Does Gender Status Translate into Economic Participation of Women? Certain Evidence from Kerala

Kumar B, Pradeep (2020): Does Gender Status Translate into Economic Participation of Women? Certain Evidence from Kerala. Published in: Shanlax International Journal of Economics , Vol. 1, No. 9 (1 December 2020): pp. 50-56.

Abstract

Many indicators of gender inclusiveness show that Kerala has been much ahead of other states in ensuring the welfare of females. It needs to be reiterated that in the case of both education and health, women in Kerala stand quietly at the receiving ends as the beneficiaries rather than the agents of economic and social change. The women inclusive way of progress does not necessarily confine itself to the widening of education and health opportunities for women, but it largely and more positively depend on the effective participation of women in economic activities. It is disheartening that if we probe into the status of women from these yardsticks of ‘active’ economic participation, the picture of gender equality appears more discouraging in Kerala which has been acclaimed as a ‘model’ for not only other states in the country but also for other countries in the world. A secular decline in Work Participation Rate for women in labour market clearly shows that education does not aid women to add themselves to the labour market. Economists and sociologists offer many plausible explanations for this absconding nature of educated and skilled women from the labour market. The real gender inclusion and women empowerment will be fulfilled only when women start actively engaging in productive fields using their knowledge and entitlements.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Gender status, Women Empowerment, Work Force Participation, Active Agents, Unemployment, Decision Making, Economic Participation
• Subjects: A - General Economics and Teaching > A1 - General Economics > A10 - General

References

1.Bachelet, M. (2012, October 16). UN Women. Retrieved August 20, 2020, from www.unwomen.org: unwomen.org/en/news/stories/2012/10/power-women-as-drivers-of-growth-and-social-inclusion-speech-by-un-women-executive-director-mich

2.Balakrishnan, R. (2019, August 14). Herstory. Retrieved August 18, 2020, from https://yourstory.com/: yourstory.com/herstory/2019/08/india-government-schemes-women-empowerment-modi

3.Duarte, R., Sarasa, C., & Serrano, M. (2018). Structural change and female participation. Barcelona: Universitat de Barcelona.

4.Kelles-Viitanen, A., & Shrestha, A. (2011). Gender Equality and Social Inclusion. Nepal: United Nations Resident and Humanitarian Coordinator’s Office. 5. Nadkarni, S. (2012, May 22). https://cdn.todaysclinician.com. Retrieved August 17, 2020, from https://todaysclinician.com/gender-sensitisation-the-need-of-the-hour/

6.Spain, D., & Bianchi, S. M. (1999). Women in the labor market. Focus, 4-48.

7.Bayeh, E. (2016). The role of empowering women and achieving gender equality to the sustainable development of Ethiopia. Pacific Science Review B: Humanities and Social Sciences, 37-42.

8.Bianchi, S. M. (2012). Housework: Who did, does or will do it, and how much does it matter? Social Forces, 91, 55–63.

9.Blood, R. O., & Wolfe, D. M. (1960). Husbands and wives: The dynamics of married living. New York: Free Press.

10.Chacko, E. (2003). Marriage, development, and the status of women in Kerala, India. Gender and Development, 52-59.

11.Chaudhary, A. C. (2012). An analysis of different approaches to women empowerment: a case study of Pakistan. World Appl. Sci. J, 16(7), 971–980.

12.Coltrane, S. (2000). Research on household labor: Modeling and measuring the social embeddedness of routine family work. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62,1208-12322.

13.Follett, C. (2018, December 17). CATO Institute. Retrieved August 20, 2020, from https://www.cato.org/: https://www.cato.org/publications/policy-analysis/how-markets-empower-women-innovation-market-participation-transform

14.George, S. B. (2019, February 28). Gender gap in Wage, unemployment. Thiruvananthapuram: The Hindu.

15.GoK. (2018). Economic Review. Thiruvananthapuram: State Planning Board, Kerala.

16.Gulati, L. (1981). Profiles in Female Poverty. New Delhi: Hindustan Publishing Corporation.

17.Jay, S., & Nunn, R. (2018, April 10). How women are still left behind in the labor market. Retrieved August 15, 2020, from https://www.brookings.edu/: brookings.edu/blog/up-front/2018/04/10/how-women-are-still-left-behind-in-the-labor-market/

18.Kapur, R. (2019, January). Status of Women in Ancient India. Retrieved August 18, 2020, from https://www.researchgate.net/: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330220793_Status_of_Women_in_Ancient_India

19.Mirkin, H. (1984). The passive female the theory of patriarchy. American Studies, 39-57.

20.Prabhu, S. K., Sarker, P. C., & Radha, A. (1996). Gender-Related Development Index for Indian States: Methodological Issues. Economic and Political Weekly, WS 72- WS 79.

21.PTI. (2018). India ranks 108th in WEF gender gap index 2018. New Delhi: Economic Times.

22.Riaz, S. (2018). The impact of women’s education and employment on their empowerment: an empirical evidence from household level survey. Springer Quality and Quantity, 2855-2870.

23.Summers, L. (1994). Investing in All the People. Washington DC: World Bank.

24.Thirlwall, A. (2011). Economics of Development. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

25.Thomas, E. T. (1995, February 11). Educated Unemployment in Kerala: Some Socio-Economic Aspects. Economic and Political Weekly, pp. 325-326.