Xu, Lili and Lee, Sang-Ho (2021): Policy implications of the CSR in an international transportation market under subsidy.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_106259.pdf Download (372kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This paper focuses on the international transportation market in which a high-speed rail (HSR) firm competes with both the domestic and foreign airline firms providing differentiated transport services. We investigate and compare two types of corporate social responsibility (CSR)—mandatory and voluntary CSR—imposed on HSR under a government subsidy policy. We show that, when the transport substitutability is high (low) in a domestic travel leg, mandatory CSR is lower (higher) than voluntary CSR, and the optimal subsidy under mandatory CSR is lower (higher) than that under voluntary CSR. We also examine the effect of privatization policy of the HSR with transposition subsidy on welfare. We show that full privatization with CSR activities always improves social welfare under an appropriate subsidy, independent of the transport substitutability and types of CSR activities.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Policy implications of the CSR in an international transportation market under subsidy |
English Title: | Policy implications of the CSR in an international transportation market under subsidy |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | High-speed rail, corporate social responsibility, transportation subsidy, privatization policy, mixed market |
Subjects: | D - Microeconomics > D4 - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design > D43 - Oligopoly and Other Forms of Market Imperfection H - Public Economics > H2 - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue > H25 - Business Taxes and Subsidies L - Industrial Organization > L2 - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior > L21 - Business Objectives of the Firm L - Industrial Organization > L3 - Nonprofit Organizations and Public Enterprise > L33 - Comparison of Public and Private Enterprises and Nonprofit Institutions ; Privatization ; Contracting Out |
Item ID: | 106259 |
Depositing User: | Professor Sang-Ho Lee |
Date Deposited: | 25 Feb 2021 07:53 |
Last Modified: | 25 Feb 2021 07:53 |
References: | Boubakri, N., Cosset, J. C., & Saffar, W. (2013). The role of state and foreign owners in corporate risk-taking: Evidence from privatization. Journal of Financial Economics, 108(3), 641-658. Boubakri, N., Guedhami, O., Kwok C. & Wang, H. (2020). Is privatization a socially responsible reform? Journal of Corporate Finance, 56, 129-151. Brand, B., & Grothe, M. (2015). Social responsibility in a bilateral monopoly. Journal of Economics, 115(3), 275-289. Chen, R., El Ghoul, S., Guedhami, O., & Nash, R. (2018). State Ownership and Corporate Cash Holdings. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 53(5), 2293-2334. Dahlsrud, A. (2008). How corporate social responsibility is defined: An analysis of 37 definitions. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 15, 1-13. D’Alfonso, T., Jiang, C., & Bracaglia, V. (2015). Would competition between air transport and high-speed rail benefit environment and social welfare?. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 74, 118-137. D’Alfonso, T., Jiang, C., & Bracaglia, V. (2016). Air transport and high-speed rail competition: Environmental implications and mitigation strategies. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 92, 261-276. Fan, J., Wong, T., & Zhang, T. (2007). Politically connected CEOs, corporate governance, and Post-IPO performance of China's newly partially privatized firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 84(2), 330-357.. Fu, X., Zhang, A., & Lei, Z. (2012). Will China’s airline industry survive the entry of high-speed rail?. Research in Transportation Economics, 35(1), 13-25. Gatti, L., Vishwanath, B., Seele, P., & Cottier, B., (2019). Are we moving beyond voluntary CSR? Exploring theoretical and managerial implications of mandatory CSR resulting from the new Indian Companies Act. Journal of Business Ethics, 160, 961-972. Givoni, M. (2005). Aircraft and high speed train substitution: The case for airline and railway integration. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis. University College, London. Givoni, M., & Banister, D. (2007). Role of the railways in the future of air transport. Transportation Planning and Technology, 30(1), 95-112. Isaksson, L & Mitra, N. (2019). To legislate or not: That is the question – comparing CSR intent and effects in economies with voluntary CSR and legislated CSR. International Dimensions of Sustainable Management: Latest perspectives from corporate governance, responsible finance and CSR, edited by Schmidpeter, R., Capaldi, N., Idowu, S. O. & Herrera, A.S. Springer Janic, M. (1993). A mode of competition between high speed rail and air transport. Transportation Planning and Technology, 17 (1), 1-23. Jiang, C., & Zhang, A. (2014). Effects of high-speed rail and airline cooperation under hub airport capacity constraint. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 60, 33-49. Jiang, C., D’Alfonso, T., & Wan Y. (2017). Air-rail cooperation: Partnership level, market structure and welfare implications. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 104, 461-482. Khan, F.U., Zhang, J., & Dong, N. (2020), Does privatization matter for corporate social responsibility? Evidence from China. Eurasian Business Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40821-020-00154-w Kim, S. L., Lee, S. H., & Matsumura, T. (2019). Corporate social responsibility and privatization policy in a mixed oligopoly. Journal of Economics, 128(1), 67-89. Lambertini, L., & Tampieri, A. (2015). Incentives, performance and desirability of socially responsible firms in a Cournot oligopoly. Economic Modelling, 50, 40-48. Leal, M., Garcia, A., & Lee, S. H. (2018). The timing of environmental tax policy with a consumer-friendly firm. Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics, 59(1), 25-43. Lee, S.H. (2006). Welfare-improving privatization policy in the telecommunications industry. Contemporary Economic Policy, 24(2), 237-248. Lee, S.H., Sato, S., Matsumura, T., 2018. An analysis of entry-then-privatization model: Welfare and policy implications. Journal of Economics, 123(1), 71-88. Lee, S. H., & Park, C. H. (2019). Eco-firms and the sequential adoption of environmental corporate social responsibility in the managerial delegation. B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics, 19(1), 20170043. Liu, C. C., Wang, L. F., & Lee, S. H., (2015). Strategic environmental corporate social responsibility in a differentiated duopoly market. Economics Letters, 129, 108-111. Liu, J. H., Wang, Y. P., & Wu, L. S. (2011). The effect of guanxi on audit quality in China. Journal of Business Ethics, 103(4), 621-638. Ma, D., & Parish, W. L. (2006). Tocquevillian moments: Charitable contributions by Chinese private entrepreneurs. Social Forces, 85(2), 943-964. Mc Williams, A. &Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. The Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 117-127. Rothengatter, W. (2011). Competition between airlines and high-speed rail. In: Macario, R., van de Voorde, E. (Eds.), Critical Issues in Air Transport Economics and Business. Routledge, Oxford, UK. Socorro, M. P., & Viecens, M. F. (2013). The effects of airline and high speed train integration. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 49, 160-177. Waagstein, P. R. (2011). The mandatory corporate social responsibility in Indonesia: Problems and implications. Journal of Business Ethics, 98, 455-466. Xia, W., Jiang, C., Wang, K., Zhang, A. (2019). Air-rail revenue sharing in a multi-airport system: Effects on traffic and social welfare. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 121, 304-319. Xu, L., Fan, X., & Luan, W. (2020). Strategic corporate social responsibility of high-speed rail in China. China Economic Review, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2020.101499 Xu, L., & Lee, S. H. (2019). Tariffs and privatization policy in a bilateral trade with corporate social responsibility. Economic Modelling, 80, 339-351. Yang, H., & Zhang, A. (2012). Effects of high-speed rail and air transport competition on prices, profits and welfare. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 46(10), 1322-1333. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/106259 |