Florian, Violeta and Rusu, Marioara and Roşu, Elisabeta (2020): Ecological agriculture and biodiversity -relationships, congruences, objective conditions and perceptions of local actors. Published in: Agrarian Economy and Rural Development - Realities and Perspectives for Romania, 2020 , Vol. 11, No. ISSN 2668-0955, ISSN-L 2285-6803 (19 November 2020): pp. 211-218.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_106313.pdf Download (514kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Ecological agriculture provides a favourable framework for maintaining biodiversity by using economically and socially efficient friendly farming practices, generating modern attributes to rural communities and offering a different lifestyle and a different quality of life to the entire society. In two counties ranking in the top ten counties with areas cultivated under organic farming system, Cluj and Suceava, there are positive implications of these farming practices on biological diversity. Qualitative research methods were used to see the local/rural actors’ opinion on this topic: hybrid forum and in-depth-interviews. Farmers’ decisions to adopt sustainable practices for the environment, which provide positive externalities for biodiversity, water, soil and landscapes, are generated by business-specific economic and social rationality tending to achieve profit specific objectives by using traditional knowledge and skills from the intangible rural heritage.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Ecological agriculture and biodiversity -relationships, congruences, objective conditions and perceptions of local actors |
English Title: | Ecological agriculture and biodiversity -relationships, congruences, objective conditions and perceptions of local actors |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | ecological agriculture, biodiversity, rural communities, local actors. |
Subjects: | Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q1 - Agriculture > Q15 - Land Ownership and Tenure ; Land Reform ; Land Use ; Irrigation ; Agriculture and Environment R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R1 - General Regional Economics > R11 - Regional Economic Activity: Growth, Development, Environmental Issues, and Changes |
Item ID: | 106313 |
Depositing User: | Ana Ursu |
Date Deposited: | 04 Mar 2021 07:59 |
Last Modified: | 04 Mar 2021 07:59 |
References: | Ahmad F, Ahmad I, Khan MS., (2008). Screening of free-living rhizospheric bacteria for their multiple plant growth promoting activities. Microbiol Res 163(2):173–181. Ahn TS, Ka JO, Lee GH, Song HG., (2007). Microcosm study for revegetation of barren land with wild plants by some plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. J Microbiol Biotechnol 17(1):52–57. Babalola OO, Kirby BM, Le Roes-Hill M, Cook AE, Cary SC, Burton SG, Cowan DA., (2009). Phylogenetic analysis of actinobacterial populations associated with Antarctic Dry Valley mineral soils. Environ Microbiol 11(3):566–576. Baehler E, de Werra P, Wick LY, Pechy-Tarr M, Mathys S, Maurhofer M, Keel C., (2006). Two novel MvaT-like global regulators control exoproduct formation and biocontrol activity in root-associated Pseudomonas fluorescens, CHAO. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 19(3):313–329. Egamberdieva D., (2008). Plant growth promoting properties of rhizobacteria isolated from wheat and pea grown in loamy sand soil. Turk J Biol 32(1):9–15. Herschkovitz Y, Lerner A, Davidov Y, Rothballer M, Hartmann A, Okon Y, Jurkevitch E., (2005). Inoculation with the plant-growth-promoting rhizobacterium Azospirillum brasilense causes little disturbance in the rhizosphere and rhizoplane of maize (Zea mays). Microb Ecol 50(2):277–288. Lavania M, Chauhan PS, Chauhan SVS, Singh HB, Nautiyal CS., (2006). Induction of plant defense enzymes and phenolics by treatment with plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria Serratia marcescens NBRI1213. Curr Microbiol 52(5):363–368. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/106313 |