Goagara, Daniel and Giurca Vasilescu, Laura (2009): Evaluarea pe baza de active: analiza critica.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_16496.pdf Download (311kB) | Preview |
Abstract
For estimation the value of the firm, there can be used three approaches: the approach based on assets, the approach based on incomes and the approach based on comparison. Each type of approach include more methods and techniques of evaluation and, in practice can be used all three approaches in order to estimate the value of the firm. Among the patrimonial methods (evaluation based on assets) the most representative are the followings: Net Accounting Asset (ANC); Net Corrected Accounting Asset (ANCc); Net Liquidation Asset (ANL); the substantial value; the permanent capital necessary for exploitation. A comparative analysis of the methods ANC and ANCc reveals the main advantages and disadvantages of them. But the selection of a certain approach or methods depends on the type of firm, on its situation at the evaluation date, on the available information, on the purpose of evaluation etc. and the option for a method or another is based finally on the evaluator’s choice which select the used methods in function of the specific conditions where the evaluation is done and of the existing advantages/disadvantages.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Evaluarea pe baza de active: analiza critica |
English Title: | Evaluation based on assets: critical anaysis |
Language: | Romanian |
Keywords: | patrimonial evaluation; evaluation methods; Net Accounting Asset; Net Corrected Accounting Asset |
Subjects: | M - Business Administration and Business Economics ; Marketing ; Accounting ; Personnel Economics > M4 - Accounting and Auditing > M41 - Accounting G - Financial Economics > G3 - Corporate Finance and Governance > G31 - Capital Budgeting ; Fixed Investment and Inventory Studies ; Capacity |
Item ID: | 16496 |
Depositing User: | Laura Giurca Vasilescu |
Date Deposited: | 28 Jul 2009 18:51 |
Last Modified: | 01 Oct 2019 16:07 |
References: | ANEVAR, (2001), Culegere de standarde, Ed. Mexim Grafic, pag. 110 Auvray, A., Boutier, C. J., Chammarad Boyer, G. (1990), Evaluation des entreprises, questionnaire d'option generale, Economie&Comptabilite no 170, Mars, p.3 Bircea, I. (2005), Evaluarea întreprinderii, Ed. Dacia Buglea, A., Eros-Stark, L. (2001), Evaluarea întreprinderii. Teorie şi studiu de caz, Ed. Marineasa, Timişoara, pag. 117 Căruntu, M. (2003), Şi activul net contabil dă de furcă, Piaţa financiară, Nr. 5, Mai Dumitrescu, D., Dragotă, V., Ciobanu, A. (2002), Evaluarea întreprinderilor, Ed. a II-a, Ed. Economică, Bucureşti Işfanescu, A., Robu, V., Anghel, I. (2001), Evaluarea întreprinderii, Editura Tribuna Economică, Bucureşti, pag.180 Pântea, P. I., Deaconu, A. (2002), Care este utilitatea tabloului fluxurilor de numerar, Adevărul economic, nr. 17 Siminică, M. (2008), Diagnosticul financiar al firmei, Ed. Universitaria, Craiova Stan, S. (coordonator), (2003), Evaluarea entităţii, Editura IROVAL, Bucureşti, pag. 91 Topscalian, P. (1989), Rachats des societes, evaluation, et rendement, Les Edition Eyrolles, pag. 3-10 Union Europeene des Experts Comptables Economiques et Financiers (1961), L' evalution des entreprises et parts d'entreprises, Paris Dumond, pag. 2 Vintilă, G. (1998), Diagnosticul financiar şi evaluarea întreprinderilor, Ed. Didactică şi Pedagogică, Bucureşti |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/16496 |