Aguirre, Iñaki and Yenipazarli, Arda (2022): A Rationale for the “Meeting Competition Defense” when Competitive Pressure Varies Across Markets.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_113746.pdf Download (331kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This paper analyzes the economic implications of oligopoly price discrimination when competition pressure varies across markets. We find that a necessary condition for price discrimination to enhance social welfare is satisfied when the number of firms is higher in the strong market compared to the weak market. We also investigate certain economic implications of the Robinson-Patman Act (RPA) associated with “meeting competition defense” (MCD). Using equilibrium models, we find a basic rationale for the MCD: in cases of primary-line injury, when competitive pressure is more pronounced in the strong market relative to the weak market, the use of MCD might allow price discrimination to enhance welfare by boosting consumer surplus in the weak market. This result holds true regardless of whether price discrimination occurs in the final good market or intermediate good market, and it is robust to the nature of competition. We also unravel that these results change drastically under secondary-line injury.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | A Rationale for the “Meeting Competition Defense” when Competitive Pressure Varies Across Markets |
English Title: | A Rationale for the “Meeting Competition Defense” when Competitive Pressure Varies Across Markets |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | third-degree price discrimination, Robinson-Patman Act, meeting competition defense, oligopoly, welfare. |
Subjects: | D - Microeconomics > D4 - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design > D43 - Oligopoly and Other Forms of Market Imperfection D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D61 - Allocative Efficiency ; Cost-Benefit Analysis L - Industrial Organization > L1 - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance > L13 - Oligopoly and Other Imperfect Markets L - Industrial Organization > L4 - Antitrust Issues and Policies > L41 - Monopolization ; Horizontal Anticompetitive Practices |
Item ID: | 113746 |
Depositing User: | Professor Iñaki Aguirre |
Date Deposited: | 20 Jul 2022 09:59 |
Last Modified: | 20 Jul 2022 09:59 |
References: | Adachi, T. 2022. A Sufficient Statistics Approach for Welfare Analysis of Oligopolistic Third-Degree Price Discrimination, unpublished manuscript. Adachi, T., & N. Matsushima. 2014. The Welfare Effect of Third-Degree Price Discrimination in a Differentiated Oligopoly. Economic Inquiry, 52, 1231-1244. Aguirre, I. 2016. On the Economics of the Meeting Competition Defense Under the Robinson-Patman Act. The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis and Policy 16, 1213-1238. Aguirre, I., S. Cowan & J. Vickers. 2010. Monopoly Price Discrimination and Demand Curvature. American Economic Review, 100, 1601-1615. Antitrust Modernization Commission. 2007. Report and Recommendations. Belleflamme, P. & M. Peitz. 2015. Industrial Organization: Markets and Strategies, 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Blair, R. D. & C. DePasquale. 2014. Antitrust's Least Glorious Hour": The Robinson-Patman Act. Journal of Law and Economics, 57, s201-s216.. Bork, R. H. 1978. The Antitrust-Paradox: A Policy at War with Itself. New York: Basic Books. Chen, Y., J. Li & M. Schwartz. 2021. Competitive Differential Pricing. Rand Journal of Economics, 52, 100-124. Corts, K. 1998. Third-Degree Price Discrimination in Oligopoly: All-Out Competition and Strategic Commitment." Rand Journal of Economics, 29, 306-323. Dastidar, K. 2006. On Third-Degree Price Discrimination in Oligopoly. Manchester School, 74, 231-250. DeGraba, P. 1990. Input Market Price Discrimination and the Choice of Technology. American Economic Review, 80, 1246-1253. Hausman, J. & J. Mackie-Mason. 1988. Price Discrimination and Patent Policy. Rand Journal of Economics, 19, 253-265. Holmes, T. 1989. The effects of Third-Degree Price Discrimination in Oligopoly. American Economic Review, 79, 244-250. Inderst, R. & G. Shaffer. 2009. Market power, Price Discrimination, and Allocative Efficiency in Intermediate-Goods Markets. Rand Journal of Economics, 40, 658-672. Inderst, R. & T. Valletti. 2009. Price Discrimination in Input Markets. Rand Journal of Economics, 40, 1-19. Katz, M. 1987. The Welfare Effects of Third-Degree Price Discrimination in Intermediate Good Markets. American Economic Review, 77, 154-167. Miklós-Thal, J. & G. Shaffer. 2021a. Pass-Through as an Economics Tool: On Exogenous Competition, Social Incidence, and Price Discrimination. Journal of Political Economy, 129, 323-335. Miklós-Thal, J. & G. Shaffer. 2021b. Input Price Discrimination by Resale Market. Rand Journal of Economics, 52, 727-757. Miklós-Thal, J. & G. Shaffer. 2021c. Third-Degree Price Discrimination in Oligopoly with Endogenous Input Costs. International Journal of Industrial Organization, EARIE 2020 Special Issue, 79, December. Neven, D. & L. Phlips. 1985. Discriminating Oligopolists and Common Markets. Journal of Industrial Economics, 34, 133-149. O'Brien, D. 2014. The welfare effects of third-degree price discrimination in intermediate good markets: the case of bargaining. Rand Journal of Economics, 45, 92-115. O'Brien, D & G. Shaffer. 1994. The welfare effects of forbidding discriminatory discounts: A secondary-line analysis of Robinson-Patman. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 10, 296--318. Pigou, A. 1920. The Economics of Welfare, London: Macmillan, Third Edition. Robinson, J. 1933. The Economics of Imperfect Competition, London: Macmillan. Salinger, M. 1988. Vertical mergers and market foreclosure. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 103, 345-356. Scherer, F. & D. Ross. 1990. Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, Third Edition. Schmalensee, R. 1981. Output and Welfare Implications of Monopolistic Third-Degree Price discrimination. American Economic Review, 71, 242-247. Schwartz, M. 1986. The Perverse Effects of the Robinson-Patman Act. Antitrust Bulletin, 31, 733--757. Schwartz, M. 1990. Third-Degree Price Discrimination and Output: Generalizing a Welfare Result. American Economic Review, 80, 1259-1262. Sokol, D. 2015. Analyzing Robinson-Patman. The George Washington Law Review, 83, 2064-2100. Stole, L. 2007. Price Discrimination and Competition. In Handbook of Industrial Organization, Vol. 3, ed. M. Armstrong and R. Porter, 2221-2299. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science Publishers B.V. Varian, H. 1985. Price Discrimination and Social Welfare. American Economic Review, 75, 870-875. Varian, H. 1989. Price Discrimination, in R. Schmalensee and R. Willig (eds) Handbook of Industrial Organization: Volume I, North-Holland, Amsterdam. Viscusi, W., J. Harrington, & D. Sappington. 2018. Economics of Regulation and Antitrust, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts. Weyl, G. & M. Fabinger. 2013. Pass-Through as an Economic Tool: Principles of Incidence under Imperfect Competition. Journal of Political Economy, 121, 528-583. Yenipazarli, A. 2021. On the Effects of Antitrust Policy Intervention in Pricing Strategies in a Distribution Channel. Decision Sciences, forthcoming. Yoshida, Y. 2000. Third-Degree Price Discrimination in Input Markets: Output and Welfare. American Economic Review, 90, 240--246. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/113746 |