Social Preferences and Well-Being: Theory and Evidence

Iwasaki, Masaki (2022): Social Preferences and Well-Being: Theory and Evidence. Published in: Humanities and Social Sciences Communications , Vol. 342, No. 10 (20 June 2023): pp. 1-13.

Abstract

Many studies have shown that individuals engage in prosocial behaviors, such as pro-environmental and charitable behaviors, on the basis of their social preferences. But the nature of social preferences has not been well studied, and it has been unclear how they relate to individual well-being. It is important to clarify this linkage so that various policies and laws can maximize social welfare. This study explores the hypothesis that social preferences are in general positively correlated with subjective well-being and that individuals who are more prosocial are happier than individuals who are more proself. This study first presents a theoretical model that mathematically describes the relationship between social preferences and subjective well-being. Then it uses survey data from the United States to empirically examine the relationship between the two. Regression analysis finds a statistically significant positive correlation between prosociality and total well-being, a correlation driven primarily by eudaimonic well-being and hedonic well-being, subdomains of total well-being. The effect size of prosociality on well-being is similar to the effect sizes of parenthood, income, and education, which are important determinants of well-being, thus confirming that prosociality is a crucial determinant of individual well-being.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Social preferences, Well-being, Social value orientation, Prosociality, Happiness
• Subjects: A - General Economics and Teaching > A1 - General Economics > A13 - Relation of Economics to Social Values; D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D64 - Altruism ; Philanthropy; I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I3 - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty > I31 - General Welfare, Well-Being

References

Aknin LB, Dunn EW, Norton MI (2012) Happiness runs in a circular motion: evidence for a positive feedback loop between prosocial spending and happiness. J Happiness Stud 13(2):347–355. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-011-9267-5

Aknin LB, Whillans AV (2021) Helping and happiness: a review and guide for public policy. Soc Issues Policy Rev 15(1):3–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/sipr.12069

Boenigk S, Mayr ML (2016) The happiness of giving: evidence from the German socioeconomic panel that happier people are more generous. J Happiness Stud 17(5):1825–1846. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-015-9672-2

Böhm R, Fleiß J, Rybnicek R (2021) On the stability of social preferences in inter-group conflict: a lab-in-the-field panel study. J Conflict Resol 65(6):1215–1248. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002721994080

Bowles S, Polania-Reyes S (2012) Economic incentives and social preferences: substitutes or complements? J Econ Lit 50(2):368–425. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.50.2.368

Boyce CJ, Brown GDA, Moore SC (2010) Money and happiness: rank of income, not income, affects life satisfaction. Psychol Sci 21(4):471–475. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610362671

Buhrmester M, Kwang T, Gosling SD (2011) Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: a new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspect Psychol Sci 6(1):3–5. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610393980

Carlson M, Charlin V, Miller N (1988) Positive mood and helping behavior: a test of six hypotheses. J Pers Soc Psychol 55:211–229. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.55.2.211

Charness G, Rabin M (2002) Understanding social preferences with simple tests. Q J Econ 117(3):817–869. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355302760193904

Cuñado J, de Gracia FP (2012) Does education affect happiness? Evidence for Spain. Soc Indic Res 108(1):185–196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-011-9874-x

D’Attoma JW, Volintiru C, Malézieux A (2020) Gender, social value orientation, and tax compliance. CESifo Econ Stud 66(3):265–284. https://doi.org/10.1093/cesifo/ifz016

De Cremer D, Van Lange PAM (2001) Why prosocials exhibit greater cooperation than proselfs: the roles of social responsibility and reciprocity. Eur J Pers 15(S1):S5–S18. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.418

Decancq K, Fleurbaey M, Schokkaert E (2017) Wellbeing inequality and preference heterogeneity. Economica 84(334):210–238. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecca.12231

Diener E, Emmons RA, Larsen RJ, Griffin S (1985) The satisfaction with life scale. J Pers Assess 49(1):71–75. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13

Dixit A, Levin S (2017) Social creation of pro-social preferences for collective action. In: Buchholz W, Rübbelke D (eds) The theory of externalities and public goods: essays in memory of Richard C. Cornes, Springer International Publishing, p 127–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49442-5_7

Falk A, Graeber T (2020) Delayed negative effects of prosocial spending on happiness. Proc Natl Acad Sci 117(12):6463–6468. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1914324117

Fehr E, Schmidt KM (1999) A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. Q J Econ 114(3):817–868. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355399556151

FitzRoy FR, Nolan MA (2022) Income status and life satisfaction. J Happiness Stud 23(1):233–256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-021-00397-y

Ghesla C, Grieder M, Schmitz J (2019) Nudge for good? Choice defaults and spillover effects. Front Psychol 10. https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00178

Grosch K, Rau HA (2017) Gender differences in honesty: the role of social value orientation. J Econ Psychol 62:258–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2017.07.008

Hervás G, Vázquez C (2013) Construction and validation of a measure of integrative well-being in seven languages: The Pemberton Happiness Index. Health Qual Life Outcomes 11(1):66. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-11-66

Hui BPH (2022) Prosocial behavior and well-being: shifting from the ‘chicken and egg’ to positive feedback loop. Curr Opin Psychol 44:231–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.09.017

Kahneman D, Riis J (2005) Living, and thinking about it: two perspectives on life. In: Huppert FA, Baylis N, Keverne B (eds) The science of well-being, Oxford University Press, p 284–305. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198567523.003.0011

Keyes CLM (1998) Social well-being. Soc Psychol Q 61(2):121–140. https://doi.org/10.2307/2787065

Kushlev K, Radosic N, Diener E (2022) Subjective well-being and prosociality around the globe: happy people give more of their time and money to others. Soc Psychol Personal Sci 13(4):849–861. https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506211043379

Lawton RN, Gramatki I, Watt W, Fujiwara D (2021) Does volunteering make us happier, or are happier people more likely to volunteer? Addressing the problem of reverse causality when estimating the wellbeing impacts of volunteering. J Happiness Stud 22(2):599–624. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-020-00242-8

Levitt SD, List JA (2007) What do laboratory experiments measuring social preferences reveal about the real world? J Econ Perspect 21(2):153–174. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.21.2.153

Mattauch L, Hepburn C, Spuler F, Stern N (2022) The economics of climate change with endogenous preferences. Resour Energy Econ 69:101312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2022.101312

McClintock CG, Allison ST (1989) Social value orientation and helping behavior. J Appl Soc Psychol 19(4):353–362. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1989.tb00060.x

Meier S, Stutzer A (2008) Is volunteering rewarding in itself? Economica 75(297):39–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0335.2007.00597.x

Messick DM, McClintock CG (1968) Motivational bases of choice in experimental games. J Exp Soc Psychol 4(1):1–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(68)90046-2

Murphy RO, Ackermann KA (2014) Social value orientation: theoretical and measurement issues in the study of social preferences. Pers Soc Psychol Rev 18(1):13–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868313501745

Murphy RO, Ackermann KA, Handgraaf MJJ (2011) Measuring social value orientation. Judgm Decis Mak 6(8):771–781. http://journal.sjdm.org/11/m25/m25.html

Napier JL, Jost JT (2008) Why are conservatives happier than liberals? Psychol Sci 19(6):565–572. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02124.x

Nikolaev B (2018) Does higher education increase hedonic and eudaimonic happiness? J Happiness Stud 19(2):483–504. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-016-9833-y

Oliver A (2017) Distinguishing between experienced utility and remembered utility. Public Health Ethics 10(2):122–128. https://doi.org/10.1093/phe/phw014

Onraet E, Van Assche J, Roets A, Haesevoets T, Van Hiel A (2017) The happiness gap between conservatives and liberals depends on country-level threat: a worldwide multilevel study. Soc Psychol Personal Sci 8(1):11–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550616662125

Pollmann-Schult M (2014) Parenthood and life satisfaction: why don’t children make people happy? J Marriage Fam 76(2):319–336. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12095

Radó MK (2020) Tracking the effects of parenthood on subjective well-being: evidence from Hungary. J Happiness Stud 21(6):2069–2094. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-019-00166-y

Rinner MT, Haller E, Meyer AH, Gloster AT (2022) Is giving receiving? The influence of autonomy on the association between prosocial behavior and well-being. J Context Behav Sci 24:120–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2022.03.011

Ryan RM, Deci EL (2001) On happiness and human potentials: a review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annu Rev Psychol 52(1):141–166. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.141

Ryan RM, Frederick C (1997) On energy, personality, and health: subjective vitality as a dynamic reflection of well-being. J Pers 65(3):529–565. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1997.tb00326.x

Ryff CD (1989) Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. J Pers Soc Psychol 57(6):1069. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.1069

Samuelson PA (1938) A note on the pure theory of consumer’s behaviour. Economica 5(17):61–71. https://doi.org/10.2307/2548836

Sen A (1973) Behaviour and the concept of preference. Economica 40(159):241–259. https://doi.org/10.2307/2552796

Shahrier S, Kotani K, Kakinaka M (2017) Religiosity may not be a panacea: importance of prosociality to maintain humanitarian donations. In: Working Papers (SDES-2017-23; Working Papers), Kochi University of Technology, School of Economics and Management. https://ideas.repec.org/p/kch/wpaper/sdes-2017-23.html

Song Y, Broekhuizen ML, Dubas JS (2020) Happy little benefactor: prosocial behaviors promote happiness in young children from two cultures. Front Psychol 11. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01398

Steger MF, Kashdan TB, Oishi S (2008) Being good by doing good: daily eudaimonic activity and well-being. J Res Pers 42(1):22–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2007.03.004

Thaler RH, Sunstein CR (2008) Nudge: improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. Penguin, London.

Tilman AR, Dixit AK, Levin A (2019) Localized prosocial preferences, public goods, and common-pool resources. Proc Natl Acad Sci 116(12):5305–5310. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1802872115

U.S. Census Bureau (2017) Was median household income in 2016 the highest median household income ever reported from the Current Population Survey Annual Social and Economic Supplement? https://www.census.gov/newsroom/blogs/random-samplings/2017/09/was_median_household.html. Accessed 18 May 2023

Van Doesum NJ, Murphy RO, Gallucci M, Aharonov-Majar E, Athenstaedt U, Au WT, Bai L, Böhm R, Bovina I, Buchan NR, Chen XP, Dumont KB, Engelmann JB, Eriksson K, Euh H, Fiedler S, Friesen J, Gächter S, Garcia C, ... Lange PAMV (2021) Social mindfulness and prosociality vary across the globe. Proc Natl Acad Sci 118(35). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2023846118

Van Lange PAM, Bekkers R, Schuyt TNM, Vugt MV (2007) From games to giving: social value orientation predicts donations to noble causes. Basic Appl Soc Psychol 29(4):375–384. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973530701665223

Van Lange PAM, Schippers M, Balliet D (2011) Who volunteers in psychology experiments? An empirical review of prosocial motivation in volunteering. Pers Individ Dif 51(3):279–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.05.038

Van Lange PAM, Semin-Goossens A (1998) The boundaries of reciprocal cooperation. Eur J Soc Psychol 28(5):847–854. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199809/10)28:5<847::AID-EJSP886>3.0.CO;2-L

Von Neumann J, Morgenstern O (1944) Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton University Press.

Watson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A (1988) Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. J Pers Soc Psychol 54(6):1063–1070. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.54.6.1063

Wee SC, Choong WW, Low ST (2021) Can "nudging" play a role to promote pro-environmental behaviour? Environ Challenges 5:100364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2021.100364

Ziegler A (2020) Heterogeneous preferences and the individual change to alternative electricity contracts. Energy Econ 91:104889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104889