, Y., Smith, R., 2001. Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. J. Appl. Econom. 16 (3), 289-326. Phillips, P., Perron, P., 1988. Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika 75 (2), 335-346. Poumanyvong, P., Kaneko, S., 2010. Does urbanization lead to less energy use and lower CO2 emissions? A cross-country analysis. Ecol. Econ. 70 (2), 434-444. Shahbaz, M., Balsalobre, D., Shahzad, S., 2018a. The influencing factors of CO2 emissions and the role of biomass energy consumption: statistical experience from G-7 countries. MPRA Paper No. 87456, Munich University Library, Munich, Germany. Shahbaz, M., Shahzad, S., Alam, S., Apergis, N., 2018b. Globalisation, economic growth and energy consumption in the BRICS region: the importance of asymmetries. J. Int. Trade. Econ. Dev. (8), 985-1009. Shahbaz, M., Balsalobre-Lorente, D., Sinha, A., 2019. Foreign direct investment-CO2 emissions nexus in Middle East and North African countries: importance of biomass energy consumption. J. Clean. Prod. 217(2019), 603-614. Shahbaz, M., Sinha, A., 2019. Environmental Kuznets curve for CO2 emissions: a literature survey. J. Econ. Stud. 46 (1), 106-168. Shahbaz, M., Hoang, T.H., Mahalik, M.K., Roubaud, D., 2017. Energy consumption, financial development and economic growth in India: new evidence from a nonlinear and asymmetric analysis. Energy Econ. 63 (March), 199-212. Shahbaz, M., Hye, Q., Tiwari, A., Leitãod, N., 2013. Economic growth, energy consumption, financial development, international trade and CO2 emissions in Indonesia. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 25 (2013), 109-121. Shahbaz, M., Mallick, H., Mahalik, M., Loganathan, N., 2015. Does globalization impede environmental quality in India? Ecol. Indic. 52 (2015), 379-393. Shahbaz, M., Sbia, R., Hamdi, H., Ozturk, I., 2014. Economic growth, electricity consumption, urbanization and environmental degradation relationship in United Arab Emirates. Ecol. Indic. 45 (2014), 622-631. Shahzad, S.J.H., Kumar, R.R., Zakaria, M., Hurr, M., 2017. Carbon emission, energy consumption, trade openness and financial development in Pakistan: a revisit. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 70, 185-192. Sharma, R., Kautish, P., Kumar, D., 2018. Impact of selected macroeconomic determinants on economic growth in India: an empirical study. Vision J. Bus. Perspect. 22 (4), 405-415. Sharma, R., Kautish, P., Uddin, M., 2020. Do the international economic endeavors affect CO2 emissions in open economies of South Asia? An empirical examination under nonlinearity. Manag. Eviron. Qual. 31 (1), 89-110. Shin, Y., Yu, B., Greenwood-Nimmo, M., 2014. Modelling asymmetric cointegration and dynamic multipliers in an ARDL framework. In: Horrace, W., Sickles, R. (Eds.), Festschrift in Honor of Peter Schmidt. Springer Science and Business Media, New York. Sinha, A., Gupta, M., Shahbaz, M., Sengupta, T., 2019. Impact of corruption in public sector on environmental quality: Implications for sustainability in BRICS and next 11 countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 232, 1379-1393. Soytas, U., Sarib, R., Ewing, B., 2007. Energy consumption, income, and carbon emissions in the United States. Ecol. Econ. 62 (3-4), 482-489. Stern, D., Common, M., Barbier, E., 1996. Economic growth and environmental degradation: the environmental Kuznets curve and sustainable development. World Dev. 24 (7), 1151-1160. Sulaiman, C., Abdul-Rahim, A., 2018. Population growth and CO2 emission in Nigeria: a recursive ARDL approach. Sage Open 8 (2), 1-14. Tucker, M., 1995. Carbon dioxide emissions and global GDP. Ecol. Econ. 15 (3), 215-223. United Nations, 2019. The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2019. United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and Pacific (UNESCAP), 2019. Asia and the Pacific SDG Progress Report 2019. Vidyarhthi, H., 2014. An econometric study of energy consumption, carbon emissions and economic growth in South Asia: 1972-2009. World J. Sci. Technol. Sustain. Dev. 11 (3), 182-195. Wang, Z.-X., Li, Q., 2019. Modelling the nonlinear relationship between CO2 emissions and economic growth using a PSO algorithm-based grey Verhulst model. J. Clean. Prod. 207 (2019), 214-224. Wang, Z.-X., Hao, P., Yao, P.-Y., 2017. Non-linear relationship between economic growth and CO2 emissions in China: an empirical study based on panel smooth transition regression models. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 14 (12), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14121568. Zhang, X.-P., Cheng, X.-M., 2009. Energy consumption, carbon emissions, and economic growth in China. Ecol. Econ. 68 (2009), 2706-2712. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/103428 |