Long, Xianling and Huang, Kaixing and Hou, Hao (2025): Why Rural Residents Do Not Migrate: The Hidden Welfare Costs of Rural-Urban Migration.
![]() |
PDF
MPRA_paper_125162.pdf Download (5MB) |
Abstract
A persistent puzzle in developing economies is why rural households remain in low-productivity agricultural sectors despite the substantial income gaps with non-agricultural opportunities. While existing studies attribute this gap to market frictions, institutional barriers, and differences in human capital, this paper shifts the focus to household-level welfare trade-offs, specifically, the non-pecuniary welfare losses borne by family members left behind when working-age individuals migrate. We develop a theoretical framework to show how such hidden costs affect labor reallocation and how they can be quantified empirically. Leveraging China's Grain for Green (GFG) Program--a nationwide conservation policy that induced farmland retirement in exchange for subsidies, we show that the policy led to significant increases in migration and non-agricultural labor, especially among women and younger individuals. Using revealed preference logic, we estimate that hidden migration costs amount to 10.5--12.6% of total household income for policy-induced migrants. Drawing on rich survey data, we trace these costs to two key sources: disruptions to children's education and reduced caregiving capacity for elderly household members. These findings highlight the need for policies that ease the burden of migrating with dependents, such as removing restrictions on education and healthcare access in destination areas.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Why Rural Residents Do Not Migrate: The Hidden Welfare Costs of Rural-Urban Migration |
English Title: | Why Rural Residents Do Not Migrate: The Hidden Welfare Costs of Rural-Urban Migration |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Rural-urban migration, Hidden migration cost, Grain for Green Program |
Subjects: | I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I3 - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty > I31 - General Welfare, Well-Being O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O13 - Agriculture ; Natural Resources ; Energy ; Environment ; Other Primary Products R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R1 - General Regional Economics > R14 - Land Use Patterns R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R2 - Household Analysis > R23 - Regional Migration ; Regional Labor Markets ; Population ; Neighborhood Characteristics |
Item ID: | 125162 |
Depositing User: | Dr. kaixing huang |
Date Deposited: | 03 Jul 2025 14:39 |
Last Modified: | 03 Jul 2025 14:39 |
References: | 1. Adamopoulos, T., Brandt, L., Leight, J., and Restuccia, D. (2022). Misallocation, selection, and productivity: A quantitative analysis with panel data from China. Econometrica, 90(3):1261–1282. 2. Adamopoulos, T. and Restuccia, D. (2014). The size distribution of farms and international productivity differences. American Economic Review, 104(6):1667-1697. 3.Bauer, T. K., Braun, S., and Kvasnicka, M. (2013). The economic integration of forced migrants: Evidence for post-war Germany. The Economic Journal, 123(571):998–1024. 4.Beaman, L. A.(2012). Social networks and the dynamics of labour market outcomes: Evidence from refugees resettled in the US. The Review of Economic Studies, 79(1):128–161. 5.Howlader, A. (2024). Environmental recovery after the dust bowl: Implications of land policies in the great plains. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 11(2):403–449. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/125162 |