Dagher, Leila and harajli, hassan (2014): Willingness to pay for green power in an unreliable electricity sector: Part 1. The case of the Lebanese residential sector. Published in: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews , Vol. 50, (2015): pp. 1634-1642.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_116121.pdf Download (573kB) | Preview |
Abstract
A willingness to pay (WTP) analysis for renewable-based electricity is undertaken for the Lebanese residential sector. A survey of 600 samples was conducted based on a stratified random sampling method, in which energy use and expenditures, socioeconomic, and demographic characteristics were collected. Four scenarios for WTP for green power were designed to best reflect the possibilities of integrating renewable energy sources in Lebanon’s ‘unreliable’ electricity sector; (1) local system covering partial electricity needs, (2) local system covering entire electricity needs, (3) utility-provided green power covering partial electricity needs, and (4) utility-provided green power covering entire electricity needs. The results based on a Tobit model highlight the importance of renewable energy options that displace completely the diesel generator sets, i.e. options 2 and 4. Other parameters such as ownership of the home, age, perception of trust in government institutions, and awareness of renewable systems were also found significant in influencing WTP for RE.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Willingness to pay for green power in an unreliable electricity sector: Part 1. The case of the Lebanese residential sector |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | green power; willingness-to-pay; renewable energy; Lebanon |
Subjects: | Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q2 - Renewable Resources and Conservation Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q4 - Energy |
Item ID: | 116121 |
Depositing User: | Dr Leila Dagher |
Date Deposited: | 25 Jan 2023 14:26 |
Last Modified: | 25 Jan 2023 14:27 |
References: | Aoun NS, Harajli HA, Queffeulou P. Preliminary appraisal of wave power prospects in Lebanon. Renewable Energy 2013; 53: 165-173. World Bank. Lebanon social impact analysis – electricity and water sectors. Report No. 48993-LB, Middle East and North Africa: World Bank; 2009. Dagher L, Ruble I. Challenges for CO2 mitigation in the Lebanese electric power sector. Energy Policy 2010; 38: 912-918. MEW. Policy Paper for the Electricity Sector, Report #1. Beirut: Ministry of Energy and Water (MEW); 2010. Al Assad, J., 2014. “Lebanon’s NREAP: One Step Towards the Right Path”, Beirut Energy Forum 2014, 16th-18th September 2014, Dhbayi, Lebanon. El-Fadel RH, Hammond GP, Harajli HA, Jones CI, Kabakian VK, Winnett AB. The Lebanese electricity system in the context of sustainable development. Energy Policy 2010; 38: 751-761. Vallvé X, Harajli H, Abou Jaoudeh EA, Obeid J. Novel example of PV and WTG back-up power systems for weak rural grids in Lebanon. 6th European Conference on PV-Hybrids and Mini-Grids, Chambéry April 26th/27th; 2012. Tampier M. Effective green power policies. Refocus – The International Renewable Energy Magazine; Jan/Feb 2003: 30–33. Bateman IJ, Carson RT, Day B, Hanemann M, Hanley N, Hett I, Jones-Lee M, Loomes G, Mourato S, Ozdemiroglu E, Pearce D, Sugden R, Swanson J. Economic Valuation with Stated Preference Techniques: A Manual. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar; 2002. Menegaki A. Valuation for renewable energy: A comparative review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2008; 12: 2422-2437. Bollino CA. The Willingness to Pay for Renewable Energy Sources: The Case of Italy with Socio-demographic Determinants. The Energy Journal 2009; 30(2): 81-96. Batley SL, Fleming PD, Urwin P. Willingness to pay for renewable energy: implications for UK green tariff offerings. Indoor and Built Environment 2000; 9: 157–170. Batley SL, Colbourne D, Fleming PD, Urwin P. Citizen versus consumer: challenges in the UK green power market. Energy Policy 2001; 29: 479–487. Zarnikau J. Consumer demand for ‘green power’ and energy efficiency. Energy Policy 2003; 31: 1661-1672. Nomura N, Akai M. Willingness to pay for green electricity in Japan as estimated through contingent valuation method. Applied Energy 2004; 78: 453-463. Zoric J. Hrovatin N. Household willingness to pay for green electricity in Slovenia. Energy Policy 2012; 47: 180-187. Clark CF, Kotchen MJ, Moore MR. Internal and external influences on pro-environmental behavior: participation in a green electricity program. Journal of Environmental Psychology 2003; 23(3):237–46. PRASEG. MORI Opinion Poll on Public Support for Green Energy. London: PRASEG; London 19 Swedenergy. Vad tycker elkunderna om grön el. Sveriges Elleverantörer, Stockholm; 1999. Ek K, Söderholm P. Norms and economic motivation in the Swedish green electricity market. Ecological Economics 2008; 68: 169–182. Hansla A, Gamble A, Juliusson A, Gärling T. Psychological determinants of attitude towards and willingness to pay for green electricity. Energy Policy 2008; 36: 768–774. Farhar BC, Houston AH. Willingness to pay for electricity from renewable energy. Golden: National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL); 1996. Bigerna S, Polinori P. Italian households’ willingness to pay for green electricity. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2014; 34: 110-121. Abdullah S, Jeanty PW. Willingness to pay for renewable energy: Evidence from a contingent valuation survey in Kenya. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2011; 15: 2974-2983. Sardianou E, Genoudi P. Which factors affect the willingness of consumers to adopt renewable energies. Renewable Energy 2013; 57: 1-4. Diaz-Rainey I, Ashton J. Stuck between a ROC and a hard place? Barriers to the take up of green energy in the UK. Energy Policy 2008; 36(8): 3053–3061. Borchers AM, Duke JM, Parsons GR. Does willingness to pay for green energy differ by source? Energy Policy 2007; 35: 3327-3334. Goett AA, Hudson K, Train KE. Customers' choice among retail energy suppliers: the willingness-to-pay for service attributes. The Energy Journal 2000; 21: 1–28. Gracia A, Barreiro-Hurle J, Perez LP. Can renewable energy be financed with higher electricity prices? Evidence from a Spanish Region. Energy Policy 2012; 50: 784-794. Roe B, Teisl MF, Levy A, Russell M. US consumers’ willingness to pay for green electricity. Energy Policy 2001; 29: 917-925. Bergmann A, Hanley N, Wright R. Valuing the attributes of renewable energy investments. Energy Policy 2006; 34: 1004-1014. Longo A, Markandya A, Petrucci M. The internalization of externalities in the production of electricity: willingness to pay for the attributes of a policy for renewable energy. Ecological Economics 2008; 67: 140–152. Zografakis N, Sifaki E, Pagalou M, Nikitaki G, Psarakis V. Assessment of public acceptance and willingness to pay for renewable energy sources in Crete. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2010; 14: 1088-1095. Soon JJ, Ahmad SA. Willingly or grudgingly? A meta-analysis on the willingness to pay for renewable energy use. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2015; 44: 877-887. MEW, UNDP. Lebanon’s first national survey study of the solar water heater market. Beirut: MEW/UNDP/GEF; 2014 (link: http://cedro-undp.org/Publications/National%20Studies/45. Energy UK, 2014; http://www.energy-uk.org.uk/policy/fuel-poverty.html; accessed 09/February/2015. Tobin J. Estimation of Relationships for Limited Dependent Variables. Econometrica 1958; 26: 24–36. Greene WH. Econometric Analysis. 5th Edition. New Jersey: Prentice Hall; 2003. Kotchen MJ, Moore MR. Private provision of environmental public goods: household participation in green-electricity programs. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 2007; 53: 1–16. Carlsson F, Martinsson P. Willingness to Pay among Swedish Households to Avoid Power Outages: A Random Parameter Tobit Model Approach. Energy Journal 2007; 28 (1): 75-89. Halstead JM, Lindsay BE, Brown CM. Use of the Tobit Model in Contingent Valuation: Experimental Evidence from the Pemigewasset Wilderness Area. Journal of Environmental Management 1991; 33: 79-89. Heckman J. The common structure of statistical models of truncation, sample selection, and limited dependent variables and a simple estimator for such models. Ann. Econom. Social Meas 1976; 5: 475–492. Heckman J. Sample bias as a specification error. Econometrica 1979; 47: 153–161. Wooldridge JM. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. Cambridge: MIT Press; 2002. Ek K. Public and private attitudes towards “green” electricity: the case of Swedish wind power. Energy Policy 2005; 33(13):1677–89. Wiser R. Using contingent valuation to explore willingness to pay for renewable energy: a comparison of collective and voluntary payment vehicles. Ecological Economics 2006; 62 (3-4):419–32. DECC. Private Rented Sector Energy Efficiency Regulations (Domestic) (England and Wales). London: DECC; 2014. GVA. Challenging the Government on Sustainability: Incentivizing through Tax. London: GVA; 2012. MOE, UNDP. Optimal Renewable Energy Mix of the Power Sector by 2020: Investment Cost Implications for Lebanon. Beirut: MOE/UNDP; 2014. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/116121 |