Saha, Tanaya and Sinha, Avik and Abbas, Shujaat (2022): Green financing of Eco-innovations: Is the Gender Inclusivity taken care of? Published in: Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja (2022)
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_111921.pdf Download (558kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The OECD countries are in pursuit of the betterment of environmental quality based on their capability of Eco-innovation. This progression might pave their ways in attaining the Sustainable Developmental Goals (SDGs). Developing a green financing channel for funding is necessary for the sustenance of these projects. However, the potential impact of this project financing mechanism is conditional on the social balance in the economic system. Gender inequality being a major social issue in the OECD countries, it might pose a predicament in attaining the full potential of the green financing of eco-innovations. It is anticipated that the eco-innovation endeavors in the OECD countries are not gender-inclusive, and hence, gender inequality might limit the cognitive aptitude of these endeavors. The present study intends to assess the moderating role of gender inequality on the impact of green financing of eco-innovations for the OECD countries. Using the dynamic elasticity modeling approach, the study finds that the presence of gender inequality dampens the potential of green financing mechanisms to boost eco-innovations. The social imbalance caused by gender inequality also weakens the impacts of the structural and institutional environment to foster innovations. Based on the findings of the study, an SDG-oriented policy framework has been suggested.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Green financing of Eco-innovations: Is the Gender Inclusivity taken care of? |
English Title: | Green financing of Eco-innovations: Is the Gender Inclusivity taken care of? |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Green finance; Eco-innovation; Gender; SDG; OECD |
Subjects: | Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics |
Item ID: | 111921 |
Depositing User: | Dr. Avik Sinha |
Date Deposited: | 11 Feb 2022 11:36 |
Last Modified: | 11 Feb 2022 11:36 |
References: | Abbasi, K.R., Hussain, K., Haddad, A.M., Salman, A., Ozturk, I., 2022. The role of Financial Development and Technological Innovation towards Sustainable Development in Pakistan: Fresh insights from consumption and territory-based emissions. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 176, 121444. Abreu, A., 2020. Gender and Innovation: Implications for Sustainable Development: A GenderInSITE Policy Brief. Academy of Science of South Africa. Agirman, E., Osman, A.B., 2019. Green Finance For Sustainable Development: A Theoretical Study. Avrasya Sosyal ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, 6(1), 243-253. Alola, A.A., Ozturk, I., Bekun, F.V., 2021. Is clean energy prosperity and technological innovation rapidly mitigating sustainable energy-development deficit in selected sub-Saharan Africa? A myth or reality. Energy Policy, 158, 112520. Bjertnæs, G.H., 2021. Taxation of fuel and vehicles when emissions are constrained. Discussion Paper No. 949, Statistisk sentralbyrå. Chen, J., Leung, W.S., Evans, K.P., 2018. Female board representation, corporate innovation and firm performance. Journal of Empirical Finance, 48, 236-254. Chudik, A., Pesaran, M.H., 2015. Common correlated effects estimation of heterogeneous dynamic panel data models with weakly exogenous regressors. Journal of Econometrics, 188(2), 393-420. Faccio, M., Marchica, M.T., Mura, R., 2016. CEO gender, corporate risk-taking, and the efficiency of capital allocation. Journal of Corporate Finance, 39, 193-209. Gabbatiss, J., 2021. Analysis: Why climate-finance ‘flows’ are falling short of $100bn pledge. Carbon Brief. Available at: https://www.carbonbrief.org/analysis-why-climate-finance-flows-are-falling-short-of-100bn-pledge Gabbi, G., Ticci, E., Vercelli, A., Hall, C., 2016. Financialization, economy, society and sustainable development: A European Union sustainable banking network. European Policy Brief. Galia, F., Zenou, E., Ingham, M., 2015. Board composition and environmental innovation: does gender diversity matter?. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 24(1), 117-141. García‐Sánchez, I. M., Gallego‐Álvarez, I., Zafra‐Gómez, J. L., 2021. Do independent, female and specialist directors promote eco‐innovation and eco‐design in agri‐food firms?. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(2), 1136-1152. Geddes, A., Schmidt, T.S., Steffen, B., 2018. The multiple roles of state investment banks in low-carbon energy finance: An analysis of Australia, the UK and Germany. Energy Policy, 115, 158-170. Godil, D.I., Sharif, A., Ali, M.I., Ozturk, I., Usman, R., 2021. The role of financial development, R&D expenditure, globalization and institutional quality in energy consumption in India: New evidence from the QARDL approach. Journal of Environmental Management, 285, 112208. Grazzi, M., 2018. The importance of promoting gender equality in science and technology-based entrepreneurship and innovation activities. UNESCO. Hughes, I., Byrne, E., Glatz-Schmallegger, M., Harris, C., Hynes, W., Keohane, K., Gallachóir, B.Ó., 2020. Deep Institutional Innovation for Sustainability and Human Development. University College Cork. International Institute for Sustainable Development. Abbreviation (IISD), 2020. Making Finance Flows Consistent with the Paris Agreement. Available at: https://sdg.iisd.org/commentary/policy-briefs/making-finance-flows-consistent-with-the-paris-agreement/ Islam, M.A., Yousuf, S., Hossain, K.F., Islam, M.R., 2014. Green financing in Bangladesh: challenges and opportunities–a descriptive approach. International Journal of Green Economics, 8(1), 74-91. Lilien, D.M., 1982. Sectoral shifts and cyclical unemployment. Journal of Political Economy, 90, 777-793. Lin, B., Ma, R., 2022. Green technology innovations, urban innovation environment and CO2 emission reduction in China: Fresh evidence from a partially linear functional-coefficient panel model. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 176, 121434. Love, P. (Ed.), 2016. Debate the Issues: New Approaches to Economic Challenges. OECD Publishing, Paris. Mininni, G. M., 2022. The Barefoot College ‘eco-village’approach to women's entrepreneurship in energy. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 42, 112-123. Navarro, J.C., 2017. The Digital Transformation Imperative. An IDB Science and Business innovation Agenda for the New Industrial Revolution. Inter-American Development Bank, Washington DC. Nosheen, M., Iqbal, J., Abbasi, M. A., 2021. Do technological innovations promote green growth in the European Union?. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(17), 21717-21729. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), 2011. Fostering Innovation for Green Growth. OECD Publishing, Paris. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), 2012. New Approaches to Economic Challenges. OECD Publishing, Paris. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), 2017. The Pursuit of Gender Equality: An Uphill Battle. OECD Publishing, Paris. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), 2018. Bridging the Digital Gender Divide: Include, Upskill, Innovate. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), 2019. Aligning Development Co-operation and Climate Action: The Only Way Forward. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), 2020. Forum on Green Finance and Investment 2020. Centre on Green Finance and Investment. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), 2021a. Environment at a Glance Indicators. Available at: https://www.oecd.org/environment/environment-at-a-glance/ Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), 2021b. Building a gender-equal recovery. Available at: https://www.oecd-forum.org/rooms/building-a-gender-equal-recovery OSAGI (Office of the Special Advisor on Gender Issues and Advancement of Women). 2001. Gender Mainstreaming: Strategy for Promoting Gender Equality. Available at: http://www.un.org/womenwatch/osagi/pdf/factsheet1.pdf Østergaard, C.R., Timmermans, B., Kristinsson, K., 2011. Does a different view create something new? The effect of employee diversity on innovation. Research Policy, 40(3), 500-509. Pesaran, M.H., 2006. Estimation and inference in large heterogeneous panels with a multifactor error structure. Econometrica, 74(4), 967-1012. Pesaran, M.H., 2007. A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross‐section dependence. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22(2), 265-312. Porter, M.E., 1991. America’s green strategy. Scientific America, 264, 168. Sinha, A., Mishra, S., Sharif, A., Yarovaya, L., 2021. Does green financing help to improve environmental & social responsibility? Designing SDG framework through advanced quantile modelling. Journal of Environmental Management, 292, 112751. Sinha, A., Rastogi, S.K., 2017. Collaboration between central and state government and environmental quality: Evidences from Indian cities. Atmospheric Pollution Research, 8(2), 285-296. Suki, N. M., Suki, N. M., Sharif, A., Afshan, S., Jermsittiparsert, K., 2022. The role of technology innovation and renewable energy in reducing environmental degradation in Malaysia: A step towards sustainable environment. Renewable Energy, 182, 245-253. Sustainable Development Solutions Network (SDSN), 2021. Sustainable Development Report 2021. Taghizadeh-Hesary, F., Yoshino, N., 2020. Sustainable solutions for green financing and investment in renewable energy projects. Energies, 13(4), 788. Tsai, K.H., Liao, Y.C., 2017. Sustainability strategy and eco‐innovation: A moderation model. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(4), 426-437. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), 2018. Trade in environmentally sound technologies: Implications for Developing Countries. United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO), 2018. Manufacturing Development in Catching Up Countries: Locating Demand-Driven Policy Interventions from a Long-Term Perspective. Inclusive and Sustainable Industrial Development Working Paper Series, WP. 18. United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO), 2020. Industrial Development Report 2020: Industrializing in the digital age. Vienna. Westerlund, J., 2007. Testing for error correction in panel data. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 69(6), 709-748. World Bank, 2021a. World Development Indicators. available at: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator World Bank, 2021b. Worldwide Governance Indicators. available at: https://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/ Wu, D., Malcom, S., 2017. Research and knowledge (S&T) needed to get the right innovation, including grassroots knowledge. Academy of Science of South Africa. Yoshino, N., Taghizadeh–Hesary, F., Nakahigashi, M., 2019. Modelling the social funding and spill-over tax for addressing the green energy financing gap. Economic Modelling, 77, 34-41. Zastempowski, M., Cyfert, S., 2021. Impact of entrepreneur’s gender on innovation activities. The perspective of small businesses. Plos one, 16(10), e0258661. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/111921 |