Evaluation of Chinese provincial ecological well-being performance based on the driving effect decomposition

Wang, Shengyun and Zhang, Jingjing and Chu, Meifen and Li, Jing (2021): Evaluation of Chinese provincial ecological well-being performance based on the driving effect decomposition.

Abstract

The focus of this paper is three-fold. First, it recalculates the HDI and EFI, use the ratio of HDI and EF to build the EWP, then evaluate and analyze the EWP of China's provinces. Second, it develops a unique ecological well-being performance (EWP) model, which is divided into two driving effects: the well-being effect of economic growth and the ecological efficiency of economic growth. Third, using the Human Development Index (HDI), it measures the well-being effect and ecological efficiency of economic growth in 31 Chinese provinces. Based on the EWP results, it divides the Chinese provinces into five types from economic leading and upgrading to overall descending. The research results show that China's HDI has greatly improved from 2006 to 2016, displaying a trend of "Beijing, Tianjin and Shanghai take the lead in upgrading, and then the uprising trend expands from east to west". However, during the same period from 2006 to 2016, the growth rate of China's people’s well-being was significantly lower than that of per capita ecological footprint (EF), and the overall EWP declined. China's growth in people’s well-being is decoupled from economic growth, which indicates that China’s rapid economic growth was not followed by a similar progress in China’s people’s well-being. The above results suggest that China's total factor productivity (TFP) and green total factor productivity (GTFP) were improving but in different degrees during the above period. Other results show that, the carbon footprint has always been the largest component of China's EF, and the GTFP has always been lower than the TFP. According to the technology progress index and scale efficiency driving of change index, China’s provinces mainly focus on provincial TFP rather than GTFP. This paper suggests that the different types of provinces should adopt different strategies to improve their EWP in order to promote high-quality economic development.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Ecological Well-being Performance (EWP), Human Development Index (HDI), Ecological Footprint (EF), Green Total Factor Productivity (GTFP), Driving Effect
• Subjects: Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q57 - Ecological Economics: Ecosystem Services ; Biodiversity Conservation ; Bioeconomics ; Industrial Ecology

References

Bian, J., Ren, H., Liu, P., & Zhang, Y. (2018). Sustainable urbanization performance evaluation based on “origin” and “modernization” perspectives: A case study of Chongqing, China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 15, 1714. Bian, J., Ren, H., & Liu, P. (2020). Evaluation of urban ecological well-being performance in China: A case study of 30 provincial capital cities. J. Journal of Cleaner Production, 254. Chung, Y.H., Fare, R., & Grosskope, S. (1997). Productivity and undesirable outputs: A directional distance function approach. J. Environ. Manage., 51(3), 229-240. Daly, H.E. (1974). The world dynamics of economic growth: The economics of the steady state. J. Am Econ Rev., 64(2), 15-23. Feng, J., & Yuan, J. (2016). On Chinese regional ecological well-being performance and its influence factors. Forum Sci. Technol. China (3), 100-105. Fu, W., Zhao, J.Q. and Du.G.Z. (2014). The evaluation of resource sustainable utilization—based on empirical analysis of resources welfare index. Journal of Natural Resources, Vol.29 (11), pp. 1902-1915. Huo, T., Hong, R., Zhang, X., Cai, W., Wei, F., Nan, Z., & Xia, W. (2018). China's energy consumption in the building sector: A Statistical Yearbook-Energy Balance Sheet based splitting method. J. Clean. Prod., 185, 665-679. Ji, Q., Li, C., & Jones, P. (2017). New green theories of urban development in China. Sustainable Cities Soc., 30, 248-253. Jorgenson, A.K., & Dietz, T. (2015). Economic growth does not reduce the ecological intensity of human well-being. J. Sustainability Science, 10(1), 1-8． Klugman, J., Rodríguez, F., & Choi, H.J. (2011). The HDI 2010: New controversies, old critiques. J. Econ. Inequal., 9 (2), 249-288. Knight, K.W., & Rosa, E.A. (2011). The environmental efficiency of well-being: A cross-national analysis. Soc. Indic. Res., 40(3), 931-949. Kumar, S. (2006). Environmentally sensitive productivity growth: A global analysis using Malmquist-Luenberger Index. J. Ecological economics, 56(4), 280-293. Li, J., Luo, Y. & Wang, S.Y. (2019). Spatial effects of economic performance on the carbon intensity of human well-being: The environmental Kuznets curve in Chinese provinces. J. Journal of Cleaner Production, 233, 681-694. Lin, J.Y. (2013). Demystifying the Chinese economy. Aust. Econ. Rev. 46, 259-268. Munasinghe, M., & Mcneely, J. (1995). Key concepts and terminology of sustainable development. In M. Munasinghe & W. Shearer (Eds.), Defining and Measuring Sustainability: The biogeophysical foundations (pp.19-56). Washington DC: World Bank. Obrist, D., Kirk, J.L., Zhang, L., Sunderland, E.M., Jiskra, M., & Selin, N.E. (2018). A review of global environmental mercury processes in response to human and natural perturbations: Changes of emissions, climate, and land use. Ambio, 47, 116-140. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (1998). Eco-efficiency. OECD Publishing. Pirgmaier, E. (2017). The neoclassical trojan horse of steady-state economics. Ecol. Econ., 133, 52-61. Qi, P., Xu, Y.D., & Deng, L.N. (2017). A review of ecological well-being performance study home and abroad. J, Journal of Shenyang University of Technology (Social Science Edition), 10(6), 521-526. Rees, W.E. (1992). Ecological footprints and appropriated carrying capacity: What urban economics leaves out. J. Environ Urban, 4(2), 121-130. Sen, A. (1989). Development as capability expansion. J, Journal of Development Planning, 19, 41-58. Shi, D. and Wang., J.J. (2016). Measurement and evaluation of China’s ecological pressure and ecological efficiency based on ecological footprint. J. China Industrial Economics, 5, 5-21. Tapio, P. (2005). Towards a theory of decoupling: Degrees of decoupling in the EU and the case of road traffic in Finland between 1970 and 2001. Transp. Policy, Vol. 12, pp. 137–151. Toth, G., & Szigeti, C. (2016). The historical ecological footprint: From over-population to over-consumption. Ecol. Indic., 60, 283-291. Teixidó-Figueras, J., Duro, J.A. (2014). Spatial Polarization of the Ecological Footprint Distribution, Ecological Economics, Vol. 104 (3), pp.93–106 UNDP (1990). Human development report 1990: Concept and measurement of human development. New York. UNDP (2016). China national human development report 2016. China Publishing Group Corporation. Wackernagel, M., Onisto, L., & Bello, P. (1997). Ecological footprints of nations: How much nature do they have? [Brochure]. International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives. Wang, Q., Zhao, Z., Shen, N., & Liu, T. (2015). Have Chinese cities achieved the win-win between environmental protection and economic development? From the perspective of environmental efficiency. Ecol. Indicat., 51, 151-158. Wang, S.Y., Luo, Y.T., Han, Y.J. and Li, J. (2018). Regional difference and determinants of human well-being in China: Based on the analysis of human development index. Progress in Geography, Vol. 37 (8), pp. 1150-1158. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (1998). United Nations Environment Program. Eco-efficiency and cleaner production: Charting the course to sustainability. Geneva: WBCSD. Yue, S., Yang, Y., & Pu, Z. (2017). Total factor ecology efficiency of regions in China. Ecol. Indicat., 73, 284-292. Zhang, S., Zhu, D.J., Shi, Q.H., and Cheng, M.W., (2018). Which countries are more ecologically efficient in improving human well-being? An application of the index of ecological well-being performance. J. Resour Conserv Recycl., 129, 112-119. Zhang, Y., Chen, X., Wu, Y., Shuai, C., and Shen, L. (2019). The environmental Kuznets curve of CO2 emissions in the manufacturing and construction industries: A global empirical analysis. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 79, 106303. Zhu, D.J. (2013). Beyond growth: What are differences between sustainable development economics and neoclassical Economics. J. Academic Monthly, 10, 79-89.