Zhu, Ge (2024): Liberated from care: Long-term care insurance policy and Employment for women.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_120472.pdf Download (1MB) | Preview |
Abstract
In the context of an increasingly aging population, this paper examines the economic incentives of long-term care insurance policies for women to disengage from informal care responsibilities within the household. Through constructing both theoretical analytical frameworks and empirical identification strategies, we seek to comprehend the causal relationship between women benefiting from long-term care insurance policy pilot programs and their entry or re-entry into the labor market. Our findings indicate that long-term care insurance policies significantly stimulate female employment. This discovery implies that aiding women in shifting family responsibilities to the market contributes to enhancing female labor participation. Robustness checks corroborate our findings, and the outcomes of competitive hypotheses demonstrate that alleviating family care burdens is more conducive to promoting female employment than providing care job opportunities. Further analysis suggests that long-term care insurance policies may also potentially undermine China's "raising children to support old age" mechanism and the preference for sons over daughters. However, there exist heterogeneities concerning enhancing women's bargaining power in both the household and society.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Liberated from care: Long-term care insurance policy and Employment for women |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Long-term Care insurance policy; Women employment; Informal care; China; Competing hypotheses; Bargaining power of women |
Subjects: | I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I1 - Health J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J2 - Demand and Supply of Labor |
Item ID: | 120472 |
Depositing User: | Mr Ge Zhu |
Date Deposited: | 27 Mar 2024 14:56 |
Last Modified: | 27 Mar 2024 14:56 |
References: | Goldin C. The quiet revolution that transformed women's employment, education, and family[J]. American economic review, 2006, 96(2): 1-21. Liu L, Dong X, Zheng X. Parental care and married women's labor supply in urban China[J]. Feminist Economics, 2010, 16(3): 169-192. Feng J, Zhang X. Retirement and grandchild care in urban China[J]. Feminist Economics, 2018, 24(2): 240-264. Soldo B J, Myllyluoma J. Caregivers who live with dependent elderly[J]. The Gerontologist, 1983, 23(6): 605-611. Leigh A. Informal care and labor market participation[J]. Labour Economics, 2010, 17(1): 140-149. Wang Y, Zhang C. Gender inequalities in labor market outcomes of informal caregivers near retirement age in urban China[J]. Feminist Economics, 2018, 24(2): 147-170. He D, McHenry P. Does formal employment reduce informal caregiving? [J]. Health economics, 2016, 25(7): 829-843. Nguyen H T, Connelly L B. The effect of unpaid caregiving intensity on labour force participation: Results from a multinomial endogenous treatment model[J]. Social Science & Medicine, 2014, 100: 115-122. Van Houtven C H, Coe N B, Skira M M. The effect of informal care on work and wages[J]. Journal of health economics, 2013, 32(1): 240-252. Chen L, Zhao N, Fan H, et al. Informal care and labor market outcomes: Evidence from Chinese married women[J]. Research on Aging, 2017, 39(2): 345-371. Chen L, Fan H, Chu L. The hidden cost of informal care: An empirical study on female caregivers' subjective well-being[J]. Social Science & Medicine, 2019, 224: 85-93. Van Houtven C H, Norton E C. Informal care and health care use of older adults[J]. Journal of health economics, 2004, 23(6): 1159-1180. Liang H, Wang B, Wu Y, et al. The association between financial support of adult children to their parents and informal care provision in China and its differences in household registration, residence arrangement and community-based care services: 2008~ 2018[J]. International Journal for Equity in Health, 2023, 22(1): 46. Broese van Groenou M I, De Boer A. Providing informal care in a changing society[J]. European journal of ageing, 2016, 13: 271-279. Bauer J M, Sousa-Poza A. Impacts of informal caregiving on caregiver employment, health, and family[J]. Journal of population Ageing, 2015, 8: 113-145. Kim H B, Lim W. Long-term care insurance, informal care, and medical expenditures[J]. Journal of public economics, 2015, 125: 128-142. Courbage C, Montoliu-Montes G, Wagner J. The effect of long-term care public benefits and insurance on informal care from outside the household: Empirical evidence from Italy and Spain[J]. The European journal of health economics, 2020, 21: 1131-1147. Kan M, Kajitani S. The Impact of Public Long-term Care Insurance on Time Spent on Informal Care among At-home Caregives-Findings from Japanese Micro Data[J]. Economic Review, 2014, 65(4): 345-361. Fu R, Noguchi H, Kawamura A, et al. Spillover effect of Japanese long-term care insurance as an employment promotion policy for family caregivers[J]. Journal of health economics, 2017, 56: 103-112. Coe N, Goda G S, Van Houtven C. Family Spillovers of Long-Term Care Insurance[J]. NBER Working Paper, 2015 (w21483). Chen H, Ning J. The impacts of long-term care insurance on health care utilization and expenditure: evidence from China[J]. Health Policy and Planning, 2022, 37(6): 717-727. Carmichael F, Charles S, Hulme C. Who will care? Employment participation and willingness to supply informal care[J]. Journal of health economics, 2010, 29(1): 182-190. Arno P S, Levine C, Memmott M M. The Economic Value Of Informal Caregiving: President Clinton's proposal to provide relief to family caregivers opens a long-overdue discussion of this “invisible” health care sector[J]. Health Affairs, 1999, 18(2): 182-188. Killingsworth M R. Labor supply[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge university press, 1983. Becker G S. A treatise on the family: Enlarged edition[M]. Harvard university press, 1991. Carmichael F, Charles S. The opportunity costs of informal care: does gender matter? [J]. Journal of health economics, 2003, 22(5): 781-803. Nash J. Two-person cooperative games[J]. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 1953: 128-140. Hsieh C T, Klenow P J. Misallocation and manufacturing TFP in China and India[J]. The Quarterly journal of economics, 2009, 124(4): 1403-1448. Coase R H. The problem of social cost[J]. The journal of Law and Economics, 1960, 3: 1-44. Liu H, Ma J, Zhao L. Public long-term care insurance and consumption of elderly households: Evidence from China[J]. Journal of Health Economics, 2023, 90: 102759. Chetty R, Looney A, Kroft K. Salience and Taxation: Theory and Evidence[J]. American Economic Review, 2009, 99. Ferrara E L, Chong A, Duryea S. Soap operas and fertility: Evidence from Brazil[J]. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 2012, 4(4): 1-31. Pierce J R, Schott P K. The surprisingly swift decline of US manufacturing employment[J]. American Economic Review, 2016, 106(7): 1632-1662. Nunn N, Wantchekon L. The slave trade and the origins of mistrust in Africa[J]. American economic review, 2011, 101(7): 3221-3252. Korovkin V, Makarin A. Conflict and intergroup trade: Evidence from the 2014 Russia-Ukraine crisis[J]. American Economic Review, 2023, 113(1): 34-70. Edlund L. Son preference, sex ratios, and marriage patterns[J]. Journal of political Economy, 1999, 107(6): 1275-1304. Foster A, Rosenzweig M. Missing women, the marriage market and economic growth[J]. Unpublished manuscript available at http://adfdell. pstc. brown. edu/papers/sex. pdf, 2001. Duflo E. Grandmothers and granddaughters: old‐age pensions and intrahousehold allocation in South Africa[J]. The World Bank Economic Review, 2003, 17(1): 1-25. Qian N. Missing women and the price of tea in China: The effect of sex-specific earnings on sex imbalance[J]. The Quarterly journal of economics, 2008, 123(3): 1251-1285. Cheng N, Fan E, Wu T M. Sweet unbinding: Sugarcane cultivation and the demise of foot-binding[J]. Journal of Development Economics, 2022, 157: 102876. Chao A, Schor J B. Empirical tests of status consumption: Evidence from women's cosmetics[J]. Journal of Economic psychology, 1998, 19(1): 107-131. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/120472 |