Перспективы цифровой трансформации механизмов координации

Parinov, Sergey (2021): Перспективы цифровой трансформации механизмов координации.

Abstract

The intensity and scale of communication between people, which have grown significantly over the past three decades, have not yet led to comparable in scale improvements in the coordination of the activities of socio-economic agents. One of the reasons is the lack of a full-fledged digital transformation of coordination mechanisms. Therefore, an urgent scientific task is to determine methodological approaches for the full digitalization of coordination processes. Cognitive sciences offer a fundamental description of the processes of socio-economic coordination in the form of a shared mental model of participants in joint activities. This approach made it possible to identify and analyze the main parameters of the basic version of the mechanism for coordinating activities, as well as to determine the possibilities of creating different versions of this mechanism, adapted to various cases of joint activity. It is shown that the traditional market and command coordination mechanisms are representable in terms of the shared mental model, as its particular cases. Analysis of the digitalization directions of the fundamental processes of coordination of activities, which are common for various coordination mechanisms, allows us to consider the consequences of their digital transformation in the form of increasing the efficiency of both these mechanisms and the economy as a whole. The possibility of creating an unified coordination mechanism based on computer technologies was considered, which, on the one hand, could replace the traditional market and command mechanisms, and on the other, could be used to coordinate all types of joint activities, including non-economic ones.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• English Title: Towards digital transformation of coordination mechanisms
• Language: Russian
• Keywords: digital transformation, activity coordination, mental model, shared mental model, market and command mechanisms of coordination, unified mechanism of coordination
• Subjects: O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights; P - Economic Systems > P0 - General

References

Батов, Г. Х. (2021). Организационные императивы цифровой экономики. // Цифровая экономика, 5 апреля 2021. [Batov G. (2021) Organizational imperatives of the digital economy // Digital Economy Journal, April 5, 2021. In Russian] http://digital-economy.ru/stati/organizatsionnye-imperativy-tsifrovoj-ekonomiki

Паринов С.И. (2020а). Влияние развития коммуникаций на свойства экономики. // Журнал Цифровая экономика, н. 9, с. 21-28. [Parinov, S. (2020b). The influence of communication development on the economy properties. // Digital Economy Journal. In Russian] DOI: 10.34706/DE-2020-01-02

Паринов С.И. (2020б). Общая теория согласования социально-экономической деятельности. // Электронный препринт Соционет, с. 35. [Parinov, S. (2020a). General theory of socio-economic activity coordination. Preprint at Socionet, pp. 35. In Russian] https://socionet.ru/publication.xml?h=repec:rus:frzyhd:1

Паринов С.И. (2002). К теории сетевой экономики. Новосибирск, ИЭОПП СО РАН, с. 165. [Parinov, S. (2002). Towards a theory of the networked economy. Novosibirsk, IEIE SB RAS, pp. 165. In Russian] https://play.google.com/books/reader?id=O1vmIgAAAEAJ

Adler, P. S. (2001). Market, hierarchy, and trust: The knowledge economy and the future of capitalism. // Organization science, 12(2), 215-234. http://www-bcf.usc.edu/~padler/research/MHT-2.pdf

Badke-Schaub, P., Neumann, A., Lauche, K., & Mohammed, S. (2007). Mental models in design teams: a valid approach to performance in design collaboration?. // CoDesign, 3(1), 5-20.

Crowston, K., Rubleske, J., & Howison, J. (2015). Coordination theory: A ten-year retrospective. // In Human-computer interaction and management information systems: Foundations (pp. 134-152). https://surface.syr.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1079&context=istpub

Denzau, A. T., & North, D. C. (1994). Shared mental models: ideologies and institutions. // Kyklos, 47(1), 3-31. http://ecsocman.hse.ru/data/957/750/1216/9309003.pdf

Elliott M. (2016) Stigmergic Collaboration: A Framework for Understanding and Designing Mass Collaboration. // In: Cress U., Moskaliuk J., Jeong H. (eds) Mass Collaboration and Education. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Series, vol 16. Springer, Cham. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-13536-6_4

Fan, X., & Yen, J. (2007). Realistic cognitive load modeling for enhancing shared mental models in human-agent collaboration. // Proceedings of the 6th international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems (p. 60). ACM. http://www.cs.ucf.edu/~gitars/cap6671-2011/Papers/fan-humanagent.pdf

Jones, N., Ross, H., Lynam, T., Perez, P., & Leitch, A. (2011). Mental models: an interdisciplinary synthesis of theory and methods. // Ecology and Society, 16(1). http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol16/iss1/art46/main.html

Jonker, C., van Riemsdijk, M., & Vermeulen, B. (2011). Shared mental models. A conceptual analysis. // Coordination, Organizations, Institutions, and Norms in Agent Systems VI, 132-151.

Klein, D., & Orsborn, A. (2009). Concatenate coordination and mutual coordination. // Journal of economic Behavior & organization, 72(1), 176-187. http://econfaculty.gmu.edu/klein/PdfPapers/KleinOrsbornJEBO.pdf

Malone, T. W., & Crowston, K. (1994). The interdisciplinary study of coordination. // ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 26(1), 87-119. https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/174666.174668

Marsh, L., & Onof, C. (2008). Stigmergic epistemology, stigmergic cognition. // Cognitive Systems Research, 9(1-2), 136-149. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/10004/1/3z2fx4r7prqwob3vfdq.pdf

Mathieu, J. E., Heffner, T. S., Goodwin, G. F., Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (2000). The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. // Journal of applied psychology, 85(2), 273.

Mohammed, S., Ferzandi, L., & Hamilton, K. (2010). Metaphor no more: A 15-year review of the team mental model construct. // Journal of management, 36(4), 876-910.

Richards, D. (2001). Coordination and shared mental models. // American Journal of Political Science, 259-276. http://plouffe.fr/simon/OEIS/citations/ajps2.pdf

Nielsen, M.M., & Jordanoski, Z. (2020). Digital transformation, governance and coordination models: A comparative study of Australia, Denmark and the Republic of Korea. // The 21st Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research.

Salas, E., Sims, D. E., & Burke, C. S. (2005). Is there a “big five” in teamwork? // Small group research, 36(5), 555-599.

Scheerer, A., Hildenbrand, T., & Kude, T. (2014). Coordination in large-scale agile software development: A multiteam systems perspective. // In 2014 47th Hawaii international conference on system sciences (pp. 4780-4788). IEEE. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/6759189