Charbit, Claire and Michalun, Varinia (2009): E-Government Partnerships Across Levels of Government. Published in: PUBLIC GOVERNANCE AND TERRITORIAL DEVELOPMENT DIRECTORATE : pp. 166-181.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_16564.pdf Download (275kB) | Preview |
Abstract
E-government Partnerships across Levels of Government, is an overview of the challenges and approaches to creating a collaborative and cooperative partnership across levels of government for e-government development and implementation.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | E-Government Partnerships Across Levels of Government |
English Title: | E-Government Partnerships Across Levels of Government |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | E-Governance; cooperative partenership; decentralization; federalism |
Subjects: | H - Public Economics > H7 - State and Local Government ; Intergovernmental Relations |
Item ID: | 16564 |
Depositing User: | Garry Williams |
Date Deposited: | 10 Aug 2009 10:03 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 16:39 |
References: | Bailey, D. and L. De Propris. (2002) “EU Structural Funds, Regional Capabilities and Enlargement: Towards Multi-Level Governance?” Journal of European Integration, 24, 303-324. Beynon-Davies, P and Martin, S (2004). Electronic Local Government and the Modernisation Agenda: Progress and prospects for public service improvement.” Local Government Studies. 30, 2, 214 -229 Cabinet Office. (2000). Successful IT: Modernising Government in Action – A review of major government IT projects. Cabinet Office. London, England. Cabinet Office (2004). Enabling a Digital United Kingdom: A framework for action. TSO. London, England. Cabinet Office. (2005). Transformational Government: Enabled by technology. TSO. London, England. Cabinet Office (2006). E-Government Empirical Evidence: From willingness to impact technology. TSO. London, England. Cairncross, F. 1998. The Death of Distance: How the communications revolution will change our lives. London : Orion Business, 1997 (1998 [printing]). CapGemini. (2007). The User Challenge: Benchmarking the supply of online public services. The European Commission. Cattaneo, G. (2004) Building e-Government: European regions and alternative strategies. Communications & Strategies. 54, 25. Centre for Urban and Regional Development Studies (2003). Local e-Government Process Evaluation of the Implementation of Electronic Local Government in England. Office of the Deputy Prime Minister. London, England. Codagnone, C. and V. Cilli. (2006). Expenditure Study final report. In EGEP project, ed. R. spa. European Commission. Cooke, P. and K. Morgan. (1998). The Associational Economy: Firms, regions, and innovation. Oxford University Press. Oxford, England. De Vanna, Antonio. (2008) “Il ruolo delle istituzioni nell’attuazione dell’accessibilità.” Presentation at conference “Web Senza Barriere ‘08 http://websenzabarriere.uniroma2.it Ebel, R. and S. Yilmaz. (2002) Concept of Fiscal decentralization and Worldwide Overview. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper. Washington, DC. EITO. (2006). European Information Technology Observatory Emilia-Romagna, R. (2005). Benchmarking della Società dell’Informazione in Emilia-Romagna. Primo Rapporto. Emilia-Romagna Region. Foley, P and Ghani, S (2005). “The Business Case for e-Government.” Lau, E; Craig, R and Muller, E (eds) e-Government for Better Government. OECD Publishing. Paris, France. Gershon, P. (2004). Releasing Resources to the Front Line: Independent review of public sector efficiency. HM Treasury. London, England House of Commons Committee of Public Accounts. (2004). Transforming the Performance of HM Customs and Excise through Electronic Service Delivery. HC 138 Stationary Office. London, England. Mele, V. (2004). The Central-Local Relationship in the EU Member States in the Field of ElectronicGovernment. Department for Innovation and Technology. Rome, Italy. OECD. (2005). E-Government for Better Government. OECD Publishing. Paris, France. OECD (2007a). Linking Regions and Central Governments: Contracts for Regional Development. OECD Publishing. Paris, France ODPM (2002a). “Majority of Councils set to meet 2005 e-Government Target.” ODPM Press Release, December 19, 2002 ODPM (2002b). The National Strategy for Local e-Government. Office of the Deputy Prime Minister. London, England. ODPM (2003). National Procurement Strategy for Local Government in England. Office of the Deputy Prime Minister. London, England. Performance and Innovation Unit (2000). E.gov: Electronic government services for the 21st Century. Cabinet Office. London, England. Porter, M. E. (2003) The Economic Performance of Regions. Regional Studies. 37, 549–578. Sharma, C. K. (2006). Decentralization Dilemma: Measuring the degree and evaluating the outcomes. Indian Journal of Political Science, LXVII, 16. Sintini, S. (2007). Legislation on e-Accessibility: the Italian approach. National Centre for IT in Public Administration. Society of Information Technology Management (2005). Better Connected 2005: A snapshot of local authority websites. SOCITM. Northampton, UK Strumpf, K. S. (2002). “Does Government Decentralization Increase Policy Innovation?” Journal of Public Economic Theory, 4, 207-243. Tsebelis, G. (1999). “Veto Players and Law Production in Parliamentary Democracies: An empirical analysis.” American Political Science Review 93, 3, 591-608., 93, 591-608. Wildasin, D. E. (1998). Fiscal Aspects of Evolving Federations: Issues for policy and research. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper. Washington, DC. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/16564 |