On the deterrent effect of individual versus collective liability in criminal organizations

Hauret, Laetitia and Langlais, Eric and Sonntag, Carine (2009): On the deterrent effect of individual versus collective liability in criminal organizations.

Abstract

Our paper addresses the question of the deterrent effect of a monetary sanction associated to a collective rather than an individual liability, when crimes are realized within a hierarchical gang (defined as a criminal organization where the leader is a sleeping partner, and several agents are active partners in the illegal or criminal activity). We develop a model where the active gang members face contradictory incentives to commit a crime. On the one hand, public authorities try to deter each gang member by imposing sanctions; on the second, the leader of the gang try to keep his members enough active in the gang by threatening them of private sanctions. We show that sanctions based on individual liability are inefficient to deter gang’s members since the leader overreacts on the public sanctions. In contrast, we show that a regime of collective liability, allowing the judge to sanction the sleeping partner even if he hasn’t realized any crime himself, can reach enough deterrence of the members of the gang.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Gangs deterrence, individual and collective liability, optimal law enforcement
• Subjects: K - Law and Economics > K0 - General; K - Law and Economics > K4 - Legal Procedure, the Legal System, and Illegal Behavior > K42 - Illegal Behavior and the Enforcement of Law

References

BATTIN-PEARSON S., THORNBERRY T., HAWKINS D. and KROHN M. (1998), “Gang membership, delinquent peers and delinquent behavior”, Juvenile Justice Bulletin, US Department of Justice.

BECKER G. (1968), “Crime and Punishment: an economic approach”, Journal of Political Economy, n°2, volume 76, pp. 169-217.

BUCHANAN J.M. (1973) “A defense of organized crime”, in S. Rottenberg Ed., The economics of crime and punishment, Washington : American Enterprise Institute, pp. 119-132.

CASE A. and KATZ L. (1991), “The Company You Keep: The Effects of Family and Neighborhood on Disadvantaged Youths”, NBER Working Paper, n°3705.

FUDENBERG D. and TIROLE J . (1991), Game Theory, The MIT Press.

FAUCONNET P. (1920), La Responsabilité. Etude de Sociologie , Ed. Alcan, Paris.

GAROUPA N. (2000), “The economics of organized crime and optimal law enforcement”, Economic Inquiry, n°2, volume 38, pp. 278-288.

GAROUPA N. (2001), “Optimal probability and magnitude of fines”, European Economic Review, vol. 45, pp.1765-1771.

GAROUPA N. (2007), “Optimal law enforcement and criminal organization”, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, vol. 63, pp. 461-474.

GLAESER E., SACERDOTE B. and SCHEINKMAN J. (1996), “Crime and Social Interactions”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, n°2, volume 111, pp. 507-548.

HEBERT J., HAMEL S. and SAVOIE G. (1997), “Jeunesse et gangs de rue – Phase 1”, Rapports de recherche de l’IRDS, Montréal, Canada. (http://www.centrejeunessedemontreal.qc.ca/irds/pdf/rapp_f.pdf)

HUFF R. (1998), “Comparing the criminal behavior of youth gangs and at-risk youths”, Research in Brief National Institute of Justice, US Department of Justice.

KONRAD K. A. and SKAPERDAS S. (1997), “Extortion”, Economica, vol. 65, pp. 461-477.

KONRAD K. A. and SKAPERDAS S. (1998), “Credible threats in extortion”, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, vol. 33, pp. 23-39.

MANSOUR A., MARCEAU N. and MONGRAIN S. (2006), “Gangs and crime deterrence”, Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, n°2, volume 22, pp. 315-339.

PATACCHINI E. and ZÉNOU Y. (2005), “Crime and conformism”, CEPR discussion paper n°5331.

POLINSKY M. and SHAVELL S. (2000), “The economic theory of public enforcement of law”, Journal of Economic Literature, n°1, volume 38, pp. 45-76.

PORET S. (2002), “La structure verticale d'un réseau de distribution de drogues illicites et politique répressive optimale”, Document de travail du CREST n° 2002-07.

PRIVILEGGI F., MARCHESE C. and CASSONE A. (2001), “Agent's liability versus Principal liability when attitudes toward risk differ”, International Review of Law and Economics, volume 21, pp. 181-195.

REINGANUM J. (1993), The law enforcement process and criminal choice, International review of Law and economics, volume 13, pp. 115-134.

SHAVELL S. (1997), “The optimal level of corporate liability given the limited ability of corporations to penalize their employees”, International Review of Law and Economics, volume 17, pp. 203-213.

SAH R. (1991), “Social Osmosis and Patterns of Crime”, Journal of Political Economy, n°6, volume 99, pp. 1272-1295.

THORNBERRY T., KROHN M., LIZOTTE A. and CHARD-WIERSCHEM D. (1993), “The role of juvenile gangs in facilitating delinquent behavior”, Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, n°1, volume 30, pp. 55-87.