Antelo, Manel and Bru, Lluís (2024): On the size of innovation and selling versus licensing.
PDF
MPRA_paper_122731.pdf Download (236kB) |
Abstract
We consider a non-producer patentholder with a cost-reducing innovation that can be used in a homogeneous duopolistic industry. To profit from the innovation, the patentholder can decide to sell it, or license it, and if the latter, the number of licences to grant as well as the corresponding contractual terms. We show that the size (value or quality) of innovation is crucial for that decision. The patentholder prefers to sell a small-sized innovation, in which case the buyer further licenses it to the competitor by means of a pure ad-valorem royalty contract. However, if the innovation is moderate or large, the patentholder retains ownership and licenses it to both firms through 2PT contracts involving per-unit royalties. Sale is shown to be welfare superior to licensing for both consumers and firms.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | On the size of innovation and selling versus licensing |
English Title: | On the size of innovation and selling versus licensing |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Cost-reducing innovation, sale, licensing, per-unit royalty, ad-valorem royalty, welfare |
Subjects: | L - Industrial Organization > L1 - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance > L13 - Oligopoly and Other Imperfect Markets L - Industrial Organization > L2 - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior > L24 - Contracting Out ; Joint Ventures ; Technology Licensing |
Item ID: | 122731 |
Depositing User: | Dr. Manel Antelo |
Date Deposited: | 21 Nov 2024 14:46 |
Last Modified: | 21 Nov 2024 14:46 |
References: | Badía, B.D., Tauman, Y., Tumendemberel, B. (2020), On the diffusion of competing innovations. Mathematical Social Sciences 108, 8–13. Banerjee, S., Poddar, S. (2019), To sell or not to sell: Licensing versus selling by an outside innovator, Economic Modelling, 76, 293–304. Bianchi, M., Chiesa, V., Frattini, F. (2011), Selling Technological Knowledge: Managing the Complexities of Technology Transactions, Research-Technology Management 54(2), 18–26. Cahoy, D.R., Kwasnica, A.M., Lopez, L.A. (2016), The role of auctions in university intellectual property transactions, Duquesne Law Review 54 (1), 53–80. Caviggioli, F., Ughetto, E. (2013), The drivers of patent transactions: corporate views on the market for patents, R&D Management 43, 318–332. Caviggioli, F., De Marco, A., Montobbio, F., Ughetto, E. (2020), The licensing and selling of inventions by US universities, Technological Forecasting and Social Change 159, Article 120189. Colombo, S., Filippini, L. (2015), Patent licensing with Bertrand competitors, The Manchester School 83(1), 1–16. De Marco, A., Scellato, G., Ughetto, E., Caviggioli, F. (2017), Global markets for technology: evidence from patent transactions, Research Policy 46 (9), 1644–1654. Doganoglu, T., Inceoglu, F., Muthers, J. (2021), Licensing with free entry, Economics of Innovation and New Technology 30, 643-660. Drivas, K., Economidou, C., Karamanis, D., Zank, A. (2016), Academic patents and technology transfer, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 40 (C), 45–63. Fan, C., Jun, B. H., Wolfstetter, E. (2018), Per unit vs. ad valorem royalty licensing, Economics Letters, 170, 71-75. Figueroa, N., Serrano, C.J. (2013), Patent trading flows of small and large firms. Working Paper No. 18982. National Bureau of Economic Research. Fischer, T., Leidinger, J. (2014), Testing patent value indicators on directly observed pa tent value– An empirical analysis of Ocean Tomo patent auctions, Research Policy 43 (3), 519–529. Fusco, S., Lissoni, F., Martinez, C., Sterzi, V. (2019), Monetization strategies of university patents through PAEs: an analysis of US patent transfers. Mimeo. https://doi.org/10. 2139/ssrn.3410086. Available at SSRN. Galasso, A., Schankerman, M., Serrano, C.J. (2013), Trading and enforcing patent rights, Rand Journal of Economics 44 (2), 275–312. Huang, J.-H., Chang, P.-P. (2011), Selling patents to companies in Taiwan, Asian Journal of Technology Innovation 18, 2010. Irish, V. (2005), Intellectual property rights for engineers (2nd ed.), London: The Institute of Electrical Engineers. Jeong, S., Lee, S., Kim, Y. (2013), Licensing versus selling in transactions for exploiting patented technological knowledge assets in the markets for technology, The Journal of Technology Transfer 38 (3), 251–272. Kamien, M.I. (1992). Patent licensing. In Aumann, R. and Hart, S. (eds.), Handbook of Game Theory with Economic Applications Vol. 1, 331–354. North-Holland. Kamien, M.I., Tauman, Y. (1986), Fees versus royalties and the private value of a patent, The Quarterly Journal of Economics 101(3), 471–491. Kamien, M.I., Oren, S.S., Tauman, Y. (1992), Optimal licensing of cost-reducing innovation, Journal of Mathematical Economics 21(5), 483–508. Kamien, M.I., Tauman, Y. (2002), Patent licensing: the inside story, The Manchester School 70(1), 7–15. Katz, M.L., Shapiro, C. (1986), How to license intangible property, The Quarterly Journal of Economics 101(3), 567–589. Lichtenthaler, U. (2005), External commercialization of knowledge: Review and research agenda, International Journal of Management Reviews 7, 231–255. Megantz, R.C. (2002), Technology Management: Developing and Implementing Effective Licensing Programs, New York: Wiley. Miao, C.-H. (2013), On the superiority of fixed fee over auction in technology licensing, The Manchester School 81(3), 324–331. Niu, S. (2019), Licensing versus assignment: Innovation transfer in an asymmetric duopoly, Journal of Public Economic Theory 21 (6), 1286-1308. Niu, S., Wang, M. (2022), Partial acquisition and patent licensing in an asymmetric duopoly, The Manchester School 90 (1), 92-105. Odasso, M.C., Scellato, G., Ughetto, E. (2014), Selling patents at auction: an empirical analysis of patent value, Industrial and Corporate Change 24 (2), 417–438. Pries, F., Guild, P. (2011), Commercializing inventions resulting from university research: analyzing the impact of technology characteristics on subsequent business models, Technovation 31 (4), 151-160 Sen, D., Tauman, Y. (2007), General Licensing Schemes for a Cost-Reducing Innovation, Games and Economic Behavior 59 (1), 163–186. Serrano, C.J. (2010), The dynamics of the transfer and renewal of patents, Rand Journal of Economics 41 (4), 686–708. Serrano, C.J. (2018), Estimating the gains from trade in the market for patent rights, International Economic Review 59 (4), 1877–1904. Shen, H., Huang, C., Mao, H., Sharif, N. (2018), To license or sell: A study on the patent transaction modes in China, HKUST IEMS Working Paper No. 2018-51. Sinha, U. B. (2016), Optimal value of a patent in an asymmetric Cournot duopoly market, Economic Modelling 57, 93–105. Sneed, K.A., Johnson, D.K.N. (2009), Selling ideas: the determinants of patent value in an auction environment, R&D Management 39, 87–94. Tauman, Y., Weng, M.-H. (2012), Selling patent rights and the incentive to innovate, Economics Letters 114, 241–244. Wang, X. H. (1998), Fee versus royalty licensing in a Cournot duopoly model, Economics Letters 60 (1), 55–62. Wu, Y., Welch, E.W., Huang, W.L. (2015), Commercialization of university inventions: individual and institutional factors affecting licensing of university patents, Technovation 36 (37), 12-25. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/122731 |