Impact of Energy Efficiency on CO2 Emissions: Empirical Evidence from Developing Countries

Mirza, Faisal Mehmood and Sinha, Avik and Khan, Javeria Rehman and Kalugina, Olga A. and Zafar, Muhammad Wasif (2022): Impact of Energy Efficiency on CO2 Emissions: Empirical Evidence from Developing Countries. Published in: Gondwana Research , Vol. 106, (2022): pp. 64-77.

Abstract

Attaining higher level of the energy efficiency is being considered as a preferred and cost-effective policy option to achieve economic propensity, environmental sustainability and improved energy security in recent years. This drive to achieve higher energy efficiency levels is mainly motivated by higher international oil prices during last two decades, the concerns regarding energy supply security and rising CO2 emissions globally. In this background, this study decomposes energy intensity into structural and activity effects, and empirically examines their impact on CO2 emissions in environmental Kuznets curve framework for the developing economies. Second generation methodological approach is adopted. The decomposed indices reflect that energy efficiency has played a key role in decreasing energy intensity, while structural shifts have caused only a minor reduction in energy intensity. The findings suggest that energy efficiency improvements have largest influence on CO2 emissions mitigation. In developing countries as a whole, energy efficiency has positive while structural shifts have negative relation with CO2 emissions in long run. The findings presented that energy efficiency is major contributor of CO2 emissions reduction. While structural shifts in developing countries tend to increase CO2 emissions because these countries are moving towards the sectors that are producing more pollution. However, the income is one of the major contributors of CO2 emissions. While renewable energy consumption has negative and industrialization has positive impact on CO2 emissions in developing countries. The study outcomes are utilized to develop a policy framework for attaining the SDG 7 and SDG 13 in the chosen countries.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Energy Efficiency; Structural Shifts; Energy Intensity; Developing Economies; CO2 emissions; EKC; SDG
• Subjects: Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics

References

Abdullah, S.M., Siddiqua, S., Huque, R., 2017. Is health care a necessary or luxury product for Asian countries? An answer using panel approach. Health Econ. Rev. 7, 201–208.

Adetutu, M.O., Glass, A.J., Weyman-Jones, T.G., 2016. Economy-wide estimates of rebound effects: Evidence from panel data. Energy J. 37(3), 251–269.

Ahmed, K., Rehman, M.U., Ozturk, I., 2017. What drives carbon dioxide emissions in the long-run? Evidence from selected South Asian Countries. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 70, 1142–1153.

Al-Mulali, U., Ozturk, I., Lean, H.H., 2015. The influence of economic growth, urbanization, trade openness, financial development, and renewable energy on pollution in Europe. Nat. Hazards 79(1), 621–644.

Alam, S., 2010. Globalization, Poverty and Environmental Degradation: Sustainable Development in Pakistan. J. Sustain. Dev. 3(3), 103–114.

Ali, W., Abdullah, A., Azam, M., 2017. The dynamic relationship between structural change and CO2 emissions in Malaysia: a cointegrating approach. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 24(14), 12723–12739.

Ang, J.B., 2007. CO2 emissions, energy consumption, and output in France. Energy Policy 35(10), 4772–4778.

Apergis, N., Ozturk, I., 2015. Testing environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in Asian countries. Ecol. Indic. 52, 16–22.

Apergis, N., Payne, J.E., 2009. Energy consumption and economic growth in Central America : Evidence from a panel cointegration and error correction model. Energy Econ. 31(2), 211–216.

Bai, J., Kao, C., Ng, S., 2009. Panel cointegration with global stochastic trends. J. Econom. 149(1), 82–99.

Bai, J., Ng, S., 2004. A Panic Attack on Unit Roots and Cointegration. Economerica 72(4), 1127–1177.

Bai, J., Ng, S., 2006. Evaluating latent and observed factors in macroeconomics and finance. J. Econom. 131(1-2), 507–537.

Bai, J., Ng, S., 2010. Panel unit root tests with cross-section dependence: A further investigation. Econom. Theory 26(4), 1088–1114.

Bölük, G., Mert, M., 2015. The renewable energy, growth and environmental Kuznets curve in Turkey: an ARDL approach. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 52, 587–595.

Boyd, G.A., Roop, J.M., 2004. A note on the fisher ideal index decomposition for structural change in energy intensity. Energy J. 25(1), 87–101.

Bronstein, K., 2020. The Good, Bad, and Ugly about Renewable Energy in Developing Countries. RTI International.

Cantore, N., 2011. Promoting energy efficiency in developing countries–new evidence based on firms analysis. United Nations Industrial Development Organization, Vienna.

Chang, Y., 2004. Bootstrap unit root tests in panels with cross-sectional dependency. J. Econom. 120(2), 263–293.

Chen, J., Wang, P., Cui, L., Huang, S., Song, M., 2018. Decomposition and decoupling analysis of CO2 emissions in OECD. Appl. Energy 231, 937–950.

Cheng, Y., Sinha, A., Ghosh, V., Sengupta, T., Luo, H., 2021. Carbon tax and energy innovation at crossroads of carbon neutrality: Designing a sustainable decarbonization policy. J. Environ. Manage. 294, 112957.

De Hoyos, R.E., Sarafidis, V., 2006. Testing for cross-sectional dependence in panel-data models. Stata J. 6(4), 482.

Dickey, D.A., Fuller, W.A., 1979. Distribution of the Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series With a Unit Root. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 74(366), 427.

Dinda, S., 2004. Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: a survey. Ecol. Econ. 49(4), 431-455.

Fan, Y., Liu, L.C., Wu, G., Wei, Y.M., 2006. Analyzing impact factors of CO2 emissions using the STIRPAT model. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 26(4), 377–395.

Farhani, S., Shahbaz, M., 2014. What role of renewable and non-renewable electricity consumption and output is needed to initially mitigate CO2emissions in MENA region? Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 40, 80–90.

Hoekstra, R., van den Bergh, J.C.J.M., 2003. Comparing structural decomposition analysis and index. Energy Econ. 25(1), 39–64.

International Energy Agency (IEA), 2020. Clean Energy Innovation: Part of Energy Technology Perspectives.

International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA), 2019. Advancing Renewables in Developing Countries: Progress of projects supported through the IRENA/ADFD Project Facility. Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.

Im, K.S., Pesaran, M.H., Shin, Y., 2003. Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. J. Econom. 115(1), 53–74.

Inglesi-Lotz, R., Pouris, A., 2012. Energy efficiency in South Africa: A decomposition exercise. Energy, 42(1), 113–120.

Jimenez, R., Mercado, J., 2014. Energy intensity: A decomposition and counterfactual exercise for Latin American countries. Energy Econ. 42, 161–171.

Kao, C., 1999. Spurious regression and residual-based tests for cointegration in panel data. J. Econom. 90(1), 1–44.

Langlois, P., Yank, A., 2018. Developing countries and energy efficiency potential: Strategies for low-carbon development after the Paris agreement. International Partnership for Energy Efficiency Cooperation.

Levin, A., Lin, C.F., Chu, C.S.J., 2002. Unit root tests in panel data: Asymptotic and finite-sample properties. J. Econom. 108(1), 1–24.

Lin, B., Liu, H., 2015. CO2 emissions of China’s commercial and residential buildings: Evidence and reduction policy. Build. Environ. 92, 418–431.

Maddala, G.S., Wu, S., 1999. A comparative study of unit root tests with panel data and a new simple test. Oxf. Bull. Econ. Stat. 61, 631–652.

Meadows, D., Meadows, D.L., Randers, J., Behrens-III, William, W., 1972. The limits to growth: a report for the club of Rome's project on the predicament of mankind, Universe Books, New York.

Metcalf, G.E., 2008. An empirical analysis of energy intensity and its determinants at the state level. Energy J. 29, 1–26.

Moshiri, S., Duah, N., 2016. Changes in Energy Intensity in Canada. Energy J. 37, 315–342.

Neumayer, E., 2003. Are left-wing party strength and corporatism good for the environment? Evidence from panel analysis of air pollution in OECD countries. Ecol. Econ. 45(2), 203–220.

Palm, F.C., Smeekes, S., Urbain, J.P., 2011. Cross-sectional dependence robust block bootstrap panel unit root tests. J. Econom. 163(1), 85–104.

Pedroni, P., 1999. Critical Values for Cointegration Tests in Heterogeneous Panels with Multiple Regressors. Oxf. Bull. Econ. Stat. 61(s1), 653–670.

Pedroni, P., 2004. Panel cointegration: Asymptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time series tests with an application to the PPP hypothesis. Econom. Theory 20(3), 597–625.

Persyn, D., Westerlund, J., 2008. Error-correction-based cointegration tests for panel data. Stata J. 8, 232–241.

Pesaran, M.H., 2004. General diagnostic tests for cross-sectional dependence in panels. Cambridge University Working Paper.

Pesaran, M.H., 2007. A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross‐section dependence. J. Appl. Econom. 22(2), 265–312.

Phillips, P.C.B., Sul, D., 2003. Dynamic panel estimation and homogeneity testing under cross section dependence. Econom. J. 6, 217–259.

Phillips, P., Perron, P., 1988. Testing for a Unit Root in Time Series Regressions. Biometrika 75(2), 335–346.

Shahbaz, M., Nasreen, S., Ahmed, K., Hammoudeh, S., 2017. Trade openness–carbon emissions nexus: The importance of turning points of trade openness for country panels. Energy Econ. 61, 221–232.

Shahbaz, M., Sinha, A., 2019. Environmental Kuznets curve for CO2 emissions: a literature survey. J. Econ. Stud. 46(1), 106–168.

Sharma, R., Sinha, A., Kautish, P., 2021. Does renewable energy consumption reduce ecological footprint? Evidence from eight developing countries of Asia. J. Clean. Prod. 285, 124867.

Shironitta, K., 2016. Global structural changes and their implication for territorial CO2 emissions. J. Econ. Struct. 5(1), 20.

Sinha, A., Mishra, S., Sharif, A., Yarovaya, L., 2021. Does green financing help to improve environmental & social responsibility? Designing SDG framework through advanced quantile modelling. J. Environ. Manage. 292, 112751.

Song, F., Zheng, X., 2012. What drives the change in China’s energy intensity: Combining decomposition analysis and econometric analysis at the provincial level. Energy Policy 51, 445–453.

Tajudeen, I.A., 2015. Examining the role of energy efficiency and non-economic factors in energy demand and CO2 emissions in Nigeria: Policy implications. Energy Policy 86, 338–350.

Tajudeen, I.A., Wossink, A., Banerjee, P., 2018. How significant is energy efficiency to mitigate CO2 emissions? Evidence from OECD countries. Energy Econ. 72, 200–221.

United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO), 2007. Policies for promoting industrial energy efficiency in developing countries and transition economies.

United Nations, 2019. The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2019.

United Nations, 2020. The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2020.

United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP), 2017. Renewable energy and energy efficiency in developing countries can support Paris Agreement, and benefit people.

Wang, Z., Shi, C., Li, Q., Wang, G., 2011. Impact of Heavy Industrialization on the Carbon Emissions: An Empirical Study of China. Energy Procedia 5, 2610–2616.

Westerlund, J., 2007. Testing for error correction in panel data. Oxf. Bull. Econ. Stat. 69(6), 709–748.

World Bank, 2018. Access to Energy is at the Heart of Development.

Zafar, M.W., Mirza, F.M., Anees, S., Zaidi, H., Hou, F., 2019a. The nexus of renewable and nonrenewable energy consumption , trade openness ,and CO2 emissions in the framework of EKC : evidence from emerging economies. Environ Sci Pollut Res, 26, 15162–15173.

Zafar, M.W., Shahbaz, M., Hou, F., Sinha, A., 2019b. From nonrenewable to renewable energy and its impact on economic growth : The role of research & development expenditures in Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation countries. J. Clean. Prod. 212, 1166–1178.

Zafar, M.W., Shahbaz, M., Sinha, A., Sengupta, T., Qin, Q., 2020. How renewable energy consumption contribute to environmental quality? The role of education in OECD countries. J. Clean. Prod. 268, 122149.

Zafar, M.W., Sinha, A., Ahmed, Z., Qin, Q., Zaidi, S.A.H., 2021. Effects of biomass energy consumption on environmental quality: the role of education and technology in Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation countries. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 142, 110868.