Reconstructing climate policy: how best to engage China and other developing countries?

Zhang, ZhongXiang (2003): Reconstructing climate policy: how best to engage China and other developing countries?

Abstract

Duke University organized the International Conference on Reconstructing Climate Policy: Moving Beyond the Kyoto Impasse, May 2003. The organizer invited me to specifically address the following two issues at the conference: 1) Whether is the proposal for joint accession by the U.S. and China in the interest of China?, and 2) Even if participating a global cap-and-trade regime is so beneficial to China as many economic studies suggest, why has China consistently refused in international negotiations even to discuss its participation in it?. In this paper, we look at the first issue from the following perspectives: a) how does China value importance of maintaining unity of the Group of 77?; b) what lessons has China learned from bilateral negotiations with the U.S. to work out the terms for China to get accession to the WTO?; c) what is the legitimacy of the U.S. insistence that it re-joins the Kyoto Protocol only if major developing countries join?; d) what are implications of the U.S. strikingly reversed position on the commitments of developing countries in New Delhi for initiating discussions on joint accession by the U.S. and China?; and e) how would joint accession by the U.S. and China be perceived?. We then address the second issue from the following perspectives: a) from the point of view of fairness, how do developing countries including China and India perceive emissions caps in the first place?; b) why have China and India been sceptical to international emissions trading?; c) how is an inflow of CDM investment in China perceived politically in comparison with the exports of emissions permits to the U.S.?; d) what are the implications of “lock in” to emissions cap, in particular no rules and principles for setting emissions targets for the commitment periods subsequent to Kyoto?; e) how to address the complex undertaking of setting emissions caps for developing countries, which must be linked to future, unobserved levels in comparison with the historically observed levels for industrialized countries?. Finally, the paper touches on the likely path forward.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Cap-and-trade regime; Clean development mechanism; International climate negotiations; Kyoto Protocol; China; United States
• Subjects: Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q52 - Pollution Control Adoption and Costs ; Distributional Effects ; Employment Effects; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q4 - Energy > Q48 - Government Policy; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q2 - Renewable Resources and Conservation > Q28 - Government Policy; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q4 - Energy > Q42 - Alternative Energy Sources; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q54 - Climate ; Natural Disasters and Their Management ; Global Warming; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q58 - Government Policy

References

Baumert, K.A. and N. Kete (2002), Introduction: An Architecture for Climate Protection, in K.A. Baumert, O. Blanchard, S. Llosa and J.F. Perkaus (editors), Building on the Kyoto Protocol: Options for Protecting the Climate, World Resources Institute, Washington, DC.

Löschel, A. and Z.X. Zhang (2002), The Economic and Environmental Implications of the US Repudiation of the Kyoto Protocol and the Subsequent Deals in Bonn and Marrakech, Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv - Review of World Economics, Vol. 138, No. 4, pp. 711-746.

McKibbin, W. J. and P.J. Wilcoxen (2002), Climate Change Policy After Kyoto: A Blueprint for a Realistic Approach, Washington: The Brookings Institution.

People’s Daily (1997), Head of the Chinese Delegation Expounds China’s Stance on Global Climate Change, Overseas Edition, December 9.

Sharma, A. (1998), Climate No Headway. Down to Earth 7, Centre for Science and Environment, New Delhi.

Stewart, R.B. and J.B. Wiener (2003), Reconstructing Climate Policy: Beyond Kyoto, American Enterprise Press, Washington, DC.

UNFCCC (1999), Mechanisms Pursuant to Articles 6, 12 and 17 of the Kyoto Protocol: Synthesis of Proposals by Parties on Principles, Modalities, Rules and Guidelines – Note by the Chairman, United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), FCCC/SB/1999/INF.2/Add.2, Bonn.

Weyant, J.P. (ed., 1999). The Cost of the Kyoto Protocol: A Multi-model Evaluation. Energy Journal, Vol. 20 (Special Issue on the Cost of the Kyoto Protocol), pp. 1-398.

Zhang, Z.X. (2000a), Estimating the Size of the Potential Market for the Kyoto Flexibility Mechanisms, Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv - Review of World Economics, Vol. 136, No. 3, pp. 491-521.

Zhang, Z.X. (2000b), Can China Afford to Commit itself an Emissions Cap? An Economic and Political Analysis, Energy Economics, Vol. 22, No. 6, pp. 587-614.

Zhang, Z.X. (2004), Meeting the Kyoto Targets: The Importance of Developing Country Participation, Journal of Policy Modeling, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 3-19.