Islam, Shahidul and Tanasiuk, Evan (2012): Differential response on pre- and post-disclosed committed inducements in a face to face interview. Published in: Journal of Business and Behavioral Sciences , Vol. 25, No. 1 (2013): pp. 69-81.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_107276.pdf Download (184kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Inducements of different forms and at different stages are used for motivating people to participate in human subject research. Although it is accepted that inducements, in general, play a positive role in increasing participation rate, there are exceptions. Inducements may contaminate the quality of research findings or may even reduce response rate in some circumstances. If the research project is purely for public goods, the researcher does not have any intention of personal gain, and that message is clearly conveyed to the prospective respondents, a material inducement may not be needed. Under such a situation, peoples' altruistic behavior takes precedence over psychological egoism.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Differential response on pre- and post-disclosed committed inducements in a face to face interview |
English Title: | Differential response on pre- and post-disclosed committed inducements in a face to face interview |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Response rate, inducement, incentives, survey incentive |
Subjects: | D - Microeconomics > D1 - Household Behavior and Family Economics D - Microeconomics > D1 - Household Behavior and Family Economics > D19 - Other Y - Miscellaneous Categories > Y9 - Other |
Item ID: | 107276 |
Depositing User: | Shahidul Islam |
Date Deposited: | 28 Apr 2021 13:32 |
Last Modified: | 28 Apr 2021 13:32 |
References: | Benabou, R. & Tirole, J. (2006). Incentives and prosocial behavior. The American Economic Review, 96(5):1652-1678. Cannell, C. F. and Henson, R. (1974). Incentives, motives, and responses bias. Annals of Economic and Social Measurement. 3:307-317. Cobanoglu, C. & Cobanoglu, N. (2003). The effect of incentives in web surveys: application and ethical considerations. International Journal of Marketing Research. 45(4) :475-48 8. Davem, M.; Rockwood, T. H.; Sherrod, R. & Campbell, S. (2003). Prepaid monetary incentives and data quality in face-to-face interviews: Data from the 1996 survey of income and program participation incentive experiment. Public Opinion Quarterly, 67:139-174. Deutskens, E.; de Ruyter, K.; Wetzels, M., & Oosterveld, P. (2004). Response rate and response quality of internet-based surveys: an experimental study. Marketing Letters, 15(l):21-36. Dillman, D. (1991). The design and administration of mailed surveys. Annual Review of Sociology, 17:225-249. Eyerman, J.; Bowman, K.; Butler, D., & Wright, D. (2005). The differential impact of incentives on refusals: results from the 2001 national household survey on drug abuse incentive experiment. Journal of Economic and Social Measurement. 30:157-169. Frey, B. S. & Jegen, R. (2001). Motivation crowding theory. Journal of Economic Surveys, 15(5):589-511. Frey, B. S. & Oberholzer-Gee, F. (1997). The cost of price incentives: an empirical analysis of motivation crowding-out. The American Economic Review, 87(4):746-755. Gneezy, U.; Meier, S., & Rey-Biel. (2011). When and why incentives (don't) work to modify behavior. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 25(4): 191-210. Goritz, A. S. (2006). Incentives in web studies: methodological issues and review. International Journal of Internet Science, l(l):58-70. Grady, C. (2001). Money for research participants: does it jeopardize informed consent? The American Journal of Bioethics. l(2):40-44. Hager, M. A.; Wilson, S.; Poliak, T. H., & Rooney, P. M. (2003). Response rates for mail surveys of nonprofit organizations: a review and empirical test. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly. 32:252-267. Hansen, R. A. (1980). A self-perception interpretation of the effect of monetary and nonmonetary incentive on mail survey respondents behavior. Journal of Marketing Research, 17:77-83. Heyman, J. & Ariely, D. (2004). Effort for payment: a tale of two markets. Psychological Science. 15(11):787-793. James, K. M.; Ziegenfuss, J. Y.; Tilburt, J. C.; Harris, A. M., & Beebe, T. J. (2011). Getting physicians to respond: the impact of incentive type and timing on physician survey response rates. Health Services Research, 46(l):232-242. Kanaan, R. A.; Wessely, S. C., & Armstrong, D. (2010). Differential effects of pre and post-payment on neurologists' response rates to a postal survey. BMC Neurobiology, 10:100 Koloski, N. A.; Talley, N. J.; Boyce, P. M., & Morris-Yates, A. D. (2001). The effects of questionnaire length and lottery ticket inducement on the response rate in mail surveys. Psychology and Health. 16:67-75. Kube, S.; Maréchal, M. and Puppe, C. (2008). The currency of reciprocity - gift-exchange in the workplace. University of Zurich, IEW Working Paper No. 377. Kulka, R. A.; Eyerman, J., & McNeeley, M. E. (2005). The use of monetary incentives in federal surveys on substance use and abuse. Journal of Economic and Social Measurement. 30:233-249. Mazar, N.; On, A., & Ariely, D. (2008). The dishonesty of honest people: a theory of self-concept maintenance. Journal of Marketing Research. 45(6):633-644. Peck, J. K. & Dresch, S. P. (1981). Financial incentives, survey response, and sample representativeness: Does money matter? Review of Public Data Use. 9(4):245-266. Read, D. (2005). Monetary incentives, what are they good for? Journal of Economic Methodology, 12(2):265-276. Ritter, G.; Reil, S.; Gadzuk, A., & Krenzke, T. (2005). Incentive effects on cooperation rates and sample composition in the alcohol and drug services study. Journal of Economic and Social Measurement. 30:171-189. Sánchez-Femández, J.; Muñoz-Leiva, F.; Montoro-Rios, F. J., & Ibáñez-Zapata, J. A.. (2010). An analysis of the effect of pre-incentives and post-incentives based on draws on response to web surveys. Quality and Quantity: International Journal of Methodology. 44(2):357-373. Shaw, M. J.; Beebe, T. J.; Jensen, H. L., & Adlis, S. A. (2001). The use of monetary incentives in a community survey: impact on response rates, data quality, and cost. Health Services Research. 35(6): 1339-46. Shuttleworth, F. K. (1931). A study of questionnaire technique. Journal of Educational Psychology, 22:652-658. Szelenyi, K.; Bryant, A. N., & Lindholm, J. A. (2005). What money can buy: examining the effects of prepaid monetary incentives on survey response rates among college students. Educational Research and Evaluation. 11(4):3 85-404. Talukder, M. M. H. (2011). Ethics in healthcare: inducement and human subjects. AGATHOS: An International Review of the Humanities and Social Sciences. 2:118-128. Trussel, N. & Lavrakas, P. J. (2004). The influence of incremental increases in token cash incentives on mail survey response: is there an optimal amount? Public Opinion Quarterly. 68(3):349-367. Warriner, K.; Goyder, J.; Gjertsen, H., & Mcspurren, K. (1996). Charities, no; lotteries, no; cash, yes. Public Opinion Quarterly. 60:542-562. Willimack, D. K.; Schuman, H.; Pennell, B. E., & Lepkowski, J. M. (1995). Effects of a prepaid nonmonetary incentive on response rates and response quality in a face-to-face survey. Public Opinion Quarterly. 59:76-92. Wright, D.; Bowman, K.; Butler, D., & Eyerman, J. (2005). Non-response bias from the national household survey on drug abuse incentive experiment. Journal of Economic and Social Measurement. 30:219-231. Zangeneh, M.; Barmaki, R.; Gibson-Wood, H.; Levitan, M. J.; Romeo, R., & Bottoms, J. (2008). Research compensation and lottery: an outline empirical pilot study. International Journal of Mental Health Addiction, 6:517-521. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/107276 |