Oluc, Ihsan and Ben Jebli, Mehdi and Can, Muhlis and Guzel, Ihsan and Brusselaers, Jan (2022): The Productive Capacity And Environment: Evidence From OECD Countries.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_112590.pdf Download (569kB) | Preview |
Abstract
There are many economic parameters that may affect environmental degradation. At the forefront of these parameters is the productive economic structures of the countries The present paper discusses the dynamic relationship between carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, economic growth and productive capacity index (PCI) for a panel of 38 OECD countries spanning the period 2000-2018. The empirical study applied PMG-ARDL approach, panel cointegration techniques and Granger causality tests the examine the short and long-run association between the variables. The cross-sectional dependence test of Pesaran (2004) revealed the use of the second generation panel unit root tests (CADF and CIPS). The cointegration relationships between the variables are proved using Westerlund and Pedroni cointegration tests. The estimated coefficients of PMG-ARDL revealed that the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis is established. Besides, the empirical findings obtained from long-run estimation confirm that productive capacity has a significant role on increasing environmental quality.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | The Productive Capacity And Environment: Evidence From OECD Countries |
English Title: | The Productive Capacity And Environment: Evidence From OECD Countries |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Product Capacity Index; CO2 Emissions; Economic Complexity; Economic Structure; Environment |
Subjects: | E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E2 - Consumption, Saving, Production, Investment, Labor Markets, and Informal Economy F - International Economics > F1 - Trade F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F14 - Empirical Studies of Trade Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q54 - Climate ; Natural Disasters and Their Management ; Global Warming Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q55 - Technological Innovation Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q57 - Ecological Economics: Ecosystem Services ; Biodiversity Conservation ; Bioeconomics ; Industrial Ecology |
Item ID: | 112590 |
Depositing User: | Dr. Muhlis Can |
Date Deposited: | 30 Mar 2022 06:50 |
Last Modified: | 30 Mar 2022 06:50 |
References: | Abid, M. (2016). Impact of economic, financial, and institutional factors on CO2 emissions: Evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa economies. Utilities Policy, 41, 85–94. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2016.06.009 Adebayo, T. S., Oladipupo, S. D., Rjoub, H., Kirikkaleli, D., & Adeshola, I. (2022). Asymmetric effect of structural change and renewable energy consumption on carbon emissions: designing an SDG framework for Turkey. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 1–29. Ahmad, Mahmood, Jiang, P., Majeed, A., Umar, M., Khan, Z., & Muhammad, S. (2020). The dynamic impact of natural resources, technological innovations and economic growth on ecological footprint: An advanced panel data estimation. Resources Policy, 69(September), 101817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101817 Ahmad, Manzoor, Khan, Z., Rahman, Z. U., Khattak, S. I., & Khan, Z. U. (2021). Can innovation shocks determine CO2 emissions (CO2e) in the OECD economies? A new perspective. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 30(1), 89–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2019.1684643 Ahmad, T., & Zhang, D. (2020). A critical review of comparative global historical energy consumption and future demand: The story told so far. Energy Reports, 6, 1973–1991. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2020.07.020 Ahmed, Z., & Wang, Z. (2019). Investigating the impact of human capital on the ecological footprint in India: An empirical analysis. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(26), 26782–26796. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05911-7 Alotaibi, S., Quddus, M., Morton, C., & Imprialou, M. (2021). Transport investment, railway accessibility and their dynamic impacts on regional economic growth. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 100702. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2021.100702 Apergis, N., Can, M., Gozgor, G., & Lau, C. K. M. (2018). Effects of export concentration on CO 2 emissions in developed countries: an empirical analysis. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25(14), 14106–14116. Bano, S., Zhao, Y., Ahmad, A., Wang, S., & Liu, Y. (2018). Identifying the impacts of human capital on carbon emissions in Pakistan. Journal of Cleaner Production, 183, 1082–1092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.008 Ben Jebli, M., & Hadhri, W. (2018). The dynamic causal links between CO2 emissions from transport, real GDP, energy use and international tourism. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 25(6), 568–577. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2018.1434572 Bhattacharya, M., Awaworyi Churchill, S., & Paramati, S. R. (2017). The dynamic impact of renewable energy and institutions on economic output and CO 2 emissions across regions. Renewable Energy, 111, 157–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.03.102 Bolt, J., & Luiten Van Zanden, J. (2020). The Maddison Project: Maddison style estimates of the evolution of the world economy. A new 2020 update. University of Groningen, Groningen Growth and Development Centre, Maddison Project Working Paper, October, 44. Brandt, N., Schreyer, P., & Zipperer, V. (2017). Productivity Measurement with Natural Capital. Review of Income and Wealth, 63, S7–S21. https://doi.org/10.1111/roiw.12247 Buysse, J., Can, M., & Gozgor, G. (2018). Globalisation outcomes and the real output in the subSaharan Africa LICs: a cointegration analysis. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 31(1), 338–351. Can, M., Ahmad, M., & Khan, Z. (2021). The impact of export composition on environment and energy demand: evidence from newly industrialized countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13084-5 Can, M., & Gozgor, G. (2017). The impact of economic complexity on carbon emissions: evidence from France. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 24(19), 16364–16370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-9219-7 Casson, M. C., Della Giusta, M., & Kambhampati, U. S. (2010). Formal and Informal Institutions and Development. World Development, 38(2), 137–141. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2009.10.008 Charfeddine, L. (2017). The impact of energy consumption and economic development on Ecological Footprint and CO2 emissions: Evidence from a Markov Switching Equilibrium Correction Model. Energy Economics, 65, 355–374. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2017.05.009 Chatti, W. (2021). Moving towards environmental sustainability: information and communication technology (ICT), freight transport, and CO2 emissions. Heliyon, 7(10), e08190. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08190 Chekouri, S. M., Chibi, A., & Benbouziane, M. (2020). Examining the driving factors of CO2 emissions using the STIRPAT model: the case of Algeria. International Journal of Sustainable Energy, 39(10), 927–940. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786451.2020.1770758 Christoforidis, T., & Katrakilidis, C. (2021). The dynamic role of institutional quality, renewable and non-renewable energy on the ecological footprint of OECD countries: do institutions and renewables function as leverage points for environmental sustainability? Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(38), 53888–53907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13877-8 Danish, Baloch, M. A., Mahmood, N., & Zhang, J. W. (2019). Effect of natural resources, renewable energy and economic development on CO2 emissions in BRICS countries. Science of The Total Environment, 678, 632–638. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.028 Danish, Khan, N., Baloch, M. A., Saud, S., & Fatima, T. (2018). The effect of ICT on CO2 emissions in emerging economies: does the level of income matters? Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25(23), 22850–22860. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2379-2 Demissew Beyene, S., & Kotosz, B. (2020). Testing the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: an empirical study for East African countries. International Journal of Environmental Studies, 77(4), 636–654. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207233.2019.1695445 Doğan, B., Saboori, B., & Can, M. (2019). Does economic complexity matter for environmental degradation? An empirical analysis for different stages of development. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(31), 31900–31912. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06333-1 Fafchamps, M., & Quisumbing, A. R. (1999). Human capital, productivity, and labor allocation in rural Pakistan. Journal of Human Resources, 369–406. Friedlingstein, P., O’Sullivan, M., Jones, M. W., Andrew, R. M., Hauck, J., Olsen, A., Peters, G. P., Peters, W., Pongratz, J., & Sitch, S. (2020). Global carbon budget 2020. Earth System Science Data, 12(4), 3269–3340. Godil, D. I., Sharif, A., Afshan, S., Yousuf, A., & Khan, S. A. R. (2020). The asymmetric role of freight and passenger transportation in testing EKC in the US economy: evidence from QARDL approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(24), 30108–30117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09299-7 Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1991). Environmental impacts of a North American free trade agreement. National Bureau of economic research. Guo, X., & Guo, X. (2016). A Panel Data Analysis of the Relationship Between Air Pollutant Emissions, Economics, and Industrial Structure of China. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 52(6), 1315–1324. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2016.1152792 Hancock, C., Kingo, L., & Raynaud, O. (2011). The private sector, international development and NCDs. Globalization and Health, 7(1), 23. https://doi.org/10.1186/1744-8603-7-23 Haseeb, A., Xia, E., Saud, S., Ahmad, A., & Khurshid, H. (2019). Does information and communication technologies improve environmental quality in the era of globalization? An empirical analysis. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(9), 8594–8608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04296-x Hoffmann, M. J. (2013). Global climate change. The Handbook of Global Climate and Environment Policy, 3–18. Hosseini, H. M., & Kaneko, S. (2013). Can environmental quality spread through institutions? Energy Policy, 56, 312–321.https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.12.067 International Energy Agency. (2022). IEA. In Electricity Information. IPCC. (2018). Global warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change,. In Ipcc - Sr15 (Vol. 2, Issue October). Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Islam, M. M., Khan, M. K., Tareque, M., Jehan, N., & Dagar, V. (2021). Impact of globalization, foreign direct investment, and energy consumption on CO2 emissions in Bangladesh: Does institutional quality matter? Environmental Science and Pollution Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13441-4 Jensen, E. J., Pfister, L., & Bui, T. P. (2012). Physical processes controlling ice concentrations in cold cirrus near the tropical tropopause. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 117(D11). Khan, I., & Hou, F. (2021). The dynamic links among energy consumption, tourism growth, and the ecological footprint: the role of environmental quality in 38 IEA countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(5), 5049–5062. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10861-6 Khan, M. (2020). CO2 emissions and sustainable economic development: New evidence on the role of human capital. Sustainable Development, 28(5), 1279–1288. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2083 Khan, S., Yahong, W., & Chandio, A. A. (2022). How does economic complexity affect ecological footprint in G-7 economies: the role of renewable and non-renewable energy consumptions and testing EKC hypothesis. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-19094-1 Koc, S., & Bulus, G. C. (2020). Testing validity of the EKC hypothesis in South Korea: role of renewable energy and trade openness. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(23), 29043–29054. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09172-7 Liu, H., Kim, H., Liang, S., & Kwon, O.-S. (n.d.). Export Diversification and Ecological Footprint: A Comparative Study on EKC Theory among Korea, Japan, and China. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103657 Malik, A. S. (2012). Sustainable Development: Ecology and Economic Growth BT - Handbook of Climate Change Mitigation (W.-Y. Chen, J. Seiner, T. Suzuki, & M. Lackner (eds.); pp. 197–233). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7991-9_7 Martimort, D., & Sand-Zantman, W. (2013). Solving the global warming problem: beyond markets, simple mechanisms may help! Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue Canadienne d’économique, 46(2), 361–378. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/caje.12016 Nathaniel, S. P. (2021). Biocapacity, human capital, and ecological footprint in G7 countries: the moderating role of urbanization and necessary lessons for emerging economies. Energy, Ecology and Environment, 6(5), 435–450. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40974-020-00197-9 Neagu, O., & Teodoru, M. C. (2019). The relationship between economic complexity, energy consumption structure and greenhouse gas emission: Heterogeneous panel evidence from the EU countries. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11020497 Qureshi, S., & Najjar, L. (2017). Information and communications technology use and income growth: evidence of the multiplier effect in very small island states. Information Technology for Development, 23(2), 212–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2016.1173634 Rashed, A. H., & Shah, A. (2021). The role of private sector in the implementation of sustainable development goals. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23(3), 2931–2948. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-00718-w Ren, T., Can, M., Paramati, S. R., Fang, J., & Wu, W. (2019). The Impact of Tourism Quality on Economic Development and Environment: Evidence from Mediterranean Countries. In Sustainability (Vol. 11, Issue 8). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11082296 Roser, M., Ritchie, H., & Ortiz-Ospina, E. (2013). World population growth. Our World in Data. Saboori, B., Sapri, M., & bin Baba, M. (2014). Economic growth, energy consumption and CO2 emissions in OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development)’s transport sector: A fully modified bi-directional relationship approach. Energy, 66, 150–161. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2013.12.048 Sahoo, M., & Sethi, N. (2021). The intermittent effects of renewable energy on ecological footprint: evidence from developing countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14600-3 Saidi, K., & Omri, A. (2020). Reducing CO2 emissions in OECD countries: Do renewable and nuclear energy matter? Progress in Nuclear Energy, 126, 103425. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2020.103425 Santos, G. (2017). Road transport and CO2 emissions: What are the challenges? Transport Policy, 59, 71–74. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2017.06.007 Sharma, R., Sinha, A., & Kautish, P. (2021). Does renewable energy consumption reduce ecological footprint? Evidence from eight developing countries of Asia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 285, 124867. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124867 Smil, V. (2017). Energy Transitions: Global and National Perspectives. & BP Statistical Review of World Energy. Hentet, 15, 2020. Talukdar, D., & Meisner, C. M. (2001). Does the Private Sector Help or Hurt the Environment? Evidence from Carbon Dioxide Pollution in Developing Countries. World Development, 29(5), 827–840. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(01)00008-0 UN. (2021). Ensuring that no one is left behind - Fostering economic growth, prosperity, and sustainability. Sustainable Development Knowledge Platform. UNCTAD. (2006). The Least Developed Countries Report 2006: Developing Productive Capacities. United Nations Geneva. UNCTAD. (2021). UNCTAD Productive Capacities Index: Methodological Approach and Results. 63. UNCTADSTAT. (2021). United Nations Conference on Trade and Development Data Center. Wang, H., & Wei, W. (2020). Coordinating technological progress and environmental regulation in CO2 mitigation: The optimal levels for OECD countries & emerging economies. Energy Economics, 87, 104510. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2019.104510 Wang, Y., Rodrigues, V. S., & Evans, L. (2015). The use of ICT in road freight transport for CO2 reduction–an exploratory study of UK’s grocery retail industry. The International Journal of Logistics Management. Yuan, C., Liu, S., Fang, Z., & Wu, J. (2009). Research on the energy-saving effect of energy policies in China: 1982–2006. Energy Policy, 37(7), 2475–2480. Zhang, C., & Liu, C. (2015). The impact of ICT industry on CO2 emissions: A regional analysis in China. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 44, 12–19. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.12.011 |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/112590 |