Evaluating Stock Selection in the SaaS Industry: The Effectiveness of the Rule of 40

Lee, King Fuei (2024): Evaluating Stock Selection in the SaaS Industry: The Effectiveness of the Rule of 40. Forthcoming in: Applied Finance Letters , Vol. 13, (July 2024): pp. 168-185.

Abstract

The Rule of 40 is a popular financial guideline used by software-as-a-service (SaaS) industry participants to assess the operational health of the companies. This paper investigates the effectiveness of the Rule of 40 as a stock selection criterion. Our study analyses a sample of 1771 SaaS companies worldwide spanning the period 2003-2022. The findings demonstrate that the Rule of 40 adds value and delivers a moderately high Sharpe ratio as a stock selection tool. A modified rule, the SaaS Investing Rule of 65, is proposed and found to outperform the Rule of 40 in identifying relative winners and losers within the SaaS space. The effectiveness of the rules raises practical implications for investors and analysts. Additionally, we explore the effectiveness of alternative versions of the Rule of 40 using different measures of profitability, as well investigate whether the returns are driven by traditional style factors.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Rule of 40, SaaS, software-as-a-service, stock selection, SaaS Investing Rule of 65
• Subjects: G - Financial Economics > G1 - General Financial Markets > G10 - General; G - Financial Economics > G1 - General Financial Markets > G12 - Asset Pricing ; Trading Volume ; Bond Interest Rates

References

1. Bandulet, F., 2017. Software-as-a-Service as Disruptive Technology in the Enterprise Application Market: An Empirical Analysis of Revenue Growth and Profitability among SaaS Providers (2005-2015). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/319879108_Software-as-a-Service_as_Disruptive_Innovation_in_the_Enterprise_Application_Market_An_Empirical_Analysis_of_Revenue_Growth_and_Profitability_among_SaaS_Providers_2005_-_2015

2. Cadambi, P. and Easwaran, S., 2016. Transforming Your SaaS Business: A Strategic Guide for Optimizing Business Performance. KPMG. https://assets.kpmg.com/content/dam/kpmg/pdf/2016/07/transforming-saas.pdf

3. Cummings, D., 2015. Rule of 40% for SaaS Companies. David Cummings on Startups. https://davidcummings.org/2015/03/08/rule-of-40-for-saas-companies/

4. Davis, J., Fama, E. and French, K., 2000. Characteristics, Covariances, and Average Returns: 1929 to 1997. Journal of Finance 55(1), 389–4062

5. Dempsey, D. and Kelliher, F., 2017. Industry Trends in Cloud Computing: Alternative Business-to-Business Revenue Models. Palgrave Macmillan.

6. Depeyrot, T., and Heap, S., 2018. Hacking Software’s Rule of 40. Bain and Company. https://www.bain.com/insights/hacking-softwares-rule-of-40/

7. Dolgaia, A. and Sorokina, V., 2020. The Investment Analysis of IT Companies: A Case Study of Yandex. Review of Business and Economics Studies, 10(3), 33-55.

8. Eriksen, M., 2022. Is the Rule of 40 an Outdated SaaS KPI?. Viking Venture. https://vikingventure.com/is-the-rule-of-40-an-outdated-saas-kpi/#:~:text=Short%20answer%3A%20no%2C%20it%20is,slight%20adjustment%20to%20the%20calculation.

9. Eugene, F. and French, K., 1992. The Cross-Section of Expected Stock Returns. Journal of Finance, 47(2), 427-465.

10. Feld, B., 2015. The Rule of 40% For a Healthy SaaS Company. Brad Feld blog. https://feld.com/archives/2015/02/rule-40-healthy-saas-company/

11. Fisher, K., 1984. Super Stocks. Homewood, Illinois: Dow Jones-Irwin.

12. Floerecke, S. and Lehner, F., 2022. Meta-Study of Success-Related Factors of SaaS Providers Based on a Cloud Computing Ecosystem Perspective. Handbook on Digital Business Ecosystems: Strategies, Platforms, Technologies, Governance and Societal Challenges, p.327.

13. Gardner, T., 2015. Essential SaaS Metrics: Revenue Retention Fundamentals. SaaS Capital. https://www.saas-capital.com/blog-posts/essential-saas-metrics-revenue-retention-fundamentals/

14. Gardner, T., 2016. Determining the Worth of Your SaaS Company. Techcrunch. https://techcrunch.com/2016/10/07/determining-the-worth-of-your-saas-company/

15. Guo, Z., and Ma, D., 2018. A Model of Competition Between Perpetual Software and Software as a Service. MIS Quarterly, 42(1), 101-120.

16. Heimann, R. and Rathi, P. (2017) SaaS Operating Metrics and Valuation Benchmarking Study. Rvier Cities. https://rccf.com/wp-content/uploads/River-Cities-SaaS-Operating-Metrics-and-Valuation-Benchmarking-Study.pdf

17. Ilmanen, A., Maloney, T. and Ross, A., 2014. Exploring Macroeconomic Sensitivities: How Investments Respond to Different Economic Environments. Journal of Portfolio Management 40(3), 87-99.

18. Kellogg, D., 2013. What Drives SaaS Company Valuation? Growth!. Kellblog. https://kellblog.com/2013/06/05/what-drives-saas-company-valuation-growth/

19. Kellogg, D., 2023. Metrics That Matter in 2023: My KiwiSaaS Presentation Slides. Kellblog. https://kellblog.com/2023/03/29/metrics-that-matter-in-2023-my-kiwisaas-presentation-slides/

20. Latka, N., 2022. What is the Rule of 40? Calculation Guide Included. LATKA - B2B SaaS Blog. https://blog.getlatka.com/rule-of-40/

21. Leibowitz, M., 2002. The Levered P/E Ratio. Financial Analysts Journal 58(6), 68-77.

22. Li, S., Cheng, H. K., Duan, Y. and Yang, Y. C., 2017. A Study of Enterprise Software Licensing Models. Journal of Management Information Systems, 34(1), 177-205.

23. Löfgren, E. and Pettersson, L., 2021. Mäta Bör Man : En studie om prestationsmått och kvalitetskriterier inom SaaS-B2B branschen. Handelshogskolan Umea University. https://umu.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1564149/FULLTEXT02.pdf

24. Newton, T. and Schlecht, I., 2016. SaaS Investors: Mind The Valuation 'GAP' (Growth At Any Price). Seeking Alpha. https://seekingalpha.com/article/3981986-saas-investors-mind-valuation-gap-growth-price

25. Nissim, D. and Penman,S., 1999. Ratio Analysis and Equity Valuation. Unpublished Working Paper. Columbia University – Department of Accounting.

26. Norges Bank Investment Management, 2022. Stress Testing. Norges Bank. https://www.nbim.no/contentassets/1c26bc90eb274356a60fd77ae5a5bf49/stress-testing-2022.pdf

27. Osterwalder, A., and Pigneur, Y., 2010. Business Model Generation: A Handbook for Visionaries, Game Changers, and Challengers. Wiley.

28. Penman, S, Richardson, S. and Tuna, A., 2005. The Book-to-Price Effect in Stock Returns: Accounting for Leverage. Unpublished Working Paper. Columbia University – Department of Accounting.

29. Roche, P. and Tandon, S., 2021. SaaS and the Rule of 40: Keys to the Critical Value Creation Metric. McKinsey and Company. https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/technology-media-and-telecommunications/our-insights/saas-and-the-rule-of-40-keys-to-the-critical-value-creation-metric

30. Shim, S. and Lee, B., 2012. Sustainable Competitive Advantage of a System Goods Innovator in a Market With Network Effects and Entry Threats. Decision Support Systems, 52(2), 308-317.

31. Skok, D., 2017. SaaS Metrics 2.0 - A Guide to Measuring and Improving What Matters. For Entrepreneurs From David Skok. https://www.forentrepreneurs.com/saasmetrics-2/

32. Strazzulla, P., 2016. Some Thoughts on Valuing SaaS Companies. Medium. https://blog.philstrazzulla.com/some-thoughts-on-valuing-saas-companies-52939f24e31

33. Walther, S., Plank, A., Eymann, T., Singh, N. and Phadke, G., 2012. Success Factors and Value Propositions of Software as a Service Providers – A Literature Review and Classification. AMCIS 2012 Proceedings. 1.

34. York, J., 2012. SaaS Metrics FAQs | What is Churn?. Chaotic Flow. http://chaotic-flow.com/saas-metrics-faqs-what-is-churn/