The effect of COVID-19 stimulus payments on sales of local small businesses: Quasi-experimental evidence from Korea

Choi, Hoon (2021): The effect of COVID-19 stimulus payments on sales of local small businesses: Quasi-experimental evidence from Korea.

Abstract

This paper examines how sales of local small businesses can be promoted through COVID-19 stimulus payments. In the beginning of April, 2020, Gyeonggi provincial government in Korea implemented a stimulus payment program worth up to 500 thousand Korean Won (416 US dollars) per person to encourage local consumption. By exploiting unique features of the stimulus payments that restricted the use of the payments in the municipality of residence at establishments accepting local currency, the paper identifies the treatment effect of the stimulus payments, taking a difference-in-difference-in-differences approach. The results suggest that the stimulus payments led to significant increases in card spending in establishments accepting local currency, relative to other establishments. The estimated overall spending effect of 4.1% persisted over three weeks, and the effect is heterogeneous across sectors. While the estimated spending effect of the stimulus payments is larger among sectors such as groceries, furniture, and beauty, sectors such as restaurants, leisure, and travel that experienced substantial sales losses did not gain much from the stimulus payments. This suggests that targeting sectors the most severely affected can be a more effective policy measure in terms of alleviating the gaps in COVID-19 induced economic losses across sectors.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: COVID19 stimulus payments; Card transaction data; Local small businesses; Korea; Difference-in-difference-in-differences.
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D1 - Household Behavior and Family Economics > D12 - Consumer Economics: Empirical Analysis; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E2 - Consumption, Saving, Production, Investment, Labor Markets, and Informal Economy > E21 - Consumption ; Saving ; Wealth; H - Public Economics > H2 - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue > H24 - Personal Income and Other Nonbusiness Taxes and Subsidies

References

Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J. S. (2008). Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’s Companion, Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton.

Baek, S., Kim, S., Rhee, T., & Shin W. (2021). The consumption response to universal payments: Evidence from a natural experiment. SSRN.

Baker, S. R., Farrokhnia, R. A., Mayer, S., Pagel, M., & Yannelis, C. (2020). Income, liquidity, and the consumption response to the 2020 economic stimulus payments. NBER Working Paper No. 27097.

Bank of Korea. (2020). Result of the survey on the usage of payment methods and mobile financial services in 2019. Bank of Korea. (In Korean).

Bertrand, M., Duflo, E., & Mullainathan, S. (2004). How much should we trust differences in-differences estimates? Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119(1), 249-275.

Chetty, R., Friedman, J. N., Nathaniel, H., Michael, S., & The Opportunity Insights Team. (2020). How did COVID-19 and stabilization policies affect spending and employment? NBER Working Paper No. 27431.

Coibion, O., Gorodnichenko, Y., & Weber, M. (2020). How did U.S. consumers use their stimulus payments? NBER Working Paper No. 27693.

Feldman, N., & Heffetz, O. (2021). A Grant to every citizen: survey evidence of the impact of a direct government payment in Israel. NBER Working Paper No. 28312.

Johnson, D., Parker, J., & Souleles, N. (2006). Household expenditure and the income tax rebates of 2001. American Economic Review, 96(5), 1589–1610.

Kang, C., Woo, S., & Lee, W. (2021). The impact of the first emergency disaster support fund policy on household consumption in 2020: Analysis using the household income and expenditure survey. Working Paper. (In Korean).

Kim, M., & Oh, Y. (2020). Effects and implications of the first emergency disaster support fund. KDI Policy Forum No. 281. (In Korean).

Kim, M., & Lee, S. (2021). Can stimulus checks boost an economy under covid-19? evidence from South Korea. International Economic Journal, 35(1), 1–12.

Kim, S., Koh, K. & Lyou, W. (2020). Spending impact of COVID-19 stimulus payments: Evidence from card transaction data in South Korea. SSRN 3701676.

Kubota, S., Onishi, K., & Toyama, Y. (2021). Consumption responses to COVID-19 payments: Evidence from a natural experiment and bank account data. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 188, 1-17.

Liu, Q., Shen, Q., Li, Z., & Chen, S. (2020). Stimulating consumption at low budget–evidence from a large-scale policy experiment amid the COVID-19 pandemic. SSRN 3626518.

Misra, K., Singh, V., & Zhang, Q. (2021). Impact of stay-at-home-orders and cost-of-living on stimulus response: Evidence from the CARES Act. SSRN 3631197.

MOEF (2020), Tackling COVID-19 health, quarantine and economic measures: Korean experience. Ministry of Economy and Finance.

OECD. (2020a). Covid-19: SME policy response, OECD, Paris.

OECD. (2020b). OECD Economic Outlook, OECD, Paris.

OECD. (2020c). The territorial impact of COVID-19: Managing the crisis across levels of government, OECD, Paris.

Parker, J., Souleles, N., Johnson, D., & McClelland, R. (2013). Consumer spending and the economic stimulus payments of 2008. American Economic Review, 103(6), 2530– 2553.

Zavodny, M. (2000). The effects of official English laws on limited‐English‐proficient workers”, Journal of Labor Economics, 18(3), 427-452.