Expensive Tastes and Public Funding for the Arts

Rushton, Michael (2019): Expensive Tastes and Public Funding for the Arts.

Abstract

A challenging question in moral philosophy is how to gauge the achievement of equity between individuals when people differ in their preferences, and in particular where some people might have “expensive tastes”, in that the goods necessary to bring them to a certain level of welfare are much costlier to obtain than the goods that bring others to the same level of welfare. “Opera” is an example often presented in the literature, although we can imagine other aspects of culture that are vitally important to a small minority but very costly to provide, and whose benefits are not most often enjoyed by the well-off; the preservation of an aboriginal language, or the specific cultural practices of an immigrant minority, for example. A distinction might also arise if equity involves consideration of whether the “expensive tastes” were deliberately cultivated by the people who hold them. This paper situates the “expensive tastes” debate in the real world of arts funding bodies that value equity in funding, and are challenged with making allocation decisions under hard budget constraints. Should “expensive tastes” matter at all in choices regarding funding, and, if so, how?

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Arts policy, expensive tastes, equality
• Subjects: H - Public Economics > H4 - Publicly Provided Goods; Z - Other Special Topics > Z1 - Cultural Economics ; Economic Sociology ; Economic Anthropology > Z11 - Economics of the Arts and Literature

References

Alesina, A., Baqir, R. and Easterly, W. (1999) Public goods and ethnic divisions. Quarterly Journal of Economics 114: 1243-1284.

Arneson, R.J. (1989) Equality and equal opportunity for welfare. Philosophical Studies 56(1): 77-93.

Arneson, R.J. (1990) Liberalism, distributive subjectivism, and equal opportunity for welfare. Philosophy and Public Affairs 19(2): 158-194.

Atkinson, A.B. and Stiglitz, J.E. (1980) Lectures on Public Economics. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Becker, G.S., and Murphy, K.M. (1988) A theory of rational addiction. Journal of Political Economy 96(4): 675-700.

Bille Hansen, T. (1997) The willingness-to-pay for the Royal Theatre in Copenhagen as a Public Good. Journal of Cultural Economics 21(1): 1-28.

Black, S. (1992) Revisionist liberalism and the decline of culture. Ethics 102(2): 244-267.

Blackorby, C., and Donaldson, D. (1988) Cash versus kind, self-selection, and efficient transfers. American Economic Review 78(4): 691-700.

Carey, J. (2006) What Good are the Arts? Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Caves, R.E. (2000) Creative Industries: Contracts Between Art and Commerce. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Claassen, R. (2013) Public goods, mutual benefit, and majority rule. Journal of Social Philosophy 44(3): 270-290.

Cohen, G.A. (2011) On the Currency of Egalitarian Justice. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport (2018) Taking Part Focus on: Arts. London: DCMS.

Diamond, P.A. and Hausman, J.A. (1994) Contingent valuation: is some number better than no number? Journal of Economic Perspectives 8(4): 45-64.

Dugher, M. (2018) Arts Council funding to opera is unfair – pop needs support too. The Guardian (April 18).

Dworkin, R. (1985) Can a liberal state support art? In: A Matter of Principle, Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.

Dworkin, R. (2000) Sovereign Virtue. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.

Feinberg, J. (1994) Not with my tax money: the problem of justifying government subsidies for the arts. Public Affairs Quarterly 8(2): 101-123.

Fleischer, M.P. (2017) How is the opera like a soup kitchen? In: M. Bhandari (ed.) The Philosophical Foundations of Tax Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 255-79.

Frey, B.S. (2000) Arts and Economics: Analysis and Cultural Policy. Heidelberg: Springer.

Friedman, M. (1962) Capitalism and Freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Hadley, S. and Gray, C. (2017) Hyperinstrumentalism and cultural policy: means to an end or an end to meaning? Cultural Trends 26(2): 95-106.

Hansmann, H.B. (1980) The role of nonprofit enterprise. Yale Law Journal 89(5): 835-901.

Holtug, N. (2015) Welfare luck egalitarianism and expensive tastes. Moral Philosophy and Politics 2(1): 179-206.

Kaplow, L. (2006) Choosing expensive tastes. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 36(3): 415-425.

Kymlicka, W. (1995) Multicultural Citizenship. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Lippert-Rasmussen, K. (2013) Offensive preferences, snobbish tastes, and egalitarian justice. Journal of Social Philosophy 44(4): 439-458.

Mirrlees, J.A. (1971) An exploration in the theory of optimum income taxation. Review of Economic Studies 38(2): 175-208.

Musgrave, R. (1959) The Theory of Public Finance. New York: McGraw-Hill.

National Endowment for the Arts. (2015) A Decade of Arts Engagement: Findings from the Survey of Public Participation in the Arts, 2002-2012. Washington, DC: National Endowment for the Arts.

National Endowment for the Arts (2018) U.S. Trends in Arts Attendance and Literary Reading: 2002-2017. Washington, DC: National Endowment for the Arts.

Netzer, D. (1978) The Subsidized Muse. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Newhouse, J.P. (1970) Toward a theory of nonprofit institutions: an economic model of a hospital. American Economic Review 60(1): 64-74.

Noonan, D.S. (2003) Contingent valuation and cultural resources: a meta-analytic review of the literature. Journal of Cultural Economics 27(3/4): 159-176.

Nussbaum, M. (2011) Creating Capabilities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Peacock, A.T. (1969) Welfare economics and public subsidies to the arts. Manchester School of Economics and Social Studies 37(4): 323-335.

Quong, J. (2006) Cultural exemptions, expensive tastes, and equal opportunities. Journal of Applied Philosophy 23(1): 53-71.

Rawls, J. (1971) A Theory of Justice. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.

Rawls, J. (1982) Social unity and primary goods. In: A. Sen and B. Williams (eds.) Utilitarianism and Beyond. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press: 159-186.

Rushton, M. (2003) Cultural diversity and public funding of the arts: a view from cultural economics. Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society 33(2): 85-97.

Rushton, M. (2005) Support for earmarked public spending on culture: evidence from a referendum in metropolitan Detroit. Public Budgeting and Finance 25(4): 72-85.

Scanlon, T.M. (1975) Preference and urgency. Journal of Philosophy 72: 655-669.

Scitovsky, T. (1972) What’s wrong with the arts is what’s wrong with society American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings 62(2): 62-69.

Sen, A. (1982) Equality of what? In Choice, Welfare and Measurement. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Service, T., and Kennedy, M. (2014) New York’s Met opera house on edge of precipice, says Peter Gelb. The Guardian (June 6).

Throsby, D. (2010) The Economics of Cultural Policy. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.

Wilson, N., Gross, J. and Bull, A. (2017) Towards Cultural Democracy: Promoting Cultural Capabilities for Everyone. London: King’s College