Uppal, Yogesh (2008): Preferential trading areas: investment and welfare effects when countries differ in their size.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_15193.pdf Download (273kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This paper examines the investment and welfare effects of a preferential trading area (PTA) on member and non-member countries when countries differ in their relative size. I numerically solve a three-country and two-good model to characterize equilibria pertaining to investment diverting and creating effects of a preferential trade area. I conclude that welfare benefits of a preferential trade area are non-negative for the member countries, and could go either way for the non-member countries depending on their relative size. There exist equilibria which, given the parameter values and the relative size, result in welfare improvement in non-member countries.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Preferential trading areas: investment and welfare effects when countries differ in their size |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Preferential Trade Areas; Investment effects; Size of a country |
Subjects: | F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F15 - Economic Integration F - International Economics > F2 - International Factor Movements and International Business > F23 - Multinational Firms ; International Business F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F12 - Models of Trade with Imperfect Competition and Scale Economies ; Fragmentation |
Item ID: | 15193 |
Depositing User: | Yogesh Uppal |
Date Deposited: | 14 May 2009 00:06 |
Last Modified: | 04 Oct 2019 09:38 |
References: | Baldwin, R. E. and A. J.Venables (1995). ”Regional Economic Integration”, in Handbook of International Economics, Vol. III, Ed. G. Gorssman and K. Rogoff. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science. Baldwin, R. E., R. Forslid, and J. Halland (1999). Investment Creation and Investment Diversion: Simulation Ananlysis of the Single Market Program. (In R. E. Baldwin, J. F. Francois, (Eds.), Dynamic Issues in Commercial Policy Analysis. Cambridge University Press). Brainard, S. L. (1993). ”A Simple Theory of Multinational Corporations and Trade with a Trade-Off Between Proximity and Concentration,” NBER Working Papers 4269, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. Dixit, A. and J. Stiglitz (1977). ”Monopolistic competition and optimum product diversity”, American Economic Review, 67(3), 297-308. Ekholm, K., R. Forslid, and J. Markusen (2007). ”Export-Platform Foreign Direct Investment”, Journal of the European Economic Association, 5(4), 796-822. Ethier, W. (1986). ”The Multinational Firm”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 101(4), 805-34. Ethier, W. J. and J. Markusen (1996). ”Multinational firms, technology diffusion and trade,” Journal of International Economics, 41(1-2), 1-28. Helpman, E. (1984). ”A simple theory of international trade with multinational corporations”, Journal of Political Economy, 92(3), 451-71. Helpman, E. and P. Krugman (1985). Market Structure and Foreign Trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT press. Horstmann, I. and J. Markusen (1987). ”Licensing vs. Direct Investment: A model of Internalization by the MNE”, Canadian Journal of Economics, 20(3), 464-81. Horstman, I. and J. Markusen (1992). ”Endogenous Market Structures in International trade”, Journal of International Economics, 32, 109-29. Kleinert, J. (2001). ”The role of multinational enterprises in globalization: An empirical overview”, Kiel working paper # 1069 , Kiel Institute of World Economics, Germany. Krugman, P. (1979). ”Increasing returns, Monopolistic Competition, and International Trade”, Journal of International Economics, 9, 469-79. Krugman, P. (1983). ”The New Theories of International Trade and the Multinational Enterprise”, in D. B. Audretsch and Charles Kindleberger (eds.), The Multinational Corporations in 1980s, Cambridge, MA: MIT press. Markusen, J. (1984). ”Multinationals, Multi-Plant Economies, and the Gains from Trade”, Journal of International Economics, 16, 205-26. Markusen, J. (1995). ”The boundaries of multinational enterprises and the theory of international trade”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(2), 169-89. Markusen, J. and K. E. Maskus (2001). ”A Unified Approach to Intra-Industry Trade and Direct Foreign Investment”, NBER working paper # 8335, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. Markusen, J. and A. J.Venables (1998). ”Multinational firms and thenewtrade theory”, Journal of International Economics, 46(2), 183-203. Markusen, J. and A. J. Venables (2000). ”The theory of endowment, intra-industry and multinational trade”, Journal of International Economics, 55(2), 209-34. Motta M. and G. Norman (1993). ”Eastern European Economic Integration and Foreign Direct Investment”, Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 2, 483-508. Motta M. and G. Norman (1996). ”Does Economic Integration Cause Foreign Direct Investment”, International Economic Review, 37, (4), 757-83. Panagariya, A. (2000). ”Preferential Trade Liberalization: The Traditional Theory and New Developments”, Journal of Economic Literature, 38, 287-331. Ranjan, P. (2006). ”Preferential Trade Areas, Investments by Multinational Enterprises, and Welfare”, Canadian Journal of Economics, 39(2), 493-515. Viner, J. (1950). The customs Union Issue. New York: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/15193 |