Does financial development reinforce environmental footprints? Evidence from emerging Asian countries

Sharma, Rajesh and Sinha, Avik and Kautish, Pradeep (2021): Does financial development reinforce environmental footprints? Evidence from emerging Asian countries. Published in: Environmental Science and Pollution Research , Vol. 28, (2021): pp. 9067-9083.

Abstract

In the preceding two decades, the expansion of financial services has played a vital role in pursuing economic growth agendas in the developing Asian nations. However, its harmful effect on environmental quality cannot be denied. In this backdrop, in the present study, we investigated whether the financial sector development moderated the ecological footprint, carbon footprint, and land footprint in the eight developing nations of South and Southeast Asia from 1990-2015. In doing so, we included the per capita income, energy solutions, and trade expansions as determinants of the ecological indicators. The results of the second-generation unit root tests and Westerlund’s cointegration test reported the long-run stability and cointegration, respectively. To navigate the possible cross-country dependency, we employed the cross-sectional augmented autoregressive distributed lag approach (CS-ARDL). The results confirmed that per capita income, energy solutions, trade expansion, and financial sector development invigorated the ecological footprint, carbon footprint, and land footprint in the long run. Further, it is reported that the development in the financial sector has a significant moderating impact on the nexus between energy and environmental footprints. In other words, the financial sector development drove the association between the overall environmental quality and energy solutions in the long run. Similarly, we observed that the financial sector development worked as a significant mediator between environmental proxies and trade expansion. By including the ecological footprint, carbon footprint, and land footprint as environmental proxies, the study provides the wider environmental spectrum. Based on the outcomes of the study, we proposed a novel scheme, which may help to address the harmful environmental impacts of the financial sector development in the selected developing nations.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Ecological footprint; carbon footprint; land footprint, South Asian countries; Southeast Asian countries; per capita income; energy
• Subjects: Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics

References

Al-Mulali, U., Weng-Wai, C., Sheau-Ting, L., Mohammed, A., 2015. Investigating the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis by utilizing the ecological footprint as an indicator of environmental degradation. Ecological Indicators 48, 315-323.

Alola, A. A., Arikewuyo, A.O., Ozad, B., Alola, U.V., Arikewuyo, H.O., 2019. A drain or drench on biocapacity? Environmental account of fertility, marriage, and ICT in the USA and Canada. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 27, 4032-4043.

Alola, A., Bekun, F., Sarkodie, S., 2019. Dynamic impact of trade policy, economic growth, fertility rate, renewable and non-renewable energy consumption on ecological footprint in Europe. Science of the Total Environment 685, 702-709.

Álvarez, A., Balsalobre, D., Shahbaz, M., Cantos, J., 2017. Energy innovation and renewable energy consumption in the correction of air pollution levels. Energy Policy 105, 386-397.

Anderson, G., Raissi, M., 2018. Corporate indebtedness and low productivity growth of Italian firms. IMF Working Paper No. WP/18/33, International Monetary Fund, European Department.

Ang, J., 2008. CO2 emissions, research and technology transfer in China. Ecological Economics 68 (10), 4772-4778.

Ang, J., 2008. Economic development, pollutant emission and energy consumption in Malaysia. Journal of Policy Modeling 30 (2), 271-278.

Baloch, M., Danish, Meng, F., Zhang, J., Xu, Z., 2018. Financial instability and CO2 emissions: the case of Saudi Arabia. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 25, 26030–26045.

Beck, T., Demirguc-Kunt, A., Levine, R., 1999. A new database on financial development and structure. Discussion Paper No. 2, World Bank.

Bekhet, H., Matar, A., Yasmin, T., 2017. CO2 emissions, energy consumption, economic growth, and financial development in GCC countries: dynamic simultaneous equation models. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 70, 117-132.

Bello, M., Solarin, S., Yen, Y., 2018. The impact of electricity consumption on CO2 emission, carbon footprint, water footprint and ecological footrprint: the role of hydropower in an emerging economy. Journal of Environmental Management 219, 218-230.

Breusch, T., Pagan, A., 1980. The lagrange multiplier test and its applications to model specification in econometrics. The Review of Economic Studies 47 (1), 239-253.

Destek, M., Aslan, A., 2020. Disaggregated renewable energy consumption and environmental pollution nexus in G-7 countries. Renewable Energy 151, 1298-1306.

Destek, M., Sinha, A., 2020. Renewable, non-renewable energy consumption, economic growth, trade openness and ecological footprint: evidence from organisation for economic Co-operation and development countries. Journal of Cleaner Production 242, 118537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118537.

Dogan, E., Seker, F., 2016. The influence of real output, renewable and non-renewable energy, trade and financial development on carbon emissions in the top renewable energy countries. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 60, 1074-1085.

Ebohon, O., 1996. Energy, economic growth and causality in developing countries: a case study of Tanzania and Nigeria. Energy Policy 24 (5), 447-453.

Edoja, G.C., 2017. Effect of economic growth on CO2 emission in developing countries: evidence from a dynamic panel threshold model. Cogent Economics & Finance 5 (1379239), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2017.1379239.

Faisal, F., Türsoy, T., Reşatoğlu, N., 2016. Energy consumption, electricity, and GDP causality; the case of Russia, 1990-2011. Procedia Economics and Finance 39, 653-659.

Fosten, J., Morley, B., Taylor, T., 2012. Dynamic misspecification in the environmental Kuznets curve: evidence from CO2 and SO2 emissions in the United Kingdom. Ecological Economics 76, 25-33.

Ghita, S., Saseanu, A., Gogonea, R.-M., Huidumac-Petrescu, C.-E., 2018. perspectives of ecological footprint in European context under the impact of information society and sustainable development. Sustainability 10 (3224), 1-25. doi:10.3390/su10093224.

Gill, A., Hassan, S., Haseeb, M., 2019. Moderating role of financial development in environmental Kuznets: a case study of Malaysia. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 26, 34468–34478.

Herrmann, I., Hauschild, M., 2009. Effects of globalisation on carbon footprints of products. CIRP Annals 58 (1), 13-16.

Hettige, H., Mani, M., Wheeler, D., 2000. Industrial pollution in economic development: the environmental Kuznets curve revisited. Journal of Development Economics 62 (2), 445-476.

Hou, Y., Iqbal, W., Shaikh, G., Iqbal, N., Solangi, Y., Fatima, A., 2019. Measuring energy efficiency and environmental performance: a case of South Asia. Processes 7 (325), 1-20. doi:10.3390/pr7060325.

Hubacek, K., Baiocchi, G., Feng, K., Castillo, R., Sun, L., Xue, J., 2017. Global carbon inequality. Energy, Ecology and Environment 2, 361-369.

IEA. (2019). Southeast Asia Energy Outlook 2019. Country report — October 2019, IEA, Paris. Available at: https://www.iea.org/reports/southeast-asia-energy-outlook-2019.

Ike, G., Usman, O., Sarkodie, S., 2020. Fiscal policy and CO2 emissions from heterogeneous fuel sources in Thailand: evidence from multiple structural breaks cointegration test. Science of the Total Environment 702, 134711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134711.

IMF., 2003. Foreign direct investment in emerging market countries. Report of the Working Group of the Capital Markets Consultative Group, International Monetary Fund.

IMF., 2017. South Asia: Continued Robust Growth, South Asia Regional Update. Available at: www.imf.org/~/media/Files/Countries/ResRep/IND/2017/051517-south-asia-continued-robust-growth.ashx (accessed 15 December 2019), International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC.

Iwata, H., Okada, K., Samreth, S., 2012. Empirical study on the determinants of CO2 emissions: evidence from OECD countries. Applied Economics 44 (27), 3513-3519.

Javid, M., Sharif, F., 2016. Environmental Kuznets curve and financial development in Pakistan. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 54, 406-416.

Jenkins, H., Katircioglu, S., 2010. The bounds test approach for cointegration and causality between financial development, international trade and economic growth: the case of Cyprus. Applied Economics 42 (13), 1699-1707.

Kanjilal, K., Ghosh, S., 2013. Environmental Kuznets curve for India: evidence from tests for cointegration with unknown structural breaks. Energy Policy 56, 509-515.

Katircioğlu, S., Taşpinar, N., 2017. Testing the moderating role of financial development in an environmental Kuznets curve: empirical evidence from Turkey. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 68, 572-586.

Kuznets, S., 1955. Economic growth and income inequality. The American Economic Review 45 (1), 1-28.

Levin, A., Lin, C., Chu, J., 2002. Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite sample properties. Journal of Econometrics 108 (1), 1-24.

Levin, R., Loayza, N., Beck, T., 2000. Financial intermediation and growth: causality and causes. Journal of Monetary Economics 46, 31-77.

Liu, Y., 2013. Energy production and regional economic growth in China: a more comprehensive analysis using a panel model. Energies 6 (3), 1409-1420.

Llorca, M., Meunié, A., 2009. SO2 emissions and the environmental Kuznets curve: the case of Chinese provinces. Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies 7 (1), 1-16. 10.1080/14765280802604656.

Mazur, A., Phutkaradze, Z., Phutkaradze, J., 2015. Economic growth and environmental quality in the European Union countries – is there evidence for the environmental Kuznets curve? International Journal of Management and Economics 45, 108-126.

Meadows, D., Randers, J., Meadows, D., 1972. The Limits to Growth; A Report for the Club of Rome's Project on the Predicament of Mankind. Universe Books, New York.

Moghadam, H., Lotfalipour, M., 2014. Impact of financial development on the environmental quality in Iran. Chinese Business Review 13 (9), 537-551.

Munir, A., Lean, H., Smyth, R., 2020. CO2 emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in the ASEAN-5 countries: a cross-sectional dependence approach. Energy Economics 85, 104571. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988319303664#!

OECD., 2018. Economic outlook for Southeast Asia, China and India 2018: fostering growth through digitalisation. Paris, available at: http://dx.doi.org/9789264286184-en: OECD Publishing.

OECD., 2019. Economic outlook for Southeast Asia, China and India 2019: towards smart urban transportation. OECD iLibrary 19 (1), https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/development/economic-outlook-for-southeast-asia-china-and-india-2019_saeo-2019-en.

Ozturk, I., Acaravci, A., 2013. The long-run and causal analysis of energy, growth, openness and financial development on carbon emissions in Turkey. Energy Economics 36, 262-267.

Pesaran, M., 2004. General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels. Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 0435, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.

Rahman, S., Wijayatunga, P., Gunatilake, H., Fernando, P., 2011. Energy trade in South Asia opportunities and challenges. Publication Stock No. BKK124531, Asian Development Bank, Manila, Philippines.

Riti, J., Shu, Y., Song, D., Kamah, M., 2017. The contribution of energy use and financial development by source in climate change mitigation process: a global empirical perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production 148, 882-894.

Sabir, S., Gorus, M., 2019. The impact of globalization on ecological footprint: empirical evidence from the South Asian countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 26, 33387–33398.

Sadorsky, P., 2010. The impact of financial development on energy consumption in emerging economies. Energy Policy 38, 2528-2535.

Shahbaz, M., Mahalik, M., Loganathan, N., 2015. Does globalization impede environmental quality in India? Ecological Indicators 52, 379-393.

Shahbaz, M., Sinha, A., 2019. Environmental Kuznets Curve for CO2 emission: a survey of empirical literature. Journal of Economic Studies 46 (1), 106-168.

Shahbaz, M., Balsalobre-Lorente, D., Sinha, A., 2019. Foreign direct investment–CO2 emissions nexus in Middle East and North African countries: importance of biomass energy consumption. Journal of Cleaner Production 217, 603-614.

Shahbaz, M., Hoang, T.H., Mahalik, M.K., Roubaud, D., 2017. Energy consumption, financial development and economic growth in India: new evidence from a nonlinear and asymmetric analysis. Energy Economics 63, 199-212.

Shahbaz, M., Hye, Q., Tiwari, A., Leitão, N., 2013. Economic growth, energy consumption, financial development, international trade and CO2 emissions in Indonesia. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 25, 109-121.

Shahbaz, M., Lean, H., Shabir, M., 2012. Environment Kuznets curve hypothesis in Pakistan: cointegration and Granger causality. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 33, 537-544.

Shahbaz, M., Mallick, H., Kumar, M., Sadorsky, P., 2016. The role of globalization on the recent evolution of energy demand in India: implications for sustainable development. Energy Economics 55, 52-68.

Sharif, A., Baris-Tuzemen, O., Uzuner, G., Ozturk, I., Sinha, A., 2020. Revisiting the role of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption on Turkey’s ecological footprint: evidence from Quantile ARDL approach. Sustainable Cities and Society 57, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102138.

Sharif, A., Afshan, S., Qureshi, M., 2019. Idolization and ramification between globalization and ecological footprints: evidence from quantile-on-quantile approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 26, 11191-11211.

Sharif, A., Raza, S., Ozturk, I., Afshan, S., 2019. The dynamic relationship of renewable and nonrenewable energy consumption with carbon emission: a global study with the application of heterogeneous panel estimations. Renewable Energy 133, 685-691.

Sharma, R., Kautish, P., 2020a. Examining the nonlinear impact of coal and oil based electricity production on CO2 emissions in India. The Electricity Journal 33 (6), https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1040619020300671.

Sharma, R., Kautish, P., 2020. Linkages between financial development and economic growth in the middle-income countries of South Asia: a panel data investigation. Vision 24 (2), 140-150.

Sharma, R., Kautish, P., Kumar, D., 2019. Impact of selected macroeconomic determinants on economic growth in India: an empirical study. Vision 22 (4), 405-415.

Sharma, R., Kautish, P., Uddin, G., 2020. Do the international economic endeavors affect CO2 emissions in open economies of South Asia? An empirical examination under nonlinearity. Management of Environmental Quality 31 (1), 89-110.

Sharvini, S., Noor, Z., Chong, C., Stringer, L., Yusuf, R., 2018. Energy consumption trends and their linkages with renewable energy policies in East and Southeast Asian countries: challenges and opportunities. Sustainable Environment Research 28, 257-266.

Sulaiman, J., Azman, A., Saboori, B., 2013. The potential of renewable energy: using the environmental Kuznets curve model. American Journal of Environmental Sciences 9 (2), 103-112.

The Economics Times. (2019). Out of top 10 most polluted cities in the world, 7 cities are from India alone. Retrieved May 25, 2020, from The-Economics-Times: https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/out-of-top-10-most-polluted-cities-in-the-world-7-cities-are-from-india-alone/south-asias-battle/slideshow/68266564.cms

The Jakarta Post. (2019). Jakarta has most polluted air in Southeast Asia: study. Retrieved May 25, 2020, from The-Jakarta-Post: https://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2019/03/08/jakarta-has-most-polluted-air-in-southeast-asia-study.html

Tiwari, A., Shabaz, M., Adnan, H., 2013. The environmental Kuznets curve and the role of coal consumption in India: cointegration and causality analysis in an open economy. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 18, 519-527.

Todaro, M., Smith, S., 2017. Economic Development, 12th Edition. Noida, India: Pearson Education.

Torras, M., Boyce, J., 1998. Income, inequality, and pollution a reassessment of the environmental Kuznets curve. Ecological Economics 25 (2), 147-160.

Uddin, G., Salahuddin, M., Alam, K., Gow, J., 2017. Ecological footprint and real income: panel data evidence from the 27 highest emitting countries. Ecological Indicators 77, 166-175.

Ulucak, R., Bilgili, F., 2018. A reinvestigation of EKC model by ecological footprint measurement for high, middle and low income countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 188, 144-157.

UNCTAD., 2018. Trade policy frameworks for developing countries: a manual of best practices. UNCTAD/DITC/TNCD/2017/5, United Nations, Geneva.

Wang, Z., Rasool, Y., Asgar, M., Wang, B., 2019. Dynamic linkages among CO2 emissions, human development, financial development, and globalization: emipirical evidence based on PMG long-run panel estimation. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26 (36), 36248-36263.

Westerlund, J., 2007. Testing for error correction in panel data. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 69 (6), 709-748.

World Bank., 2012. Global financial development report 2013: rethinking the role of the state in finance. World Bank, Washington, DC. Available at: http://www.worldbank.org/financialdevelopment.

Yeo, A., Deng, A., 2019. The trade policy effect in international trade: case of Pakistan. Journal of Economic Structures 8 (43), https://doi.org/10.1186/s40008-019-0169-8.

Zhang, P., London, K., 2011. Does globalization benefit developed or developing country? – case studies on Chinese and Australian construction industry. In Q. Zhou, Advances in Applied Economics, Business and Development. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.