Georgieva, Daniela and Bankova, Diyana (2021): Hybrid audit as an innovative approach in the audit practice of forestry. Published in: 15th International Scientific Conference WoodEMA 2022 Crisis management and safety foresight in forest-based sector and SMEs operating in the global environment, International Association for Economics, Management, Marketing, Quality and Huma Resources in (August 2022): pp. 31-36.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_113981.pdf Download (6MB) | Preview |
Abstract
Auditing has undergone many changes in the context of globalization and digitalization. Under the influence of the COVID-19 health crisis, additional restrictions are introduced, which are related to the impossibility of physical inspections (desk cheks or on-site ones). This has a significant effect on the activities of sectors and enterprises where on-site inspections are a priority, like in forestry. In order to answer the current challenges, the Forest StewardshipCouncil introduces a new audit approach, called "hybrid audit". The main goal of the study is to analyze the benefits and risks of hybrid audits in forestry. This will be done by (1) performing a comparative analysis with other types of audit (particularly financial and IT audit) and (2) deriving the characteristics and requirements of the hybrid audit. The study is conducted based on the scientific methods of analogy, analysis and synthesis, induction, deduction, and logical approach. The results of the study outlined the need for specific, local forestry-related rules and methodology of the procedures for the hybrid audit to be developed. Additionally, there is a risk of gaps in the check and verification of the forestry documentation and resources when using the hybrid audit
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Hybrid audit as an innovative approach in the audit practice of forestry |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | hybrid audit, forestry, management, risks, benefits |
Subjects: | M - Business Administration and Business Economics ; Marketing ; Accounting ; Personnel Economics > M4 - Accounting and Auditing > M42 - Auditing Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q0 - General |
Item ID: | 113981 |
Depositing User: | Daniela Georgieva |
Date Deposited: | 03 Aug 2022 10:14 |
Last Modified: | 03 Aug 2022 10:14 |
References: | A framework for audit quality key elements that create an environment for audit quality (2014): IAASB and IFAC, New York. Auditing Forests: Guidance for Supreme Audit Institutions (2010): Working Group on Environmental Auditing. Belova, G.; Hristova, A. (2021): Climate change and its impact on the health through the prism of WHO/Europe. International politics, South-west University. pp. 30-47. Chobanova, R.; Kocarev, L.; Popova, R.; Georgieva, D. V.; Trayanov, Z.; Traichevska, D.; Angelova, R. (2018): Forestry Sector in Bulgaria and Macedonia. Sofia: ERI-BAS. Gejdoš, M.; Potkány, M. (2015): Development of the market with wood in Slovakia and Central Europe. In: Wood Processing and Furniture Manufacturing Challenges on the World Market and Wood-Based Energy Goes Global. рр. 1-6. Georgieva, V.; D, Bankova, D. (2020): Problems in audit and reporting in Bulgaria’s forestry. In: Sustainability of forest-based industries in the global economy, WoodEMA, i.a., University of Zagreb, Competence Centre. pp. 31-36. Jelačić, D.; Bičanić, K.; Motik, D. (2010): Croatian wood processing and furniture manufacturing in a time of crisis, Ekonomika a menažment podnikov. рр. 70-76. Nicorescu, A.-I.; H ̆al ̆alisan,A.-F.; Popa, B.; Neykov, N. (2021): Challenges for FSC Forest Certification: Audits in the Context of Pandemic COVID-19. Forests 2021(12): pp. 1-12. Popova, R. (2018): Trends in Forestry sector – Global and regional challenges. Forestry sector in Bulgaria and Macedonia. Economy Research Institute at the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences. рр. 30-47. Veysel, A. (2017): Auditing (financial audit), Siela, Sofia. World Wildlife Fund (2016): Rakovodstvo za uchastie na zainteresovanite strani v protsesa na gorska sertifikatsiyapo FSC. https://wwfeu.awsassets.panda.org/downloads/booklet_low_res.pdf FSC International Center (2020): COVID-19 Policy Responses Collection of derogations, interpretations, and frequently asked questions. URL: https://fsc.org/sites/default/files/2020-12/FSC_COVID-19_Policy_responses_2020.11.30.pdf Bankova, D.(2020): About cybersecurity in the companies. URL: https://www.ides.bg/media/1741/01-2020-diyaa-bankova-1.pdf ISO 9001 (2015): Quality Management System. URL: https://www.iso.org/files/live/sites/isoorg/files/archive/pdf/en/iso9001-2015-process-appr.pdf ISO 19011 (2018): Guidelines for Auditing Management Systems. URL: https://www.iso.org/standard/70017.html INTOSAI (2010): International Organization of Supreme Audit Institutions. URL: https://www.intosai.org/ Audit guideline on fraud (2014): European Court of Auditors, CEAD-a directorate. URL:https://www.eca.europa.eu/Lists/ECADocuments/AUDITGUIDELINE_FRAUD/AUDITGUIDELINE_FRAUD_EN.pdf |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/113981 |