Aggressiveness as Performance Signaling: Forced Distribution Rating System in Tax Authority

Iswahyudi, Heru (2021): Aggressiveness as Performance Signaling: Forced Distribution Rating System in Tax Authority. Published in:

Abstract

This article is aimed at examining whether introducing the forced distribution rating system (FDRS) in tax authority may improve performance and at exploring alternative explanations for the results utilizing the perspectives of signaling theory. Using Indonesian tax authority as case study and employing the interrupted time-series analysis on tax collection data, it is found that the adoption of FDRS may have worsened the already declining trend in collection. One of the possible explanations for this deterioration is that the introduction of FDRS, combined with the existing system of collection targets, may incentivize tax officials to demonstrate aggressive behaviors toward taxpayers as signals of performance with the desired outcome of being categorized as top performers under the FDRS. These behaviors may erode taxpayers’ trust in tax authority, diminish voluntary compliance, and encourage migration into the underground economy; thence spurring a vicious cycle: as the tax base is shrinking because taxpayers are going underground, tax revenue will decline thus prompting tax officers to signal their performance by behaving more aggressively toward taxpayers, hence encouraging more taxpayers to escape to the underground economy. It is important for tax authorities to implement performance evaluation systems which are conducive toward creating and maintaining trustworthy relationships between taxpayers and tax officers.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Signaling Theory, Forced Ranking, Tax Compliance, Underground Economy, Trust in Tax Authority
• Subjects: H - Public Economics > H2 - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue > H26 - Tax Evasion and Avoidance; L - Industrial Organization > L2 - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior > L25 - Firm Performance: Size, Diversification, and Scope; M - Business Administration and Business Economics ; Marketing ; Accounting ; Personnel Economics > M1 - Business Administration > M14 - Corporate Culture ; Diversity ; Social Responsibility

References

Adsit, D. J., Bobrow, W. S., Hegel, P. S., & Fitzpatrick, B. G. (2018). The return on investment of rank and yank in a simulated call-center environment. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice Research, 70(2), 113.

Alm, J. (2019). Can Indonesia Reform Its Tax System? Problems And Options. Journal of Poverty Alleviation and International Development, 10, 71-99.

Alm, J., Martinez-Vazquez, J., & Schneider, F. (2004). ‘Sizing’the Problem of the Hard-to-Tax. Contributions to Economic Analysis, 268, 11-75.

Badan Pusat Statistik. (2019). Indikator Ekonomi Desember 2019.

Badan Pusat Statistik. (2021). Indikator Ekonomi April 2021.

Bangerter, A., Roulin, N., & König, C. J. (2012). Personnel selection as a signaling game. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(4), 719.

Berger, J. (2019). Signaling can increase consumers' willingness to pay for green products. Theoretical model and experimental evidence. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 18(3), 233-246.

Berger, J., Harbring, C., & Sliwka, D. (2013). Performance appraisals and the impact of forced distribution—an experimental investigation. Management Science, 59(1), 54-68.

Bergh, D. D., Connelly, B. L., Ketchen Jr, D. J., & Shannon, L. M. (2014). Signalling theory and equilibrium in strategic management research: An assessment and a research agenda. Journal of Management Studies, 51(8), 1334-1360.

Bird, R. M. (2004). Administrative Dimensions of Tax Reform. Asia-Pacific Tax Bulletin, 10(3), 134-150.

Blume, B. D., Rubin, R. S., & Baldwin, T. T. (2013). Who is attracted to an organisation using a forced distribution performance management system? Human Resource Management Journal, 23(4), 360-378.

Boswell, W. R., & Boudreau, J. W. (2002). Separating the developmental and evaluative performance appraisal uses. Journal of Business Psychology, 16(3), 391-412.

Bretz Jr, R. D., Milkovich, G. T., & Read, W. (1992). The current state of performance appraisal research and practice: Concerns, directions, and implications. Journal of management, 18(2), 321-352.

Briker, R., Hohmann, S., Walter, F., Lam, C. K., & Zhang, Y. (2021). Formal supervisors' role in stimulating team members' informal leader emergence: Supervisor and member status as critical moderators. Journal of Organizational Behavior.

Cable, D. M., & Judge, T. A. (1994). Pay preferences and job search decisions: A person‐organization fit perspective. Personnel Psychology, 47(2), 317-348.

Cappelli, P. (2009). What's old is new again: Managerial “talent” in an historical context. In Research in personnel and human resources management: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

CEIC. (2021).

Celani, A., & Singh, P. (2011). Signaling theory and applicant attraction outcomes. Personnel Review, 40(2), 222-238. doi:10.1108/00483481111106093

Chattopadhayay, R., & Ghosh, A. K. (2012). Performance appraisal based on a forced distribution system: its drawbacks and remedies. International Journal of Productivity Performance Management.

Connelly, B. L., Certo, S. T., Ireland, R. D., & Reutzel, C. R. (2011). Signaling theory: A review and assessment. Journal of management, 37(1), 39-67.

Costa, P. T. J., & McCrae, R. R. (2008). The Revised Neo Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R). In G. J. Boyle, G. Matthews, & D. H. Saklofske (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of personality theory and assessment, Vol. 2. Personality measurement and testing (pp. 179 - 198): Sage Publications, Inc.

Direktorat Jenderal Pajak. (2019). Laporan Tahunan DJP 2019. Retrieved from Jakarta: https://www.pajak.go.id/sites/default/files/2020-12/Laporan%20Tahunan%20DJP%202019%20-%20INDONESIA.pdf

Ehrhart, M. G., & Klein, K. J. (2001). Predicting followers' preferences for charismatic leadership: The influence of follower values and personality. The Leadership Quarterly, 12(2), 153-179.

Eichenwald, K. (2012). Microsoft's Lost Decade. Vanity Fair.

Feld, L. P., & Frey, B. (2002). Trust breeds trust: How taxpayers are treated. Centre for Tax System Integrity Working Paper No. 32 Australian National University and Australian Taxation Office.

Felfe, J., & Schyns, B. (2006). Personality and the Perception of Transformational Leadership: The Impact of Extraversion, Neuroticism, Personal Need for Structure, and Occupational Self‐Efficacy 1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36(3), 708-739.

Hammar, H., Jagers, S. C., & Nordblom, K. (2009). Perceived tax evasion and the importance of trust. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 38(2), 238-245.

Iswahyudi, H. (2020a). Have Diminishing Returns Set in? The Efficiency of Indonesian Tax Administration. Bisnis & Birokrasi Journal, 26(3).

Iswahyudi, H. (2020b). The problem of gross receipts taxes in Indonesia: Economic distortions and policy options. [Working Paper]. Munich Personal RePEc Archive.

Jenkins Jr, G. D., Mitra, A., Gupta, N., & Shaw, J. D. (1998). Are financial incentives related to performance? A meta-analytic review of empirical research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(5), 777.

Kaplanoglou, G., & Rapanos, V. T. (2013). Tax and trust: The fiscal crisis in Greece. South European Society Politics, 18(3), 283-304.

Kharouf, H., Lund, D. J., Krallman, A., & Pullig, C. (2020). A signaling theory approach to relationship recovery. European Journal of Marketing, 54(9), 2139-2170. doi:10.1108/EJM-10-2019-0751

Kirchler, E., Hoelzl, E., & Wahl, I. (2008). Enforced versus voluntary tax compliance: The “slippery slope” framework. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29(2), 210-225.

Kwoh, L. (2012). Rank and yank” retains vocal fans. The Wall Street Journal, 31, 2012.

Lawler, E. E., III. (2002). The Folly of Forced Ranking. Strategy+Business, Third Quarter 2002.

Li, J., Tang, J., Jiang, L., Yen, D. C., & Liu, X. (2019). Economic Success of Physicians in the Online Consultation Market: A Signaling Theory Perspective. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 23(2), 244-271. doi:10.1080/10864415.2018.1564552

Linden, A. (2015). Conducting interrupted time-series analysis for single-and multiple-group comparisons. The Stata Journal, 15(2), 480-500.

Linden, A. (2017). A comprehensive set of postestimation measures to enrich interrupted time-series analysis. The Stata Journal, 17(1), 73-88.

Magee, J. C., & Galinsky, A. D. (2008). 8 social hierarchy: The self‐reinforcing nature of power and status. Academy of Management Annals, 2(1), 351-398.

Marquez, X. (2020). The Mechanisms of Cult Production: An Overview. In K. Postoutenko & D. Stephanov (Eds.), Ruler Personality Cults from Empires to Nation-States and Beyond: Symbolic Patterns and Interactional Dynamics: Forthcoming.

Martin, G., & Groen-in't Woud, S. (2011). Employer branding and corporate reputation management in global companies. In H. Scullion & D. G. Collings (Eds.), Global Talent Management (pp. 87-110). London: Routledge.

Ministry of Finance. (2021). Reformasi Birokrasi Untuk Kesejahteraan Masyarakat. https://www.kemenkeu.go.id/sites/default/files/artikel_pajak_2509.pdf

Moon, S. H., Scullen, S. E., & Latham, G. P. (2016). Precarious curve ahead: The effects of forced distribution rating systems on job performance. Human Resource Management Review, 26(2), 166-179.

Osborne, T., & McCann, L. (2004). Forced Ranking and Age-Related Employment Discrimination. Human Rights Magazines.

Ovide, S., & Feintzeig, R. (2013). Microsoft Abandons 'Stack Ranking' of Employees. The Wall Street Journal.

Peraturan Direktur Jenderal Pajak Nomor Per - 12/PJ/2018 tentang Pengelolaan Kinerja di Lingkungan Direktorat Jenderal Pajak, (2018).

Pfeffer, J., & Sutton, R. I. (2006). Evidence-based management. Harvard business review, 84(1), 62.

Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879.

Rynes, S. L., Gerhart, B., & Parks, L. (2005). Personnel psychology: Performance evaluation and pay for performance. Annual Review Psychology, 56, 571-600.

Schleicher, D. J., Bull, R. A., & Green, S. G. (2009). Rater reactions to forced distribution rating systems. Journal of management, 35(4), 899-927.

Shin, S. J., & Zhou, J. (2003). Transformational leadership, conservation, and creativity: Evidence from Korea. Academy of Management Journal, 46(6), 703-714.

Spence, M. (2002). Signaling in retrospect and the informational structure of markets. American Economic Review, 92(3), 434-459.

Stiglitz, J. E. (2002). Information and the Change in the Paradigm in Economics. American Economic Review, 92(3), 460-501.

Taj, S. A. (2016). Application of signaling theory in management research: Addressing major gaps in theory. European Management Journal, 34(4), 338-348.

Thomas, R., Darby, J. L., Dobrzykowski, D., & van Hoek, R. (2020). Decomposing social sustainability: Signaling theory insights into supplier selection decisions. Journal of Supply Chain Management.

Trank, C. Q., Rynes, S. L., & Bretz, R. D. (2002). Attracting applicants in the war for talent: Differences in work preferences among high achievers. Journal of Business Psychology, 16(3), 331-345.

Turban, D. B., & Keon, T. L. (1993). Organizational attractiveness: An interactionist perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(2), 184.

Welch, J., & Byrne, J. A. (2003). Jack: Straight from the Gut. New York: Grand Central Publishing.

Welch, J., & Welch, S. (2005). Winning. New York, NY: Harper Business.

Whiting, H. J., & Kline, T. J. B. (2007). Testing a model of performance appraisal fit on attitudinal outcomes. The Psychologist-Manager Journal, 10(2), 127-148.