Wang, Ying (2021): Fund-raising and Allocation of Green Climate Fund: Taking Global Pareto Optimality and Fiscal Balance into Consideration.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_106861.pdf Download (821kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This study analyzes how the Green Climate Fund (GCF) should raise and allocate funds to achieve Pareto optimality in climate governance globally and its own fiscal balance. To make the conclusion more suitable for global climate governance analysis, this study modifies the hypothesis of the public externality model constructed by Baumol and Oates. Subsequently, by comparing the Pareto optimality model of global climate governance and market equilibrium model, this study infers the unique price conditions to induce the market to satisfy Pareto-optimality requirements. Subsequently, this study deduces the rules and the possible ways that must be followed for raising capital and allocating of GCFs while considering global Pareto optimality and fiscal balance. The study observes that the equilibrium results of the international climate game will not achieve the global Pareto-optimality and the financial balance of GCF simultaneously when each country anticipates that the GCF aims to Pareto optimality in climate governance globally and its own fiscal balance.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Fund-raising and Allocation of Green Climate Fund: Taking Global Pareto Optimality and Fiscal Balance into Consideration |
English Title: | Fund-raising and Allocation of Green Climate Fund: Taking Global Pareto Optimality and Fiscal Balance into Consideration |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Green Climate Fund; Capital Raising and Allocation; Global Pareto Optimality; Fiscal Balance; Mathematical Model |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C6 - Mathematical Methods ; Programming Models ; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling > C62 - Existence and Stability Conditions of Equilibrium H - Public Economics > H2 - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue > H23 - Externalities ; Redistributive Effects ; Environmental Taxes and Subsidies P - Economic Systems > P4 - Other Economic Systems > P45 - International Trade, Finance, Investment, and Aid Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q54 - Climate ; Natural Disasters and Their Management ; Global Warming Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q58 - Government Policy |
Item ID: | 106861 |
Depositing User: | Dr Ying Wang |
Date Deposited: | 29 Mar 2021 09:37 |
Last Modified: | 29 Mar 2021 09:37 |
References: | Antimiani, A., Costantini, V., Markandya, A., Martini, C., Palma, A., & Tommasino, M. C. (2014). A dynamic cge modelling approach for analyzing trade-offs in climate change policy options: the case of green climate fund. Seeds Working Papers. Carmen Marchiori, Simon Dietz & Alessandro Tavoni.(2017). Domestic Politics and the Formation of International Environmental Agreements[J]. Journal of Environmental Economics & Management, 81(1):115-131. Chander P. (2010). Cores of games with positive externalities. Core Discussion Papers, 30(1), 78–98. Chander P. (2017). Subgame-perfect cooperative agreements in a dynamic game of climate change ☆. Journal of Environmental Economics & Management, 84, 173-188. Chander P., & Wooders M. (2010). Subgame perfect cooperation in an extensive game. Vanderbilt University Department of Economics Working Papers. Cui Lianbiao. (2014). Design and Analysis of the Green Climate Fund. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Science and Technology of China). Cui Lianbiao, Song Malin, Zhu lei & Fan Ying. (2015). Financing Burden Sharing of the Green Climate Fund: A Perspective of the Combination of Historical Responsibility and Economic Ability. Journal of Finance and Economics, 41(3), 65-76. Cui, L. B., Zhu, L., Springmann, M., & Fan, Y. (2014). Design and analysis of the green climate fund. Journal of system science and systems engineering,23(3), 266-299. Fridahl, M., & Linnér, B. O. (2016). Perspectives on the green climate fund: possible compromises on capitalization and balanced allocation. Climate & Development, 8(2), 105-109. Grasso M. (2010). An ethical approach to climate adaptation finance. Global Environmental Change, 20(1), 74-81. Hof A. F., Elzen M. G. J. D. & Beltran A. M. (2011). Predictability, equitability and adequacy of post-2012 international climate financing proposals. Environmental Science & Policy, 14(6), 615-627. Lattanzio, R. K. (2011). International climate change financing: the green climate fund (gcf). Liu Qian, Nian Shuting & Wang Yao. (2015). Global Climate Finance Architecture and the Countermeasure of China. China Population, Resources and Environment, 25(10), 30-38. Li Zonglu. (2013). Analysis of financing ideas based on Special Drawing Rights . Henan Social Sciences, 21(1), 48-52. Manzanares, F. J. (2017). The green climate fund – a beacon for climate change action. Asian Journal of Sustainability & Social Responsibility, 1-5. Shen Lvye & Yang Pu. (2017). A brief analysis of the sources of long-term funds of the green climate fund. Economic Research Guide,(6), 61-63. Silverstein D. N. (2013). A globally harmonized carbon price framework for financing the green climate fund. Social Science Electronic Publishing. William J.Baumol & Wallace E.Oates.(1988). The theory of environmental policy(Second edition). Cambridge :Cambridge University Press. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/106861 |