Network Externalities and Critical Mass in the Mobile Telephone Network: a Panel Data Estimation

Baraldi, A. Laura (2008): Network Externalities and Critical Mass in the Mobile Telephone Network: a Panel Data Estimation.

Abstract

This paper develops a simple demand model with network externalities which allow us to identify the shape of the network externalities function in the mobile telephone market and to estimate the critical mass. If the mobile telephone network exhibits positive network externalities, we expect that the demand curve is not downward sloping everywhere but it has an increasing part, the critical mass of the installed base of subscribers. Once the critical mass is reached, the growth of the network is self-sustaining. We use a panel data of the 30 OEDC Countries from 1989 to 2006 for estimating the relationship between price of 3-minute cellular call and the installed base of subscribers; we find strong network externalities effects in mobile telephone market which drive the demand curve for this network good to be an inverted U function. Moreover, given that the concavity of the demand curve depends on the extent of network externalities, the idea is to identify some variables which could affect the intensity of network effects in the mobile telephone market, because the more concave the demand curve is, sooner the critical mass is reached for any price. This may have important implications for producers in terms of initial investment and marketing strategies which they have to do to attain the critical mass.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Network Externalities, Mobile Telecommunication, Critical Mass
• Subjects: L - Industrial Organization > L9 - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities > L96 - Telecommunications; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C1 - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General > C13 - Estimation: General; D - Microeconomics > D1 - Household Behavior and Family Economics > D12 - Consumer Economics: Empirical Analysis; D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D85 - Network Formation and Analysis: Theory

References

Arellanno M., Bond S. (1991) “Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equation” The Review of Economic Studies, 58: 277-297.

Arellano, M. & Bover, O. (1995), “Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error components models”, Journal of Econometrics 68, 29-51.

Baltagi, B., 1995, Econometric Analysis of Panel Data. London : John Wiley.

Baraldi A.L. (2003) “Equilibrium size in network with indirect network externalities” Rivista Italiana degli Economisti, n. 3.

Becker G.S. (1991), “A Note on Restaurant Pricing and Other Examples of Social Influence on Price”, Journal of Political Economy 99(5), 1109-1116.

Beggs A., P. Klemperer (1992), “Multi-period competition with switching costs”, Econometrica 60(3), 651-666.

Blonski M. (2002), “Network externalities and two-part tariffs in telecommunication markets”, Information Economics and Policy 14, 95-109.

Blonski M. (2002), “Network externalities and two-part tariffs in telecommunication markets”, Information Economics and Policy 14, 95-109.

Blundell, R. & Bond, S. (1998), “Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models”, Journal of Econometrics 87, 115-143.

Bousquet A., M. Ivaldi (1997), “Optimal pricing of telephone usage: An econometric implementation”, Information Economics and Policy 9(3), 219-239.

Brynjolfsson E., C.F. Kemerer (1996), “Network Externalities in Microcomputer Software: An Econometric Analysis of the Spreadsheet Market”, Management Science 42(12), 1627-47.

Cabral L.M.B. (1990), “On the adoption of innovations with ‘network’ externalities”, Mathematical Social Sciences 19, 299-308.

Cabral L.M.B. (1990), “On the adoption of innovations with ‘network’ externalities”, Mathematical Social Sciences 19, 299-308.

Dhebar A., S. S. Oren (1985), “Optimal dynamic pricing for expanding networks”, Marketing Science 4(4), 336-351.

Doganoglu T, Grzybowski L. (2005) “Estimating Network Effects in the Mobile Telecommunication Industry in Germany” Information Economic and Policy Volume 19, Issue !, March 2007, pp. 65-79.

Dranove D., N. Gandal (2000), “The DVD vs. DIVX Standard War: Empirical Evidence of Vaporware”, University of California, Berkeley, Department of Economics Working Paper E00/293.

Economides N. (1996), “The Economics of Networks”, International Journal of Industrial Organization 14(6), 673-699.

Economides N., Ch. Himmelberg (1995), “Critical Mass and Network Size with Application to the US Fax market”, Stern School of Business, New York University Discussion Paper EC-95-11.

Economides, Nicholas and Rick Flyer, (1995), "Technical Standards Coalitions for Network Goods," mimeo.

Economides N., L.J. White (1994), “Networks and Compatibility: Implications for Antitrust”, European Economic Review 38(3/4), 651-662.

Farrell J., C. Shapiro (1988), “Dynamic competition with switching costs”, RAND Journal of Economics 19(1), 123-137.

Farrell J., P. Klemperer (2001), “Coordination and Lock-In: Competition with Switching Costs and Network Effects”, mimeo.

Farrell, J. and G. Saloner, 1985, Standardization, compatibility, and innovation, Rand Journal of Economics 16, 70-83.

Gandal N. (1994), “Hedonic Price Indexes for Spreadsheets and an Empirical Test for Network Externalities”, RAND Journal of Economics 25(1), 160-170.

Gandal N. (1995), “Competing Compatibility Standards and Network Externalities in the PC Software Market”, Review of Economics and Statistics 77(4), 599-608.

Gandal N., Kende M., and R. Rob (2000), “The dynamics of technological adoption in hardware/software systems: the case of compact disc players”, RAND Journal of Economics 31(1), 43-61.

Grajek M. (2002), “Identification of Network Externalities in Markets for Non-Durables”, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin, Discussion Paper FS IV 02-32.

Grajek M. (2003), “Estimating network effects and compatibility in Mobile telecommunication”, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin, Discussion Paper SP II 2003-26.

Granger C.W.J., T. Teräsvirta (1993), “Modelling Nonlinear Economic Relationships”, Oxford University Press, New York.

Granovatter M., R. Soong (1986), “Threshold model of interpersonal effects in consumer demand”, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 7, 83-99.

Greenstein S. (1993), “Did installed base give an incumbent any (measurable) advantage in federal computer procurement?”, RAND Journal of Economics 24(1), 19-39.

Gruber H., F. Verboven (2001), “The diffusion of mobile telecommunications services in the European Union”, European Economic Review 45, 577-588.

Katz M. L., C. Shapiro (1994), “Systems Competition and Network Effects”, Journal of Economic Perspectives 8(2), 93-115.

Katz M.L., C. Shapiro (1985), “Network Externality, Competition, and Compatibility”, American Economic Review 75(3), 424-440.

Katz M.L., C. Shapiro (1994), “Systems Competition and Network Effects”, Journal of Economic Perspectives 8(2), 93-115.

Kim H.-S., N. Kwon (2003), “The advantage of network size in acquiring new subscribers: a conditional logit analysis of the Korean mobile telephone market”, Information Economics and Policy 15(1), 17-33.

Kim H.-S., N. Kwon (2003), “The advantage of network size in acquiring new subscribers: a conditional logit analysis of the Korean mobile telephone market”, Information Economics and Policy 15(1), 17-33.

Klemperer P. (1995), “Competition when Consumers have Switching Costs: An Overview wit Applications to Industrial Organization, Macroeconomics and International Trade”, Review of Economic Studies 62, 515-539.

Leibenstein H. (1950), “Bandwagon, snob, and Veblen Effects in the theory of consumers’ demand”, Quarterly Journal of Economics 64, 183-207.

Liebowitz S., S. Margolis (1994), “Network Externalities: An Uncommon Tragedy”, Journal of Economic Perspectives 8(2), 133-150.

Lindbeck A., S. Nyberg, and J.W. Weibull (1999), “Social norms and economic incentives in the welfare state”, Quarterly Journal of Economics 114(1), 1-35.

Okada Y., K. Hatta (1999), “The interdependent telecommunications demand and efficient price structure”, Journal of Japanese and International Economies 13(4), 311-335.

Parker P.M., L.-H. Röller (1997), “Collusive conduct in duopolies: multimarket contact and cross-ownership in the mobile telephone industry”, RAND Journal of Economics 28(2), 304-322.

Reiss P. C., F. A. Wolak (2002), “Structural econometric modeling: rationales and examples from Industrial Organization”, mimeo.

Rogers, E. (2003) “Diffusion of Innovations” Fifth Edition, Free Press, New York.

Rohlfs J. (1974), “A theory of interdependent demand for a communications service”, Bell Journal of Economics 5(1), 16-37.

Rysman M. (2002), “Competition Between Networks: A Study of the Market for Yellow Pages”, Boston University, Industry Studies Project Working Paper #104.

Schoder D. (2000), “Forecasting the success of telecommunication services in the presence of network effects”, Information Economics and Policy 12, 181-200.

Shapiro C., H. R. Varian (1999), “Information Rules: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy” Harvard Business School Press, Boston MA.

Wilska, T.-A. (2003). Mobile Phone Use as Part of Young People’s Consumption Styles. Journal of Consumer Policy, 26(4), 441-463.