ABS, MBS and CDO compared: an empirical analysis

Vink, Dennis (2007): ABS, MBS and CDO compared: an empirical analysis. Published in: The Journal of Structured Finance , Vol. 14, No. 2 (8 August 2008): pp. 27-45.

Abstract

The capital market in which asset-backed securities are issued and traded is composed of three main categories: ABS, MBS and CDOs. We were able to examine a total number of 3,466 loans (worth €548.85 billion) of which 1,102 (worth €163.90 billion) have been classified as ABS. MBS issues represent 1,782 issues (worth €320.83 billion), and 582 are CDO issues (worth €64.12 billion). We have investigated how common pricing factors compare for the main classes of securities. Due to the differences in the assets related to these securities, the relevant pricing factors for these securities should differ, too. Taking these three classes as a whole, we have documented that the assets attached as collateral for the securities differ between security classes, but that there are also important univariate differences to consider. We found that most of the common pricing characteristics between ABS, MBS and CDO differ significantly. Furthermore, applying the same pricing estimation model to each security class revealed that most of the common pricing characteristics associated with these classes have a different impact on the primary market spread exhibited by the value of the coefficients. The regression analyses we performed suggest that ABS, MBS and CDOs are in fact different instruments, as implied by the differences in impact of the pricing factors on the loan spread between these security classes.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Institution: Nyenrode Business Universiteit
• Language: English
• Keywords: asset securitization; asset-backed securitisation; bank lending; default risk; risk management; spreads; leveraged financing
• Subjects: G - Financial Economics > G1 - General Financial Markets > G12 - Asset Pricing ; Trading Volume ; Bond Interest Rates; G - Financial Economics > G0 - General; G - Financial Economics > G2 - Financial Institutions and Services > G21 - Banks ; Depository Institutions ; Micro Finance Institutions ; Mortgages

References

Blum, L., DiAngelo, C., 1997. Structuring efficient asset-backed transactions. In: Bhattachary, A.K., Fabozzi, F.J. (Eds.), Asset-backed securities. Frank J. Fabozzi Associates, pp. 237-268.

Childs, P.D., Ott, S.H., Riddiough, T.J., 1996. The pricing of multiclass commercial mortgage-backed securities. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 31, 581-603.

Chow, G.C., 1960. Tests of equality between sets of coefficients in two linear regressions. Econometrica 28, 591-605.

Choudhry, M., Fabozzi, F.J., 2004. The Handbook of European Structured Financial Products. Wiley Finance.

Davidson, R., MacKinnon, J.G., 1993. Estimation and Inference in Econometrics. Oxford University Press, pp. 375-376.

DeMarzo, P.M. 2005. The pooling and tranching of securities: A model of informed intermediation. Review of Financial Studies 18, 1-35.

Elton, E.J., Gruber, M.J., Agrawal. D., Mann, C., 2001. Explaining the rate spread on corporate bonds. The Journal of Finance 56, 247-277.

Fabozzi, F.J., Roever, W.A., 2003. A primer on securitization. The Journal of Structured and Project Finance 9 (Summer), 5-19.

Firla-Cuchra, M., Jenkinson, T., 2006. Why are securitization issues tranched? Working Paper, Oxford University.

Fitch Ratings, 2004. Global criteria for collateralised debt obligations. Credit Products Criteria Report (September 13).

Helwege, J., Turner, C.M., 1999. The slope of the credit yield curve for speculative-grade issuers. The Journal of Finance 54, 1869-1885.

John, K., Lynch, A.W., Puri, M., 2003. Credit ratings, collateral, and loan characteristics: Implications for yield. Journal of Business 76, 371-407.

Kleimeier, S., Megginson, W.L., 2001. An empirical analysis of limited recourse project finance. Working Paper, University of Oklahoma, Michel F. Price College of Business.

Merton, R., 1974. On the pricing of corporate debt: The risk structure of interest rates. The Journal of Finance 29, 449-470.

Moody’s Investors Service, 2002. European ABS and WBS Market Summary. International Structured Finance Special Report.

Nomura, 2004. CDOs in plain English. Nomura Fixed Income Research.

Riddiough, T.J., 1997. Optimal design and governance of asset-backed securities. Journal of Financial Intermediation 6, 121-152.

Sarig, O., Warga, A., 1989. Some empirical estimates of the risk structure of interest rates. The Journal of Finance 44, 1351-1361.

Standard and Poor’s, 2006. In the emerging markets, securitization isn’t a commoditized asset. Structured Finance.

Structured Finance International. Securitizations of non-US assets - January 1, 1999 to March 31, 2005. In: SFI Data. Euromoney Institutional Investor.

The Bond Market Association, 2002. SEC Hearing on Credit Rating Agencies. Statement of The Bond Market Association.

White, H., 1980. A heteroscedasiticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroscedasticity. Econometrica 48, 817-838.