Lapatinas, Athanasios and Litina, Anastasia and Zanaj, Skerdilajda (2020): Environmental Culture and Economic Complexity.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_105067.pdf Download (210kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This paper establishes economic complexity as a powerful predictor of environmental attitudes. While the economic complexity index (ECI) has been associated with a series of economic outcomes, yet there has not been a link in the literature between ECI and environmental attitudes. This research pushes forward the hypothesis that economic complexity shapes cultural values and beliefs. We use a multilevel empirical analysis that associates aggregate values of the ECI, at the country level, with individual responses related to attitudes towards the environment. Our findings suggest that more complex economies are associated with: i) a higher likelihood to participate voluntarily in organizations targeting environmental protection; and ii) higher willingness to pay for the environment. To further reinforce our findings by ensuring identification we replicate the benchmark analysis using as a proxy of a country's level of economic complexity, the average ECI of the neighbouring countries (weighted by population and/or volume of trade) . With a similar intention, i.e., to mitigate endogeneity concerns as well as to further frame our findings as ``the cultural implications of ECI'' we replicate our analysis with a sample of second generation immigrants. The immigrant analysis, suggests that the level of economic complexity of the parents' country of origin, has a long-lasting effect on second generation immigrants' attitudes related to the environment. Because humankind’s attitudes and actions are of key importance for a sustainable future, a better understanding as to what drives environmental attitudes appears critical both for researchers and policy makers.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Environmental Culture and Economic Complexity |
English Title: | Environmental Culture and Economic Complexity |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Economic Complexity Index; Environmental Attitudes; Multilevel analysis; Migration |
Subjects: | O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights Z - Other Special Topics > Z1 - Cultural Economics ; Economic Sociology ; Economic Anthropology |
Item ID: | 105067 |
Depositing User: | Anastasia Litina |
Date Deposited: | 24 Aug 2021 05:49 |
Last Modified: | 24 Aug 2021 05:49 |
References: | Hidalgo, C.A.; Klinger, B.; Barabási, A.L.; Hausmann, R. The product space conditions the development of nations. Science 2007, 317, 482–487. Hidalgo, C.A.; Hausmann, R. The building blocks of economic complexity. proceedings of the national academy of sciences 2009, 106, 10570–10575. Ceccantoni, G.; Tarola, O.; Zanaj, S. Green Consumption and Relative Preferences in a Vertically Differentiated International Oligopoly. Ecological Economics 2018, 149, 129 – 139. Barringer, F. The new trophy home, small and ecological. The New York Times 2008. Bénabou, R.; Tirole, J. Incentives and Prosocial Behavior. American Economic Review 2006, 96, 1652–1678. doi:10.1257/aer.96.5.1652. Alesina, A.; Giuliano, P.; Nunn, N. On the Origins of Gender Roles: Women and the Plough *. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 2013, 128, 469–530. doi:10.1093/qje/qjt005. Giuliano, P. Living Arrangements in Western Europe: Does Cultural Origin Matter? Journal of the European Economic Association 2007, 5, 927–952. doi:10.1162/JEEA.2007.5.5.927. Fernández, R.; Fogli, A. Culture: An Empirical Investigation of Beliefs, Work, and Fertility. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 2009, 1, 146–77. doi:10.1257/mac.1.1.146. Falk, A.; Becker, A.; Dohmen, T.; Enke, B.; Huffman, D.; Sunde, U. Global Evidence on Economic Preferences*. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 2018, 133, 1645–1692. doi:10.1093/qje/qjy013. Gruber, J.; Hungerman, D.M. The Church Versus the Mall: What Happens When Religion Faces Increased Secular Competition?*. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 2008, 123, 831–862. doi:10.1162/qjec.2008.123.2.831. Di Tella, R.; Haisken-De New, J.; MacCulloch, R. Happiness adaptation to income and to status in an individual panel. Journal of Economic Behavior Organization 2010, 76, 834 – 852. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2010.09.016. Earle, J.S.; Gehlbach, S.; Sakova, Z.; Vecernik, J. Mass Privatization, Distributive Politics, and Popular Support for Reform in the Czech Republic. Site working paper no. 121, 1997. Luttmer, E.F.P.; Singhal, M. Culture, Context, and the Taste for Redistribution. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 2011, 3, 157–79. doi:10.1257/pol.3.1.157. Alesina, A.; Fuchs-Schündeln, N. Goodbye Lenin (or Not?): The Effect of Communism on People’s Preferences. American Economic Review 2007, 97, 1507–1528. doi:10.1257/aer.97.4.1507. Giuliano, P.; Spilimbergo, A. Growing up in a Recession. The Review of Economic Studies 2013, 81, 787–817. doi:10.1093/restud/rdt040. Algan, Y.; Cahuc, P. Inherited Trust and Growth. American Economic Review 2010, 100, 2060–92. doi:10.1257/aer.100.5.2060. Algan, Y.; Cahuc, P. Trust and Growth. Annual Review of Economics 2013, 5, 521–549. Guiso, L.; Sapienza, P.; Zingales, L. The Role of Social Capital in Financial Development. American Economic Review 2004, 94, 526–556. Algan, Y.; Guriev, S.; Papaioannou, E.; Passari, E. The European Trust Crisis and the Rise of Populism. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 2017, pp. 309–382. Algan, Y.; Cahuc, P. Civic Virtue and Labor Market Institutions. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 2009, 1, 111–45. doi:10.1257/mac.1.1.111. Alesina, A.; Ferrara, E.L. Who Trusts Others? Journal of Public Economics 2002, 85, 207–34. Simoes, A.J.G.; Hidalgo, C.A. The economic complexity observatory: An analytical tool for understanding the dynamics of economic development. Workshops at the twenty-fifth AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, 2011. Hausmann, R.; Hidalgo, C.A.; Bustos, S.; Coscia, M.; Simoes, A.; Yildirim, M.A. The atlas of economic complexity: Mapping paths to prosperity; Mit Press, 2014. Stojkoski, V.; Utkovski, Z.; Kocarev, L. The impact of services on economic complexity: Service sophistication as route for economic growth. PloS one 2016, 11, e0161633. Chávez, J.C.;Mosqueda,M.T.; Gómez-Zaldívar,M. Economic complexity and regional growth performance: Evidence from the Mexican Economy. Review of Regional Studies 2017, 47, 201–219. Hartmann, D.; Guevara, M.R.; Jara-Figueroa, C.; Aristarán, M.; Hidalgo, C.A. Linking Economic Complexity, Institutions, and Income Inequality. World Development 2017, 93, 75–93. BandeiraMorais, M.; Swart, J.; Jordaan, J. Economic Complexity and Inequality: Does Productive Structure Affect Regional Wage Differentials in Brazil? USE Working Paper series 2018, 18. Hartmann, D. Economic complexity and human development: How economic diversification and social networks affect human agency and welfare; Taylor & Francis, 2014. Kannen, P. Does foreign direct investment expand the capability set in the host economy? A sectoral analysis. The World Economy 2020, 43, 428–457. Adam, A.; Garas, A.; Katsaiti, M.S.; Lapatinas, A. Economic complexity and jobs: an empirical analysis. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 2021, forthcoming. Arif, I. Productive knowledge, economic sophistication, and labor share. World Development, 139, 105303. Lapatinas, A. The effect of the Internet on economic sophistication: An empirical analysis. Economics Letters 2019, 174, 35–38. Lapatinas, A.; Litina, A. Intelligence and economic sophistication. Empirical Economics 2019, 57, 1731–1750. Vu, T.V. Does LGBT inclusion promote national innovative capacity? Available at SSRN 2020. Balland, P.A.; Jara-Figueroa, C.; Petralia, S.G.; Steijn, M.P.; Rigby, D.L.; Hidalgo, C.A. Complex economic activities concentrate in large cities. Nature Human Behaviour 2020, 4, 248–254. Mealy, P.; Teytelboym, A. Economic complexity and the green economy. Research Policy 2020, p. 103948. Tacchella, A.; Cristelli, M.; Caldarelli, G.; Gabrielli, A.; Pietronero, L. A new metrics for countries’ fitness and products’ complexity. Scientific reports 2012, 2, 723. Leten, B.; Belderbos, R.; Van Looy, B. Technological diversification, coherence, and performance of firms. Journal of Product Innovation Management 2007, 24, 567–579. Rigby, D.L. Technological relatedness and knowledge space: entry and exit of US cities from patent classes. Regional Studies 2015, 49, 1922–1937. Kogler, D.F.; Essletzbichler, J.; Rigby, D.L. The evolution of specialization in the EU15 knowledge space. Journal of Economic Geography 2017, 17, 345–373. Guerrero, O.A.; Axtell, R.L. Employment growth through labor flow networks. PloS one 2013, 8, e60808. Neffke, F.; Henning, M. Skill relatedness and firm diversification. Strategic Management Journal 2013, 34, 297–316. Essletzbichler, J. Relatedness, industrial branching and technological cohesion in US metropolitan areas.Regional Studies 2015, 49, 752–766. Neffke, F.M.; Otto, A.; Weyh, A. Inter-industry labor flows. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 2017, 142, 275–292. Fankhauser, S.; Bowen, A.; Calel, R.; Dechezleprêtre, A.; Grover, D.; Rydge, J.; Sato, M. Who will win the green race? In search of environmental competitiveness and innovation. Global Environmental Change 2013, 23, 902–913. Hamwey, R.; Pacini, H.; Assunção, L. Mapping green product spaces of nations. The Journal of Environment & Development 2013, 22, 155–168. Fraccascia, L.; Giannoccaro, I.; Albino, V. Green product development: What does the country product space imply? Journal of cleaner production 2018, 170, 1076–1088. Can, M.; Gozgor, G. The impact of economic complexity on carbon emissions: evidence from France. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 2017, 24, 16364–16370. Neagu, O.; Teodoru, M.C. The relationship between economic complexity, energy consumption structure and greenhouse gas emission: Heterogeneous panel evidence from the EU countries. Sustainability 2019, 11, 497. Dogan, B.; Saboori, B.; Can, M. Does economic complexity matter for environmental degradation? An empirical analysis for different stages of development. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 2019, 26, 31900–31912. Neagu, O. The Link between Economic Complexity and Carbon Emissions in the European Union Countries: A Model Based on the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) Approach. Sustainability 2019, 11, 4753. Chu, L.K. Economic structure and environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: new evidence from economic complexity. Applied Economics Letters 2020, pp. 1–5. Lapatinas, A.; Garas, A.; Boleti, E.; Kyriakou, A. Economic complexity and environmental performance: Evidence from a world sample 2019. Inglehart, R. Public Support for Environmental Protection: Objective Problems and Subjective Values in 43 Societies. PS: Political Science and Politics 1995, 28, 57–72. Dunlap, R.E.; Mertig, A.G. Global Environmental Concern: An Anomaly for Postmaterialism. Social Science Quarterly 1997, 78, 24–29. Litina, A.; Moriconi, S.; Zanaj, S. The Cultural Transmission of Environmental Values: A Comparative Approach. World Development 2016, 84, 131–148. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.0. Hidalgo, C. Why information grows: The evolution of order, from atoms to economies; Basic Books, 2015. Albeaik, S.; Kaltenberg, M.; Alsaleh, M.; Hidalgo, C.A. Measuring the Knowledge Intensity of Economies with an Improved Measure of Economic Complexity. arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.05826 2017. Fernández, R. Women, Work, and Culture. Journal of the European Economic Association 2007, 5, 305–332. Jayadevappa, R.; Chhatre, S. International trade and environmental quality: a survey. Ecological Economics 2000, 32, 175 – 194. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00094-4. OECD. ITF Transport Outlook. Technical report, 2015. Tvinnereim, E., L.X..J.E. Public perceptions of air pollution and climate change: different manifestations, similar causes, and concerns. Climate Change 2017, 140, 2399–41. Otto, Adeline; Gugushvili, D. Eco-Social Divides in Europe: Public Attitudes towards Welfare and Climate Change Policies. Sustainability 2020, 12, 404. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/105067 |