Khan, Muhammad Umer (2016): Environmental Concerns in Capital Budgeting: Impact on Firms Performance.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_116417.pdf Download (284kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Product manufacturing often has negative effects on the environment. Pollution, waste disposal, recycling, insurance, and public relations associated with these effects have become a focus in the 21st century. Within the last two decades, the concern for these environmental effects has grown. Companies and upper management are held financially responsible for negative environmental impacts. This new financial responsibility must be incorporated into the traditional capital budgeting process. To measure the impact of capital budgeting decisions on firm’s performance while incorporating environmental concerns.
The research objective of this study is to measure the impact of capital budgeting decisions on firm’s performance and to observe the capital budgeting decisions which are environmentally friendly taken by firms to increase revenues. The research will be based upon a quantitative design. The researcher will examine the behaviour of different environmental decisions through asking questions with the help of survey and document analysis, and will try to find out the basic idea of authorized professionals regarding the impact of environmental policies effecting firms performance. The research strategy for this research is that the surveys will be conducted and document analysis of the firms in the manufacturing sector of Pakistan will be done which includes cement, fertilizers, chemical, and sports industries.
In the rapid industrialization era where life is becoming simple and easier for all human beings on the other hand it is suffocating for the Global Climate. The independent variable Environmental Concerns is found to have a direct impact on the performance of the firms as the pressure from Media, Government policies, Investors and employees is forcing the firms to adopt environmentally friendly business activities which is resulting in increased revenue for the firms. Those firms who have not adopted any environmentally friendly business practices, and plan to make any capital budgeting decisions in the future will surely result positively in the form of increased revenues, more customers and successfully achieving the vision of the company.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Environmental Concerns in Capital Budgeting: Impact on Firms Performance |
English Title: | Environmental Concerns in Capital Budgeting: Impact on Firms Performance |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Capital budgeting; environment |
Subjects: | G - Financial Economics > G3 - Corporate Finance and Governance G - Financial Economics > G3 - Corporate Finance and Governance > G31 - Capital Budgeting ; Fixed Investment and Inventory Studies ; Capacity |
Item ID: | 116417 |
Depositing User: | Amjad Khan |
Date Deposited: | 20 Feb 2023 09:28 |
Last Modified: | 20 Feb 2023 09:28 |
References: | 1. Ahmad, B., & Ali, S. B. (2012). Do Individual Investors in Pakistan Prefer Dividends? 2. Ahmad, M., & Ali, S. B. (2008). Technical Analysis in the Stock Markets of Pakistan: A Case of Commercial Banks. 3. Aleem, M. U., Purwani, M., Ali, U., Ali, S. B., & Bhojani, N. (2018). Power of Training and Development on Employee Retention in Pharmaceutical Organization, IBT Journal of Business Studies, 14(2), 148-157. 4. Aleem, M. U., Ali, S. B., Naz, S., & Baig, U. (2021). Recognizing the Influence of Training Needs Analysis on Performance of Business Faculties in Karachi Business Schools. KASBIT Business Journal, 14(2), 37-52. 5. Ali, M., & Ali, S. B. (2014). The impact of working capital management on firm profitability and fixed investment in Pakistan. 6. Ali, M. S. B., Iqbal, M. A., & Qazi, N. S. (2014). Shariah Compliance of Islamic Mutual Funds in Pakistan–Perspective of Small Investors’. 7. Ali, S.B., (2012). Quality of Internal Risk Rating Frameworks at Commercial Banks in Pakistan. University Library of Munich, Germany. 8. Ali, S. B., Khan, Z. S., Shah, Z. A., Ahmed, H., & Aziz, A. (2021). Quality of Internal Risk Rating Framework at Commercial Banks in Pakistan, Elementary Education Online, 20 (5), 7150-7163. 9. Ali, S. B. (2012). Corporate Governance and Accounting Practices in Pakistan. 10. Ali, S. B., Farooq, K., Shah, Z. A., & Burney, S. (2021). Testing the Evidence on Weak Form EMH at Pakistan Stock Market. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, 12(8). 11. Ali, S. B., Hussain, B. M., Baig, U., Khan, Z. S., Raza, A., & Murad, H. (2021). The Enigma of Capital Structure Theories: An Empirical Investigation Between Peer Corporations in Pakistan. International Journal of Advanced Research in Engineering and Technology, 113-124. 12. Ali, S. B., & Khalidi, M. A. (2020). Valuation of equity securities, private firms, and startups. IBT Journal of Business Studies (JBS), 16(1). 13. Ali, S. B., Khan, Z. S., Shah, Z. A., & Ahmad, M. (2021). Lean Accounting System: Importance and Successful Implementation. Journal of Contemporary Issues in Business and Government| Vol, 27(3), 2388. 14. Ali Zaidi, S. N., & Ali, S. B. (2006). Risk and Scope of Debit Check Card in Competitive Market of Pakistan. 15. Arshad, M. A., Ali, S. B., Masood, K., Syed, A., Jabeen, N., & Sabir, R. I. (2021). The Nexus between Culture and IT Capabilities and Innovation Capabilities: Focusing on Manufacturing Firms in Pakistan. Multicultural Education, 7(9). 16. Arshad, M. A., Ali, S. B., Jafri, S. K. A., Arshad, M. H., & Sabir, R. I. (2021). Effect of Organizational Culture and Information Technology Capabilities on Innovation Capabilities: A Case of Manufacturing Firms. Elementary Education Online, 20(5), 6388-6388. 17. Arshad, M. Z., Ali, S. B., Sabir, R. I., Shahidan, A. N., & Arshad, M. A. (2021). The interrelationship between Orientations and SME’s Performance. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, 12(7). 18. Baig, U., Hashmi, M. A., Ali, S. B., & Zehara, S. (2020). Exploratory Sequential Mixed Methods in Doctorate Research: Extended Application of Constructivist Grounded Theory. IBT Journal of Business Studies (JBS), 16(2). 19. Buysse, K., & Verbeke, A. (2003). Proactive Environmental Strategies: A Stakeholders Prespective. Strategic Management Journal , 453-470. 20. C.C, E., & F.Maliana, J. (2003). Quality Management, Environmental Management And Firm Performance. Journal of Management Sciences, 823-849. 21. Cordeiro, J.J, & Sarkis, J. (1997). Environmental proactivism and firm performance: evidence from security analyst earning forecast. business strategy and Environment, 663-680. 22. Cormier D., M. M., & B., V. V. (2005). Environmental Disclosure Quality in Large German Companies: Economic Incentives, Public Pressures or Institutional Conditions? European Accounting Review, 3-39. 23. Daulatzai, M, U. K., Ali, S. B., Jafri, S. K. A., & Awan, M. H. T. (2021). Impact of Green HRM on Environmental Performance: Mediating Role of Employees’ Organizational Commitment, International Journal of Disaster Recovery and Business Continuity, 12(1), 405–412. 24. Enrique.M, & Sadorsky.K.L. (2005). How to reconcile environmental and economic performance to improve corporate sustainability. Journal of Environmental Management, 105-118. 25. G., O. (2000). Environmental Disclosures in the Annual Report: Extending the Applicability and the Predictive Power of Legitimacy . Theory, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 344-371. 26. Gonzalez-Benito, J., & Gonza´ lez-Benito, O. (2005). Environmental Proactivity and Business Performance: An Empirical Analysis. Journal of Environmental Management Sciences, 1-25. 27. Hussain, Z., & Ali, S. B. (2009). Implementation of Operational Risk Regime: A Case of Commercial Banks in Pakistan. 28. Karagozoglu, N., & Lindell, M. (2000). Environmental Management: Testing The Win–Win Model. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 817-829. 29. Klassen, R., & McLaughlin, C. 1. (1996). The Impact Of Environmental Management on firms performance. Journal Of Management Science, 1199-1214. 30. Khurram, W., Jafri, S. K. A., Ali, S. B., & Shah, Z. A. (2021). Survival of the Quickest: Role of Innovativeness and Transformational Leadership in Determining Sustainable Competitive Advantage of Born Global SMEs. Survival, 12(1), 907-929. 31. Link, S., & Naveh, E. (2008). Standardization and discretion: does the environmental standard ISO 14001 lead to performance benefits. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 508-519. 32. Miles, M., & Covin, J. (2000). Environmental Marketing: A Source Of Reputational Competitive, And Financial Advantage. Journal of Business Ethics, 299-311. 33. Murad, H., Ali, S. B., Baig, U., Raza, A., Ali, S., & Abdullah, A. (2021). Comparative study: conventional and Islamic banking performance in Pakistan. International Journal of Management (IJM), 12(3), 448-459. 34. Murty, M., Kumar, S., & Paul, M. (2006). Environmental regulation, productive efficiency and cost of pollution abatement: a case study of the sugar industry in india. Journal of Environmental Management , 1-17. 35. Owolabi, A. (2006). Incorporating environmental cost into Nigeria oil and gas accounting. journal of environmental studies, 545-569. 36. Rizvi, A., & Ali, S. B. (2011). Risk Taking Behavior of Investors of Pakistan 37. Sarkis.J. (2006). The adoption of environmental and risk management practices:relationships to environmental performance. Journal of Environment Management, 367-381. 38. Sharma, S., & Vredenburg, H. (1998). Proactive corporate environmental strategy and the development of competitively valuable organizational capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 728-753. 39. Shih, K.-H., & Chen, H.-J. (2006). Assessment of sustainable development and knowledge of environmental management: internal auditors’ perspectives. Journal of industrial management and data, 896-909. 40. T.D., W., & G.R., F. (2000). Corporate Environmental Reporting: A Test of Legitimacy Theory. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 10-26. 41. Ullah, Z., Sulaiman, M, A. B. A., Ali, S. B., Ahmad, N., Scholz, M., & Han, H (2021). The Effect of Work Safety on Organizational Social Sustainability Improvement in the Healthcare Sector: The Case of a Public Sector Hospital in Pakistan. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(1), 1-18. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/116417 |