A bio-economic analysis of a sustainable agricultural transition using green biorefinery

Cong, Rong-Gang and Termansen, Mette (2016): A bio-economic analysis of a sustainable agricultural transition using green biorefinery. Published in: Science of the Total Environment

Abstract

Traditional pig production often relies on cereal-based feed, which has adverse environmental effects, e.g. nitrogen leaching and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Alternative production systems are therefore sought to improve the sustainability of pig production. A promising alternative is to use proteinaceous feed from grass, produced in a green bio-refinery (GBR), to substitute part of the cereals in the feed. Cultivation of grass on arable land can reduce nitrogen leaching and pesticide application, and increase carbon storage. The GBR using grass as feedstock also produces valuable byproducts, e.g. fibre and biogas. In this study we combine a life-cycle analysis (LCA) and a cost-benefit analysis to compare the economic and environmental effects of producing the pig feed to produce 1 ton of pork using two feeding systems. We apply this approach to the intensive Danish pork production as a case study. The results show that compared with traditional cereal-based feeding system for producing a ton of pork, using proteinaceous concentrate from small-scale GBR will (1) decrease the average feed cost by 5.01%; (2) produce a profit of 96 € before tax in the GBR; and (3) decrease the nitrogen leaching (NO3-N) by 28.2%. However, in most of the scenarios (except for G2), the nitrogen emissions into the air (N2O-N) will also increase because of the increased N fertilizer application compared to a cereal-based system. In most of the scenarios (except for S1 and G1), the energy and land use will also be saved. However, some important factors, e.g. the soil characteristics, pressed juice fraction in fresh biomass and scale of GBR, could subvert the conclusion about energy and land use saving in the alternative feeding system.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Biotechnology; Cost-benefit analysis; Greenhouse gas emissions; Nitrogen leaching; Proteinaceous feed; Sustainable agriculture
• Subjects: Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q1 - Agriculture > Q15 - Land Ownership and Tenure ; Land Reform ; Land Use ; Irrigation ; Agriculture and Environment

References

Agostini, P., Fahey, A., Manzanilla, E., O'Doherty, J., De Blas, C., Gasa, J., 2014. Management factors affecting mortality, feed intake and feed conversion ratio of grow-finishing pigs. Animal 8, 1312–1318.

Aide, T.M., Grau, H.R., 2004. Globalization, migration, and Latin American ecosystems. Science 305, 1915–1916.

Ambye-Jensen, M., Adamsen, A.P.S., 2015. Green biorefinery feed protein - feasibility study on scale of implementation. 11th International Conference on Renewable Resources & Biorefineries. At York, UK.

Andersen, M., Kiel, P., 2000. Integrated utilisation of green biomass in the green biorefinery. Ind. Crop. Prod. 11, 129–137.

Carlson, D., Lærke, H.N., Poulsen, H.D., Jørgensen, H., 1999. Roughages for growing pigs, with emphasis on chemical composition, ingestion and faecal digestibility. Acta Agric. Scand. Sect. A Anim. Sci. 49, 129–136.

Cong, R.-G., Brady, M., 2012. How to design a targeted agricultural subsidy system: efficiency or equity? PLoS One 7, e41225.

Cong, R.-G., Hedlund, K., Andersson, H., Brady, M., 2014. Managing soil natural capital: an effective strategy for mitigating future agricultural risks? Agric. Syst. 129, 30–39.

Cong, R.-G., Termansen, M., Brady, M.V., 2015. Managing soil natural capital: a prudent strategy for adapting to future risks. Ann. Oper. Res. 1–25.

Dalgaard, T., Halberg, N., Porter, J.R., 2001. A model for fossil energy use in Danish agriculture used to compare organic and conventional farming. Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 87, 51–65.

Danielsen, V., Hansen, L.L., Møller, F., Bejerholm, C., Nielsen, S., 2000. Production results and sensory meat quality of pigs fed different amounts of concentrate and ad lib. clover grass or clover grass silage, Ecological animal husbandry in the Nordic countries. Proceedings from NJF-seminar, pp. 79–86.

Dansereau, L.P., El-Halwagi, M., Chambost, V., Stuart, P., 2014. Methodology for biorefinery portfolio assessment using supply-chain fundamentals of bioproducts. Biofuels Bioprod. Biorefin. 8, 716–727.

Dourmad, J.-Y., Jondreville, C., 2007. Impact of nutrition on nitrogen, phosphorus, Cu and Zn in pig manure, and on emissions of ammonia and odours. Livest. Sci. 112, 192–198.

Eriksen, J., Jensen, P.N., Jacobsen, B.H., 2014. Virkemidler til realisering af 2. generations vandplaner og målrettet arealre-gulering. DCA report. DCA - Nationalt Center for Fødevarer og Jordbrug.

Fearnside, P.M., 2001. Soybean cultivation as a threat to the environment in Brazil. Environ. Conserv. 28, 23–38.

Frame, J., 2005. Grasslands: developments, opportunities, perspectives. Science Publishers.

Grass, S., 2004. Utilisation of Grass for Production of Fibres, Protein and Energy.

Greve, M.H., Breuning-Madsen, H., 1999. Soil mapping in Denmark. European Soil Bureau Research Report.

Gylling, M., Jørgensen, U., Bentsen, N.S., Kristensen, I.T., Dalgaard, T., Felby, C., Johannsen, V.K., 2013. The +10 Million Tonnes Study: Increasing the Sustainable Production of Biomass for Biorefineries. Department of Food and Resource Economics, University of Copenhagen.

Hansen, A.V., 2012. Chapter 18: feed intake in reproducing sows. In: Knudsen, K.E.B., Kjeldsen, N.J., Poulsen, H.D., Jensen, B.B. (Eds.), Nutritional Physiology of Pigs. Danish Pig Research Center, Foulum, Denmark.

Hansen, L.L., Claudi-Magnussen, C., Jensen, S.K., Andersen, H.J., 2006. Effect of organic pig production systems on performance and meat quality. Meat Sci. 74, 605–615.

IPCC, 2006. IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories.

Jørgensen, U., Elsgaard, L., Sørensen, P., Olsen, P., Vinther, F.P., Kristensen, E.F., Ejrnæs, R., Nygaard, B., Krogh, P.H., Bruhn, A., Rasmussen, M.B., Johansen, A., Jensen, S.K., Gylling, M., Bojesen, M., 2013. Biomasse-udnyttelse i Danmark - potentielle ressourcer og bæredygtighed. DCA, DCA Report. DCA - Nationalt center for fødevarer og jordbrug. Kamm, B., 2000. Green biorefinery Brandenburg, article to development of products and of technologies and assessment. Brandenburg Umweltber 8, 260–269.

Kamm, B., Kamm, M., 2004. Principles of biorefineries. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 64, 137–145.

Kamm, B., Kamm, M., 2007. Biorefineries–multi product processes. White Biotechnology. Springer, pp. 175–204.

Kamm, B., Hille, C., Schönicke, P., Dautzenberg, G., 2010. Green biorefinery demonstration plant in Havelland (Germany). Biofuels Bioprod. Biorefin. 4, 253–262.

Kamm, B., Kamm, M., Soyez, K., 1998. The green biorefinery, concept of technology. First International Symposium on Green Biorefinery (Neuruppin). Society of Ecological Technology and System Analysis, Berlin.

Kamm, B., Schönicke, P., Kamm, M., 2009. Biorefining of green biomass – technical and energetic considerations. CLEAN – Soil, Air, Water 37, 27–30.

Kjeldsen, N., 2012. Chapter 2: from feed to pig - supply and utilisation of nutrients. In: Knudsen, K.E.B., Kjeldsen, N.J., Poulsen, H.D., Jensen, B.B. (Eds.), Nutritional Physiology of Pigs. Danish Pig Research Centre, Denmark.

Lebret, B., 2008. Effects of feeding and rearing systems on growth, carcass composition and meat quality in pigs. Animal 2, 1548–1558.

Lindberg, J.E., Andersson, C., 1998. The nutritive value of barley-based diets with forage meal inclusion for growing pigs based on total tract digestibility and nitrogen utilization. Livest. Prod. Sci. 56, 43–52.

Lipp, J., 2007. Lessons for effective renewable electricity policy from Denmark, Germany and the United Kingdom. Energ Policy 35, 5481–5495.

Møller, F., Martinsen, L., 2013. Socio-economic Evaluation of Selected Biogas Technologies.Aarhus University, DCE-Danish Centre for Environment and Energy.

Narodoslawsky, M., 1999. Green biorefinery. Second International Symposium on Green Biorefinery. SUSTAIN, Feldbach.

Nations, F.A.A.O.O.T.U., 2015. World Fertilizer Trends and Outlook to 2018.

Nørring, N.P., Jørgensen, E., 2009. Eutrophication and agriculture in Denmark: 20 years of experience and prospects for the future. In: Andersen, J.H., Conley, D.J. (Eds.), Eutrophication in Coastal Ecosystems: Towards Better Understanding and Management Strategies Selected Papers from the Second International Symposium on Research and Management of Eutrophication in Coastal Ecosystems, 20–23 June 2006, Nyborg, Denmark. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, pp. 65–70.

O'Keeffe, S., Schulte, R.P.O., Sanders, J.P.M., Struik, P.C., 2011. I. Technical assessment for first generation green biorefinery (GBR) using mass and energy balances: scenarios for an Irish GBR blueprint. Biomass Bioenergy 35, 4712–4723.

O'Keeffe, S., Schulte, R., Sanders, J., Struik, P., 2012. II. Economic assessment for first generation green biorefinery (GBR): scenarios for an Irish GBR blueprint. Biomass Bioenergy 41, 1–13.

Patterson, D., Walker, N., 1979. The use of effluent from grass silage in the diet of finishing pigs. I. Variation in composition of effluents. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 4, 263–274.

Saintilan, R., Sellier, P., Billon, Y., Gilbert, H., 2012. Genetic correlations between males, females and castrates for residual feed intake, feed conversion ratio, growth rate and carcass composition traits in large white growing pigs. J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 129, 103–106.

Sanders, J.P., 2012. Biorefinery: the bridge between agriculture and chemistry. New Biotechnol. 29, S6.

Seppälä, A., Kyntäjä, S., Blasco, L., Siika-Aho, M., Hautala, S., Byman, O., Ilvesniemi, H., Ojamo, H., Rinne, M., Harju, M., 2014. Grass silage extract, feed component suitable for pigs–prospects for on farm biorefinery. Proceedings of the 5th Nordic Feed Science Conference, Uppsala, Sweden, 10–11 June 2014/ed. P. Udén. Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet.

Sharma, H.S.S., Carmichael, E., Muhamad, M., McCall, D., Andrews, F., Lyons, G., McRoberts, W.C., Hornsby, P.R., 2012. Biorefining of perennial ryegrass for the production of nanofibrillated cellulose. RSC Adv. 2, 6424–6437.

Termansen, M., Gylling, M., Jørgensen, U., Hermansen, J., Hansen, L.B., Knudsen, M.T., Adamsen, A.P.S., Ambye-Jensen, M., Jensen, M.V., Jensen, S.K., Anderssen, H.E., Gyldenkæme, S., 2016. Green Biomass.

Tybirk, P., Sloth, N.M., Jørgensen, L., 2013. Nutrient Requirement Standards, 17th Edition of the Danish Nutrient Standards. Pig Research Centre, Denmark.

Velthof, G.L., Nelemans, J.A., Oenema, O., Kuikman, P.J., 2005. Gaseous nitrogen and carbon losses from pig manure derived from different diets. J. Environ. Qual. 34, 698–706.