Productivity or privilege: Game-theoretic and experimental models of social class

Gunnthorsdottir, Anna and Thorsteinsson, Palmar (2024): Productivity or privilege: Game-theoretic and experimental models of social class.

Abstract

Social stratification, segregation and inequity invite concerns about fairness and social harmony. Our game-theoretic and experimental results indicate that they can also be detrimental to productivity, efficiency, and welfare. Class is defined by players’ resources, incentives to make a public contribution, and social mobility. We discuss the model’s real-world applications, and ways to increase efficiency and welfare through increased equity, mobility, or competition. We also describe how the model can be adapted to represent and experimentally test different class structures, the interaction between demographic characteristics and class, and the effectiveness of policies that modify incentives. We experimentally test a two-class model. The poorer L-class are socially mobile: for them, effort is linked to social positioning and earnings akin to what is often referred to as a Middle-Class mindset. The productive L-players support a relatively efficient equilibrium that encompasses both classes. Upper-class H-players, notwithstanding their guaranteed privilege and superior resources, are relatively unproductive and display behavior akin to class-consciousness by contributing only what is necessary to remain above the L-class. The experimental results confirm that humans respond swiftly to incentives associated with their material status and economic opportunities and suggest that policies aimed at increasing welfare through incentive modification can be successful.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Inequality, social class, game theory, experiment, welfare
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C7 - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory > C72 - Noncooperative Games; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C9 - Design of Experiments > C91 - Laboratory, Individual Behavior; D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D63 - Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement; I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I3 - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty; I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I3 - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty > I38 - Government Policy ; Provision and Effects of Welfare Programs

References

Alesina, A.,& Angeletos, G.-M. (2005). Fairness and Redistribution. American Economic Review, 95 (4), 960-980. DOI:10.1257/0002828054825655.

Alesina, A., & Giuliano, P. (2009), Preferences for Redistribution. IZA Discussion Paper No. 4056, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1369802 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1369802

Alfani, G. (2021). Economic inequality in preindustrial times: Europe and beyond. Journal of Economic Literature, 59 (1), 3-44. https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/jel.20191449

Andreoni, J. (1989). Giving with impure altruism: Applications to charity and ricardian Equivalence. Journal of Political Economy, 97 (6), 1447–1458. https://doi.org/10.1086/261662.

Anecdotes of Voltaire (1786). The Edinburgh Magazine or Literary Miscellany 3(6), p. 410. Edinburgh, UK: Sibbald. https://archive.org/details/sim_edinburgh-magazine-or-literary-miscellany_1786-06_3/page/410/mode/2up?q=Voltaire. Retrieved 8 September 2023.

Becker, G. (I974). A theory of social interactions. Journal of Political Economy, 82(6), 1063-1093. https://doi.org/10.1086/260265

Boffey, D. (2022, September 13). King Charles will not pay tax on inheritance from the queen. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2022/sep/13/king-charles-will-not-pay-tax-on-inheritance-from-the-queen

Brandts, J., Saijo, T., & Schram, A. (2004). How universal is behavior? A four country comparison of spite and cooperation in voluntary contribution mechanisms. Public Choice, 119, 381-424. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:puch.0000033329.53595.1b

Bryant, C. (2017, September 7). The long road: How the aristocracy preserved their power. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/news/2017/sep/07/how-the-aristocracy-preserved-their-power

Buckley, E., & Croson, R. (2006). Income and wealth heterogeneity in the voluntary provision of linear public goods. Journal of Public Economics, 90(4), 935-955. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2005.06.002

Camerer, C. (2003). Behavioral Game Theory. Ch. 7.3, pp. 367-375.

Carroll, D., & Chen, A. (2016). Income Inequality Matters, but Mobility Is Just as Important. Economic Commentary (Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland), 1-6. DOI 10.26509/frbc-ec-201606

Chan, K., Mestelman, S., Moir, R., & Muller, R. A. (1996). The voluntary provision of public goods under varying income distributions. Canadian Journal of Economics, 29, 54-69.

Chang W-C. (2021). Corruption and perceived fairness: empirical evidence from East Asian countries. Journal of East Asian Studies, 21(2), 305-330. https://doi.org/10.1017/jea.2020.44

Charles, 5., Gherman, T., & Paliza, J.C. (2022). The Gini Index: A Modern Measure of Inequality. In: 5. Charles & A. Emrouznejad (Eds.) Modern Indices for International Economic Diplomacy. NY: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84535-3_3

Chelwa, G., Hamilton, D., & Stewart, J. (2022). Stratification economics: Core constructs and policy implications. Journal of Economic Literature, 60(2), 377-399. DOI:10.1257/jel.20211687

Cherry, T., Kroll, S., & Shogren, J. (2005). The impact of endowment heterogeneity and origin on public good contributions: Evidence from the lab. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 57(3), 357–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2003.11.010

Colgrave, S. (2019, Nov. 6). The strange death of middle-class England. Byline Times. https://bylinetimes.com/2019/11/06/the-strange-death-of-middle-class-england/.

Confederation of Icelandic Enterprise (2011). Kaupgjaldskrá SA Nr. 13. Available from http://old.sa.is/media/1186/13.pdf. Retrieved 25 October 2023.

Cooper, M. (2015, Oct. 2). The downsizing of the American dream. The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2015/10/american-dreams/408535/

Croson, R. (2008). Public Goods Experiments. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_2159-1

Dal Bó, E., & Dal Bó, P. (2014). Do the right thing: The effects of moral suasion on cooperation. Journal of Public Economics, 17, 28-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2014.05.002

Davis, K., & Moore, W. E. (1944). Some Principles of Stratification. American Sociological Review,10(2), 242–249. https://doi.org/10.2307/2085643

Duca, S., Helbing, D., & Nax, H. (2018). Assortative Matching with Inequality in Voluntary Contribution Games. Computational Economics, 52, 1029–1043. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10614-017-9774-5

Emerson, R. (1962). Power-dependence relations. American Sociological Review, 21(1), 31-41. https://doi.org/10.2307/2089716

Encyclopedia Britannica (2023, Nov. 17). Social class: Characteristics of the principal classes. https://www.britannica.com/topic/social-class. Retrieved 27 November 2023.

Fehr, E., & Gächter, S. (2000). Cooperation and punishment in public goods experiments. American Economic Review, 90(4), 980-94. https://www.aeaweb.org/articles/pdf/doi/10.1257/aer.90.4.980

Ferster, C. B., Culbertson, S., & Boren, M. C. (1975). Behavior Principles (2nd ed.). NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Fukuyama, F. (2012). The Future of History: Can liberal democracy survive the decline of the Middle Class? Foreign Affairs, 91(1), 53-61. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/2012-01-01/future-history

Giorgi, G., & Gigliarano, C. (2016). The Gini concentration index: A review of the inference literature. Journal of Economic Surveys, 31(4), 1130-1148. DOI: 10.1111/joes.12185.

Gächter, S. (2007). Conditional cooperation: Behavioral regularities from the lab and the field and their policy implications. In B. S. Frey & A. Stutzer (Eds.), Economics and Psychology: A Promising New Cross-Disciplinary Field (pp. 19–50). Boston, MASS: MIT Press.

Gächter, S, Renner, E., & Sefton, M. (2008). The long-run benefits of punishment. Science, 322, 1510. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.1164744

Glaeser, E., Scheinkman, J., & Shleifer, A. (2003). The Injustice of Inequality. Journal of Monetary Economics 50, 199-222. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3932(02)00204-0

Grusky D., Hall, P., & Markus, H. (2019). The rise of opportunity markets: How did it happen & what can we do? Daedalus,148(3), 19–45. https://doi.org/10.1162/daed_a_01749

Gunnthorsdottir, A., McCabe, K., & Smith, V. (2002). Using the Machiavellian instrument to predict trustworthiness in a bargaining game. Journal of Economic Psychology, 23(1), 49-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-4870(01)00067-8

Gunnthorsdottir, A., Vragov, R., Seifert, S., & McCabe, K. (2010). Near-efficient equilibria in contribution-based competitive grouping. Journal of Public Economics, 94, 987-994. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.07.004.

Gunnthorsdottir, A., Vragov, R., & Shen, J. (2010). Tacit coordination in contribution-based grouping with two endowment levels. In R. M. Isaac & D. A. Norton (Eds.), Research in Experimental Economics 13, 13–75. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0193-2306(2010)0000013004

Gunnthorsdottir, A., Thorsteinsson, P., & Olafsson, S. (2023). Reciprocity or community? Different cultural pathways to cooperation and welfare. Cross-Cultural Research, 57(4), 391-428. https://doi.org/10.1177/10693971231166165

Gunnthorsdottir, A. & Thorsteinsson, P. (2011). Tacit coordination and equilibrium selection in a merit-based grouping mechanism: A cross-cultural validation study. In Chan, F., Marinova, D. and Anderssen, R.S. (Eds.) MODSIM2011, 19th International Congress on Modelling and Simulation. Modelling and Simulation Society of Australia and New Zealand, December 2011, pp. 1292-1298. https://mssanz.org.au/modsim2011/D1/gunnthorsdottir.pdf

Haile, D., Sadrieh, A., & Verbon, H. (2008a). Self-Serving Dictators and Economic Growth. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 67, 573-586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2007.09.004

Haile, D., Sadrieh, A., & Verbon, H. (2008b). Cross-racial envy and underinvestment in South African partnerships. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 32(5), 703–724. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23601848

Harsanyi, J., & Selten, R. (1988). A General Theory of Equilibrium Selection in Games. Boston: MIT Press.

Hausken, K., & Cressman, R. (2004). Formalization of Multi-Level Games. International Game Theory Review, 6(2), 195-221. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219198904000150

Hofmeyr, A., Burns, J., & Visser, M. (2007). Income Inequality, Reciprocity and Public Good Provision: An Experimental Analysis. South African Journal of Economics, 75, 508-520. doi:10.1111/j.1813-6982.2007.00127.x

Herrmann, B., Thöni, C., & Gächter, S. (2008). Antisocial punishment across societies. Science, 319, 1362-1367. DOI: 10.1126/science.1153808

Holt, C., Johnson, C., & Schmidtz, D. (2015). Prisoner’s Dilemma Experiments. In M. Peterson (Ed.), The Prisoner’s Dilemma. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 243-264.

Isaac, R.M., McCue, K., & Plott, C. (1985). Public goods provision in an experimental environment. Journal of Public Economics, 26(1), 51-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(85)90038-6

Kahneman, D. (1988). Experimental economics: A psychological perspective. In R. Tietz, W. Albers, & R. Selten (Eds.), Bounded Rational Behavior in Experimental Games and Markets, Berlin: Springer. pp. 11-18.

Khosla, V. (2024, January 16). India’s wedding industry soars to $75 billion, growing 7-8% annually. MINT. https://www.livemint.com/industry/indias-wedding-industry-soars-to-75-billion-growing-7-8-annually-11705403127520.html

Mateen, Z., & Sebastian, M. (2024, July 10).The marathon Indian wedding turning heads around the world. BBC News. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c87repz4yx8o

Kochhar, R, & Sechopoulos, S. (2022, April 20). How the American middle class has changed in the past five decades. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2022/04/20/how-the-american-middle-class-has-changed-in-the-past-five-decades/.

Kraus, M., Piff, P., Mendoza-Denton, R., Rheinschmidt, M., & Keltner, D. (2012). Social class, solipsism, and contextualism: How the rich are different from the poor. Psychological Review, 119(3), 546-572. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028756

Krause, E., & Sawhill, I. (2018, June 5). Seven reasons to worry about the American middle class. Washington, DC: Brookings. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/seven-reasons-to-worry-about-the-american-middle-class/

Kuznetsova, N., & Tupitsyn, A. (2014). Middle class: The socio-economic stabilizer of country development. Asian Social Science, 10(17), 278-284. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ass.v10n17p278

Lanier, J. (2013). Who Owns the Future? NY: Simon & Schuster.

Lewis, A. (1985). Racial Conflict and Economic Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Ludwig, G. (Ed.) (2020). The Vanishing American Dream: A Frank Look at the Economic Realities Facing Middle and Lower Income Americans. NY: Disruption Books.

Mahendru, M., Gomes, K., Dutta, M., Apoorva M., Gomes, K., Dutta, Mishra, N., & Mishra, P.R. (2023). Survival of the richest: The India story. Oxfam India. https://d1ns4ht6ytuzzo.cloudfront.net/oxfamdata/oxfamdatapublic/2023-01/India%20Supplement%202023_digital.pdf?kz3wav0jbhJdvkJ.fK1rj1k1_5ap9FhQ

Manstead, A. (2018). The psychology of social class: How the socioeconomic status impacts thought, feelings, and behaviour. British Journal of Social Psychology, 57(2), 267-291. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12251

Moya M., & Fiske, S. (2017). The social psychology of the Great Recession and social class divides. Journal of Social Issues, 73,1–15. https://spssi.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/josi.12201

Nax, H., Balietti, S., Murphy, R.O., & Helbing, D. (2017). Adding noise to the institution: an experimental welfare investigation of the contribution-based grouping mechanism. Social Choice and Welfare, 50(2), 213-245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-017-1081-5

Nax, H., Murphy, R.O., Duca, S., & Helbing, D. (2017). Contribution-based grouping under noise. Games 8(4), 50. https://doi.org/10.3390/g8040050

Nax, H., Murphy, R. O., & Helbing, D. (2017). Nash dynamics, meritocratic matching, and cooperation. In B. Jann & W. Przepiorka (Eds.), Social Dilemmas, Institutions, and the Evolution of Cooperation. Oldenburg: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110472974

Nax, H., Murphy, R. O., & Helbing, D. (2014) Stability and welfare of 'merit-based' group-matching mechanisms in voluntary contribution game. WP, ETH Zurich. https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/65444/

OECD (2012, January). Income inequality and growth: The role of taxes and transfers. OECD Economics Department Policy Note No. 9. https://web-archive.oecd.org/2012-06-14/88542-49417295.pdf

Office of the Vice President of the United States (2010). Annual report of the White House task force on the middle class. https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/100226-annual-report-middle-class.pdf

Olson, M. (1965). The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and The Theory of Groups. Cambridge, MASS: Harvard University Press.

Ostrom, E., Walker, J., & Gardner, R. (1992). Covenants with and without a sword: Self-governance is possible. American Political Science Review, 86(2), 404-417. https://doi.org/10.2307/1964229

Piketty, T. (2022). A Brief History of Equality. Cambridge, MASS: Belknap.

Piketty, T. (2020). Capital and Ideology. Cambridge, MASS: Belknap.

Piketty, T. (2015). The Economics of Inequality. Cambridge, MASS: Belknap.

Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge, MASS: Belknap.

Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MASS: Belknap.

Reeves, R., Guyot, K., & Krause, E. (2018, May 7). Defining the Middle class: Cash, credentials, or culture? Washington, DC: Brookings. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/defining-the-middle-class-cash-credentials-or-culture/ Retrieved 28 September 2023.

Rettig Gur, H. (2023, May 23). Why the new state budget both favors and hurts Haredim and deeply threatens Israel. The Times of Israel. https://www.timesofisrael.com/the-new-state-budget-favors-haredim-and-hurts-them/

Sadrieh, A., & Verbon, H. (2006). Inequality, Trust, and Growth: An Experimental Study. European Economic Review, 50(5), 1197-1222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecore5.2005.01.009

Saez, E., & Zucman, G. (2016). Wealth inequality in the United States since 1913: Evidence from capitalized income tax data. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 131(2), 519-578. 519–578. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjw004

Tackett, N. (2019). Violence and the one percent. The fall of the medieval Chinese aristocracy in comparison to the fall of the French nobility. The American Historical Review, 124(3), 933–937. https://doi.org/10.1093/ahr/rhz317

Van Lange, P., Joireman, J., Parks, C., & Van Dijk, E. (2013). The psychology of social dilemmas: A review. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 120, 125-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2012.11.003

Veblen, T. (1899/2006). The Theory of the Leisure Class. UK: Oxford University Press.

Visser, M., & Burns, J. (2015). Inequality, social sanctions and cooperation within South African fishing communities. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 118, 95-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2015.03.009

West, E., & Nelson, F. (2013). The strange death of the British middle class: The great stabilising force in our society is disappearing fast. https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/the-strange-death-of-the-british-middle-class/. Retrieved 25 October 2023.

Wike, R., Poushter, J., Silver, L., Devlin, K., Fetterof, J., Castillo, A., & Huang C. (2019, Oct. 14). Political and economic changes since the fall of communism. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2019/10/14/political-and-economic-changes-since-the-fall-of-communism/

World Values Survey (2023). WVS cultural map: 2023 version released. https://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSNewsShow.jsp?ID=467. Retrieved 20 October 2023.

Zelmer, J. (2003). Linear public goods Experiments: A meta-analysis. Experimental Economics, 6, 299–310. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026277420119

Zitner, A. (2023, November 23). Voters see American dream slipping out of reach, WSJ/NORC poll shows. The Wall Street Journal. https://www.wsj.com/us-news/american-dream-out-of-reach-poll-3b774892