The Paradox of Thrift in the Two-Sector Kaleckian Growth Model

Fanti, Lucrezia and Zamparelli, Luca (2020): The Paradox of Thrift in the Two-Sector Kaleckian Growth Model.

Abstract

We analyze the paradox of thrift in a two-sector Kaleckian growth model. We consider an economy with one consumption and one investment good, differential sectoral mark-ups, and profit rates equalization. We show that when the investment function depends on aggregate capacity utilization and on the aggregate profit share (the Bhaduri-Marglin investment function) the paradox of thrift in its growth version may fail if mark-ups are higher in the investment good sector. In this case, the reduction in the saving rate produces a reallocation of economic activity towards the investment good sector; the aggregate profit share rises and its positive effect on investment may offset the reduction in average capacity utilization if investment is relatively more sensitive to profitability than to the level of activity.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: two-sector growth model, paradox of thrift, Bhaduri-Marglin investment function
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D3 - Distribution > D33 - Factor Income Distribution; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E1 - General Aggregative Models > E11 - Marxian ; Sraffian ; Kaleckian

References

Amadeo, E. J., (1986a) `The role of capacity utilisation in long-period analysis', Political Economy, 2 (2), 147-185.

Amadeo, E. J., (1986b) `Notes on capacity utilisation, distribution and accumulation', Contributions Political Economy, 5(1), 83-94.

Beqiraj, E., L. Fanti and L. Zamparelli, (2019) `Sectoral composition of output and the wage share: The role of the service sector', Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 51, 1-10.

Bhaduri, A. and S. Marglin, (1990) `Unemployment and the real wage: the economic basis for contesting political ideologies', Cambridge Journal of Economics, 14(4), 375–393.

Dutt, A. K., (1988) 'Convergence and equilibrium in two sector models of growth, distribution and prices', Journal of Economics, 48(2), 135–158.

Dutt, A. K., (1990) Growth, Distribution and Uneven Development, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Dutt, A. K., (1997a) 'Profit-rate Equalization in the Kalecki-Steindl Model and the 'Over-determination' Problem', The Manchester School, 65(4), 443-451.

Dutt, A. K., (1997b) `Equilibrium, path dependence and hysteresis in post-Keynesian models', in P. Arestis and M. Sawyer, eds., Essays in Honour of G. C. Harcourt, Vol 2: Markets, Unemployment and Economic Policy, Routledge, 238-53.

Franke, R., (2000) `Optimal Utilization of Capital and a Financial Sector in a Classical Gravitation Process', Metroeconomica, 51 (1), 40-66.

Fujita, S., (2018) 'Mark-up pricing, sectoral dynamics, and the traverse process in a two-sector Kaleckian economy', Cambridge Journal of Economics, 43(2), 465-479. Harcourt, G. C. (1965) A two‐sector model of the distribution of income and the level of employment in the short run, The Economic Record, 41(93), pp. 103-117.

Keynes, J.M., (1936[1973]) The General Theory of Employment Interest and Money, London: Macmillan.

Kim, J.H. and M. Lavoie, (2017) 'Demand-led Growth and Long-run Convergence in a Neo-Kaleckian Two-sector Model', The Korean Economic Review, 33(1), 179-206.

Lavoie, M. and P. Ramirez-Gaston, (1997) 'Traverse in a Two-Sector Kaleckian Model of Growth with Target-Return Pricing', The Manchester School, 65 (2), 145-169.

Mandeville, B., (1714[1988]) The Fable of the Bees, Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.

Marglin, S., and A. Bhaduri, (1990) `Profit Squeeze and Keynesian Theory' in S. Marglin and J.B. Schor (eds.), The golden age of capitalism— reinterpreting the postwar experience. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Murakami, H., (2018) 'A two-sector Keynesian model of business cycles', Metroeconomica, 69(2), 444-472.

Nishi, H. (2019) 'A two-sector Kaleckian model of growth and distribution with endogenous productivity dynamics', Economic Modelling, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2019.09.032.

Park, M. S., (1995) `A Note on the `Kalecki-Steindl' Steady-state Approach to Growth and Income Distribution', The Manchester School, 63(3), 297-310.

Steedman, I., (1992) `Questions for Kaleckians', Review of Political Economy, 4(2),125-151.

Taylor, L., (1985) `A stagnationist model of economic growth', Cambridge Journal of Economics, 9(4), 381-403.