Institutionalist Clues in Celso Furtado’s Economic Thought

Nastasi, Federico and Spagano, Salvatore (2023): Institutionalist Clues in Celso Furtado’s Economic Thought.

Abstract

The Brazilian economist Celso Furtado escapes from the traditional distinctions among different schools of thought. Indeed, he made large use of tools from various proveniences according to a pragmatic approach. Nonetheless, this paper shows that his work also contains several characteristic elements of the institutionalist tradition. In the early 1960s, Furtado placed institutions at the centre of his analysis of the evolution of the economic history. Moreover, he rejected the kind of determinism that follows a concept of choice entirely dependent on the utility-maximizing rationality. Coherently, he opposed the New Institutional Economics as an example of neoclassical retread of institutional issues. Finally, and especially, even without theorizing it, he adopted the institutionalised individual as an economic agent. This choice, rather than that of the homo oeconomicus, implied assuming an agent able to shape institutions that, in turn, influence human behaviours according to a downward cumulative causation.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Furtado, Structuralism, Institutionalism
• Subjects: B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B2 - History of Economic Thought since 1925

References

Bielschowsky, Ricardo. “Vigencia de los Aportes de Celso Furtado al Estructuralismo” Revista de la CEPAL (2006).

Boianovsky, Mauro. “A View from the Tropics: Celso Furtado and the Theory of Economic Development in the 1950s” History of Political Economy 42.2 (2010): 221-266.

Coase, Ronald. “The Theory of the firm” Economica 4.16 (1937): 386-405.

Coase, Ronald. “The Problem of Social Cost” Classic Papers in Natural Resource Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London (1960): 87-137.

Dequech, David. “Economic Institutions: Explanations for Conformity and Room for Deviation” Journal of Institutional Economics 9.1 (2013): 81-108.

Domar, Evsey. Capital Expansion, Rate of Growth, and Employment” Econometrica, Journal of the Econometric Society (1946): 137-147.

Dutta, Dilip. “Convergence of Structuralism and Institutionalism in Development Economics and Studies—Revisited” Inclusive Growth and Development in 21st Century—A Structural and Institutional Analysis of China and India 9 (2014): 3-33.

Furtado, Celso. Formação Econômica do Brasil. Editôra Fundo de Cultura (1961). Furtado, Celso. Development and Underdevelopment. University of California Press (1964).

Hamilton, Walton. “The Institutional Approach to Economic Theory” American Economic Review 9, Suppement (1919): 309-318.

Harrod, Roy. “An Essay in Dynamic Theory" The Economic Journal 49.193 (1939): 14-33.

Hodgson, Geoffrey M. “What is the Essence of Institutional Economics?” Journal of Economic Issues 34.2 (2000): 317-329.

Hodgson, Geoffrey M. “What are Institutions?” Journal of Economic Issues 40.1 (2006): 1-25.

Hodgson, Geoffrey M. and Thorbjørn Knudsen. Darwin’s Conjecture: The Search for General Principles of Social and Economic Evolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press (2010).

Kaldor, Nicholas. “A Model of Economic Growth” The Economic Journal 67.268 (1957): 591-624.

López, Manuel F. “Raúl Prebisch y la Universidad de Buenos Aires”, en El Pensamiento de Raúl Prebisch. Editorial Tesis (1988).

Love, Joseph L. “Furtado, las Ciencias Sociales y la Historia” Estudios Sociológicos (1999): 3-21.

Mallorquín, Carlos. “El Institucionalismo Norteamericano y el Estructuralismo Latinoamericano:¿Discursos Compatibles?” Revista Mexicana de Sociología (2001): 71-108.

Mallorquín, Carlos. “Celso Furtado y la Utopía Organizada” Estudios Sociológicos (2005): 637-658.

Mallorquín, Carlos. “En resguardo de lo Herético: el Estructuralismo Latinoamericano y el Institucionalismo Norteamericano” Estructuralismo latinoamericano e institucionalismo norteamericano.¿ Discursos compatibles en la teoría social contemporánea (2006).

Ormaechea, Emilia. “Latin American Development: What About the State, Conflict and Power?” Journal of Economic Issues 54.2 (2020): 322-328.

Peck, Harvey W. Economic Thought and Its Institutional Background. Farrar & Rinehart, Inc. New York (1935).

Prebisch, Raul. “The Economic Development of Latin America and its Principal Problems.” Economic Bulletin for Latin America (1962).

Ramstad, Yngve, “’Reasonable Value’ Versus ‘Instrumental Value’: Competing Paradigms in Institutional Economics”, Journal of Economic Issues, 23.3 (1989): 761-777.

Robinson, James A., and Daron Acemoglu. Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity and Poverty. London: Profile (2012). Rodríguez, Octavio. El Estructuralismo Latinoamericano. Siglo XXI (2006).

Street, James H. and James D. Dilmus. “Institutionalism, Structuralism, and Dependency in Latin America” Journal of Economic Issues, 16.3 (1982): 673-689.

Street, James H. “Raúl Prebisch, 1901-1986: An Appreciation” Journal of Economic Issues 21.2 (1987a): 649- 659.

Street, James. H. “The Institutionalist Theory of Economic Development.” Journal of Economic Issues 21.4 (1987b): 1861-1887.

Sunkel, Osvaldo. “Institucionalismo y Estructuralismo.” Revista de La CEPAL 38 (1989): 147-156.

Veblen, Thorstein. The Theory of the Leisure Class: An Economic Study in the Evolution of Institutions. New York: Macmillan (1899).

Veblen, Thorstein. The Place of Science in Modern Civilization and Other Essays, New York: Huebsch (1919).

Williamson, Oliver E. “The New Institutional Economics: Taking Stock, Looking Ahead” Journal of economic literature 38.3 (2000): 595-613.