de Rus, Gines (2000): Infraestructuras: ¿Qué podemos decir los economistas? Published in: La investigación económica en España: 1990-2000. Una década de cambios. (2001)
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_12194.pdf Download (205kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Infrastructures have been traditionally built, maintained and operated by the public sector. Road and railway networks, energy, electricity and water were traditionally designed in public sector headquarters in many countries until the eighties. Since then, and due to fiscal crisis and public sector inefficiencies, among other factors, privatization is a key ingredient of the industrial policy all over the world.
Technological change and the analysis of economists have modified the conventional view which assimilated infrastructure and public monopoly. Technological developments explain part of the change in the telecommunication markets. Moreover, the economic analysis showed that the electricity sector, railways or ports had several activities which could be unbundled as a way to introduce competition.
One of the field which has attracted the attention of economic research in the last two decades is the contribution of public infrastructure to economic growth, though economists had been investigating long time before how to assess investment projects in public infrastructure, or how should prices be set in the context of long live assets, sunk costs, congestion and externalities
This paper provides a broad overview of the economics of infrastructure.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Infraestructuras: ¿Qué podemos decir los economistas? |
English Title: | Infrastructure: what can the economists say? |
Language: | Spanish |
Keywords: | Infraestructure, utilities, regulation cost-benefit analysis |
Subjects: | H - Public Economics > H4 - Publicly Provided Goods > H41 - Public Goods K - Law and Economics > K2 - Regulation and Business Law > K23 - Regulated Industries and Administrative Law L - Industrial Organization > L9 - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities > L91 - Transportation: General D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D61 - Allocative Efficiency ; Cost-Benefit Analysis |
Item ID: | 12194 |
Depositing User: | Gines de Rus |
Date Deposited: | 16 Dec 2008 08:59 |
Last Modified: | 01 Oct 2019 13:32 |
References: | Adler, H.A. (1987): Economic appraisal of transport projects. The Johns Hopkins University Press. Aschauer, D. A. (1989a): “Is public expenditure productive?”. Journal of Monetary Economics, 23(2) pp. 177-200. Aschauer, D. A. (1989b): “Public investment and productivity growth in the group of seven”. Econonomic Perspectives 13(5), pp. 17-25. Brautigan, R. (1989): “Optimal policies for natural monopolies”, en R. Schmalensee and R. Willig. Handbook of Industrial Organisation, vol. II. North Holland. Crampes, C. y A. Estache (1998): “Regulatory trade-offs in the design of concession contracts”. Utilities Policy, n 7, pp. 1-13. de la Fuente, A. (1996): “Infraestructuras y productividad: un panorama de la evidencia empírica”. Información Comercial Española, n 757, pp. 25-39. de la Fuente, A. (2000): Infrastructures and productivity: a survey. Instituto de Análisis Económico, CSIC. de Rus, G. (1993). Los servicios de transporte aéreo, marítimo y terrestre: estructura económica y regulación. Documento de Trabajo. FEDEA. Madrid. de Rus, G. y G. Nombela (1999): Least present value of net revenue: a new proposal for highway concessions. Departamento de Análisis Económico Aplicado. Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. Engel, E.; R. Fischer and A. Galetovic (1997): “Highway franchising: pitfalls and opportunities”, American Economic Review, 87 (2), 68-72. Gómez-Ibáñez, J.A. y J.R. Meyer (1993): Going private: the international experience with transport privatisation. Brookings Institution.Washington, D.C. Gramlich, E. (1994): “Infrastructure investment: A review essay”. Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 32, pp. 1176-1196. Guasch, J.L. (2000): Impact of concessions’ design in sector performance: an empirical analysis of ten years of performance, mimeo, World Bank, Washington. Jones, L.P., P. Tandon and I. Vogelsang (1990): Selling public enterprises: A cost- benefit methodology. The MIT Press. Kerf, M., R. D. Gray, T. Irwin, C. Lévesque y R. R. Taylor (1998): “Concessions for infrastructure. A guide to their design and award". World Bank Technical Paper, nº 399. Kühn, K-U y P. Regibeau (1998): ¿Ha llegado la competencia?. Un análisis económico de la reforma de la regulación del sector eléctrico en España. Instituto de Análisis Económico. CSIC. Laffont, J.J. y J. Tirole (1993): A theory of incentives in procurement and regulation. The MIT Press. Mas, M., J. Maudos, F. Pérez y E. Uriel (1995): APublic capital and convergence in the Spanish regions@. Entreprenenrship & Regional Development, n1 7, pp. 309-327. Mas, M., J. Maudos, F. Pérez y E. Uriel (1996): El “stock” de capital en España y sus comunidades autónomas, 2ª edición revisada, 3 volúmenes. Fundación BBV. Mas, M., J. Maudos, F. Pérez y E. Uriel (1998): El “stock” de capital en España y su distribución territorial, 3ª edición, 4 volúmenes. Fundación BBV. Ottaviano, G. y D. Puga (1998): “Agglomeration in the global economy: A survey of the new economic geography”. The World Economy. 21(6): 707-731. Pearce, D.W. y C.A. Nash (1981): The social appraisal of projects. A text in cost-benefit analysis. Macmillan. Preston, J. y C. A. Nash (1994): European railway comparisons and the future of RENFE. Documento de trabajo. FEDEA. Puga, D. (2000): “European regional policies in light of recent location theories”, presentado en el seminario Globalization and the location of economic activities. Instituto Catalán de Finanzas. Instituo de Análisis Económico. Vickerman, R., K. Spiekermann y M. Wegener (1999): “Accesibility and economic development in Europe”. Regional Studies, 33 (1): 1-15. World Bank (1994): Infrastructure for development. World Development Report. Oxford University Press. World Bank (1997): Private participation in infrastructure. The World Bank, Washington D.C. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/12194 |