Revisiting fiscal responsibility norms: a cross country analysis of the impact of Covid-19

Srivastava, Dinesh Kumar and Trehan, Ragini and Bharadwaj, Muralikrishna and Kapur, Tarrung (2021): Revisiting fiscal responsibility norms: a cross country analysis of the impact of Covid-19.

Abstract

In this paper, we have reviewed the Covid induced shock to the debt and deficit profiles of 10 of the largest economies by size of GDP in 2019 referred to in this paper as the Big-10 economies. There is a sharp upsurge in their government debt-GDP ratios because their policy responses to the Covid induced recession have been large fiscal stimuli based on borrowing. With low and often negative growth rates and high fiscal deficit, the debt-GDP ratios are projected to rise sharply in these economies. As normalcy is restored, these countries may attempt to sharply reduce their borrowing levels relative to GDP. However, we argue that before this is done, individual countries may do well to reassess their sustainability norms whether cast in terms of agreements such as the Maastricht Treaty or country level Fiscal Responsibility Legislations (FRLs) or other similar norms. This revision is called for because of the longer-term trends in these economies of rising money supply, falling nominal interest rates and nominal growth rate. The contribution of this article lies in highlighting that the existing FRL norms have become dated in the European and other similar economies because of significant changes in macro parameters such as the interest rate, the long-term growth rate and the government debt-GDP profiles of these countries as compared to the time when these norms were originally determined. There is thus a need now to re-determine these norms which may be higher than their current levels. Even though, some recent literature suggests that the sustainability benchmarks may have shifted upwards, we argue that the post Covid debt-GDP ratios have exceeded these revised benchmarks by significant margins in the case of a number of the Big-10 economies

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Covid-19, Government Debt, Growth, Inflation, 2008 Economic Crisis
• Subjects: E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E6 - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook > E61 - Policy Objectives ; Policy Designs and Consistency ; Policy Coordination; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E6 - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook > E62 - Fiscal Policy; H - Public Economics > H6 - National Budget, Deficit, and Debt > H62 - Deficit ; Surplus; H - Public Economics > H6 - National Budget, Deficit, and Debt > H63 - Debt ; Debt Management ; Sovereign Debt; H - Public Economics > H6 - National Budget, Deficit, and Debt > H68 - Forecasts of Budgets, Deficits, and Debt

References

Aldama, P. and Creel, J., 2019. Fiscal policy in the US: Sustainable after all?. Economic Modelling, 81, pp.471-479

Barro, Robert 1989. The Ricardian Approach to Budget Deficit. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 3(2), p. 37-54

Bernheim, B. D. 1989. A neoclassical perspective on budget deficits. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 3(2), 55-72.

Cherif, R. and Hasanov, F. 2012. Public Debt Dynamics: The Effects of Austerity, Inflation, and Growth Shocks. IMF Working Paper WP/12/230 (September).https://www.imf.org/-/media/Websites/IMF/imported-full-text-pdf/external/pubs/ft/wp/2012/_wp12230.ashx

Cossia, M. 2017, Asymmetric paths of public debts and of general government deficits across countries within and outside the European monetary unification and economic policy of debt dissolution. The Journal of Economic Asymmetries, 15, 17–31

Ehnts, Dirk, and Michael Paetz. 2021, COVID-19 and its economic consequences for the Euro Area. Eurasian Economic Review (2021): 1-23

Eisner, R. 1989. Budget deficits: rhetoric and reality. Journal of economic perspectives, 3(2), 73-93.

Hansen, G. D., & İmrohoroğlu, S. (2016). Fiscal reform and government debt in Japan: A neoclassical perspective. Review of Economic Dynamics, 21, 201–224

Jacobs, J., Ogawa, K., Sterken, E., & Tokutsu, I. (2019). Public Debt, Economic Growth and the Real Interest Rate: A Panel VAR Approach to EU and OECD Countries. Applied Economics, 1–18.

International Monetary Fund. October 2020. “World Economic Outlook: A long and difficult Ascent.”. https://www.imf.org/-/media/Files/Publications/WEO/2020/October/English/text.ashx (Accessed November 15, 2020)

International Monetary Fund October 2020. Fiscal Monitor: Policies for the Recovery. https://www.imf.org/-/media/Files/Publications/fiscal-monitor/2020/October/English/text.ashx (Accessed December 02, 2020)

Lledó, V., Yoon, S., Fang, X., Mbaye, S., & Kim, Y. 2017. Fiscal rules at a glance. International Monetary Fund, 2-77. https://www.imf.org/external/datamapper/fiscalrules/Fiscal%20Rules%20at%20a%20Glance%20-%20Background%20Paper.pdf

Mbaye, S., Badia, M.M.M. and Chae, K. 2018. Global debt database: Methodology and sources. International Monetary Fund. https://www.imf.org/-/media/Files/Publications/WP/2018/wp18111.ashx

Ramos-Herrera, M.D.C. and Prats, M.A., 2020. Fiscal Sustainability in the European Countries: A Panel ARDL Approach and a Dynamic Panel Threshold Model. Sustainability, 12(20), p.8505.

Rangarajan, C. and Srivastava, D. K. (2005). Fiscal deficits and government debt: implications for growth and stabilization. Economic and Political Weekly, 2919-2934.

Sakuragawa, Masaya, and Yukie Sakuragawa. "Government fiscal projection and debt sustainability." Japan and the World Economy 54 (2020): 101010

Tapsoba, R. (2012). Do National Numerical Fiscal Rules really shape fiscal behaviours in developing countries? A treatment effect evaluation. Economic Modelling, 29(4), 1356–1369

Von Furstenberg, G. M., Green, R. J., and Jeong, J. H. 1986. Tax and spend, or spend and tax?. The review of Economics and Statistics, 179-188