Paying for pensions: An international comparison of administrative charges in funded retirement-income systems

Whitehouse, Edward (2000): Paying for pensions: An international comparison of administrative charges in funded retirement-income systems. Published in:

Abstract

High charges for personal pensions were one factor in the personal pensions mis-selling debacle in the United Kingdom. They continued to arouse concern among politicians and commentators. The Labour government, with its new flagship ‘stakeholder’ pension, chose to regulate both the structure of charges and their level. This paper assesses the international experience of charges in funded retirement-income systems, drawing on evidence from fourteen countries with very diverse policies. Measuring the price of financial services is more difficult than comparing the cost of other goods or services. Providers can levy many different kinds of charges. These can include one-off and ongoing charges; proportional and fixed-rate fees; some based on contributions, some on the value of assets in the fund and some on investment returns. These different charges accumulate and interact in Complicated ways over the membership of a pension plan. The most familiar summary measure of charges is the ‘reduction in yield’. This adds together all the charges over the lifetime of an example pension policy and expresses them as a percentage of assets. Measuring charges as a proportion of contributions is the alternative. This turns out to be the same as calculating lifetime charges as a proportion of the balance accumulated at retirement. This second measure is known as the ‘reduction in premium’ or the charge ratio. The fourteen countries surveyed (Section 2) adopt very different approaches. At one end of the spectrum, Australia and the United Kingdom (with personal pensions) have completely liberal policies on charge levels and structures, but require providers to set out the effect of charges in a standard format. Most Latin American countries, including Argentina and Chile, restrict the charge structure: in these cases, allowing a fixed fee plus a charge as a proportion of contributions. Poland, too, limits the types of fee that can be levied, but also limits funds to charging 0.6 per cent of assets, while other charges are uncapped. Sweden, Kazakhstan and the United Kingdom (with stakeholder pensions) restrict both the charge structure and the charge level. In the last two, there is a fixed ceiling while Sweden varies the cap using a complex formula based on the amount that providers charge to manage voluntary savings. Finally, Bolivia auctioned the rights to manage its mandatory pension fund assets to international fund managers. The empirical evidence from these countries charge levels. In countries with systems based on individual accounts and individual choice among competing pension providers, average charges vary from under 15 to above 30 per cent. The paper assesses the options and the arguments for ontrolling charges. Measures to increase transparency comprise requirements for providers to disclose the level of charges, public provision of information in charge ‘league tables’ and allowing charges to be levied on top of rather than out of mandatory pension contributions. If governments choose to restrict charge structures, to facilitate comparisons between different providers, the most important policy choice is between contribution-based levies and asset-based fees. Latin American countries have tended to opt for the former, the United Kingdom has chosen the latter for stakeholder pensions. The main issues in this choice are the time profile of providers’ revenues, fund managers’ incentives to maximise returns and the incidence of the charges on different providers. Restricting charge levels raises some important concerns, particularly about governments’ ability to choose the ‘right’ level for the ceiling and the trade-offs in terms of restricting competition and individual choice of fund. Many of these policies to limit charges are aimed particularly at protecting low-income workers. But some countries have adopted alternative policies: for example, excluding low-income workers from the requirement to contribute and protecting them with safety-net pensions in old-age or cross-subsidising low-income workers directly with a minimum contribution from the government. Some commentators have suggested alternative institutional structures for managing funded pension assets to reduce costs. However, empirical evidence shows that publicly managed pension funds have generated poor returns. Also, the evidence on economies of scale in fund management suggests that the minimum efficient scale is relatively small and does not imply the presence of efficiency gains from a monopoly in managing funded pensions except in small economies. Again, there are important trade-offs in these policies, including corporate governance problems and the restriction of competition and individual choice.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: pensions; administrative charges; administrative costs
• Subjects: G - Financial Economics > G2 - Financial Institutions and Services > G23 - Non-bank Financial Institutions ; Financial Instruments ; Institutional Investors; D - Microeconomics > D1 - Household Behavior and Family Economics > D14 - Household Saving; Personal Finance

References

Aaron, H.J. (1966), ‘The social insurance paradox’, Canadian Journal of Economics, vol. 32, pp. 371-374. Ambarish, R. and Siegel, L. (1996), ‘Time is the essence’, Risk.

Anderson, J.M., Kolberg, J.E., Vroman, W. and Evans-Young, T. (1997), ‘The pension system of Kazazkhstan: policy, structure, operations and reform’, report to the Ministry of Labour and Social Protection.

Andrews, E.S. (1999), ‘Kazakhstan: an ambitious approach to pension reform’, Pension Reform Primer series, Social Protection Discussion Paper, World Bank, Washington, D.C.

Arrau, P. and Schmidt-Hebbel, K. (1994), ‘Pension systems and reforms: country experiences and research issues’, Revista de Analisis Economico, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 3-20.

Axia Economics (1999a), ‘Comments on minimum standards for stakeholder pensions’, London.

Axia Economics (1999b), ‘Comments on employer access for stakeholder pensions’, London.

Bacon and Woodrow (1999), Comparative Tables: Proposals for Discussion, report prepared for the Financial Services Authority, London.

Ball, R. Kothari, S.P. Shanken, J. (1995), ‘Problems in measuring portfolio performance: an application to contrarian investment strategies’, Journal of Financial Economics, vol. 38, pp. 79-107.

Bateman, H., Doyle, S. and Piggott, J. (1999), ‘Private mandatory retirement provision: design and implementation challenges’, presented to the 21st annual research conference of the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management, 4 6 November, Washington, D.C.

Benston, G.J. (1998), Regulating Financial Markets: A Critique and some Proposals, Hobart Paper no. 135, Institute of Economic Affairs, London.

Blake, D., Lehmann, B.N. and Timmerman, A. (1997), ‘Performance measurement using multiple asset class portfolio data: a study of UK pension funds’, Discussion Paper no. 1618, Centre for Economic Policy Research, London.

Bodie, Z., Marcus, A.J. and Merton, R.C. (1988), ‘‘Defined benefit versus defined contribution pension plans: what are the real trade offs?’, in Bodie, Z., Shoven, J.B. and Wise, D.A. (eds), Pensions in the US Economy, University of Chicago Press for National Bureau of Economic Research.

Brown, S.J., Goetzmann, W.N., Ibbotson, R.G. and Ross, S.A. (1992), ‘Survivorship bias in performance studies’, Review of Financial Studies, vol. 5, pp. 553-580.

Brown-Humes, C. (1999), ‘Death of a salesman: the stakeholder pension may put many financial advisors out of business as they are forced to accept lower commissions’, Financial Times, 22 April.

Carhart, M.M. (1997), ‘On persistence in mutual fund performance’, Journal of Finance, vol. 52, pp. 57-82. Chance, D.M. and Ferris, S.P. (1991), ‘Mutual fund distribution fees: an empirical analysis of the impact of deregulation’, Journal of Financial Services Research, vol. 5, pp. 25-42.

Chen, Z., and Knez, P.J. (1995), ‘Portfolio performance measurement: theory and applications’, Review of Financial Studies, vol. 9, pp. 511-555.

Chlon, A., Góra, M. and Rutkowski, M. (1999), ‘Shaping pension reform in Poland: Security through Diversity’, Pension Reform Primer series, Social Protection Discussion Paper no. 9923, World Bank, Washington, D.C.

Chordia, T. (1996), ‘The structure of mutual fund charges’, Journal of Financial Economics, vol. 41, pp. 3-39.

Demarco, G. and Rofman, R. (1999), ‘Collecting and transferring pension contributions’, Pension Reform Primer series, Social Protection Discussion paper no. 9907, World Bank, Washington, D.C.

Demarco, G., Rofman, R. and Whitehouse, E.R. (1998), ‘Supervising mandatory funded pension systems: issues and challenges’, Pension Reform Primer series, Social Protection Discussion Paper no. 9816, World Bank, Washington, D.C.

Department of Social Security (1997a), Social Security Statistics, H.M.S.O., London.

Department of Social Security (1997b), ‘Guaranteed secure pensions for all, says Peter Lilley’, DSS Press Notice no. 97/044, London.

Department of Social Security (1998), A New Contract for Welfare: Partnership in Pensions, London.

Department of Social Security (1999a), ‘Stakeholder pensions: minimum standards — the government’s proposals’, Consultation Brief no. 1, London.

Department of Social Security (1999b), ‘Stakeholder pensions: employer access — the government’s proposals’, Consultation Brief no. 2, London.

Department of Social Security (1999c), ‘Stakeholder pensions: the tax regime — the government’s proposals’, Consultation Brief no. 6, London.

De Ryck, K. (1998), ‘Asset allocation, financial market behaviour and impact of EU pension funds on European capital markets’, in Blommenstein, H.J and Funke, N. (eds), Institutional Investors in the New Financial Landscape, OECD, Paris.

Diamond, P. (1994), ‘Privatization of social security: lessons from Chile’, Revista de Analisis Economico, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 21-34.

Diamond, P. (1998), ‘Administrative costs and equilibrium charges with individual accounts’, Working Paper no. 7050, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Mass.

Disney, R.F., Emmerson, C. and Tanner, S. (1999), Partnership in Pensions: An Assessment, Institute for Fiscal Studies, London.

Disney, R.F., Palacios, R.J. and Whitehouse, E.R. (1999), ‘Individual choice of pension arrangement as a pension reform strategy’, Working Paper no. 99/18, Institute for Fiscal Studies, London.

Disney, R.F. and Whitehouse, E.R. (1991), ‘Occupational and industrial earnings over time: the use of pooled cross-section data’, Working Paper no. 91/7, Institute for Fiscal Studies, London.

Disney, R.F. and Whitehouse, E.R. (1994), ‘Choice of private pension and pension benefits in Britain’, Working Paper no. 94/2, Institute for Fiscal Studies, London.

Disney, R.F. and Whitehouse, E.R. (1996), ‘What are occupational pension entitlements worth in Britain?’, Economica, vol. 63, pp. 213-238.

Disney, R.F. and Whitehouse, E.R. (1999), ‘Pension plans and retirement incentives’, Pension Reform Primer series, Social Protection Discussion Paper no. 9924, World Bank, Washington, D.C.

Elton, E.J., Gruber, M.J. and Blake, C.R. (1996a), ‘Survivorship bias and mutual fund performance’, Review of Financial Studies, vol. 10, pp. 1097-1120.

Elton, E.J., Gruber, M.J. and Blake, C.R. (1996b), ‘The persistence of risk-adjusted mutual fund performance’, Journal of Business, vol. 69, pp. 133-157.

Elton, E.J., Gruber, M.J., Das, S. and Hlavka, M. (1993), ‘Efficiency with costly information: a reinterpretation of evidence for managed portfolios’, Review of Financial Studies, vol. 6, pp. 1-22.

Ferson, W. and Schadt, R. (1996), ‘Measuring fund strategy and performance in changing economic conditions’, Journal of Finance, vol. 51, pp. 425-462.

Ferson, W. and Warther, V.A. (1996), ‘Evaluating fund performance in a dynamic market’, Financial Analysts Journal, pp. 20-28.

Financial Services Authority (1998), Public Understanding of Financial Services: A Strategy for Consumer Education, Consultation Paper no. 15, London.

Financial Services Authority (1999a), Consumer Education: A Strategy for Promoting Public understanding of Financial Services, London.

Financial Services Authority (1999b), Comparative Information for Financial Services, Consultation Paper no. 28, London.

Financial Times (1999), ‘Warning on stakeholder costs: Life assurers unlikely to make money from proposed scheme’, 12 April.

Finsinger, J. and Schmid, F..A. (1994), ‘Prices, distribution channels and regulatory intervention in European Insurance Markets’, Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance, September.

General Accounting Office (1996), ‘SSA benefit statements: well received by public but difficult to understand’, HEHS-97-19, Washington, D.C.

General Accounting Office (1997a), ‘SSA benefit estimate statements: additional data needed to improve workload management’, Washington, D.C.

General Accounting Office (1997b), ‘Social security administration: internet access to personal earnings and benefits information’, T-AIMD/HEHS-97-123, Washington, D.C.

Goldberg, F.T. and Graetz, M. (1998), ‘Reforming social security: how to implement a practical and workable system of personal retirement accounts’, Working Paper no. xxxx, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Mass.

Good, W.R. and Hermansen, R.W. (1998), Index Your Way to Investment Success, New York Institute of Finance.

Goodhart, C. (1988), ‘The costs of regulation’, in Seddon, A. (ed.), Financial Regulation or Over-Regulation? Institute of Economic Affairs, London.

Gosling, A. Machin, S. and Meghir, C.H.D. (1998), ‘The changing distribution of male wages in the UK’, Working Paper no. 98/9, Institute for Fiscal Studies, London.

Government Actuary (1991), Occupational Pensions in 1987: Eighth Survey, H.M.S.O., London.

Harris, L. and Gurel, E. (1986), ‘Price and volume effects associated with changes in the S&P 500 list: new evidence for the persistence of price pressures’, Journal of Finance, vol. 41, pp. 815-829.

Heller, P. (1998), ‘Rethinking public pension initiatives’, Working Paper no. 98/61, International Monetary Fund, Washington, D.C.

House of Commons, Treasury Committee (1999), Financial Services Regulation: The Government’s Response to the Third Report from the Committee of Session 1998-99, Fourth Special Report, Session 1998-99, London.

Iglesias, A. and Palacios, R.J. (1999), ‘Managing public pension reserves: evidence from the international experience’, Pension Reform Primer series, Social Protection Discussion Paper, World Bank, Washington, D.C., forthcoming.

Indro, D.C., Jiang, C.X., Hu, M.Y. and Lee, W.Y. (1999), ‘Mutual fund performance: does fund size matter?’ Financial Analysts’ Journal, pp. 74-87.

Inland Revenue (1996), Inland Revenue Statistics 1996, Government Statistical Service, London.

James, E., Ferrier, G., Smalhout, J. and Vittas, D. (1999), ‘Mutual funds and institutional investments: what is the most efficient way to set up individual accounts in a social security system’, Working Paper no. 7049, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Mass.

James, E., Smalhout, J. and Vittas, D. (1999), ‘Administrative costs and the organization of individual account systems: a comparative perspective’, presented to the conference ‘New Ideas about Old-Age Security’, World Bank, Washington, D.C., 14 15 September.

Johnson, P.G. (1992), ‘The taxation of occupational and private pensions in Europe: the theory and the practice’, in Mortensen, J. (ed.), The Future of Pensions in Europe, Brassey's, London for Centre for European Policy Studies, Brussels.

Kihn, J. (1996), ‘To load or not to load? A study of marketing and distribution charges of mutual funds’, Financial Analysts’ Journal, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 28-36.

King, M.A. and Dicks-Mireaux, L. (1982), ‘Asset holdings and the life cycle’, Economic Journal, vol. 92, pp. 247-267.

Klumpes, P.J.M. (199x), ‘Interest group competition and regulating financial intermediaries: estimating the cost and benefits of regulating the UK pension industry’, [xx]

Lakonishok, J. Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R.W. (1992), ‘The structure and performance of the money management industry’, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity: Microeconomics, pp. 339-93.

Lakonishok, J., Shleifer, A., Thaler, R and Vishny, R.W. (1991), ‘Window-dressing by pension fund managers’, American Economic Review.

Lipper, M. (1994), ‘The third white paper: are mutual fund fees reasonable?’ Lipper Analytical Services, New York. Liu paper SSA ORES working paper 73

Lynch, A.W. and Mendenhall, R.R. (1997), ‘New evidence on stock price effects associated with changes in the S&P 500 index’, Journal of Business, vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 351-383.

Malhotrra, D.K. and McLeod, R.W. (1997), ‘An empirical analysis of mutual fund expenses’, Journal of Financial Research, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 175-190.

Mariscal, O.J. (1998a), ‘Argentine Pension and mutual funds and their impact on stocks’, Goldman Sachs Investment Research, New York.

Mariscal, O.J. (1998b), ‘Brazilian Pension and mutual funds and their impact on stocks’, Goldman Sachs Investment Research, New York.

Mariscal, O.J. (1998c), ‘Chilean Pension and mutual funds and their impact on stocks’, Goldman Sachs Investment Research, New York. Mariscal, O.J. (1998d), ‘Mexican Pension and mutual funds and their impact on stocks’, Goldman Sachs Investment Research, New York.

Master, S.J. (1998), ‘The problem with emerging market indexes’, Journal of Portfolio Management, pp. 93-100.

Maturana, G. and Walher, E. (1999), ‘Rentabilidades, comisiones y desempeno en la industria Chilena de fondos mutuos’, Estudios Publicos, vol. 73, pp. 293-334.

Meghir, C.H.D. and Whitehouse, E.R. (1996), ‘The evolution of wages in the UK: evidence from micro data’, Journal of Labour Economics.

Mitchell, O.S. (1998), ‘Administrative costs in public and private retirement systems’, in Fledstein, M. (ed.), Privatizing Social Security, University of Chicago Press for National Bureau of Economic Research.

Mitchell, O.S. (1999), ‘Administrative costs in Mexico’s AFORES pension system’, Working Paper no. 99-1, Pension Research Council, Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania.

Murthi, M., Orszag, J.M. and Orszag, P.R. (1999), ‘Administrative costs under a decentralized approach to individual accounts: lessons from the United Kingdom’, Discussion Paper, Birkbeck College, London.

Neubert, A.S. (ed.) (1998), Indexing for Maximum Investment Results, Glenlake Publishing.

Office of Fair Trading (1992a), Independent Financial Advisors and the Impact of Commission Disclosure, a research report by London Economics for the Office of Fair Trading, London.

Office of Fair Trading (1992b), Savings and Investments — Consumer Issues, London.

Office of Fair Trading (1994), The Surrender Values of Life Insurance Policies, London.

Office of Fair Trading (1997), Report of the Director General’s Inquiry into Pensions, London.

Office of Fair Trading (1998), ‘Vulnerable consumers: quantification and analysis’, Research Report no. 15, London.

Office of Fair Trading (1999a), ‘Stakeholder pensions: response by the Office of Fair Trading to the Green Paper Partnership in Pensions’, London.

Office of Fair Trading (1999b), ‘Stakeholder pensions: comparison of designated personal pension with the stakeholder pension’, London.

Office of Fair Trading (1999c), Vulnerable Consumers and Financial Services: the Report of the Director General’s Inquiry, London.

Office of Fair Trading (1999d), The Rules on the Polarisation of Investment Advice: A Report by the Director General of Fair Trading, London.

Olsen, K.A. and Salisbury, D.L. (1998), ‘Individual social security accounts: issues in assessing administrative feasibility and costs’, Special Report no. 34 and issue Brief no. 203, Employee Benefits Research Institute, Washington, D.C.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (1998a), Maintaining Prosperity in an Ageing Society, Paris. OECD (1998b), ‘Work-force ageing in OECD countries’, Employment Outlook, pp. 123-151, Paris. (Also available as Ageing Working Paper no. 4.1)

Orszag, P.R. and Stiglitz, J.E. (1999), ‘Rethinking pension reform: ten myths about social security systems’, presented to the conference ‘New Ideas about Old-Age Security’, World Bank, Washington, D.C., 14 15 September.

Palacios, R.J. and Pallares-Mirales, M. (1999), ‘International patterns of pension provision’, Pension Reform Primer series, Social Protection Discussion Paper, World Bank, Washington, D.C., forthcoming.

Palacios, R.J. and Whitehouse, E.R. (1998), ‘The role of choice in the transition to a funded pension system’, Social Protection Discussion Paper no. 9812, World Bank, Washington, D.C.

Peacock, A. and Bannock, G. (1996), The Rationale of Financial Services Regulation, Bannock and Partners, London.

Personal Investment Authority (1995), Life Assurance Disclosure: One Year On, London.

Personal Investment Authority (1996), Report and Financial Statements, 31 March 1996, London.

Personal Investment Authority (1999), Fifth Survey of the Persistency of Life and Pensions Policies, London. Quigley and Sinquefield, US.

Rea, J.D. and Reid, B.K. (1998), ‘Trends in the ownership cost of equity mutual funds’, Investment Company Institute, Washington, D.C.

Rodriguez, L.J. (1999), ‘Chile’s private pension system at 18: its current state and future challenges’, Social Security Paper no. 17, Cato Institute, Washington, D.C.

Samuelson, P.A. (1958), ‘An exact consumption-loan model of interest with or without the social contrivance of money’, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 66, pp. 467-482.

Samuelson, P.A. (1989a), ‘The judgement of economic science on rational portfolio management: indexing, timing and long-horizon effects’, Journal of Portfolio Management, pp. 4-12, Fall.

Samuelson, P.A. (1989b), ‘A case at last for age-phased reduction in equity’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 86, pp. 9048-9051.

Samwick, A.A. and Skinner, J. (1993), ‘How will defined-contribution pension plans affect retirement income?’, Working Paper, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Mass.

Shah, A. and Fernandes, K. (1999), ‘The relevance of index funds for pension investment in equities’, presented to the conference ‘New Ideas about Old-Age Security’, World Bank, Washington, D.C., 14 15 September.

Shah, H. (1997), ‘Towards better regulation of private pension funds’, Policy Research Working Paper no. 1791, World Bank, Washington, D.C.

Shah, H. (1999), ‘Pension fund investments: individual choice versus control’, World Bank [xxx], Washington, D.C. Shliefer, A. (1986), ‘Do demand curves slope down?’ Journal of Finance, vol. 41, pp. 579-590.

Shuttleworth, J.L. (1997), ‘Operating costs of different forms of pension provision in the UK’, Coopers & Lybrand, London.

Srinivas, P.S., Whitehouse, E.R. and Yermo, J. (1999), ‘Regulating pension funds’ structure, investments and performance: cross-country evidence’, Pension Reform Primer series, Social Protection Discussion Paper, World Bank, Washington, D.C., forthcoming.

Timmins, N. (1999a), ‘Pension move “to hit life companies”: Providers could fall from 60 to six in a decade says OSI’, Financial Times, 29 March.

Timmins, N. (1999b), ‘Government to spell out pension reform details: Second consultation round planned as Alastair Darling tells Nicholas Timmins that proposals have “almost universal” acceptance as a significant step forward’, Financial Times, 27 April.

Trueman, J. (1999), ‘Mis-selling row “could finish off some IFAs”’, Daily Telegraph, 13 May.

Turner, R. and Beller, D. (1989), Trends in Pensions, Department of Labor, Washington, D.C. Urwin, R. Staple Inn society

Valdés Prieto, S. (1994), ‘Administrative charges in pensions in Chiule, Malaysia, Zambia and the United States’, Policy Research Working Paper no. 1372, World Bank, Washington, D.C.

Valdés Prieto, S. (1995), ‘Vendedores de AFPs: producto del mercado o de regulaciones ineficientes?’ Working Paper no. 178, Institute of Economics, Catholic University of Chile.

Valdés Prieto, S. (1999), ‘Las comisiones de las AFPs: caras o baratos?’ Estudios Publicos, vol. 73, pp. 255 291.

Vittas, D. (1998b), ‘Regulatory controversies of private pension funds’, Policy Research Working Paper no. 1893, World Bank.

Von Gersdorff, H. (1997), ‘The Bolivian pension reform’, mimeo., Financial Sector Development department, World Bank, Washington, D.C.

Walford, J. (1998), Personal Pensions 1998, Financial Times Magazines, London.

Whitehouse, E.R. (1998), ‘Pension reform in Britain’, Pension Reform Primer series, Social Protection Discussion Paper no. 9810, World Bank, Washington, D.C.

Whitehouse, E.R. (1999a), ‘The tax treatment of funded pensions’, Pension Reform Primer series, Social Protection Discussion Paper no. 9910, World Bank, Washington, D.C.

Whitehouse, E.R. (1999b), ‘Consumer financial literacy, public information and pension reform: a case study of the United Kingdom’, Pension Reform Primer series, Social Protection Discussion Paper, World Bank, Washington, D.C., forthcoming.

Whitehouse, E.R. (1999c), ‘Comments on “Administrative costs under a decentralised approach to individual accounts: lessons for the United Kingdom’, presented to the conference ‘New Ideas about Old-Age Security’, World Bank, Washington, D.C., 14 15 September. (also available from Axia Economics, London.)

Whitehouse, E.R. (2000a), ‘Consumer financial literacy and pension information: a case study of the United States’, Pension Reform Primer series, Social Protection Discussion Paper, World Bank, Washington, D.C., forthcoming.

Whitehouse, E.R. (2000b), ‘Corporate governance and funded pensions’, Pension Reform Primer series, Social Protection Discussion Paper, World Bank, Washington, D.C., forthcoming.

Whitehouse, E.R. and Wolf, M. (1997), ‘State retirement plans’, Financial Times, 3 March.

World Bank (1994), Averting the Old Age Crisis: Policies to Protect the Old and Promote Growth, Oxford University Press.

World Bank (1998), Report and Recommendations of the IBRD to the Executive Directors on a Proposed Pension Reform Adjustment Loan of US$300 million to Kazakhstan, Report no. P 7242 KZ.