Industrial Policy for Emerging Technologies: The Case of Narrow AI and the Manufacturing Value Chain as Blueprint for the Industrial Metaverse

Dietlmeier, Simon Frederic (2024): Industrial Policy for Emerging Technologies: The Case of Narrow AI and the Manufacturing Value Chain as Blueprint for the Industrial Metaverse.

Abstract

In this paper, a qualitative model is inductively developed describing a dynamic “policy mix” -system of innovation enabling and outbalancing dimensions for the deployment of narrow artificial intelligence (AI) in the manufacturing value chain. A literature review first identifies and summarizes general policy recommendations on AI as an emerging technology presented by authors prior to this research. In the empirical part, policy dimensions and suggestions of policy remedies with a focus on the manufacturing value chain were taxonomized based on exploratory interviews with 37 international elite experts on AI across several stakeholder groups. The findings were refined in a survey with participants of the workshop “AI in Manufacturing” organized by the European Commission. The dimensions build the foundation for an industrial policy in the form of a “four-wing industrial policy system model” that can unleash the value of narrow AI in the manufacturing value chain and addresses barriers to scale-up. It represents a qualitative modelling approach and confirms previous views in the literature that innovation policies need to be thought as “policy mix” and systems. A case study of the European Union’s policy mix for AI validates the model empirically based on additional interviews with ten European civil servants.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Artificial Intelligence; Emerging Technologies; Manufacturing ; Value Chain; System; Policy Mix
• Subjects: A - General Economics and Teaching > A2 - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics > A20 - General; B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B5 - Current Heterodox Approaches; B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B5 - Current Heterodox Approaches > B52 - Institutional ; Evolutionary; H - Public Economics > H7 - State and Local Government ; Intergovernmental Relations > H70 - General; M - Business Administration and Business Economics ; Marketing ; Accounting ; Personnel Economics > M2 - Business Economics > M29 - Other; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics; Y - Miscellaneous Categories > Y4 - Dissertations (unclassified); Z - Other Special Topics > Z1 - Cultural Economics ; Economic Sociology ; Economic Anthropology

References

Accenture (2019). Manufacturing the future: Artificial Intelligence will fuel the next wave of growth for industrial equipment company. [pdf], Available at: https://www.accenture.com/_acnmedia/pdf-74/accenture-pov-manufacturing-digitalfinal.pdf#zoom=50 [Accessed 28-07-2019].

Acemoglu, D. and Restrepo, P. (2018). Artificial intelligence, automation, and work. In: A. Agrawal, J. Gans and A. Goldfarb (eds.), The Economics of Artificial intelligence: An Agenda. National Bureau of Economic Research, pp. 197-236.

Aghion, P., David, P. and Foray, D. (2009). Science, technology and innovation for economic growth: Linking policy research and practice in ‘STIG Systems’. Research Policy, 38(4), pp. 681-693.

Agrawal, A., Gans, J., and Goldfarb, A. (2019). Economic policy for artificial intelligence. Innovation Policy and the Economy, 19(1), pp. 139-159.

Agre, P. and Rotenberg, M. (1998). Technology and Privacy: The New Landscape. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Alcácer, V. and Cruz-Machado, V. (2019). Scanning the industry 4.0: A literature review on technologies for manufacturing systems. Engineering Science and Technology, 22(3), pp. 899-919.

Ananny, M. and Crawford, K. (2018). Seeing without knowing: Limitations of the transparency ideal and its application to algorithmic accountability. New Media & Society, 20(3), pp. 973-989.

Asaro, P. (2016). The liability problem for autonomous artificial agents. 2016 AAAI Spring Symposium Series, pp. 190-194.

Atkinson, R. (2019). Don’t fear AI. [pdf], Available at: https://www.eib.org/attachments/big_ideasdontfearaien.pdf [Accessed 28-07-2019].

Austin, L. (2003). Privacy and the question of technology. Law and Philosophy, 22(2), pp. 119-166.

Autor, D. (2015). Why are there still so many jobs? The history and future of workplace automation. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 29(3), pp. 3-30.

Aziz, S. and Dowling, M. (2019). Machine learning and AI for risk management. In: T. Lynn, J. Mooney, P. Rosati and M. Cummins (eds.), Disrupting Finance. Cham: Springer, pp. 33-50.

Barocas, S. and Selbst, A. (2016). Big data's disparate impact. California Law Review, 104(3), pp. 671-732.

Barton, A. and Lazarsfeld, P. (1955). Some functions of qualitative analysis in social research. Frankfurter Beiträge zur Soziologie, pp. 321-361.

Baum, S. (2017). On the promotion of safe and socially beneficial artificial intelligence. AI & Society, 32(4), pp. 543-551.

Baum, S. (2018). Reconciliation between factions focused on near-term and long-term artificial intelligence. AI & Society, 33(4), pp. 565-572.

Benrimoh D., Israel S., Perlman K., Fratila R., Krause M. (2018). Meticulous transparency. An evaluation process for an agile AI regulatory scheme. In: M. Mouhoub, S. Sadaoui, O. Ait Mohamed and M. Ali (eds.), Recent Trends and Future Technology in Applied Intelligence. Cham: Springer, pp. 869-880.

Bertolini, A. (2013). Robots as products: the case for a realistic analysis of robotic applications and liability rules. Law, Innovation and Technology, 5(2), pp. 214-247.

Bessen, J., (2018). AI and jobs: The role of demand. In: A. Agrawal, J. Gans and A. Goldfarb (eds.), The Economics of Artificial Intelligence: An Agenda. National Bureau of Economic Research, pp. 291-307.

Bodansky, D. (1991). Law: Scientific uncertainty and the precautionary principle. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 33(7), pp. 4-44.

Boesl, D.B.O. and Bode, B.A.M. (2016). Technology governance. IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Innovative Business Practices for the Transformation of Societies (EmergiTech), pp. 421-425.

Boesl, D.B.O. and Bode, B.A.M. (2017). Roboethics and robotic governance. A literature review and research agenda. Iberian Robotics Conference, pp. 140-146.

Boland, A., Cherry, M. and Dickson, R. (2013). Doing a Systematic Review: A Student's Guide. London: Sage Publications.

Borgogno, O. and Colangelo, G. (2019). Data sharing and interoperability: Fostering innovation and competition through APIs. Computer Law and Security Review, Forthcoming.

Bostrom, N., Dafoe, A. and Flynn, C. (2018). Public policy and superintelligent AI: A vector field approach. Governance of AI program, Future of Humanity Institute, University of Oxford. Forthcoming in: S. Liao (ed.): Ethics of Artificial Intelligence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Boyd, R. and Holton, R. (2018). Technology, innovation, employment and power: Does robotics and artificial intelligence really mean social transformation? Journal of Sociology, 54(3), pp. 331-345.

Branscomb, L. and Keller, J. (1999). Investing in Innovation: Creating a Research and Innovation Policy that Works. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Bresnahan, T. and Trajtenberg, M. (1995). General purpose technologies ‘Engines of growth’? Journal of Econometrics, 65(1), pp. 83-108.

Brinkmann, S. and Kvale, S. (2015). InterViews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing, 3rd ed. Los Angeles: Sage.

Brundage, M., Avin, S., Clark, J., Toner, H., Eckersley, P., Garfinkel, B., Dafoe, A., Scharre, P., Zeitzoff, T. and Filar, B. (2018). The malicious use of artificial intelligence: Forecasting, prevention, and mitigation. [pdf], Available at: https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv /papers/1802/1802.07228.pdf [Accessed 20-07-2019].

Brynjolfsson, E., Mitchell, T. and Rock, D. (2018). What can machines learn, and what does it mean for occupations and the economy? AEA Papers and Proceedings, 108, pp. 43-47.

Burrell, J. (2016). How the machine ‘thinks’: Understanding opacity in machine learning algorithms. Big Data & Society, 3(1), pp. 1-12.

Calo, R. (2017). Artificial intelligence policy: A primer and roadmap. U.C. Davis Law Review, 51(2), pp. 399-436.

Cath, C., Wachter, S., Mittelstadt, B., Taddeo, M. and Floridi, L. (2018). Artificial intelligence and the ‘good society’: The US, EU, and UK approach. Science and Engineering Ethics, 24(2), pp. 505-528.

Čerka, P., Grigiene, J. and Sirbikyte, G. (2015). Liability for damages caused by artificial intelligence. Computer Law and Security Review, 31(3), pp. 376-389.

Cimoli, M., Dosi, G. and Stiglitz, J. (2009). The Political Economy of Capabilities Accumulation: The Past and Future of Policies for Industrial Development. LEM Working Paper Series, 2008/15.

Clarke, S. (2005). Future technologies, dystopic futures and the precautionary principle. Ethics and Information Technology, 7(3), pp. 121-126.

Crane, D., Logue, K. and Pilz, B. (2016). A survey of legal issues arising from the deployment of autonomous and connected vehicles. Michigan Telecommunications and Technology Law Review, 23(2), pp. 191-320.

Deloitte (2018). Distinctive traits of digital frontrunners in manufacturing. Embracing the Fourth Industrial Revolution. [pdf], Available at: https://www2.deloitte.com/insights/us/en/focus/industry-4-0/digital-leaders-in-mnufacturing-fourth-industrial-revolution.html [Accessed 28-07-2019].

Deloitte (2019). Future in the balance? How countries are pursuing an AI advantage. [pdf], Available at: https://www2.deloitte.com/cn/en/ pages/technology- media-and-telecommunications-articles/how-countries-are-pursuing-an-ai- advantage.html [Accessed 28-07-2019].

Easterby-Smith, M., Thorpe, R. and Jackson, P. (2012). Management Research. 4th ed., London: Sage.

Edmondson, A. and McManus, S. (2007). Methodological fit in management field research. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), pp. 1246-1264.

Edquist, C. (2013). Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions and Organizations. London: Routledge.

European Commission (2018a). Communication on Artificial Intelligence. COM(2018) 237 final. [pdf], Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/communication-artificial-intelligence-europe [Accessed 30-07-2019].

European Commission (2018b). Coordinated Plan on Artificial Intelligence. COM(2018) 795 final. [pdf], Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/coordinated-plan-artificial-intelligence [Accessed 30-07-2019].

European Commission (2019). Building Trust in Human-Centric Artificial Intelligence. COM(2019) 168 final. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/communication-building-trust-human-centric-artificial-intelligence [Accessed 30-07-2019].

European Commission (2021). Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council: Laying down Harmonised Rules on Artificial Intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act) and Amending Certain Union Legislative Acts. COM(2021) 206 final. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52021PC0206 &from=EN [Accessed 07-10-2022].

Felten, E., Raj, M. and Seamans, R. (2018). A method to link advances in artificial intelligence to occupational abilities. AEA Papers and Proceedings 2018, 108, pp. 1-4.

Flanagan, K., Uyarra, E. and Laranja, M. (2011). Reconceptualising the ‘policy mix’for innovation. Research Policy, 40(5), pp. 702-713.

Flick, U., Rapley, T., Gibbs, G., Banks, M., Barbour, R., Angrosino, M. and Kvale, S. (2007). The Sage Qualitative Research Kit. London: Sage.

Floridi, L. (2016). Mature information societies. A matter of expectations. Philosophy & Technology, 29(1), pp. 1-4.

Frey, C. and Osborne, M. (2017). The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 114, pp. 254-280.

Friedewald, M., Vildjiounaite, E., Punie, Y. and Wright, D. (2007). Privacy, identity and security in ambient intelligence: A scenario analysis. Telematics and Informatics, 24(1), pp. 15-29.

FTI (2018). Artificial intelligence: the race is on. The global policy response to AI. [pdf], Available at: https://euagenda.eu/upload/publications/untitled-128126-ea.pdf [Accessed 28-07-2019].

Furman, J. and Seamans, R. (2019). AI and the economy. Innovation Policy and the Economy, 19, pp. 161-191.

Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Gandy, O. (2010). Engaging rational discrimination: exploring reasons for placing regulatory constraints on decision support systems. Ethics and Information Technology, 12(1), pp. 29-42.

Gawer, A. (2014). Bridging differing perspectives on technological platforms: Toward an integrative framework. Research Policy, 43, pp. 1239-1249.

Glaser, B. and Strauss, A. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Hawthorne: Aldine de Gruyter.

Ghanbarnejad, F., Gerlach, M., Miotto, J. M., & Altmann, E. G. (2014). Extracting information from S-curves of language change. Journal of The Royal Society Interface, 11(101), 20141044.

Goldfarb, A. and Tucker, C. (2012). Privacy and innovation. Innovation Policy and the Economy, 12(1), pp. 65-90.

Goodall, N. (2014). Ethical decision making during automated vehicle crashes. Transportation Research Record, 2424(1), pp. 58-65.

Goodman, B. and Flaxman, S. (2017). European union regulations on algorithmic decision making and a "right to explanation". AI Magazine, 38(3), pp. 50-57.

Goolsbee, A. (2018). Public policy in an AI economy. In: A. Agrawal, J. Gans and A.Goldfarb (eds.), The Economics of Artificial Intelligence: An Agenda. National Bureau of Economic Research, pp. 309-316.

Graham, O. (1994). Losing Time: The Industrial Policy Debate. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Guihot, M., Matthew, A. and Suzor, N. (2017). Nudging robots: Innovative solutions to regulate artificial intelligence. Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law, 20, pp. 385-456.

Gunningham, N. and Sinclair, D. (1999). Regulatory pluralism: Designing policy mixes for environmental protection. Law & Policy, 21(1), pp. 49-76.

Gurkaynak, G., Yilmaz, I. and Haksever, G. (2016). Stifling artificial intelligence: Human perils. Computer Law and Security Review, 32(5), pp. 749-758.

Hay, C. (1999). Crisis and the structural transformation of the state: interrogating the process of change. The British Journal of Politics & International Relations, 1(3), pp. 317-344.

Heiberger, R. and Robbins, N. (2014). Design of diverging stacked bar charts for Likert scales and other applications. Journal of Statistical Software, 57(5), pp. 1-32.

Heinen, N., Heuer, A. and Schautschick, P. (2017). Artificial intelligence and human labour: Implications for companies and economic policy. Wirtschaftsdienst, 97(10), pp. 714-720.

Heinonen, K., Helkkula, A., Holmlund‐Rytkönen, M., Mustak, M., Jaakkola, E. and Halinen, A. (2013). Customer participation and value creation: A systematic review and research implications. Managing Service Quality, 23(4), pp. 341-359.

Hevelke, A. and Nida-Rümelin, J. (2015). Responsibility for crashes of autonomous vehicles: An ethical analysis. Science and Engineering Ethics, 21(3), pp. 619-630.

Himma, K. (2009). Artificial agency, consciousness, and the criteria for moral agency: What properties must an artificial agent have to be a moral agent? Ethics and Information Technology, 11(1), pp. 19-29.

Hristov, K. (2017). Internet plus policy: A study on how China can achieve economic growth through the internet of things. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 8(3), pp. 375-386.

Iphofen, R. and Kritikos, M. (2019). Regulating artificial intelligence and robotics: ethics by design in a digital society. Contemporary Social Science, pp. 1-15.

Isaksen, S., Dorval, K. and Treffinger, D. (2010). Creative Approaches to Problem Solving: A Framework for Innovation and Change. London: Sage.

Kay, A. (2006). The Dynamics of Public Policy: Theory and Evidence. Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.

Ketokivi, M. and Mantere, S. (2010). Two strategies for inductive reasoning in organizational research. Academy of Management Review, 35(2), pp. 315-333.

Kirchberger, T. (2017). European union policy-making on robotics and artificial intelligence: Selected issues. Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy, 13, pp. 191-214.

Kroll, J., Barocas, S., Felten, E., Reidenberg, J., Robinson, D. and Yu, H. (2016). Accountable algorithms. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 165, pp. 633-706.

Li, J. F. & Garnsey, E. (2014). Policy-driven ecosystems for new vaccine development. Technovation, 34, pp. 762-772.

Lin, P., Jenkins, R. and Abney, K. (2017). Robot Ethics 2.0: From Autonomous Cars to Artificial Intelligence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Maas, M. (2018). Regulating for 'normal AI accidents': Operational lessons for the responsible governance of artificial intelligence deployment. Proceedings of the 2018 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, pp. 223-228.

Magro, E. and Wilson, J. (2013). Complex innovation policy systems: Towards an evaluation mix. Research Policy, 42(9), pp. 1647-1656.

Majone, G. (2002). The precautionary principle and its policy implications. Journal of Common Market Studies, 40(1), pp. 89-109.

McKinsey & Company (2018). Artificial intelligence: automotive’s new value-creating engine. McKinsey Center for Future Mobility. [pdf], Available at: https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/automotive-and-assembly/our�insights/artificial-intelligence-as-auto-companies-new-engine-of-value [Accessed 28-07-2019].

McNally, P. and Inayatullah, S. (1988). The rights of robots: Technology, culture and law in the 21st century. Futures, 20(2), pp. 119-136.

Miles, M. and Huberman, A. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. London: Sage.

Moore, J. F. (1993). Predators and prey: A new ecology of competition. Harvard Business Review, 71, pp. 75-86.

Mundell, R. (1962). The appropriate use of monetary and fiscal policy for internal and external stability. IMF Staff Papers, 9(1), pp. 70-79.

Naisbitt, J. (1982). Megatrends. New York: Warner Books. Niederman, F. & March, S. (2019). The “Theoretical lens” concept: We all know what it means, but do we all know the same thing?. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 44(1), pp. 1-33.

Oqubay, A. (2015). Made in Africa: Industrial Policy in Ethiopia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Osborn, A. (1953). Applied Imagination: Principles and Procedures of Creative Thinking. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.

Padmore, T., Schuetze, H., & Gibson, H. (1998). Modeling systems of innovation: An enterprise-centered view. Research Policy, 26(6), pp. 605-624.

Padmore, T., & Gibson, H. (1998). Modelling systems of innovation: II. A framework for industrial cluster analysis in regions. Research Policy, 26(6), pp. 625-641.

Palmerini, E., Bertolini, A., Battaglia, F., Koops, B., Carnevale, A. and Salvini, P. (2016). RoboLaw: Towards a European framework for robotics regulation. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 86, pp. 78-85.

Park, S. (2018). The fourth industrial revolution and implications for innovative cluster policies. AI & Society, 33(3), pp. 433-445.

Pasquale, F. (2015). The Black Box Society. Boston: Harvard University Press.

Porter, M.E. (1985). Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. New York: Free Press.

Rouvroy, A. (2008). Privacy, data protection, and the unprecedented challenges of ambient intelligence. Studies in Ethics, Law, and Technology, 2(1), pp. 1-51.

Russell, S. and Norvig, P. (2016). Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. Edinburgh: Pearson Education Limited.

Sapsford, R. and Jupp, V. (2006). Data Collection and Analysis. 2nd ed., London: Sage.

Saunders, M., Thornhill, A. and Lewis, P. (2016). Research Methods for Business Students. 7th ed., Harlow: Pearson.

Scherb, A., Palmer, A., Frattaroli, S. and Pollack, K. (2012). Exploring food system policy: A survey of food policy councils in the United States. Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development, 2(4), pp. 3-14.

Scherer, M. (2015). Regulating artificial intelligence systems: Risks, challenges, competencies, and strategies. Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, 29(2), pp. 353-400.

Schuelke-Leech, B., Jordan, S. and Barry, B. (2019). Regulating autonomy: An assessment of policy language for highly automated vehicles. Review of Policy Research, 36(4), pp. 547-579.

Schwab, K. (2017). The Fourth Industrial Revolution. Geneva: World Economic Forum.

Solaiman, S. (2017). Legal personality of robots, corporations, idols and chimpanzees: a quest for legitimacy. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 25(2), pp. 155-179.

Sotarauta, M. & Srinivas, S. (2006). Co-Evolutionary Policy Processes: Understanding Innovative Economies and Future Resilience. Futures, 38(3), 312-336.

Sparrow, R. (2016). Kicking a robot dog. ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human�Robot Interaction, pp. 229-229.

Staat, W. (1993). On Abduction, Deduction, Induction and the Categories. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 29(2), 225-237.

Stahl, B. and Wright, D. (2018). Ethics and privacy in AI and big data: Implementing responsible research and innovation. IEEE Security and Privacy, 16(3), pp. 26-33.

Stilgoe, J., Owen, R. and Macnaghten, P. (2013). Developing a framework for responsible innovation. Research Policy, 42(9), pp. 1568-1580.

Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Newbury Park: Sage.

Sunstein, C. (2002). Beyond the precautionary principle. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 151(3), pp. 1003-1058.

Székely, I., Dániel Szabó, M. and Vissy, B. (2011). Regulating the future? Law, ethics, and emerging technologies. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, 9(3), pp. 180-194.

Tabandeh, A. (1994). Characterising artificial intelligence technology for international transfer. AI & Society, 8(4), pp. 315-325.

Tiwana, A. (2014). Platform Ecosystems: Aligning Architecture, Governance, and Strategy. Waltham, MA: Morgan Kaufmann.

Tutt, A. (2016). An FDA for algorithms. Administrative Law Review, 83-123.

Van Liebergen, B. (2017). Machine learning: A revolution in risk management and compliance? Journal of Financial Transformation, 45, pp. 60-67.

Villaronga, E. and Golia, A. (2019). Robots, standards and the law: Rivalries between private standards and public policymaking for robot governance. Computer Law & Security Review, 35(2), pp. 129-144.

Wall, L. (2018). Some financial regulatory implications of artificial intelligence. Journal of Economics and Business, 100, pp. 55-63.

Wallach, W. (2011). From robots to techno sapiens: Ethics, law and public policy in the development of robotics and neurotechnologies. Law, Innovation and Technology, 3(2), pp. 185-207.

Witt, U. (2003). Economic policy making in evolutionary perspective. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 13(2), pp. 77-94.

Wright, D. (2011). A framework for the ethical impact assessment of information technology. Ethics and information technology, 13(3), pp. 199-226.

Wurah, A. (2017). We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all robots are created equal. Journal of Futures Studies, 22(2), pp. 61-74.

Yearworth, M. (2010). Inductive modelling of an entrepreneurial system. Proceedings of the 28th International Conference of the System Dynamics Society, pp. 25-29.

Zhong, R., Xu, X., Klotz, E. and Newman, S. (2017). Intelligent Manufacturing in the Context of Industry 4.0: A Review. Engineering, 3(5), pp. 616-630.

6, P. (2001a). Ethics, regulation and the new artificial intelligence. Part I: Accountability and power. Information Communication and Society, 4(2), pp. 199-229.

6, P. (2001b). Ethics, regulation and the new artificial intelligence. Part II: autonomy and liability. Information, Communication & Society, 4(3), pp. 406-434.