Paid and hypothetical time preferences are the same: Lab, field and online evidence

Brañas-Garza, Pablo and Jorrat, Diego and Espín, Antonio M. and Sanchez, Angel (2020): Paid and hypothetical time preferences are the same: Lab, field and online evidence.

Abstract

The use of hypothetical instead of real decision-making incentives remains under debate after decades of economic experiments. Standard incentivized experiments involve substantial monetary costs due to participants’ earnings and often logistic costs as well. In time preferences experiments, which involve future payments, real payments are particularly problematic. Since immediate rewards frequently have lower transaction costs than delayed rewards in experimental tasks, among other issues, (quasi)hyperbolic functional forms cannot be accurately estimated. What if hypothetical payments provide accurate data which, moreover, avoid transaction cost problems? In this paper, we test whether the use of hypothetical - versus real - payments affects the elicitation of short-term and long-term discounting in a standard multiple price list task. One-out-of-ten participants probabilistic payment schemes are also considered. We analyze data from three studies: a lab experiment in Spain, a well-powered field experiment in Nigeria, and an online extension focused on probabilistic payments. Our results indicate that paid and hypothetical time preferences are mostly the same and, therefore, that hypothetical rewards are a good alternative to real rewards. However, our data suggest that probabilistic payments are not.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Time preferences, hypothetical vs real payoffs, lab, field, online experiments, BRIS
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C9 - Design of Experiments > C91 - Laboratory, Individual Behavior; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C9 - Design of Experiments > C93 - Field Experiments

References

Äkerlund, D., Golsteyn, B. H. H., Gr¨onqvist, H., and Lindahl, L. (2016). Time discounting and criminal behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(22):6160–6165.

Alan, S. and Ertac, S. (2018). Fostering patience in the classroom: Results from randomized educational intervention. Journal of Political Economy, 126(5):1865–1911.

Andreoni, J. and Sprenger, C. (2012). Estimating time preferences from convex budgets. The American Economic Review, 102(7):3333–3356.

Arechar, A. A., Gächter, S., and Molleman, L. (2018). Conducting interactive experiments online. Experimental Economics, 21(1):99-131.

Ashraf, N., Karlan, D., and Yin, W. (2006). Tying Odysseus to the mast: Evidence from a commitment savings product in the philippines. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121(2):635–672.

Balakrishnan, U., Haushofer, J., and Jakiela, P. (2020). How soon is now? Evidence of present bias from convex time budget experiments. Experimental Economics, 23(2): 294-321.

Baltussen, G., Post, G. T., Van Den Assem, M. J., and Wakker, P. P. (2012). Random incentive systems in a dynamic choice experiment. Experimental Economics, 15(3):418-443.

Bickel, W. K., Pitcock, J. A., Yi, R., and Angtuaco, E. J. (2009). Congruence of BOLD response across intertemporal choice conditions: fictive and real money gains and losses. Journal of Neuroscience, 29(27):8839-8846.

Borghans, L. and Golsteyn, B. H. (2006). Time discounting and the body mass index. Economics and Human Biology, 4(1):39–61.

Bosch-Domènech, A., Branas-Garza, P., and Espín, A. M. (2014). Can exposure to prenatal sex hormones (2D: 4D) predict cognitive reflection?. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 43:1-10.

Brañas-Garza, P. and Prissé, B. (2020). Time preferences with Continuous MPL: Lab, field and high schools. Mimeo.

Brañas-Garza, P., Estepa, L., Jorrat, D. A., Orozco, V., and Rascón Ramírez, E. (2020). To pay or not to pay: Measuring risk preferences in lab and field. Mimeo.

Bulley, A., and Pepper, G. V. (2017). Cross-country relationships between life expectancy, intertemporal choice and age at first birth. Evolution and Human Behavior, 38(5):652-658.

Burks, S., Carpenter, J., Götte, L., and Rustichini, A. (2012). Which measures of time preference best predict outcomes: Evidence from a large-scale field experiment. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 84(1):308–320.

Cadena, B. C. and Keys, B. J. (2015). Human capital and the lifetime costs of impatience. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 7(3):126–153.

Camerer, C. F. and Hogarth, R. M. (1999). The effects of financial incentives in experiments: A review and capital-labor-production framework. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 19(1/3):7–42.

Castillo, M., Ferraro, P. J., Jordan, J. L., and Petrie, R. (2011). The today and tomorrow of kids: Time preferences and educational outcomes of children. Journal of Public Economics, 95(11-12):1377–1385.

Chabris, C. F., Laibson, D., Morris, C. L., Schuldt, J. P., and Taubinsky, D. (2008). Individual laboratory-measured discount rates predict field behavior. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 37(2-3):237–269.

Clot, S., Grolleau, G., and Ibanez, L. (2018). Shall we pay all? an experimental test of random incentivized systems. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 73:93–98.

Cohen, J., Ericson, K. M., Laibson, D., and White, J. M. (2020). Measuring time preferences. Journal of Economic Literature, 58(2):299–347.

Coller, M. and Williams, M. B. (1999). Experimental Economics, 2(2):107–127.

Cubitt, R. P., Starmer, C., and Sugden, R. (1998b). Dynamic choice and the common ratio effect: an experimental investigation. The Economic Journal, 108(450), 1362–1380.

Dewitte, S. and Cremer, D. D. (2001). Self-control and cooperation: Different concepts, similar decisions? A question of the right perspective. The Journal of Psychology, 135(2):133–153.

Dohmen, T., Enke, B., Falk, A., Huffman, D., and Sunde, U. (2018). Patience and comparative development. Mimeo.

Dohmen, T., Falk, A., Huffman, D., and Sunde, U. (2010). Are risk aversion and impatience related to cognitive ability? The American Economic Review, 100(3):1238–1260.

Duckworth,A. L. and Seligman,M. E. (2005). Self-discipline outdoes IQ in predicting academic performance of adolescents. Psychological Science, 16(12):939–944.

Epper, T., Fehr, E., Fehr-Duda, H., Kreiner, C. T., Lassen, D. D., Leth-Petersen, S., and Rasmussen, G. N. (2020). Time discounting and wealth inequality. The American Economic Review, 110(4):1177–1205.

Espín, A. M., Brañas-Garza, P., Herrmann, B., and Gamella, J. F. (2012). Patient and impatient punishers of free-riders. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 279(1749):4923–4928.

Espín, A. M., Exadaktylos, F., Herrmann, B., and Brañas-Garza, P. (2015). Short-and long-run goals in ultimatum bargaining: impatience predicts spite-based behavior. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 9:214.

Espín, A. M., Correa, M., and Ruiz-Villaverde, A. (2019a). Patience predicts within-group cooperation in an ingroup bias-free way. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 83:101456.

Espín, A. M., García-Muñoz, T. M., and Martín, J. (2019b) Does intergroup discrimination undermine the future? Cross-country evidence of a link between group grievance and short-run orientation. Mimeo.

Exadaktylos, F., Esp´ín, A. M., and Brañas-Garza, P. (2013). Experimental subjects are not different. Scientific Reports, 3(1):1–6.

Falk, A., Becker, A., Dohmen, T. J., Huffman, D., and Sunde, U. (2015). The preference survey module: A validated instrument for measuring risk, time, and social preferences. IZA Discussion Paper.

Falk, A., Becker, A., Dohmen, T., Enke, B., Huffman, D., and Sunde, U. (2018). Global evidence on economic preferences. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 133(4):1645–1692.

Frederick, S. (2005). Cognitive reflection and decision making. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(4):25-42.

Frederick, S., Loewenstein, G., and O’Donoghue, T. (2002). Time discounting and time preference: A critical review. Journal of Economic Literature, 40(2):351–401.

Giné, X., Goldberg, J., Silverman, D., and Yang, D. (2017). Revising commitments: Field evidence on the adjustment of prior choices. The Economic Journal, 128(608):159–188.

Golsteyn, B. H., Grönqvist, H., and Lindahl, L. (2014). Adolescent time preferences predict lifetime outcomes. The Economic Journal, 124(580): F739–F761.

Harrison, G. W., Lau, M. I., and Williams, M. B. (2002). Estimating individual discount rates in Denmark: A field experiment. The American Economic Review, 92(5):1606–1617.

Holt, C. A. and Laury, S. K. (2002). Risk aversion and incentive effects. The American Economic Review, 92(5):1644–1655.

Horton, J. J., Rand, D. G., and Zeckhauser, R. J. (2011). The online laboratory: Conducting experiments in a real labor market. Experimental Economics, 14(3):399-425.

Jackson, M. O., and Yariv, L. (2014). Present bias and collective dynamic choice in the lab. The American Economic Review, 104(12):4184-4204.

Johnson, M. W. and Bickel, W. K. (2002). Within-subject comparison of real and hypothetical money rewards in delay discounting. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 77(2):129–146.

Kim, H. B., Choi, S., Kim, B., and Pop-Eleches, C. (2018). The role of education interventions in improving economic rationality. Science, 362(6410):83–86.

Kirby, K. N., Winston, G. C., and Santiesteban, M. (2005). Impatience and grades: Delay-discount rates correlate negatively with college GPA. Learning and Individual Differences, 15(3):213–222.

Laibson, D. (1997). Golden eggs and hyperbolic discounting. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(2):443–478.

Lakens, D. (2017). Equivalence tests: A practical primer for t tests, correlations, and meta-analyses. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(4):355– 362.

Lakens, D., Scheel, A. M., and Isager, P. M. (2018). Equivalence testing for psychological research: A tutorial. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(2):259–269.

Lawyer, S. R., Schoepflin, F., Green, R., and Jenks, C. (2011). Discounting of hypothetical and potentially real outcomes in nicotine-dependent and nondependent samples. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 19(4):263– 274.

Levitt, S. D., List, J. A., Neckermann, S., and Sadoff, S. (2016). The behavioralist goes to school: Leveraging behavioral economics to improve educational performance. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 8(4):183–219.

Lührmann, M., Serra-Garcia, M., and Winter, J. (2018). The impact of financial education on adolescents’ intertemporal choices. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 10(3):309–332.

Madden, G. J., Begotka, A. M., Raiff, B. R., and Kastern, L. L. (2003). Delay discounting of real and hypothetical rewards. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 11(2):139–145.

Madden, G. J., Raiff, B. R., Lagorio, C. H., Begotka, A. M., Mueller, A. M., Hehli, D. J., and Wegener, A. A. (2004). Delay discounting of potentially real and hypothetical rewards: II. between-and within-subject comparisons. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 12(4):251–261.

Maraver, M. J., Bajo, M. T., and Gomez-Ariza, C. J. (2016). Training on working memory and inhibitory control in young adults. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10:588.

Martín, J., Brañas-Garza, P., Espí,n A. M., Gamella, J. F., and Herrmann, B. (2019). The appropriate response of Spanish Gitanos: short-run orientation beyond current socio-economic status. Evolution and Human Behavior 40 (1), 12-22.

Matusiewicz, A. K., Carter, A. E., Landes, R. D., and Yi, R. (2013). Statistical equivalence and test–retest reliability of delay and probability discounting using real and hypothetical rewards. Behavioural Processes, 100:116–122.

McClure, S. M., Laibson, D. I., Loewenstein, G., and Cohen, J. D. (2004). Sepa-rate neural systems value immediate and delayed monetary rewards. Science, 306(5695):503–507.

Meier, S. and Sprenger, C. (2010). Present-biased preferences and credit card borrowing. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 2(1):193–210.

Meier, S. and Sprenger, C. D. (2013). Discounting financial literacy: Time preferences and participation in financial education programs. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 95:159–174.

Non, A. and Tempelaar, D. (2016). Time preferences, study effort, and academic performance. Economics of Education Review, 54:36–61.

Paola, M. D. and Gioia, F. (2014). Does patience matter in marriage stability? Some evidence from Italy. Review of Economics of the Household, 15(2):549– 577.

Paola, M. D. and Gioia, F. (2017). Impatience and academic performance. Less effort and less ambitious goals. Journal of Policy Modeling, 39(3):443–460.

Perez-Arce, F. (2017). The effect of education on time preferences. Economics of Education Review, 56:52–64. Phelps, E. S. and Pollak, R. A. (1968). On second-best national saving and game-equilibrium growth. The Review of Economic Studies, 35(2):185–199.

Rachlin, H. (2002). Altruism and selfishness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 25(02).

Rand, D. G. (2012). The promise of Mechanical Turk: How online labor markets can help theorists run behavioral experiments. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 299:172-179.

Sozou, P. (1998). On hyperbolic discounting and uncertain hazard rates. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 265(1): 2015–2020.

Rueda, M. R. (2018). Attention in the heart of intelligence. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 13: 26–33.

Sutter, M., Kocher, M. G., Glätzle-Rützler, D., and Trautmann, S. T. (2013). Impatience and uncertainty: Experimental decisions predict adolescents field behavior. The American Economic Review, 103(1):510–531.

Takeuchi, K. (2011). Non-parametric test of time consistency: Present bias and future bias. Games and Economic Behavior 71: 456-478.

Tanaka, T., Camerer, C. F., and Nguyen, Q. (2010). Risk and time preferences: Linking experimental and household survey data from Vietnam. The American Economic Review, 100(1):557–571.

Tryon, W. W. and Lewis, C. (2008). An inferential confidence interval method of establishing statistical equivalence that corrects Tryon’s (2001) reduction factor. Psychological Methods, 13(3):272.

Ubfal, D. (2016). How general are time preferences? Eliciting good-specific discount rates. Journal of Development Economics, 118:150–170.

Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2007). A practical solution to the pervasive problems of p-values. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 14(5):779–804.

Wellek, S. (2010). Testing statistical hypotheses of equivalence and noninferiority. Florida: CRC press.