Edible Oil Self-Sufficiency in India: A PCA-VECM Approach

Pipil, Dhriti Mukherjee (2024): Edible Oil Self-Sufficiency in India: A PCA-VECM Approach. Published in: Journal of Indian Economic Association , Vol. 1, No. A (December 2024): pp. 226-237.

Abstract

Between 2019 and 2022, India’s edible oil import value surged from USD 9.68 billion to USD 21.18 billion before declining to USD 16.41 billion in 2023. Rising domestic demand prompted the government to reduce import duties in 2021 to curb inflation caused by factors such as the COVID-19 pandemic, the Russia-Ukraine conflict, labour shortages, and supply-chain disruptions. Although this policy primarily affected import value, it did not reduce import volumes, which rose from 156 lakh tonnes in 2019 to 162 lakh tonnes in 2023. This highlights India’s dependence on major suppliers like Indonesia, Malaysia, Argentina, and Brazil, driven by growing domestic demand to meet the nutritional needs of its vast population. Despite initiatives such as the National Food Security Act, the Public Distribution System, and the Minimum Support Price (MSP) scheme, which aim to reduce import dependence, India’s domestic production meets only 40% of its consumption needs. Rising population, urbanisation, income growth, and changing dietary habits have perpetuated the demand-supply imbalance. The reliance on imports exposes India to global price shocks and supply disruptions, disproportionately impacting low-income households and raising food security concerns. Additionally, the shift toward biofuel production in exporting nations diverts resources away from food markets, exacerbating supply constraints. Using a two-step analytical approach, this study examines India’s edible oil market dynamics from 1981 to 2021. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) constructs demand and supply indices by capturing underlying dynamics and reducing dimensionality. A Vector Error Correction Model (VECM) further explores short-term interactions and long-term equilibrium among cointegrated variables. Results reveal that imports drive surplus ending stocks, suppressing local production incentives despite the availability of MSPs. Approximately 57% of demand disequilibrium and 68% of supply disequilibrium are corrected per period, stabilising the market within three to five years of a shock. Policy interventions are essential to reduce import dependency and address supply chain inefficiencies.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Edible oil, import liberalisation, PCA, VECM, India
• Subjects: F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F13 - Trade Policy ; International Trade Organizations; F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F14 - Empirical Studies of Trade; F - International Economics > F4 - Macroeconomic Aspects of International Trade and Finance > F44 - International Business Cycles; L - Industrial Organization > L5 - Regulation and Industrial Policy; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q1 - Agriculture > Q17 - Agriculture in International Trade; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q1 - Agriculture > Q18 - Agricultural Policy ; Food Policy

References

Abokyi, E., & Asiedu, K. F. (2021). Agricultural policy and commodity price stabilisation in Ghana: The role of buffer stockholding operations. African Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 16(4), 370–387. https://doi.org/10.53936/AFJARE.2021.16(4).24

Boly, M., & Sanou, A. (2022). Biofuels and food security: Evidence from Indonesia and Mexico. Energy Policy, 163, 112834.

Chakraborty, M., & Maitra, B. (2022). Import demand function in India under the liberalised trade regime. The Indian Economic Journal, 70(1), 53–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/00194662211063563

Chakravorty, U., Hubert, M. H., & Ural Marchand, B. (2019). Food for fuel: The effect of the US biofuel mandate on poverty in India. Quantitative Economics, 10(3), 1153–1193.

Clive, W. J. (2017). Granger and cointegration. European Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, 10(1), 58–81. https://www.ejpam.com/index.php/ejpam/article/view/2950

Cui, Z., Yan, B., Gao, Y., Wu, B., Wang, Y., Wang, H., Xu, P., Zhao, B., Cao, Z., Zhang, Y., Xie, Y., Hu, Y., Ma, X., & Niu, J. (2022). Agronomic cultivation measures on productivity of oilseed flax: A review. Oil Crop Science, 7(1), 53–62.

Davidson, J. (2013). Cointegration and error correction. In Handbook of Research Methods and Applications in Empirical Macroeconomics (pp. 165–188). Edward Elgar Publishing.

Duodu, C. P., Adjei-Boateng, D., Edziyie, R. E., Agbo, N. W., Owusu-Boateng, G., Larsen, B. K., & Skov, P. V. (2018). Processing techniques of selected oilseed by-products of potential use in animal feed: Effects on proximate nutrient composition, amino acid profile, and antinutrients. Animal Nutrition, 4(4), 442–451.

Enciso, S. R. A., Fellmann, T., Dominguez, I. P., & Santini, F. (2016). Abolishing biofuel policies: Possible impacts on agricultural price levels, price variability, and global food security. Food Policy, 61, 9–26.

Ewing, M., & Msangi, S. (2009). Biofuels production in developing countries: Assessing trade-offs in welfare and food security. Environmental Science & Policy, 12(4), 520–528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2008.10.002

Gaur, V. K., Sharma, P., Sirohi, R., Varjani, S., Taherzadeh, M. J., Chang, J. S., & Kim, S. H. (2022). Production of biosurfactants from agro-industrial waste and waste cooking oil in a circular bioeconomy: An overview. Bioresource Technology, 343, 126059.

Ghosh, N. (2009). Effects of tariff liberalization on oilseed and edible oil sector in India: Who wins and who loses? Online. www.taerindia.com/pdf/working_paper_no_2

Gulati, A., Kapur, D., & Bouton, M. M. (2019). Reforming Indian agriculture. https://casi.sas.upenn.edu/sites/default/files/research/REFORMING%20INDIAN%20AGRICULTURE%20-%20CASI%20WP%20-%20Gulati,%20Kapur,%20Bouton_0.pdf

Hotelling, H. (1933). Analysis of a complex of statistical variables into principal components. Journal of Educational Psychology, 24, 417.

Jat, R. S., Singh, V. V., Sharma, P., & Rai, P. K. (2019). Oilseed brassica in India: Demand, supply, policy perspective, and future potential. OCL, 26, 8.

Kumar, J. B. S., & Sharma, B. (2022). A review on neuropharmacological role of erucic acid: An omega-9 fatty acid from edible oils. Nutritional Neuroscience, 25(5), 1041–1055. https://doi.org/10.1080/1028415X.2020.1831262

Kumar, V., & Tiwari, A. (2020). Sparking yellow revolution in India again. Rural Pulse, 34, 1–4.

Lafi, S., & Kaneene, J. (1992). An explanation of the use of principal-components analysis to detect and correct for multicollinearity. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 13, 261–275.

Meena, M., & Mahammadhusen, K. (2016). Trade liberalisation and domestic reforms in the Indian oilseeds sector. Economic Affairs, 61(1), 45–53.

Pearson, K. (1901). LIII. On lines and planes of closest fit to systems of points in space. Philosophical Magazine, 2, 559–572.

Sharma, M., Gupta, S. K., & Mondal, A. K. (2012). Production and trade of major world oil crops. In Technological Innovations in Major World Oil Crops, Volume 1 (pp. 1–15). Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0356-2_1

Sharma, M., Khurana, S. M., & Kansal, R. (2016). Choosing quality oil for good health and long life. Indian Journal of Health & Wellbeing, 7(2).

Shroff, S., Shah, D., & Kundurthi, R. (2024). Volatility in edible oil economy. Economic & Political Weekly, 59(6), 53.

Song, Q., Ji, K., Mo, W., Wang, L., Chen, L., Gao, L., Gong, W., & Yuan, D. (2021). Dynamics of sugars, endogenous hormones, and oil content during the development of Camellia oleifera fruit. Botany, 99(8), 515–529. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjb-2021-0019

Taniguchi, I., Kagotani, K., & Kimura, Y. (2003). Microbial production of poly(hydroxyalkanoate) from waste edible oils. Green Chemistry, 5(5), 545–548. https://doi.org/10.1039/B304800B

Valiyaveettil, R. R., Jha, G. K., & Kathayat, B. (2023). Pushing for self-sufficiency in edible oils in India in the aftermath of recent global events. National Academy Science Letters, 46(6), 483–486. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40009-023-01294-z

Vyas, S., & Kumaranayake, L. (2006). Constructing socio-economic status indices: How to use principal component analysis. Health Policy and Planning, 21, 459–468. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czl029