Being numerous does not yield efficiency - Productivity and entry-exit determinants in European business services

Kox, Henk L.M. and Van Leeuwen, George and Van der Wiel, Henry (2011): Being numerous does not yield efficiency - Productivity and entry-exit determinants in European business services.

Abstract

The paper investigates whether the poor productivity performance of the European business services industry is related to scale effects, market structure, and regulatory impacts. We apply parametric and nonparametric methods to estimate the productivity frontier and so obtain the distance of firms to the productivity frontier, using detailed industry-level panel data for 13 EU countries. Subsequently, we investigate how scale effects, market structure, and national regulation explain the distance with the productivity frontier. We find that that most scale advantages are exhausted after reaching a size of 20 employees. However, scale inefficiency is persistent over time, which suggests weak competitive selection. Market and regulation characteristics explain the persistence of X-inefficiency (sub-optimal productivity relative to the industry frontier). Entry and exit dynamics increase the productivity performance, while higher market concentration works out negatively. National regulatory differences also explain part of the productivity performance, especially if this affects exit behaviour and labour reallocation costs. The most efficient scale in European business services is achieved with close to 20 employees. Scale inefficiencies show a hump-shape pattern with strong potential scale-related productivity gains for the smallest firms, while the largest firms experience persistent scale-related diseconomies, suggesting that they operate in shielded monopolist markets. The smallest firms operate under competitive conditions, but they are too small to be efficient. And since this conclusion holds for about 95 out of every 100 European business services firms, this factor weighs heavily for the overall productivity performance of this industry.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: productivity; scale efficiency; market selection; stochastic frontier model; non-parametric DEA analysis; entry-exit regulation; business services; European Union.
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D2 - Production and Organizations > D22 - Firm Behavior: Empirical Analysis; D - Microeconomics > D2 - Production and Organizations > D24 - Production ; Cost ; Capital ; Capital, Total Factor, and Multifactor Productivity ; Capacity; L - Industrial Organization > L1 - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance; L - Industrial Organization > L1 - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance > L16 - Industrial Organization and Macroeconomics: Industrial Structure and Structural Change ; Industrial Price Indices; L - Industrial Organization > L5 - Regulation and Industrial Policy > L51 - Economics of Regulation; L - Industrial Organization > L8 - Industry Studies: Services > L84 - Personal, Professional, and Business Services

References

Abramovitz, M., 1956, Resource and Output Trends in the United States Since 1870, American Economic Review, 46 (May), 5-23.

Aghion, P., N. Bloom, R. Blundell, R. Griffith and P. Howitt, 2005, Competition and innovation: an inverted U relationship, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. CXX, #2, 701–728.

Antipi, P. and M.E. de la Serve, 2010, International comparisons of industry-based productivity levels in the financial and business service sectors, International Productivity Monitor, 19 (Spring), 66-81.

Antonelli, C., 1999, The microdynamics of technological change, Routledge, London.

Arnold, J., G. Nicoletti and S. Scarpetta, 2008, Regulation, Allocative Efficiency and Productivity in OECD Countries: Industry and Firm-Level Evidence, OECD Economics Dept. WP #616, OECD, Economics Department, Paris.

Axtell, R., 2006, Firm Sizes: Facts, Formulae, Fables and Fantasies, Center on Social and Economic Dynamics Working Paper No.44, Brookings, Washington.

Axtell, R., 2001, Zipf Distribution of U.S. Firm Sizes, Science, 293, 1818-1820.

Baker, P., and I. Miles, 2008, Study on industrial policy and services, Commissioned by the European Commission (DG Enterprise), ECORYS, Brussels / Rotterdam.

Barone, G. and F. Zingano, 2008, Service regulation and growth: evidence from OECD countries, Temi di Discussione #675, Banca d’Italia, Rome.

Bartelsman, E., J. Haltiwanger and S. Scarpetta, 2009, Cross-country differences in productivity: the role of allocation and selection, NBER WP15490, Cambridge MA.

Bartelsman, E., S. Scarpetta and F. Schivardi (2003), Comparative Analysis of Firm Demographics and Survival: Micro-Level Evidence for the OECD Countries, OECD Economics Dept. WP #348, OECD, Paris.

Bartelsman, E. and M. Doms, 2000, Understanding productivity: lessons from longitudinal microdata, Journal of Economic Literature, 83 (3), 569-594.

Battese, G. and T. Coelli, 1995, A Model for Technical Inefficiency Effects in a Stochastic Frontier Production Function for Panel Data, Empirical Economics, 20 (2), 325-32.

Bloch, H., G. Madden and S. Savage, 2001, Economies of scale and scope in Australian telecommunications, Review of Industrial Organization, 18 (2), 219-227.

Bourlès, R., G. Cette, J. Lopez, J. Mairesse, and G. Nicoletti, 2010, Do product market regulations in upstream sectors curb productivity growth? Panel data evidence for OECD countries, Documents de Travail 283, Banque de France.

Brown, C, J. Haltiwanger and J. Lane, 2006, Economic turbulence: is a volatile economy good for America?, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

Camacho, J. and M. Rodriguez, 2007, Integration and diffusion of knowledge-intensive services for industry performance, in: L. Rubalcaba and H. Kox (eds.), Business services in European economic growth, Palgrave MacMillan, Basingstoke, 128-143.

Cantner,U., 2007, Firms’ differential innovative success and market dynamics, Jena Economic Research Papers 2007-078, Jena.

Coelli, J., D. Prasada Rao, C. O'Donnell and G. Battese, 2005, An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis, Springer, New York.

Copenhagen Economics, 2005, Economic Assessment of the Barriers to the Internal Market in Services, commissioned by the European Commission, Copenhagen/ Brussels.

CSES, 2001, Barriers to trade in business services - Final report, Report commissioned by the European Commission, Centre for Strategy & Evaluation Services / European Commission, Brussels.

De Wit, G., 2005, Firm size distributions - an overview of steady-state distributions resulting from firm dynamic models, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 23, 423-450.

Diewert, E., 2005, Progress in service sector productivity management, International Productivity Monitor, 11, 57-69.

Dixit, A. and J. Stiglitz, 1977, Monopolistic competition and optimum product diversity, American Economic Review, 67, 297-308.

Djankov, S., R. La Porta, F. Lopez, and A. Shleifer, 2002, The regulation of entry, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117 (1), 1-37.

European Commission, 2003, The competitiveness of business-related services and their contribution to the performance of European enterprises, COM(2003) 747 final, Brussels.

Foster, L., J. Haltiwanger and C. Krizan, 1998, Aggregate productivity growth: lessons from microeconomic evidence, NBER Working Paper 6803, NBER, Cambridge MA.

Guerrieri, P., and B. Maggi, 2005, Technology diffusion, services and endogenous growth in Europe: is the Lisbon strategy useful?, IMF Working Paper WP/05/103, IMF, Washington.

Gust, C. and J. Marquez, 2002, International comparisons of productivity growth: the role of information technology and regulatory practices, International Finance Discussion Papers, #727, Federal Reserve System.

Hempell, T., G. van Leeuwen and H. van der Wiel, 2002, ICT, innovation and business performance in services: evidence for Germany and The Netherlands, OECD-DSTI, Paris.

Johnson, N., S. Kotz and N. Balakrishnan, 1994, Continuous univariate distributions, John Wiley, New York.

Jongen. E, and S. Visser, 2010, Exploring the ambiguous impact of employment protection on employment and productivity, CPB Discussion Paper 148, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis, The Hague.

Jovanovic, B., 1982, Selection and the evolution of industry, Econometrica, 50, 649-670.

Kumbhakar, S., S. Gosh, S. and J. McGuckin, 1991, A generalized production frontier approach for estimating determinants of inefficiency in US dairy firms, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 9, 279-286.

Klapper, L., L. Laeven and R. Rajan, 2006, Entry regulation as a barrier to entrepreneurship, Journal of Financial Economics, 82 (3), 591-629.

Kocsis, V., R. Lukach, B. Minne, V. Shestalova, N. Zubanov and H. van der Wiel, 2009, Relation between entry, exit and productivity, CPB Document 180, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis, The Hague.

Kox, H., 2004, The contribution of business services to aggregate productivity growth, in: G. Gelauff et al. (eds), Fostering productivity: patterns, determinant and policy implications, Contributions to Economic Analysis #263, Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, 243-264.

Kox, H., A. Lejour and R. Montizaan, 2004, The free movement of services within the EU, CPB Document 69, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis, The Hague.

Kox, H. and A. Lejour, 2006, The effect of the Services Directive on intra-EU trade and FDI, Revue Economique, 57 (4), 747-769.

Luttmer, E., 2007, Selection, growth and the size distribution of firms, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122 (3), 1103-1144. Nickell, S., 1996, Competition and corporate performance, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 104 (4), 724–746.

Nicoletti, G. and S. Scarpetta, 2003, Regulation, Productivity and growth: OECD evidence, OECD Economic Department Working paper 347, Paris.

Nordås, H. and H. Kox, 2009, Quantifying regulatory barriers to services trade, OECD Trade Policy Working Paper #85, OECD, Paris.

Olley, G. and A. Pakes, 1996, The dynamics of productivity in the telecommunications equipment industry, Econometrica, 64, 1263-1297.

Ospina, S. and M. Schiffbauer, 2010, Competition and Firm Productivity: Evidence from Firm-Level Data, IMF Working Paper #WP/10/67, Washington.

Oulton, N., 2001, Must the growth rate decline? Baumol's unbalance growth revisited, Oxford Economic Review, 53, 606-627.

O’Mahony, M., C. Castaldi, B. Los, E. Bartelsman, Y. Maimaiti and F. Peng, 2008, EUKLEMS – Linked Data: Sources and Methods, University of Birmingham.

Paterson, I., M. Fink, and A. Ogus, 2003, Economic impact of regulation in the field of liberal professions in different Member States - regulation of professional services, Institute for Advanced Studies, Vienna.

Pels, E., P. Nijkamp and P. Rietveld, 2003, Inefficiencies and scale economies of European airport operations, Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 39(5), 341-361.

Post, T., 1999, Finding the Frontier, Methodological Advances in Data Envelopment Analysis, Ph.D Thesis, Erasmus University, Rotterdam.

Rubalcaba, L. and H. Kox, 2007, Business services in European economic growth, Palgrave MacMillan, Basingstoke/ New York.

Schreyer, P., 2001, Measuring productivity - measurement of aggregate and industry-level productivity growth: OECD manual, OECD, Paris.

Schure, P. and R. Wagenvoort, 1999, Economies of scale and efficiency in European banking: new evidence, Economic and Financial Report 1999/01, European Investment Bank, Luxembourg

Shy, O., 2001, The economies of network industries, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Syverson, C., 2010, What Determines Productivity?, NBER Working Papers 15712, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

Silk, A. and E. Berndt, 2003, Scale and Scope Economies in the Global Advertising and Marketing Services Business, HBS Research Paper #03-10.

Triplett, J. and B. Bosworth, 2004, Productivity in the US services sector: new sources of economic growth, Brookings Institution Press, Washington.

Van Leeuwen, G., 2009, Innovation and performance - a collection of microdata studies, PhD dissertation, Technical University Delft.

Van der Wiel H., 2010, Competition and innovation: Together a tricky rollercoaster for productivity, PhD dissertation, CentER/Tilburg University.

Zellner, A., J. Kmenta, and J. Drèze, 1966, Specification and Estimation of Cobb-Douglas Production Function Models, Econometrica, 34 (4), 784 – 795.