Rrumbullaku, Oltion (2021): Firms behavior around tax thresholds in Albania during the 2015 anti-informality campaign - Bunching features, persistence and growth implications. Published in: European Journal of Economics, Law and Social Sciences , Vol. Vol. 5, No. No. 2 (June 2021): pp. 63-72.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_112524.pdf Download (951kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This article studies the effects of tax thresholds on the behavior of small firms using the tax administration data of the universe of the Albanian firms during and after the anti-informality campaign of the year 2015. The main comparisons are between the year 2014, 2015 and 2016. The features of the firms that did bunch in 2015 were evaluated through a Probit regression. The bunching did persist through the three years in discussion, so it is not a temporary behavior. At the end, the tax threshold does influence in the growth of the firms, especially those firms that have a turnover just under the first threshold.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Firms behavior around tax thresholds in Albania during the 2015 anti-informality campaign - Bunching features, persistence and growth implications |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | VAT threshold, Value-added tax, bunching, small firms |
Subjects: | H - Public Economics > H2 - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue > H21 - Efficiency ; Optimal Taxation H - Public Economics > H2 - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue > H25 - Business Taxes and Subsidies H - Public Economics > H2 - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue > H26 - Tax Evasion and Avoidance H - Public Economics > H3 - Fiscal Policies and Behavior of Economic Agents > H32 - Firm |
Item ID: | 112524 |
Depositing User: | Dr Oltion Rrumbullaku |
Date Deposited: | 23 Mar 2022 13:10 |
Last Modified: | 23 Mar 2022 13:10 |
References: | Almunia, M., & Rodriguez, D. L. (2014). Heterogeneous Responses to Effective Tax Enforcement: Evidence from Spanish Firms. Banco de Espana Working Paper. Bastani, S., & Selin, H. (2014). Bunching and non-bunching at king points of the Swedish tax schedule. Journal of Public Economics, 109, 36-49. Brockmeyer, A., & Hernandez, M. (2016). Taxation, Information, and Withholding: Evidence from Costa Rica. Policy Research Working Paper. Chetty, R., Friedman, J., Pistaferri, L., & Olsen, T. (2011). Adjustment Costs, Firm Responses, and Micro vs. Macro labor supply elasticities: Evidence from Danish tax records. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126(2), 749-804. End, N., & Thackray, M. (2016). Tax Policy, Evasion, and Informality in Albania. IMF Country Report, 26-40. Engleschalk, M., & Loeprick, J. (2016). The Taxation of Micro and Small Businesses in Transition Economies: Country Experience on the Costs and Benefits of Introducing Special Tax Regimes. Journal of Tax Administration, 2(1), 145-197. Harju, J., Matikka, T., & Rauhanen, T. (2015). The effect of VAT Threshold on the Behavior of Small Businesses: Evidence and Implications. CESifo Area Conference on Public Sector Economics, Helsinki. Mortenson, J., & Whitten, A. (2015). How sensitive are taxpayers to marginal tax rates? Evidence from income bunching in the United States. Job Market Paper, Georgetown University. Paetzold, J. (2017). How do wage earners respond to a large kink? Evidence on earnings and deduction behavior from Austria. University of Salzburg. Torgler, B. (2003). Tax Morale in Transition Countries. Post-Communist Economies, 15(3), 357- 381. Yunus, M. (2006). Essays on optimal mix of taxes, spatiality and persistence under tax evasion. Georgia State University. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/112524 |