Economic theory and social justice

Johnson, Joseph (2006): Economic theory and social justice.

Abstract

Is justice individualistic or both individualistic andsocial? Opposite views on this question include von Hayek, who said that `social justice' was an oxymoron, and the late Holy Father who, in Sollicitudo Rei Socialis said that some socio-economic institutions can have`structures of sin' in their architectures. The Old Testament prophets have been interpreted either way! Using results from the Capital Controversy in economic theory, Sen's work on famines, and the Parsonian theory of the institution, we show that the `social'-justice dimension of an individual act is where its justice is unintelligible in merely individualistic terms, but requires institutional analysis.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Institution: Villanova University
• Language: English
• Keywords: Social justice; economic justice; microfoundations of macroeconomics; Capital controversy
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D63 - Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement

References

\noindent Amit Bhaduri, Unconventional Economic Essays, Delhi,\noindent Samuel Bowles and Herbert Gintis, Democracy and Capitalism, N.Y., 1986\noindent Emil Brunner, Justice and the Social Order, N.Y., 1945.\noindent Paul Davidson, Money and the Real World\noindent Jacques Dr\`eze, Unemployment Equilibria\noindent Mark Gould, Revolution in the Development of Capitalism, Berkeley\noindent Michel Grandmont, Money and Equilibrium\noindent Geoffrey Harcourt, Some Cambridge Controversies in the Theory of Capital\noindent Pierre Jal\'ee, Le Tiers Monde dans l'\'economie mondiale, Paris, 1968\noindent Maynard Keynes, The Theory of Money, London, 1930\noindent Maynard Keynes, The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money, London, 1936%\noindent Peter Marglin and Juliet Schorr, The Golden Age of Capitalism, 1945-1970\noindent David Miller, Principles of Social Justice, Cambridge, Mass., 1999, p.\ 221f, p.\ 232\noindent National conference of Catholic Bishops, Economic Justice for All, Washington, D.C., 1986, p.\ 92\noindent Talcott Parsons, The Social System, N.Y., 1951\noindent Talcott Parsons and Neil Smelser, Economy and Society, N.Y., 1956\noindent Luigi Pasinetti, The Theory of Economic Growth\noindent Joan Robinson, The production function and the theory of capital, in Collected Economic Papers, vol. 2, Cambridge, Mass., 1980.\noindent Joan Robinson, The Meaning of Capital, in, ibid., vol. 5.\noindent Joan Robinson, The Unimportance of Reswitching, in ibid.\noindent Maurice Fitzgerald Scott, A New View of Economic Growth, Oxford,\noindent Amartya Sen, ed., Growth Economics, Harmondsworth, England, 1970\noindent Amartya Sen, Poverty and Famines\noindent Sertillanges, La Philosophie Morale de Saint Thomas Aquin, Paris, 1944\noindent Michael Shubik, General Equilibrium Theory is not adequate for the reconciliation of Macroeconomics and Microeconomics, in, Kyklos, ??\noindent Guido del Vecchio, La Giustizia\noindent Leon Walras, Elements of Pure Economics, Lausanne, 1874.\noindent Simone Weil, Reflexions sur les causes de la liberte et de l'oppresion sociale, Paris, 1940\noindent Moshe Weinfeld, Social Justice in Ancient Israel and in the Ancient Near East, Jerusalem, 1995.\noindent E. Roy Weintraub, Microfoundations: The Compatibility of Microeconomics and Macroeconomic, Cambridge, 1979