Financial openness and the size of the public sector: a portfolio approach

Erauskin-Iurrita, Inaki (2008): Financial openness and the size of the public sector: a portfolio approach.

Abstract

A good deal of time has been devoted to whether more open economies have bigger governments (compensation hypothesis) or sma-ller ones (efficiency hypothesis). However, most of the research has been focused mainly on trade openness, which is clearly restrictive in a world with increasingly integrated financial markets. This paper offers an alternative view to the relationship between financial openness and some key economic variables (the size of the public sector, ...), based on a portfolio approach. A central result of the model is that an open economy implies a higher consumption-wealth ratio, lower growth, higher welfare, and a higher size of the public sector than in a closed economy due to the risk diversification that an open economy allows. The empirical evidence for 22 OECD countries in the period 1970-2004 broadly supports the main results of the model.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Financial openness; consumption-wealth ratio; growth; welfare; optimal size of the public sector
• Subjects: F - International Economics > F4 - Macroeconomic Aspects of International Trade and Finance > F41 - Open Economy Macroeconomics; F - International Economics > F4 - Macroeconomic Aspects of International Trade and Finance > F43 - Economic Growth of Open Economies

References

Alesina, A., Wacziarg, R., 1998. Openness, country size and government. Journal of Public Economics 69, 305-321.

Barro, R.J., 1990. Government spending in a simple model of endogenous growth. Journal of Political Economy 98, S103-S125.

Cameron, D., 1978. The expansion of the public economy: a comparative analysis, American Political Science Review, 72, 1243-61.

Campbell, J.Y., 1996. Understanding risk and return. Journal of Political Economy 104, 298-345.

Chiang, A.C., 1984. Fundamental methods of mathematical economics, Third edition. McGraw-Hill, Singapore.

Devereux, M.B., Smith, G.W., 1994. International risk sharing and economic growth. International Economic Review 35, 535-550.

Devereux, M.B., Saito, M., 1997. Growth and risk-sharing with incomplete international assets markets. Journal of International Economics 42, 453-481.

Islam, M.Q. (2004). The long run relationship between openness and government size, Applied Economics, 36, 995-1000.

Kamien, M.I., Schwartz, N.L., 1991. Dynamic optimization, Second edition. North-Holland, New York.

Kim, S.Y., 2007. Openness, external risk, and volatility: implications for the compensation hypothesis. International Organization 61, Winter, 181-216.

Kraay, A. and Ventura, J., 2000. Current accounts in debtor and creditor countries, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115, 1137-1166.

Lane, Philip R., and Milesi-Ferretti, G.M., 2007. The external wealth of nations mark II: Revised and extended estimates of foreign assets and liabilities, 1970-2004, Journal of International Economics, 73, 223-250. Data available from http://www.philiplane.org/papers.html.

Liberati, P., 2007. Trade openness, capital openness and government size. Journal of Public Policy, 27(2), 215-247.

Malliaris, A.G., Brock, W.A., 1982. Stochastic methods in economics and finance. North-Holland, Amsterdam.

Merton, R.C., 1969. Lifetime portfolio selection under uncertainty: the continuous-time case. Review of Economics and Statistics 51, 247-257, reprinted in: R.C. Merton, 1992. Continuous-time finance. Blackwell, Massachusetts, pp. 97-119.

Merton, R.C., 1971. Optimum consumption and portfolio rules in a continuous-time model. Journal of Economic Theory 3, 373-413, reprinted in: R.C. Merton, 1992, Continuous-time finance. Blackwell, Massachusetts, pp. 120-165.

Nehru, Vikram; and Ashok Dhareshwar (1993). "A new database on physical capital stock: sources, methodology and results", Revista de análisis económico, 8(1) June:37-59.

Obstfeld, M., 1992. Dynamic optimization in continuous-time economic models (a guide for the perplexed). Working paper, Department of Economics, University of California at Berkeley, available from website http://elsa.berkeley.edu/∼obstfeld/index.shtml.

Obstfeld, M., 1994. Risk-taking, global diversification, and growth. American Economic Review 84, 1310-1329.

Obstfeld, M., Taylor, A.M., 2004. Global capital markets. Integration, crisis, and growth. Cambridge University Press, United Kingdom.

Rodrik, D., 1998. Why do more open economies have bigger governments?. Journal of Political Economy 106, 997-1032.

Schulze, G., Ursprung, H.W., 1999. Globalization of the economy and the Nation State. The World Economy, 22, 295-352.

Turnovsky, S.J., 1996. Fiscal policy, growth, and the macroeconomic performance in a small open economy. Journal of International Economics 40, 41-66.

Turnovsky, S.J., 1997. International macroeconomic dynamics. MIT Press, Cambridge.

Turnovsky, S.J., 1999. On the role of government in a stochastically growing open economy. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 23, 873-908.

Turnovsky, S.J., 2000. Methods of macroeconomic dynamics, Second edition. MIT Press, Cambridge.