Post-Keynesian Theory of Business Enterprise and the Veblenian´s Approach: Are there commonalities?

Parada, Jairo (2008): Post-Keynesian Theory of Business Enterprise and the Veblenian´s Approach: Are there commonalities? Published in: Revista Economia del Caribe , Vol. 2, (December 2008): pp. 1-30.

Abstract

The main objective of this paper is to explore the possible common grounds, divergences and complementarities between the Veblenian’s approach on the Theory of Business Enterprise followed by Institutional economists, and the modern Post Keynesian Micro theory on Business enterprise. Due to the dispersion and lack of systematization of Institutional Economics regarding this body of theory, compared with the Post-Keynesian theory of the firm, the main efforts of this paper will be dedicated to a short survey of the Institutional approach. In the second section of the paper I review the basic ideas presented in Veblen’s main contributions on this area regarding business enterprises (industrial process, main principles, role of credit, ownership structure, the legal framework, the price behavior and the cultural incidences). Then, I make a comparison with the main theoretical results that modern postkeynesian vision has developed regarding structure of production, costing, pricing, investment, and competition and market governance . I claim that even though there are commonalities and some minor divergences between the two approaches, complementarities among them are more relevant, although the main areas of research have been somewhat different. I end with some conclusions that underline possible areas of cooperation between these two schools of economic thought within the heterodox paradigm.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Theory of the Firm, Postkeynesian Economics, Institutional Economics.
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D2 - Production and Organizations; M - Business Administration and Business Economics ; Marketing ; Accounting ; Personnel Economics > M2 - Business Economics; B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B5 - Current Heterodox Approaches

References

Berle, Adolf A. and Means, Gardiner (1968). The Modern Corporation and private property. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.

Chandler, Alfred (1988a). Strategy and Structure: chapters in the history of the industrial enterprise. In McCraw, Thomas (ed). The essential Alfred Chandler: essays toward a historical theory of Big Business. (pp.157-201). Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

Chandler, Alfred (1988b). Introduction to The visible hand. In McCraw, Thomas (ed). The essential Alfred Chandler: essays toward a historical theory of Big Business. (pp.387-397). Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

Dow, Sheila (2000). Prospects for the progress of Heterodox Economics. Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Vol. 22, (2).

Dugger, William(1980). Corporate bureaucracy: the incidence of the bureaucratic process. Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. 14 (2), p. 399-410.

________ (1985b). Centralization, diversification and administrative burden in US enterprises. Journal of economic Issues, Vol. 19 (3), 687-702.

________ (1985a). The shortcomings of concentration ratios in the conglomerate age: new sources and uses oaf corporate power. Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. 19 (2), 343-354. ________ (1988). An institutional analysis of corporate power. Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. 22 (1), 79-112. Also in Dugger, W. (1992). Underground economics: a decade of institutionalist dissent. Armonk, N.Y. M.E. Sharpe, Inc.

Eichner, Alfred (1976). The Megacorp and Oligopoly, Micro Foundations of Macro Dynamics. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Fisher, P. (1991). The stranger career of marginal cost pricing. Journal of Economic Issues. Vol. 25 (1), 77-92.

Goode, Richard (1994). Gardiner Means on administered prices. Journal of Economic Issues. Vol. 28 (1), 173-186

Gruchy, Allan (1985).Corporation, concentration and the restructuring of the American economy. Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. 19 (2), 429-40.

Knoedler, Janeth (1995). Transaction Cost theories of Business enterprises from Williamson and Veblen: Convergence, divergence, and some evidence. Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. 29, (2), 385-395.

Knoedler, Janeth (1990). As much technological as pecuniary: turn-of-the century combinations in 3 major industries. Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. 24 (2), 397-404.

Lavoie, Marc (1992). Foundations of Post-Keynesian Economic Analysis. Brookfield (VT): Edward Elgar Publishing Co.

Lee, F. and Samuels, W. (eds). (1992). The Heterodox Economics of Gardiner C. Means: a collection. New York: M.E. Sharpe, Inc.

Lee, F. and Samuels, W. Introduction: Gardiner Means, 1896-1988. In Lee, F. and Samuels, W. (eds). (1992), The Heterodox Economics of Gardiner C. Means: a collection. New York: M.E. Sharpe.

Lee, Frederic S. (1998). Post-Keynesian Price Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Lee, Frederic S. (2001). Postkeynesian Theory of Business enterprise. Forthcoming.

Lee, F. and Downward, P. (1999) Retesting Gardiner Mean’s evidence on Administered prices. Journal of Economic Issues,Vol. 33 (4), 861-886.

McCraw, Thomas. (1988). The intellectual odyssey of Alfred D. Chandler Jr. In McCraw, Thomas (ed). The essential Alfred Chandler: essays toward a historical theory of Big Business (pp. 1-24). Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

McCraw, Thomas (Ed.) (1988). The essential Alfred Chandler: essays toward a historical theory of Big Business. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

Means, Gardiner (1962). The corporate revolution in America: economic reality vs. economic theory. New York: The Crowell-Collier press.

Munkirs, John (1985). The transformation of American capitalism. Armonk, N.Y.M.E. Sharpe.

Munkirs, John and Knoedler, Janet.The existence and exercise of corporate power: an opaque fact. Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. 21 (4), 1679-1706.

Munkirs, John and Sturgeon, J. (1985). Oligopolistic cooperation: conceptual and empirical evidence of market structure evolution. Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. 19 (4), 899-922.

Peterson, D.R. (1979). Chamberlin’s monopolistic competition: neoclassical or institutional. Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. 13 (3), 669-86.

Pitelis, C. N. (1998). Transaction costs and the historical evolution of the capitalist firm. Journal of Economic issues, Vol. 32 (4), 999-1017.

Raines, J. P. and Leathers, Ch. (1992).Financial innovations and Veblen’s theory of financial markets. Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. 26 (2), 433-440.

Veblen, Thorstein (1904). The theory of Business Enterprise. New York: Scriber’s Sons. ________ (1967). Absentee ownership: the case of America. Boston: Beacon Press.

Woods, Adrian (1975). A theory of profits. London: Cambridge University Press.

Wray, L. Randall (2007). Veblen’s Theory of Business Enterprise and Keynes’s Monetary Theory of Production. Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. 41, (2) 617-624.